Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:23:08.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunological response of the hosts to Toxocara canis (Werner, 1782) infection I. Effect of superinfection on naturally infected puppies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

S. T. Fernando
S. T. Fernando
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Ceylon, Peradeniya, Ceylon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Superinfection of naturally infected puppies with large numbers of Toxocara canis eggs induced a self-cure reaction. There was a sharp fall in Toxocara egg output following superinfection in most of the puppies. In most, but not all the puppies, the existing worm burden was eliminated. Eliminated worms were full of fertile eggs, but, in the puppies in which egg production fell sharply without expulsion of the worm burden, egg production by the naturally acquired worms was suppressed only transiently.

Antibody production, measured by the complement-fixation test, was directly related to resistance to superinfection but not to self-cure.

Acquired resistance reduced the pathogenic effects of superinfection, and prevented development of the parasite beyond the second stage.

It is a pleasure to thank Professor P. Seneviratna, University of Ceylon, for his constructive criticisms of the manuscript and the facilities provided.

The writer thanks Mr W. G. Senaratne for technical assistance and typing of the manuscript.

This work was carried out with a special research grant from the University of Ceylon.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , August 1968 , pp. 547 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barth, E. E. E., Jarrett, W. F. H. & Urquhart, G. H. (1966). Studies on the mechanism of the self-cure reaction in rats infected with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. Immunology 10, 459–64.Google Scholar
Bukantz, S. C., Rein, C. R. & Kent, J. F. (1946). Studies on complement fixation. II. Preservation of sheep's blood in citrate–dextrose mixtures (modified). J. Lab. clin. Med. 31, 394–9.Google Scholar
Ehrenford, F. A. (1957). Canine ascaris as a potential source of visceral larva migrans. Am. J. trop. Med. 9, 166–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, S. T. (1968). Immunological response of rabbits to Toxocara canis infection. Parasitology 58, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabat, E. A. & Mayer, M. M. (1961). Experimental Immunochemistry, 2nd ed. p. 149. Springfield, Illinois, U.S.A.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. M., Osler, A. G., Bier, O. G. & Heidelberger, M. (1946). The activating effect of magnesium and other cations on the haemolytic function of complement. J. exp. Med. 84, 535–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, L. J. & Schultz, C. W. (1963). Nematode induced hypersensitivity in guinea-pigs: onset of eosinophilia and positive Schultz–Dale reactions following graded infections with Toxocara canis. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 113, 440–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, J. G. (1967). Experimental infections of cattle with Fasciola hepatica: the production of an acquired self cure by challenge infection. J. Helminth. 41, 223–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacher, J. F. (1957). A contribution to the life history and larval morphology of Toxocara canis. J. Parasit. 43, 599–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. (1939). Freedom from viable trichinae of frankfurters prepared under federal meat inspection. Proc. helm. Soc. Wash. 6, 35–7.Google Scholar
Sharp, A. D. & Olson, L. J. (1962). Hypersensitivity responses in Toxocara-, Ascaris-, and Trichinella-infected guinea-pigs to homologous and heterologous challenge. J. Parasit. 48, 362–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soulsby, E. J. L. (1965). Textbook of Veterinary Clinical Parasitology, vol. 1, 1120 pp. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Sprent, J. F. A. (1958). Observations on the development of Toxocara canis (Werner, 1782) in the dog. Parasitology 48, 184–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, D. F. (1950 a). Studies on resistance of sheep to infestation with Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. and on the immunological reactions of sheep exposed to infestation. II. The antibody response of sheep exposed to infestation. Aust. J. agric. Res. 1, 301–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. F. (1950 b). Studies on resistance of sheep to infestation with Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. and on the immunological reactions of sheep exposed to infestation. III. The antibody response to infestation with Trichostrongylus spp. Aust. J. agric. Res. 1, 412–26.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. F. (1950 c). Studies on resistance of sheep to infestation with Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. and on the immunological reactions of sheep exposed to infestation. IV. Antibody response to natural infestation in grazing sheep and the ‘self-cure’ phenomenon. Aust. J. agric. Res. 1, 427–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, N. R. (1929). Studies with the strongyloid nematode Haemonchus contortus. I. Acquired resistance of hosts under natural reinfection conditions out-of-doors. Am. J. Hyg. 10, 384–418.Google Scholar
Taffs, L. F. (1964). Immunological studies on experimental infection of pigs with Ascaris suum (Goeze, 1782). III. The antibody response and acquired immunity. J. Helminth. 38, 129–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, G. A. (1956). A preliminary report on the biology of Toxocara canis (Werner, 1782). Can. J. Zool. 34, 725–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar