Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:28:58.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immunomics: a 21st century approach to vaccine development for complex pathogens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2016

KARINA P. DE SOUSA
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Programme, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
DENISE L. DOOLAN*
Affiliation:
Infectious Diseases Programme, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Locked Bag 2000 Royal Brisbane Hospital, QLD 4029, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Immunomics is a relatively new field of research which integrates the disciplines of immunology, genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics and bioinformatics to characterize the host-pathogen interface. Herein, we discuss how rapid advances in molecular immunology, sophisticated tools and molecular databases are facilitating in-depth exploration of the immunome. In our opinion, an immunomics-based approach presides over traditional antigen and vaccine discovery methods that have proved ineffective for highly complex pathogens such as the causative agents of malaria, tuberculosis and schistosomiasis that have evolved genetic and immunological host-parasite adaptations over time. By using an integrative multidisciplinary approach, immunomics offers enormous potential to advance 21st century antigen discovery and rational vaccine design against complex pathogens such as the Plasmodium parasite.

Type
Special Issue Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

INTRODUCTION

The shift from an empirical to a rational method for vaccine development associated with an enhanced understanding of host–pathogen interactions is synergistic with advances in genomics and bioinformatics. Since the first complete sequencing of a DNA genome over 20 years ago, that of the phage Φ-X174, with only 5368 base pairs (Sanger et al. Reference Sanger, Nicklen and Coulson1977), the number of sequenced genomes, proteomes and transcriptomes of different pathogens has risen exponentially. There are now over 6500 complete genomes published from over 59 000 organisms, representing bacteria, viruses, parasites and eukaryotes, as available on the GOLD database (https://gold.jgi-psf.org/index). This includes the genomes, proteomes and/or transcriptomes of human, nonhuman primate, and rodent species of Plasmodium. This wealth of information is a direct consequence of technological advances focused at the molecular level and allows for multidisciplinary approaches to identify target antigens for the development of vaccines, drugs and diagnostic tests, and for the development and application of methods to identify immune correlates of protection (Doolan et al. Reference Doolan, Apte and Proietti2014). Complementary methods, such as next-generation sequencing of lymphocyte epertoires (Mehr, Reference Mehr2014), complete T- and B-cell phenotype analysis (Zarnitsyna et al. Reference Zarnitsyna, Evavold, Schoettle, Blattman and Antia2013), highly-sensitive gene expression measurement using Fluidigm (Spurgeon et al. Reference Spurgeon, Jones and Ramakrishnan2008) or Nanostring (Geiss et al. Reference Geiss, Bumgarner, Birditt, Dahl, Dowidar, Dunaway, Fell, Ferree, George, Grogan, James, Maysuria, Mitton, Oliveri, Osborn, Peng, Ratcliffe, Webster, Davidson, Hood and Dimitrov2008), high-throughput profiling technologies using CyTOF mass cytometer (Kidd et al. Reference Kidd, Peters, Schadt and Dudley2014; Hansmann et al. Reference Hansmann, Blum, Hsin-Ju, Liedtke, Robinson and Davis2015), and biophotonic imaging for visualizing the infectious disease process (Andreu et al. Reference Andreu, Zelmer and Wiles2011), among other advances, have the potential to enhance understanding of the interaction between host and pathogens at the molecular level. The availability and refinement of large-scale bioinformatic databases containing information on both host and pathogen can further advance the acquisition, analysis and application of research data to yield more clinically relevant outcomes, ideally leading to the development of vaccines that provide sterile life-long protective immunity without the need for boosting, or sensitive and specific biomarkers of pathogens exposure or protective immunity. Such applications are highly desirable in the malaria community.

The term ‘immunomics’ was coined in 2001 by Klysik (Klysik, Reference Klysik2001), who suggested that ongoing advances in technology should serve to address the correlations between genes and the functional properties of their protein products. Today, the term immunomics refers to an integration of molecular immunology, genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics and bioinformatics, effectively providing a much-needed link between these fields (Doolan, Reference Doolan2011) and enabling an effective correlation between immunology research and clinical application. Immunomics is the study of the immunome, which can be defined as the set of antigens or epitopes that interface with the host immune system (Sette et al. Reference Sette, Fleri, Peters, Sathiamurthy, Bui and Wilson2005). However, it is necessary to consider that the definition of immunomics might be subject to different interpretations, as usually happens with the fast-changing fields of study like the ones comprised in the general domain of –omics, and is likely to expand and embrace concepts that might still be under investigation. Thus, the evolution of methods and techniques in the fields that are currently under the concept of immunomics will likely influence the definition and context of this term. In this paper, we are using the Sette et al. definition for immunomics.

Immunomics is distinct from reverse vaccinology, systems immunology and vaccinomics. Reverse vaccinology aims to identify the complete repertoire of antigens that an organism is capable of secreting or expressing on its surface (Rinaudo et al. Reference Rinaudo, Telford, Rappuoli and Seib2009). Systems immunology is a sub-discipline of systems biology (Schubert, Reference Schubert2011), and deals with molecular mechanisms of how the components of the immune system work together as a whole (Narang et al. Reference Narang, Decraene, Wong, Aiswarya, Wasem, Leong and Gouaillard2012). Vaccinomics, on the other hand, integrates immunogenetics and immunogenomics with systems biology and immune responses (Poland et al. Reference Poland, Kennedy and Ovsyannikova2011), Aimed at creating vaccines that are personalized/individualized.

Immunomics is as dependent on the host as it is on the pathogen, since the immune system and the infecting pathogens have been co-evolving for thousands of years. Furthermore individual characteristics of the parasite (e.g. species, strain, virulence, etc) interact with individual characteristics of the host immune system (e.g. age, immune status, epigenetic traits) (Tournier and Quesnel-Hellmann, Reference Tournier and Quesnel-Hellmann2006; Stilling et al. Reference Stilling, Bordenstein, Dinan and Cryan2014). Each of the components of the immune response is extremely complex on its own, and the interactions between them create an even more complex network of reactions. This complexity creates a challenge for in-depth, comprehensive analyses and increases the cost of experimental verification. An immunomics-based approach offers a solution to this challenge since high-throughput screening is performed (at least in part) in silico, prior to in vitro and in vivo experimental verification. High-throughput screening is used intensely (and successfully) for lead and drug discovery (Balls et al. Reference Balls, Bennet, Kendall, Kayser and Warzecha2012; Annang et al. Reference Annang, Perez-Moreno, Garcia-Hernandez, Cordon-Obras, Martin, Tormo, Rodriguez, de Pedro, Gomez-Perez, Valente, Reyes, Genilloud, Vicente, Castanys, Ruiz-Perez, Navarro, Gamarro and Gonzalez-Pacanowska2015). Translation of this technique to immunomics in order to address the challenge created by the complexity of the immune response to a pathogen includes the use of powerful computational analysis of next-generation, high-density peptide microarrays for rapid discovery and mapping of antigenic determinants (Hecker et al. Reference Hecker, Lorenz, Steinbeck, Hong, Riemekasten, Li, Zettl and Thiesen2012; Carmona et al. Reference Carmona, Nielsen, Schafer-Nielsen, Mucci, Altcheh, Balouz, Tekiel, Frasch, Campetella, Buscaglia and Aguero2015). This allows for a more thorough, unbiased and rational approach. In this fashion, data-driven studies of the immunome facilitate identification and characterization of key antigens and epitopes.

TRADITIONAL VACCINOLOGY

Pathogens with complex life cycles, complex genomes, proteomes and transcriptomes, and correspondingly complex immunomes, represent a great challenge for the development of effective vaccines. The Plasmodium parasite which causes malaria exemplifies this challenge. Such pathogens express a broad repertoire of antigens and epitopes that could be available for recognition by the host immune system. In some cases, effective immune responses directed against only a subset of these antigens and epitopes are sufficient for competent protection. This is demonstrated by the effectiveness of subunit vaccines such as the recombinant HBsAg antigen based vaccine for hepatitis B (Arnon, Reference Arnon, Rappuoli and Bagnoli2011; Schetgen, Reference Schetgen2014). However, for many pathogens, subunit vaccines based on only one or a few antigens have proved poorly effective (Meeusen et al. Reference Meeusen, Walker, Peters, Pastoret and Jungersen2007; Foged et al. Reference Foged, Rades, Perrie and Hook2014). For many vaccines that are currently in use worldwide, for example the highly effective whole-organism based Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, the mechanism of protective immunity remains unknown (Kaufmann et al. Reference Kaufmann, Juliana McElrath, Lewis and Del Giudice2014). This gap in knowledge highlights the difficulties in assessing clear interactions between host and pathogens. Due to the poor efficacy of most subunit vaccines, until very recently almost all licensed vaccines were based on the whole organism, typically either live-attenuated pathogens or inactivated/killed pathogens (Grimm and Ackerman, Reference Grimm and Ackerman2013). In the case of malaria where extensive efforts directed towards subunit vaccines have thus far failed (Schwartz et al. Reference Schwartz, Brown, Genton and Moorthy2012), a resurgence of effort towards development of a whole-organism vaccine has occurred (Hoffman et al. Reference Hoffman, Billingsley, James, Richman, Loyevsky, Li, Chakravarty, Gunasekera, Chattopadhyay, Li, Stafford, Ahumada, Epstein, Sedegah, Reyes, Richie, Lyke, Edelman, Laurens, Plowe and Sim2010; McCarthy and Good, Reference McCarthy and Good2010; Good, Reference Good2011; Mikolajczak et al. Reference Mikolajczak, Lakshmanan, Fishbaugher, Camargo, Harupa, Kaushansky, Douglass, Baldwin, Healer, O'Neill, Phuong, Cowman and Kappe2014). A genetically attenuated Trypanosoma cruzi parasite is also being considered for vaccination against Chagas disease (Sanchez-Valdez et al. Reference Sanchez-Valdez, Perez Brandan, Ferreira and Basombrio2015). However, these whole-organism vaccines are associated with number of problems. In some cases, they have been associated with reversion to virulence, causing a proportion of vacinees to develop some form of the disease they had been vaccinated against (Bonanni and Santos, Reference Bonanni and Santos2011). Furthermore, whole-organism vaccines are almost exclusively restricted to pathogens that can be cultured in vitro and have relatively low antigen variability, which can be difficult for pathogens like Plasmodium (malaria), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis) or Schistosoma (schistosomiasis) (Doolan et al. Reference Doolan, Apte and Proietti2014).

Reverse vaccinology for rational vaccine design

An alternative strategy to culture-based in vitro approaches for the development of an effective vaccine against complex pathogens is that of reverse vaccinology, pioneered by Rappuoli in 2001 (Rappuoli, Reference Rappuoli2001). This approach analyses the entire genome of a pathogen to rapidly identify putative protective antigens and predict potential vaccine candidates (Rinaudo et al. Reference Rinaudo, Telford, Rappuoli and Seib2009; Heinson et al. Reference Heinson, Woelk and Newell2015). Reverse vaccinology studies were among the first to harness the wealth of information generated by genome sequencing for vaccine development. The proof of concept for this approach was established by the screening of surface-exposed proteins in the Neisseria meningitides genome, a causative agent of meningococcal disease, and resulted in a phase III vaccine trial after 40 years of setbacks using conventional methods (Pizza et al. Reference Pizza, Scarlato, Masignani, Giuliani, Arico, Comanducci, Jennings, Baldi, Bartolini, Capecchi, Galeotti, Luzzi, Manetti, Marchetti, Mora, Nuti, Ratti, Santini, Savino, Scarselli, Storni, Zuo, Broeker, Hundt, Knapp, Blair, Mason, Tettelin, Hood and Jeffries2000; Serruto et al. Reference Serruto, Bottomley, Ram, Giuliani and Rappuoli2012). Briefly, the sequence of the N. meningitides virulent strain MC58 was analysed using bioinformatics algorithms for surface-exposed proteins, which were then recombinantly expressed in E. coli, purified and tested in mice for their potential to induce bactericidal antibodies. Humoral response was analysed by Western blot and surface localization of the target protein was confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry. Of the 91 proteins found to be positive in the bioinformatic screening, 28 were able to induce antibodies with bactericidal activity and were prioritized based on their ability to induce broad protection. Ultimately five proteins were combined in a multicomponent vaccine named 4CMenB (Pizza et al. Reference Pizza, Scarlato, Masignani, Giuliani, Arico, Comanducci, Jennings, Baldi, Bartolini, Capecchi, Galeotti, Luzzi, Manetti, Marchetti, Mora, Nuti, Ratti, Santini, Savino, Scarselli, Storni, Zuo, Broeker, Hundt, Knapp, Blair, Mason, Tettelin, Hood and Jeffries2000; Serruto et al. Reference Serruto, Bottomley, Ram, Giuliani and Rappuoli2012). Very recently, two multicomponent vaccine formulations based on sequencing of the whole meningococcal genome to identify surface antigens of the meningococcal strains, called Bexsero® (Novartis) and Trumemba (Pfizer), were made available for clinical immunization against invasive group B meningococcal disease, although still subject to additional monitoring; however, unfavourable cost-effectiveness ratios for application of these vaccines have been reported (Christensen et al. Reference Christensen, Hickman, Edmunds and Trotter2013; Pouwels et al. Reference Pouwels, Hak, van der Ende, Christensen, van den Dobbelsteen and Postma2013; Leca et al. Reference Leca, Bornet, Montana, Curti and Vanelle2015; Tirani et al. Reference Tirani, Meregaglia and Melegaro2015).

Reverse vaccinology has limitations; in particular, it cannot predict polysaccharides, lipids or glycolipids which may be active compounds for a vaccine (Kanampalliwar et al. Reference Kanampalliwar, Rajkumar, Girdhar and Archana2013; Bertholet et al. Reference Bertholet, Reed, Rappuoli, Nor, Acosta and Sarmiento2014). It is also unlikely that a reverse vaccinology approach by itself to be able to predict a good correlate of protective immunity (Bertholet et al. Reference Bertholet, Reed, Rappuoli, Nor, Acosta and Sarmiento2014).

IMMUNOMICS-BASED VACCINOLOGY

In a field of study as complex as vaccinology, where the intricacy of the human immune system is evident from the cohorts of non-homogenous groups where disease phenotype and molecular profile (among other elements) have immense variation (Falus, Reference Falus2008), elegant approaches are required to decipher the host immune response to pathogens. Immunomics facilitates such a rational, systematic and comprehensive approach to antigen selection and prioritization for vaccine development. The wealth of information that immunomics draws on, namely large-scale genomic, proteomic and transcriptomic datasets, can be accessed via large public-access databanks such as GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) or UniProt (http://www.uniprot.org/); pathogen-specific databases such as PlasmoDB (www.PlasmoDB.org) or TriTrypDB (http://tritrypdb.org/tritrypdb); or immunology based databases such as the Immune Epitope Database (http://www.iedb.org/) or the Innate Immune Database (http://www.innatedb.com). The available information in these databases is used as primary input for epitope prediction and therefore it is crucial that sequences are verified, annotated and curated. Moreover, immunomics also faces the challenges associated with computational predictive algorithms, which are subject to a series of conditional instructions for weightings and outputs dependent on ‘learned’ behaviour or characteristics. If those conditional instructions are flawed, the error is magnified exponentially, resulting in inaccurate data.

However, the multifactorial nature of protective immunity (Pulendran and Ahmed, Reference Pulendran and Ahmed2006), the large number of antigenic determinants or epitopes that can be recognized by the cells of the immune system as immunodominant or subdominant epitopes (Sette and Sundaram, Reference Sette, Sundaram and Frelinger2006), the broad range of putative epitopes restricted by multiple human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles prevalent in the human population (del Guercio et al. Reference del Guercio, Sidney, Hermanson, Perez, Grey, Kubo and Sette1995) combined with the high variation in the frequencies of different major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) alleles in different ethnicities (Sidney et al. Reference Sidney, Steen, Moore, Ngo, Chung, Peters and Sette2010), precludes analysing such large and complex datasets without the use of computation. The need for accurate prediction of biologically relevant epitopes for rational vaccine design is therefore crucial.

Computational predictive methods

The prediction of peptide epitopes from primary protein sequences is not a modern achievement. In fact, reports from as early as 1987 show that peptide epitopes could be predicted from protein sequence by consideration of hydrophobicity and amphipathic helices, and these sequences could be synthesized to enable further study (Cease et al. Reference Cease, Margalit, Cornette, Putney, Robey, Ouyang, Streicher, Fischinger, Gallo and DeLisi1987; Gotch et al. Reference Gotch, Rothbard, Howland, Townsend and McMichael1987; Margalit et al. Reference Margalit, Spouge, Cornette, Cease, Delisi and Berzofsky1987). Subsequently, it was established that T cell epitopes are generally linear and continuous. MHC class I molecules typically bind peptides that are 8–15 amino acids long (Rammensee et al. Reference Rammensee, Bachmann, Emmerich, Bachor and Stevanovic1999), while MHC class II molecules usually bind longer peptides of 12–25 amino acids in length (Jardetzky et al. Reference Jardetzky, Brown, Gorga, Stern, Urban, Strominger and Wiley1996). These features provided the foundation for improved prediction algorithms that considered the affinity of binding of a specific peptide sequence to a given MHC molecule. Using experimental affinity data deposited in public databases as training data, researchers developed statistical methods to take the early prediction algorithms to a new level. Widely used algorithms include those in the Immune Epitope DataBase (Kim et al. Reference Kim, Ponomarenko, Zhu, Tamang, Wang, Greenbaum, Lundegaard, Sette, Lund, Bourne, Nielsen and Peters2012; Vita et al. Reference Vita, Overton, Greenbaum, Ponomarenko, Clark, Cantrell, Wheeler, Gabbard, Hix, Sette and Peters2015) such as average relative binding (ARB) (Bui et al. Reference Bui, Sidney, Peters, Sathiamurthy, Sinichi, Purton, Mothe, Chisari, Watkins and Sette2005), or alternate algorithms such as support vector machine for prediction of MHC-binding peptides (SVMHC) (Donnes and Kohlbacher, Reference Donnes and Kohlbacher2006) or NetMHCII-2·2 (Nielsen and Lund, Reference Nielsen and Lund2009). More recent prediction algorithms consider additional features, such as proteosomal cleavage sites and transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP)-binding patterns, further enhancing accuracy (Tenzer et al. Reference Tenzer, Peters, Bulik, Schoor, Lemmel, Schatz, Kloetzel, Rammensee, Schild and Holzhutter2005; Antonets and Bazhan, Reference Antonets and Bazhan2013). Current computational models consider quantitative matrices, artificial neural networks, hidden Markov models, support vector machines (SVMs), quantitative structure activity relationship and molecular docking simulations (Brusic et al. Reference Brusic, Bajic and Petrovsky2004; Desai and Kulkarni-Kale, Reference Desai and Kulkarni-Kale2014). These improvements are crucial given the high degree of MHC polymorphism and complexity of generation and presentation of T cell epitopes (Desai and Kulkarni-Kale, Reference Desai and Kulkarni-Kale2014). Overall, in silico epitope predictions represent a more targeted, cost- and time-effective strategy as compared with more traditional approaches such as screening pools of overlapping peptide pools by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELIspot) or intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), or other epitope identification methods like X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic ressonance (NMR) techniques (Sun et al. Reference Sun, Ju, Liu, Ning, Zhang, Zhao, Huang, Ma and Li2013).

Physicochemical properties associated with the T cell receptor also critically influence effective cell mediated immune responses (Osuna et al. Reference Osuna, Gonzalez, Chang, Hung, Ehlinger, Anasti, Alam and Letvin2014, Madura et al. Reference Madura, Rizkallah, Holland, Fuller, Bulek, Godkin, Schauenburg, Cole and Sewell2015). Very recent studies have shown that the T cell receptor (TCR) undergoes conformational changes upon engagement with a peptide, allowing for discrimination between peptides. This conformational change causes the peptide to diverge its amino terminus partly away from the MHC peptide binding groove, forming a higher affinity interface with the TCR than is formed with the MHC groove (Dyson, Reference Dyson2015; Madura et al. Reference Madura, Rizkallah, Holland, Fuller, Bulek, Godkin, Schauenburg, Cole and Sewell2015). This discovery suggests that future epitope predictions strategies that consider details such as antigen TCR-MHC affinity may result in improved accuracy of epitope predictions and consequently reduced time for validation studies.

With regard to B-cell epitope predictions, most of the computational methods and databases currently available focus on continuous or linear B cell epitopes (Ansari and Raghava, Reference Ansari and Raghava2010). However, many B-cell epitopes are conformational and discontinuous (Braga-Neto and Marques, Reference Braga-Neto and Marques2006; Ansari and Raghava, Reference Ansari and Raghava2010), corresponding to the tridimensional features on the surface of the antigen where recognition by the immune system occurs (Braga-Neto and Marques, Reference Braga-Neto and Marques2006). This creates difficulties for the bioinformatic prediction of B-cell epitopes. Ideally, predictive algorithms would use tridimensional surface models of the protein antigens and measure surface energy interactions of variable regions of the immunoglobulins that correlate with B-cell activation. However, due to the computational complexity associated with analysing tridimensional interactions and the limited number of known antibody-antigen complex structures, only a limited number of prediction methods exist for discontinuous epitopes [reviewed in (Yao et al. Reference Yao, Zheng, Liang and Zhang2013)]; most are considered to perform poorly (Sun et al. Reference Sun, Ju, Liu, Ning, Zhang, Zhao, Huang, Ma and Li2013). It has been suggested that combining multiple classifiers for B-cell epitope definition, as an ensemble, could improve the performance of computational B-cell epitope prediction tools (El-Manzalawy and Honavar Reference El-Manzalawy and Honavar2014), but further multidisciplinary understanding of conformational epitopes may also contribute to the improving performance of these predictive algorithms.

Enabling technologies

Immunomics-based approaches can enhance our understanding of key features of the immune system in health and disease. Classical methods of assessing immune responses have typically focused only on the frequency and magnitude of a single immune parameter, e.g. antibody titre. Immunomics, on the other hand, allows for a multifactorial view of the response and considers the relevant biological outcome, e.g. protective immunity, by effectively taking into account pertinent and appropriate elements, such as particular epitope combinations, the cytokine response measured, and the T cell population used as the target. Multiple experimental methods, with different strengths, must also be used, and consequent results integrated. For example, using an immunomics approach to a disease model, Quintana and his team have shown that immunomics can be used to predict future disease (Quintana et al. Reference Quintana, Hagedorn, Elizur, Merbl, Domany and Cohen2004). Moreover, it has been computationally shown how the immune response to an epitope modulates the behaviour of an immune network, providing evidence for immunomic regulatory networks from immunomic microarray data (Braga-Neto and Marques, Reference Braga-Neto and Marques2006).

The quality of the immune response is at least as important as the quantity, as quality can be a key determinant of protection (Zepp, Reference Zepp2010; Doolan et al. Reference Doolan, Apte and Proietti2014). Some of the more conventional methods for assessment of immune responses as a measure of T- or B-cell reactivity include immunoassays such as the Jerne plaque assay (Jerne and Nordin Reference Jerne and Nordin1963), the splenic focus assay (Klinman and Aschinazi Reference Klinman and Aschinazi1971), ELISA (Engvall and Perlmann Reference Engvall and Perlmann1971), interferon-γ (IFN-γ) ELIspot (Czerkinsky et al. Reference Czerkinsky, Nilsson, Nygren, Ouchterlony and Tarkowski1983), fluorescence-activated cell sorting (Hayakawa et al. Reference Hayakawa, Ishii, Yamasaki, Kishimoto and Hardy1987; McHeyzer-Williams et al. Reference McHeyzer-Williams, McLean, Lalor and Nossal1993), peptide-induced ICS (Ozen et al. Reference Ozen, Tucker and Miller1998), and tetramer staining (Altman et al. Reference Altman, Moss, Goulder, Barouch, McHeyzer-Williams, Bell, McMichael and Davis1996; Skinner et al. Reference Skinner, Daniels, Schmidt, Jameson and Haase2000). More recently, technological and conceptual advances have resulted in the development and application of novel methods to comprehensively assess immune responses, including approaches to simultaneously examine a large number of cell functions and phenotypic markers, including at the single cell level. Such methods include, but are not limited to, the analysis of gene expression using Nanostring (Geiss et al. Reference Geiss, Bumgarner, Birditt, Dahl, Dowidar, Dunaway, Fell, Ferree, George, Grogan, James, Maysuria, Mitton, Oliveri, Osborn, Peng, Ratcliffe, Webster, Davidson, Hood and Dimitrov2008) or Fluidigm (Spurgeon et al. Reference Spurgeon, Jones and Ramakrishnan2008), as well as mass spectrometry based methods such as CyTOF technologies (Cheung and Utz, Reference Cheung and Utz2011). The quality of those responses can be assessed via phenotypic markers, differentiation state, profile of secreted cytokines, avidity, affinity and repertoire diversity (Siegrist, Reference Siegrist and Offit2013). If used singularly, none of the methods cited above can describe the complete set of characteristics that define an antigen-specific response. Immunomics can address such problems by integrating different fields of study, thus providing a platform for combining the strengths and compensating the flaws of different methods and approaches to vaccine development.

Particularly transformative are multidisciplinary computational and mathematical methods developed to cope with multiplex data, including host–pathogen interactions (Raman et al. Reference Raman, Bhat and Chandra2010), for which experimental analysis may be costly and laborious if the pathogen is complex. These mathematical and bioinformatic platforms may also support other aspects of vaccinology such as adjuvant discovery (Schellhammer and Rarey, Reference Schellhammer and Rarey2004; Sollner et al. Reference Sollner, Heinzel, Summer, Fechete, Stipkovits, Szathmary and Mayer2010).

Immunomics for rational vaccine design

The use of an immunomics based approach to vaccinology is a promising alternative for efficacious vaccine design. Unlike reverse vaccinology, immunomics also considers the immune system. It provides a means to systematically identify the antigens and epitopes that interact with the host immune system (Sette et al. Reference Sette, Fleri, Peters, Sathiamurthy, Bui and Wilson2005; De Groot, Reference De Groot2006). The premise of an immunomics-based, rational vaccine design is a consistent induction of the desired immune response against the key pathogen antigen(s) or epitopes which are targeted by protective immune responses (Barbosa and Barral-Netto Reference Barbosa and Barral-Netto2013; Doolan et al. Reference Doolan, Apte and Proietti2014; Slifka and Amanna, Reference Slifka and Amanna2014).

Immunomics of viruses

A number of immunomics approaches have been applied to viruses. In the case of HIV, an effective vaccine might require the design or discovery of immunogens which elicit good neutralizing antibodies against circulating strains of the virus (Kwong et al. Reference Kwong, Mascola and Nabel2011). For many years, only a few neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against the virus were known; the most intensely studied have been the antibodies directed against the glycoproteins gp120 and gp41 (Burton et al. Reference Burton, Poignard, Stanfield and Wilson2012). With the advent of immunomics, more neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, some with unexpected epitopes, have been identified (see Burton et al. Reference Burton, Poignard, Stanfield and Wilson2012). Most recently, Gallerano et al. (Reference Gallerano, Ndlovu, Makupe, Focke-Tejkl, Fauland, Wollmann, Puchhammer-Stöckl, Keller, Sibanda and Valenta2015) have analysed polyclonal antibody responses of HIV-infected persons to overlapping peptides covering the complete amino acid sequences of the gp120 and gp41 proteins, and identified major epitopes that can be recognized by antibodies.

Another immunomics study has prospected the influenza A (H1N1) virus immunome and transcriptome to show a complex host response pathway to the virus, and unravelled interactions between virus and host (Dimitrakopoulou et al. Reference Dimitrakopoulou, Dimitrakopoulos, Wilk, Tsimpouris, Sgarbas, Schughart and Bezerianos2014). A different study has used immunomics to better understand the repertoire of T cell specificities for H1N1, with the objective of developing an universal vaccine for influenza virus to combat the continuous antigenic drift of the virus (Assarsson et al. Reference Assarsson, Bui, Sidney, Zhang, Glenn, Oseroff, Mbawuike, Alexander, Newman, Grey and Sette2008). This study used over 4000 peptides from a panel of 23 influenza A virus strains based on predicted high-affinity binding to HLA class I or class II and high conservancy levels. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy human donors were tested for reactivity against HLA-matched peptides by using IFN-γ ELIspot. One epitope, called PB1, was found to be the major target for both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses; 54 other non-redundant epitopes (38 class I and 16 class II) were also identified, and provide a potential base for the development of a universal influenza vaccine (Assarsson et al. Reference Assarsson, Bui, Sidney, Zhang, Glenn, Oseroff, Mbawuike, Alexander, Newman, Grey and Sette2008).

Immunomics of bacteria

Immunomics has been also successfully applied to bacteria. In one example, a Francisella tularensis protein microarray was generated and probed with serum from experimentally immunized mice to identify 11 of the 12 antigens previously discovered using traditional methods plus an additional 31 new antigens (Eyles et al. Reference Eyles, Unal, Hartley, Newstead, Flick-Smith, Prior, Oyston, Randall, Mu, Hirst, Molina, Davies, Milne, Griffin, Baldi, Titball and Felgner2007); this study further demonstrated an IgG subclass bias towards IgG2a in protected animals.

T cell based approaches have also been pursued to advance bacterial vaccine development. Moise et al. (Moise et al. Reference Moise, Moss and De Groot2012) evaluated the Helicobacter pylori genome for CD4+ T cell epitopes by using the predictor algorithm EpiMatrix; resulting epitopes were experimentally validated for MHC binding and T cell reactivity in p27 knockout mice infected with the mouse-adapted H. pylori strain. The immunoreactive epitopes were assembled into a multi-epitope vaccine that induced a broad immune response as determined by IFN-γ production in ELIspot assays (Moise et al. Reference Moise, Moss and De Groot2012).

For Mycobacterium tuberculosis, CD4+ T cells are crucial for controlling the infection (Woodworth et al. Reference Woodworth, Aagaard, Hansen, Cassidy, Agger and Andersen2014). Recently, a genome-wide screening for CD4+ T cell reactivity against M. tuberculosis (Arlehamn et al. Reference Arlehamn, Gerasimova, Mele, Henderson, Swann, Greenbaum, Kim, Sidney, James, Taplitz, McKinney, Kwok, Grey, Sallusto, Peters and Sette2013) identified a number of novel epitopes and antigens that may represent a potential vaccine candidates. This immunomics-based study screened the sequences from five complete M. tuberculosis genomes available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database and protein sequences were parsed into 15-mer peptides, which were then ranked by consensus percentile of HLA binding for the 22 alleles most commonly present in the general population. For each protein, no less than two of the best-predicted binders were selected for synthesis, creating a synthetic library of over twenty thousand peptides that were tested by IFN-γ ELIspot against T cells from latent TB-infected donors. The reactive epitopes were ranked on the basis of magnitude of response and mapped to individual bacterial antigens using a reference genome. The results revealed a very heterogeneous response to infection: 82 antigens were recognized by more than 10% of donors. Hundreds of novel epitopes recognized by the human immune system have been identified, attesting to the potential of genome-wide screening strategy (Arlehamn et al. Reference Arlehamn, Gerasimova, Mele, Henderson, Swann, Greenbaum, Kim, Sidney, James, Taplitz, McKinney, Kwok, Grey, Sallusto, Peters and Sette2013; Arlehamn and Sette, Reference Arlehamn and Sette2014).

Immunomics of parasites

We and others have had a particular interest in the immunomics of Plasmodium spp. (Doolan, Reference Doolan2011). In early studies which served as proof of concept for the protein microarray platform, 250 genes representing putative proteins from P. falciparum were selected from a genomic sequence database according to the pattern of stage-specific gene or protein expression, subcellular localization, secondary structure, and known immunogenicity or antigenicity in human and animal models (Doolan et al. Reference Doolan, Mu, Unal, Sundaresh, Hirst, Valdez, Randall, Molina, Liang, Freilich, Oloo, Blair, Aguiar, Baldi, Davies and Felgner2008). Each of these 250 sequences was then printed onto a protein microarray which was probed with human sera from individuals differing in immune status. This study showed that the protein microarray platform could be successfully applied to identify antigens recognised as serodominant by individuals naturally or experimentally exposed to malaria. A more comprehensive array of 2320 protein fragments representing 23% of the P. falciparum proteome was then fabricated; the protein selection considered stage-specific transcription or protein expression, subcellular localization, secondary protein structure, and documented immunogenicity in humans or animal models at the time of antigen selection, as indicated by multidimensional protein identification technology. Subsequent studies with this array identified a signature of 16 proteins that were associated with the sterile immunity induced by experimental immunization with radiation attenuated sporozoites (Trieu et al. Reference Trieu, Kayala, Burk, Molina, Freilich, Richie, Baldi, Felgner and Doolan2011), and a signature of 49 antigens associated with the anti-disease immunity induced by natural exposure to malaria (Crompton et al. Reference Crompton, Kayala, Traore, Kayentao, Ongoiba, Weiss, Molina, Burk, Waisberg, Jasinskas, Tan, Doumbo, Doumtabe, Kone, Narum, Liang, Doumbo, Miller, Doolan, Baldi, Felgner and Pierce2010). Those data provide experimental support for a multivalent vaccine. These and other studies identified a number of antigens that had not been previously described as immunologically reactive (reviewed in (Davies et al. Reference Davies, Duffy, Bodmer, Felgner and Doolan2015)).

Our group has also shown that immunomics-based approaches can be applied to the study of cellular responses against Plasmodium. In the proof of concept demonstration of an epitope-based T cell screening approach in the P. falciparum model, the parasite genomic sequence was scanned to identify and prioritize a set of genes representing antigens potentially expressed in the sporozoite and intrahepatic stage of the parasite life cycle. A total of 27 proteins putatively expressed in the sporozoite proteome were selected according to their level of expression in the sporozoite proteome as determined by MudPIT, as well as stage specificity. This panel included 10 antigens expressed only in sporozoites, and 17 antigens common to other stages of the parasite life cycle. Evaluation of these proteins has shown that 16 of them were reproducibly recognised by peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)s from irradiated sporozoite immunized volunteers but not by naive controls, and nine of these antigens were more antigenic than other well-characterized antigens considered as leading vaccine candidates (Doolan et al. Reference Doolan, Southwood, Freilich, Sidney, Graber, Shatney, Bebris, Florens, Dobano, Witney, Appella, Hoffman, Yates, Carucci and Sette2003). Subsequently, we have applied this strategy to the complete pre-erythrocytic stage proteome and shown that only approximately 30% of the proteome is recognized, and identified the set of antigens that are highly reactive for T cell responses (Proietti & Doolan, in preparation).

With regard to immunomics for other parasites, Schistosoma proteome and transcriptome have been mined to identify surface-derived proteins, a subset of which were then expressed and printed on a protein microarray (Driguez et al. Reference Driguez, Doolan, Loukas, Felgner and McManus2010; Loukas et al. Reference Loukas, Gaze, Mulvenna, Gasser, Brindley, Doolan, Bethony, Jones, Gobert, Driguez, McManus and Hotez2011). These arrays have been probed with specimens from humans representing distinct clinical categories as well as experimentally immunized rodents. Several proteins which are predicted to be good potential vaccine targets have been identified (Loukas et al. Reference Loukas, Gaze, Mulvenna, Gasser, Brindley, Doolan, Bethony, Jones, Gobert, Driguez, McManus and Hotez2011; McWilliam et al. Reference McWilliam, Driguez, Piedrafita, McManus and Meeusen2012). These include the tetraspanin SmTSP-2, the tegumental antigen Sm29, and the very low-density lipoprotein-binding protein SjSVLBP as well as other novel proteins (reviewed in (McWilliam et al. Reference McWilliam, Driguez, Piedrafita, McManus and Meeusen2012). More recently, these protein microarrays have been screened for IgE and multiple IgG subclasses responses using sera from resistant or susceptible individuals (Gaze et al. Reference Gaze, Driguez, Pearson, Mendes, Doolan, Trieu, McManus, Gobert, Periago, Correa Oliveira, Cardoso, Oliveira, Nakajima, Jasinskas, Hung, Liang, Pablo, Bethony, Felgner and Loukas2014). The resultant antibody profiles could distinguish between protected vs non-protected cohorts and allowed identification of antigens that might represent excellent vaccine candidates (Gaze et al. Reference Gaze, Driguez, Pearson, Mendes, Doolan, Trieu, McManus, Gobert, Periago, Correa Oliveira, Cardoso, Oliveira, Nakajima, Jasinskas, Hung, Liang, Pablo, Bethony, Felgner and Loukas2014). The same study also identified protein associated with potentially deleterious hypersensitivity responses if used as subunit vaccines in endemic populations.

CONCLUSION

Infectious diseases continue to pose a major threat to public health worldwide and the need for prophylactic or therapeutic vaccines is urgent. Many of the diseases with high indexes of mortality or morbidity are caused by pathogens with large complex genomes and multistage life cycles, which present substantial challenges for the development of an effective vaccine. Immunomics, by focusing on the key components of host–pathogen interactions, provides a sound foundation to systematically search for critical determinants of immunity, namely key target antigens and epitopes, which could form the base of rationally designed new generation vaccines. Provided that immunomics continues to exploit state-of-the-art techniques and technologies and is able to respond to the inherent challenges associated with large datasets, this approach offers, in our opinion, an enormous potential as a 21st century solution to the challenge of rationally designing vaccines which are highly effective against complex pathogens such as the causative agent of malaria.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

KdS is supported by the International Postgraduate Research Scholarship from the University of Queensland. DLD is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Principal Research Fellowship; support by a Pfizer Australia Senior Research Fellowship is also gratefully acknowledged.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

REFERENCES

Altman, J. D., Moss, P. A., Goulder, P. J., Barouch, D. H., McHeyzer-Williams, M. G., Bell, J. I., McMichael, A. J. and Davis, M. M. (1996). Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes. Science 274, 9496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreu, N., Zelmer, A. and Wiles, S. (2011). Noninvasive biophotonic imaging for studies of infectious disease. FEMS Microbiology Review 35, 360394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annang, F., Perez-Moreno, G., Garcia-Hernandez, R., Cordon-Obras, C., Martin, J., Tormo, J. R., Rodriguez, L., de Pedro, N., Gomez-Perez, V., Valente, M., Reyes, F., Genilloud, O., Vicente, F., Castanys, S., Ruiz-Perez, L. M., Navarro, M., Gamarro, F. and Gonzalez-Pacanowska, D. (2015). High-throughput screening platform for natural product-based drug discovery against 3 neglected tropical diseases: human African trypanosomiasis, leishmaniasis, and Chagas disease. Journal of Biomolecular Screening 20, 8291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ansari, H. R. and Raghava, G. P. S. (2010). Identification of conformational B-cell epitopes in an antigen from its primary sequence. Immunome Research 6, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonets, D. V. and Bazhan, S. I. (2013). PolyCTLDesigner: a computational tool for constructing polyepitope T-cell antigens. BMC Research Notes 6, 1756–0500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arlehamn, C. S. L. and Sette, A. (2014). Definition of CD4 immunosignatures associated with MTB. Frontiers in Immunology 5, 124.Google Scholar
Arlehamn, C. S. L., Gerasimova, A., Mele, F., Henderson, R., Swann, J., Greenbaum, J. A., Kim, Y., Sidney, J., James, E. A., Taplitz, R., McKinney, D. M., Kwok, W. W., Grey, H., Sallusto, F., Peters, B. and Sette, A. (2013). Memory T cells in latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection are directed against three antigenic islands and largely contained in a CXCR3 + CCR6 + Th1 subset. PLoS Pathogens 9, 24.Google Scholar
Arnon, R. (2011). Overview of vaccine strategies. In Vaccine Design: Innovative Approaches and Novel Strategies (ed. Rappuoli, R. and Bagnoli, F.), pp. 120. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK.Google Scholar
Assarsson, E., Bui, H. H., Sidney, J., Zhang, Q., Glenn, J., Oseroff, C., Mbawuike, I. N., Alexander, J., Newman, M. J., Grey, H. and Sette, A. (2008). Immunomic analysis of the repertoire of T-cell specificities for influenza A virus in humans. Journal of Virology 82, 1224112251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balls, M., Bennet, A. and Kendall, D. (2012). Translation of new technologies in biomedicines: shaping the road from basic research to drug development and clinical application – and back again. In Pharmaceutical Biotechnology: Drug Discovery and Clinical Applications (ed. Kayser, O. and Warzecha, H.), pp. 113152. Wiley-Blackwell, Weinheim, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, T. and Barral-Netto, M. (2013). Challenges in the research and development of new human vaccines. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 46, 103108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertholet, S., Reed, S. G. and Rappuoli, R. (2014). Reverse vaccinology. In The Art & Science of Tuberculosis Vaccine Development (ed. Nor, N., Acosta, A. and Sarmiento, M. E.), Chapter 3.1. Oxford University Press, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia. http://tbvaccines.usm.my/finlay/?q=content/chapter-31-reverse-vaccinology.Google Scholar
Bonanni, P. and Santos, J. I. (2011). Vaccine evolution. Perspectives in Vaccinology 1, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga-Neto, U. and Marques, E. (2006). From functional genomics to functional immunomics: new challenges, old problems, big rewards. PLoS Computational Biology 2, e81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brusic, V., Bajic, V. B. and Petrovsky, N. (2004). Computational methods for prediction of T-cell epitopes – a framework for modelling, testing, and applications. Methods 34, 436443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bui, H. H., Sidney, J., Peters, B., Sathiamurthy, M., Sinichi, A., Purton, K. A., Mothe, B. R., Chisari, F. V., Watkins, D. I. and Sette, A. (2005). Automated generation and evaluation of specific MHC binding predictive tools: ARB matrix applications. Immunogenetics 57, 304314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, D. R., Poignard, P., Stanfield, R. L. and Wilson, I. A. (2012). Broadly neutralizing antibodies present new prospects to counter highly antigenically diverse viruses. Science 337, 183186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmona, S. J., Nielsen, M., Schafer-Nielsen, C., Mucci, J., Altcheh, J., Balouz, V., Tekiel, V., Frasch, A. C., Campetella, O., Buscaglia, C. A. and Aguero, F. (2015). Towards high-throughput immunomics for infectious diseases: use of next-generation peptide microarrays for rapid discovery and mapping of antigenic determinants. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 28, 045906.Google Scholar
Cease, K. B., Margalit, H., Cornette, J. L., Putney, S. D., Robey, W. G., Ouyang, C., Streicher, H. Z., Fischinger, P. J., Gallo, R. C. and DeLisi, C. (1987). Helper T-cell antigenic site identification in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome virus gp120 envelope protein and induction of immunity in mice to the native protein using a 16-residue synthetic peptide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 84, 42494253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, R. K. and Utz, P. J. (2011). Screening: CyTOF-the next generation of cell detection. Nat Rev Rheum 7, 502503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, H., Hickman, M., Edmunds, W. J. and Trotter, C. L. (2013). Introducing vaccination against serogroup B meningococcal disease: an economic and mathematical modelling study of potential impact. Vaccine 31, 26382646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crompton, P. D., Kayala, M. A., Traore, B., Kayentao, K., Ongoiba, A., Weiss, G. E., Molina, D. M., Burk, C. R., Waisberg, M., Jasinskas, A., Tan, X., Doumbo, S., Doumtabe, D., Kone, Y., Narum, D. L., Liang, X., Doumbo, O. K., Miller, L. H., Doolan, D. L., Baldi, P., Felgner, P. L. and Pierce, S. K. (2010). A prospective analysis of the Ab response to Plasmodium falciparum before and after a malaria season by protein microarray. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 69586963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czerkinsky, C., Nilsson, L.-Å., Nygren, H., Ouchterlony, Ö. and Tarkowski, A. (1983). A solid-phase enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay for enumeration of specific antibody-secreting cells. Journal of Immunological Methods 65, 109121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, D. H., Duffy, P., Bodmer, J.-L., Felgner, P. L. and Doolan, D. L. (2015). Large screen approaches to identify novel malaria vaccine candidates. Vaccine.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Groot, A. S. (2006). Immunomics: discovering new targets for vaccines and therapeutics. Drug Discovery Today 11, 203209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
del Guercio, M. F., Sidney, J., Hermanson, G., Perez, C., Grey, H. M., Kubo, R. T. and Sette, A. (1995). Binding of a peptide antigen to multiple HLA alleles allows definition of an A2-like supertype. Journal of Immunology 154, 685693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desai, D. V. and Kulkarni-Kale, U. (2014). T-cell epitope prediction methods: an overview. Methods Mol Biol. 1184, 333364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimitrakopoulou, K., Dimitrakopoulos, G. N., Wilk, E., Tsimpouris, C., Sgarbas, K. N., Schughart, K. and Bezerianos, A. (2014). Influenza A immunomics and public health omics: the dynamic pathway interplay in host response to H1N1 infection. Omics 18, 167183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnes, P. and Kohlbacher, O. (2006). SVMHC: a server for prediction of MHC-binding peptides. Nucleic Acids Research 34, W194W197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doolan, D. L. (2011). Plasmodium immunomics. International Journal of Parasitology 41, 320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doolan, D. L., Southwood, S., Freilich, D. A., Sidney, J., Graber, N. L., Shatney, L., Bebris, L., Florens, L., Dobano, C., Witney, A. A., Appella, E., Hoffman, S. L., Yates, J. R. 3rd, Carucci, D. J. and Sette, A. (2003). Identification of Plasmodium falciparum antigens by antigenic analysis of genomic and proteomic data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 99529957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doolan, D. L., Mu, Y., Unal, B., Sundaresh, S., Hirst, S., Valdez, C., Randall, A., Molina, D., Liang, X., Freilich, D. A., Oloo, J. A., Blair, P. L., Aguiar, J. C., Baldi, P., Davies, D. H. and Felgner, P. L. (2008). Profiling humoral immune responses to P. falciparum infection with protein microarrays. PROTEOMICS 8, 46804694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doolan, D. L., Apte, S. H. and Proietti, C. (2014). Genome-based vaccine design: the promise for malaria and other infectious diseases. International Journal for Parasitology 44, 901913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Driguez, P., Doolan, D. L., Loukas, A., Felgner, P. L. and McManus, D. P. (2010). Schistosomiasis vaccine discovery using immunomics. Parasites & Vectors 3, 17563305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyson, J. (2015). T-cell receptors: tugging on the anchor for a tighter hold on the tumor-associated peptide. European Journal of Immunology 45, 380382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Manzalawy, Y. and Honavar, V. (2014). Building classifier ensembles for B-Cell epitope prediction. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.) 1184, 285294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engvall, E. and Perlmann, P. (1971). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry 8, 871874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eyles, J. E., Unal, B., Hartley, M. G., Newstead, S. L., Flick-Smith, H., Prior, J. L., Oyston, P. C., Randall, A., Mu, Y., Hirst, S., Molina, D. M., Davies, D. H., Milne, T., Griffin, K. F., Baldi, P., Titball, R. W. and Felgner, P. L. (2007). Immunodominant Francisella tularensis antigens identified using proteome microarray. PROTEOMICS 7, 21722183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falus, A. (2008). Clinical Applications of Immunomics, Springer Science & Business Media, New York.Google Scholar
Foged, C., Rades, T., Perrie, Y. and Hook, S. (2014). Subunit Vaccine Delivery, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Gallerano, D., Ndlovu, P., Makupe, I., Focke-Tejkl, M., Fauland, K., Wollmann, E., Puchhammer-Stöckl, E., Keller, W., Sibanda, E. and Valenta, R. (2015). Comparison of the specificities of IgG, IgG-subclass, IgA and IgM reactivities in African and European HIV-infected individuals with an HIV-1 clade C proteome-based array. PLoS One 10, e0117204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaze, S., Driguez, P., Pearson, M. S., Mendes, T., Doolan, D. L., Trieu, A., McManus, D. P., Gobert, G. N., Periago, M. V., Correa Oliveira, R., Cardoso, F. C., Oliveira, G., Nakajima, R., Jasinskas, A., Hung, C., Liang, L., Pablo, J., Bethony, J. M., Felgner, P. L. and Loukas, A. (2014). An immunomics approach to schistosome antigen discovery: antibody signatures of naturally resistant and chronically infected individuals from Endemic areas. PLoS Pathogens 10, e1004033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geiss, G. K., Bumgarner, R. E., Birditt, B., Dahl, T., Dowidar, N., Dunaway, D. L., Fell, H. P., Ferree, S., George, R. D., Grogan, T., James, J. J., Maysuria, M., Mitton, J. D., Oliveri, P., Osborn, J. L., Peng, T., Ratcliffe, A. L., Webster, P. J., Davidson, E. H., Hood, L. and Dimitrov, K. (2008). Direct multiplexed measurement of gene expression with color-coded probe pairs. Nature Biotechnology 26, 317325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Good, M. F. (2011). A whole parasite vaccine to control the blood stages of Plasmodium: the case for lateral thinking. Trends in Parasitology 27, 335340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gotch, F., Rothbard, J., Howland, K., Townsend, A. and McMichael, A. (1987). Cytotoxic T lymphocytes recognize a fragment of influenza virus matrix protein in association with HLA-A2. Nature 326, 881882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimm, S. K. and Ackerman, M. E. (2013). Vaccine design: emerging concepts and renewed optimism. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 24, 10781088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansmann, L., Blum, L., Hsin-Ju, C., Liedtke, M., Robinson, W. and Davis, M. M. (2015). Mass cytometry analysis shows that a novel memory phenotype B cell is expanded in multiple myeloma. Cancer Imm Res 3, 650660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayakawa, K., Ishii, R., Yamasaki, K., Kishimoto, T. and Hardy, R. (1987). Isolation of high-affinity memory B cells: Phycoerythrin as a probe for antigen-binding cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 84, 13791383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hecker, M., Lorenz, P., Steinbeck, F., Hong, L., Riemekasten, G., Li, Y., Zettl, U. K. and Thiesen, H. J. (2012). Computational analysis of high-density peptide microarray data with application from systemic sclerosis to multiple sclerosis. Autoimmunity Reviews 11, 180190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinson, A. I., Woelk, C. H. and Newell, M. L. (2015). The promise of reverse vaccinology. International Health 7, 8589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, S. L., Billingsley, P. F., James, E., Richman, A., Loyevsky, M., Li, T., Chakravarty, S., Gunasekera, A., Chattopadhyay, R., Li, M., Stafford, R., Ahumada, A., Epstein, J. E., Sedegah, M., Reyes, S., Richie, T. L., Lyke, K. E., Edelman, R., Laurens, M. B., Plowe, C. V. and Sim, B. K. (2010). Development of a metabolically active, non-replicating sporozoite vaccine to prevent Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Human Vaccines 6, 97106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jardetzky, T. S., Brown, J. H., Gorga, J. C., Stern, L. J., Urban, R. G., Strominger, J. L. and Wiley, D. C. (1996). Crystallographic analysis of endogenous peptides associated with HLA-DR1 suggests a common, polyproline II-like conformation for bound peptides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93, 734738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jerne, N. and Nordin, A. (1963). Plaque formation in agar by single antibody-producing cells. Science 140, 405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanampalliwar, A., Rajkumar, S., Girdhar, A. and Archana, T. (2013). Reverse vaccinology: basics and applications. Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination 4, 194198.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, S. H. E., Juliana McElrath, M., Lewis, D. J. M. and Del Giudice, G. (2014). Challenges and responses in human vaccine development. Current Opinion in Immunology 28, 1826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, B. A., Peters, L. A., Schadt, E. E. and Dudley, J. T. (2014). Unifying immunology with informatics and multiscale biology. Nature Immunology 15, 118127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Y., Ponomarenko, J., Zhu, Z., Tamang, D., Wang, P., Greenbaum, J., Lundegaard, C., Sette, A., Lund, O., Bourne, P. E., Nielsen, M. and Peters, B. (2012). Immune epitope database analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Research 40, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klinman, N. and Aschinazi, G. (1971). The stimulation of splenic foci in vitro. Journal of Immunology 106, 1338–1334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klysik, J. (2001). Concept of immunomics: a new frontier in the battle for gene function? Acta Biotheoretica 49, 191202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwong, P. D., Mascola, J. R. and Nabel, G. J. (2011). Rational design of vaccines to elicit broadly neutralizing antibodies to HIV-1. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 1, a007278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leca, M., Bornet, C., Montana, M., Curti, C. and Vanelle, P. (2015). Meningococcal vaccines: current state and future outlook. Pathologie Biologie 63, 144151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loukas, A., Gaze, S., Mulvenna, J. P., Gasser, R. B., Brindley, P. J., Doolan, D. L., Bethony, J. M., Jones, M. K., Gobert, G. N., Driguez, P., McManus, D. P. and Hotez, P. J. (2011). Vaccinomics for the major blood feeding helminths of humans. Omics 15, 567577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madura, F., Rizkallah, P. J., Holland, C. J., Fuller, A., Bulek, A., Godkin, A. J., Schauenburg, A. J., Cole, D. K. and Sewell, A. K. (2015). Structural basis for ineffective T-cell responses to MHC anchor residue-improved ‘heteroclitic’ peptides. European Journal of Immunology 45, 584591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margalit, H., Spouge, J. L., Cornette, J. L., Cease, K. B., Delisi, C. and Berzofsky, J. A. (1987). Prediction of immunodominant helper T cell antigenic sites from the primary sequence. Journal of Immunology 138, 22132229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, J. S. and Good, M. F. (2010). Whole parasite blood stage malaria vaccines: a convergence of evidence. Human Vaccines 6, 114123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McHeyzer-Williams, M., McLean, M., Lalor, P. and Nossal, G. (1993). Antigen-driven B cell differentiation in vivo. Journal of Experimental Medicine 178, 295307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McWilliam, H. E. G., Driguez, P., Piedrafita, D., McManus, D. P. and Meeusen, E. N. T. (2012). Novel immunomic technologies for schistosome vaccine development. Parasite Immunology 34, 276284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meeusen, E. N. T., Walker, J., Peters, A., Pastoret, P.-P. and Jungersen, G. (2007). Current status of veterinary vaccines. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 20, 489510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehr, R. (2014). Immune system modeling and analysis. Frontiers in Immunology 5, 644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikolajczak, S. A., Lakshmanan, V., Fishbaugher, M., Camargo, N., Harupa, A., Kaushansky, A., Douglass, A. N., Baldwin, M., Healer, J., O'Neill, M., Phuong, T., Cowman, A. and Kappe, S. H. (2014). A next-generation genetically attenuated Plasmodium falciparum parasite created by triple gene deletion. Molecular Therapy 22, 17071715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moise, L., Moss, S. F. and De Groot, A. S. (2012). Moving Helicobacter pylori vaccine development forward with bioinformatics and immunomics. Expert Review of Vaccines 11, 10311033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narang, V., Decraene, J., Wong, S. Y., Aiswarya, B. S., Wasem, A. R., Leong, S. R. and Gouaillard, A. (2012). Systems immunology: a survey of modeling formalisms, applications and simulation tools. Immunologic Research 53, 251265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, M. and Lund, O. (2009). NN-align. An artificial neural network-based alignment algorithm for MHC class II peptide binding prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osuna, C. E., Gonzalez, A. M., Chang, H. H., Hung, A. S., Ehlinger, E., Anasti, K., Alam, S. M. and Letvin, N. L. (2014). TCR affinity associated with functional differences between dominant and subdominant SIV epitope-specific CD8+ T cells in Mamu-A*01+ rhesus monkeys. PLoS Pathog 10, e1004069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozen, S., Tucker, L. B. and Miller, L. C. (1998). Identification of Th subsets in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis confirmed by intracellular cytokine staining. Journal of Rheumatology 25, 16511653.Google ScholarPubMed
Pizza, M., Scarlato, V., Masignani, V., Giuliani, M. M., Arico, B., Comanducci, M., Jennings, G. T., Baldi, L., Bartolini, E., Capecchi, B., Galeotti, C. L., Luzzi, E., Manetti, R., Marchetti, E., Mora, M., Nuti, S., Ratti, G., Santini, L., Savino, S., Scarselli, M., Storni, E., Zuo, P., Broeker, M., Hundt, E., Knapp, B., Blair, E., Mason, T., Tettelin, H., Hood, D. W., Jeffries, A. C. et al. (2000). Identification of vaccine candidates against serogroup B meningococcus by whole-genome sequencing. Science 287, 18161820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poland, G. A., Kennedy, R. B. and Ovsyannikova, I. G. (2011). Vaccinomics and personalized vaccinology: is science leading us toward a new path of directed vaccine development and discovery? PLoS Pathogens 7, e1002344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouwels, K. B., Hak, E., van der Ende, A., Christensen, H., van den Dobbelsteen, G. P. and Postma, M. J. (2013). Cost-effectiveness of vaccination against meningococcal B among Dutch infants: crucial impact of changes in incidence. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 9, 11291138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulendran, B. and Ahmed, R. (2006). Translating innate immunity into immunological memory: implications for vaccine development. Cell 124, 849863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintana, F. J., Hagedorn, P. H., Elizur, G., Merbl, Y., Domany, E. and Cohen, I. R. (2004). Functional immunomics: microarray analysis of IgG autoantibody repertoires predicts the future response of mice to induced diabetes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2, 1461514621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raman, K., Bhat, A. G. and Chandra, N. (2010). A systems perspective of host-pathogen interactions: predicting disease outcome in tuberculosis. Molecular BioSystems 6, 516530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rammensee, H., Bachmann, J., Emmerich, N. P., Bachor, O. A. and Stevanovic, S. (1999). SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics 50, 213219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rappuoli, R. (2001). Reverse vaccinology, a genome-based approach to vaccine development. Vaccine 19, 26882691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinaudo, C. D., Telford, J. L., Rappuoli, R. and Seib, K. L. (2009). Vaccinology in the genome era. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 119, 25152525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez-Valdez, F. J., Perez Brandan, C., Ferreira, A. and Basombrio, M. A. (2015). Gene-deleted live-attenuated trypanosoma cruzi parasites as vaccines to protect against Chagas disease. Expert Review Vaccines 14, 681697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. and Coulson, A. R. (1977). DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 74, 54635467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schellhammer, I. and Rarey, M. (2004). FlexX-Scan: fast, structure-based virtual screening. Proteins 57, 504517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schetgen, M. (2014). Anti-pneumococcal vaccination in 2014. Revue Medicale de Bruxelles 35, 325328.Google ScholarPubMed
Schubert, C. (2011). Systems immunology: complexity captured. Nature 473, 113114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, L., Brown, G. V., Genton, B. and Moorthy, V. S. (2012). A review of malaria vaccine clinical projects based on the WHO rainbow table. Malaria Journal 11, 14752875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serruto, D., Bottomley, M. J., Ram, S., Giuliani, M. M. and Rappuoli, R. (2012). The new multicomponent vaccine against meningococcal serogroup B, 4CMenB: immunological, functional and structural characterization of the antigens. Vaccine 30, 033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sette, A., Fleri, W., Peters, B., Sathiamurthy, M., Bui, H.-H. and Wilson, S. (2005). A roadmap for the immunomics of category A–C pathogens. Immunity 22, 155161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sette, A. and Sundaram, R. (2006). The phenomenon of immunodomination: speculations on the nature of immunodominance. In Immunodominance – The Choice of the Immune System (ed. Frelinger, J. A.), pp. 5772. Wyley-VCH Weinheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Sidney, J., Steen, A., Moore, C., Ngo, S., Chung, J., Peters, B. and Sette, A. (2010). Five HLA-DP molecules frequently expressed in the worldwide human population share a common HLA supertypic binding specificity. Journal of Immunology 184, 24922503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegrist, C.-A. (2013). 2 – Vaccine immunology. In Vaccines (Sixth Edition) (ed. Offit, S. A. P. A. O. A.), pp. 1432. W.B. Saunders, London.Google Scholar
Skinner, P. J., Daniels, M. A., Schmidt, C. S., Jameson, S. C. and Haase, A. T. (2000). Cutting edge: in situ tetramer staining of antigen-specific T cells in tissues. Journal of Immunology 165, 613617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slifka, M. K. and Amanna, I. (2014). How advances in immunology provide insight into improving vaccine efficacy. Vaccine 32, 29482957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sollner, J., Heinzel, A., Summer, G., Fechete, R., Stipkovits, L., Szathmary, S. and Mayer, B. (2010). Concept and application of a computational vaccinology workflow. Immunome Research 3, 17457580.Google Scholar
Spurgeon, S. L., Jones, R. C. and Ramakrishnan, R. (2008). High throughput gene expression measurement with real time PCR in a microfluidic dynamic array. PLoS ONE 3, 0001662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stilling, R. M., Bordenstein, S. R., Dinan, T. G. and Cryan, J. F. (2014). Friends with social benefits: host-microbe interactions as a driver of brain evolution and development? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 4, 147CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, P., Ju, H., Liu, Z., Ning, Q., Zhang, J., Zhao, X., Huang, Y., Ma, Z. and Li, Y. (2013). Bioinformatics resources and tools for conformational B-cell epitope prediction. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2013, 11.Google Scholar
Tenzer, S., Peters, B., Bulik, S., Schoor, O., Lemmel, C., Schatz, M. M., Kloetzel, P. M., Rammensee, H. G., Schild, H. and Holzhutter, H. G. (2005). Modeling the MHC class I pathway by combining predictions of proteasomal cleavage, TAP transport and MHC class I binding. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 62, 10251037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tirani, M., Meregaglia, M. and Melegaro, A. (2015). Health and economic outcomes of introducing the New MenB Vaccine (Bexsero) into the Italian routine infant immunisation programme. PLoS ONE 10, e0123383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tournier, J.-N. and Quesnel-Hellmann, A. (2006). Host–pathogen interactions: a biological Rendez-Vous of the infectious nonself and danger models? PLoS Pathogens 2, e44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trieu, A., Kayala, M. A., Burk, C., Molina, D. M., Freilich, D. A., Richie, T. L., Baldi, P., Felgner, P. L. and Doolan, D. L. (2011). Sterile protective immunity to malaria is associated with a panel of novel P. falciparum antigens. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 10, 31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vita, R., Overton, J. A., Greenbaum, J. A., Ponomarenko, J., Clark, J. D., Cantrell, J. R., Wheeler, D. K., Gabbard, J. L., Hix, D., Sette, A. and Peters, B. (2015). The immune epitope database (IEDB) 3·0. Nucleic Acids Research 43, 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodworth, J. S., Aagaard, C. S., Hansen, P. R., Cassidy, J. P., Agger, E. M. and Andersen, P. (2014). Protective CD4T cells targeting cryptic epitopes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resist infection-driven terminal differentiation. Journal of Immunology 192, 32473258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, B., Zheng, D., Liang, S. and Zhang, C. (2013). Conformational B-Cell epitope prediction on antigen protein structures: a review of current algorithms and comparison with common binding site prediction methods. PLoS ONE 8, e62249.Google ScholarPubMed
Zarnitsyna, V. I., Evavold, B. D., Schoettle, L. N., Blattman, J. N. and Antia, R. (2013). Estimating the diversity, completeness, and cross-reactivity of the T cell repertoire. Frontiers in Immunology 4, 485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zepp, F. (2010). Principles of vaccine design – lessons from nature. Vaccine 28, (Suppl. 3), C14C24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed