Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T18:58:57.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunological comparison of four Trypanosoma spp. (sub-genus Schizotrypanum) from bats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Susan M. Bower  and
P. T. K. Woo
Susan M. Bower
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
P. T. K. Woo*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
*
* Author to whom requests for reprints should be addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The antigenic differences and similarities between culture forms of Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) hedricki, Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) myoti, Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) vespertilionis and Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) dionisii, all isolated from bats, were compared using the double-diffusion technique. Antiserum to each trypanosome species was produced in rabbits by inoculating them with sonicated culture forms. Two isolates of T. hedricki were antigenically identical to each other, as were 2 isolates of T. myoti. There were several common antigens between the species. However, at least 1 antigen of each species was distinct from those of the other species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 85 , Issue 1 , August 1982 , pp. 111 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afchain, D., LeRay, D., Fruit, J. & Capron, A. (1979). Antigenic make-up of Trypanosoma cruzi culture forms: identification of a specific component. Journal of Parasitology 65, 507–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, J. R., Green, S. M., Chaloner, L. A. & Gaborak, M. (1972). Trypanosoma (Schizotry-panum) dionisii of Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Chiroptera): intra- and extracellular development in vitro. Parasitology 65, 251–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. R., Miles, M. A., Godfrey, D. G. & Barrett, T. U. (1978). Biochemical characterization of some species of Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) from bats (Microchiroptera). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 27, 483–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bice, D. E. & Zeledon, R. (1971). Immunoelectrophoretic comparison of Trypanosoma vespertilionis and Trypanosoma cruzi. Revista de Biologia Tropical 19, 149–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Bower, S. M. & Woo, P. T. K. (1981 a). Two new species of trypanosomes (sub-genus Schizotrypanum) in bats from southern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59, 530–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, S. M. & Woo, P. T. K. (1981 b). An in vitro comparison of Trypanosoma spp. (subgenus Schizotrypanum) from bats. Systematic Parasitology 3, 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzales Cappa, S. M. & Kagan, I. G. (1969). Agar gel and immunoelectrophoretic analysis of several strains of Trypanosoma cruzi. Experimental Parasitology 25, 50–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, I. G. & Norman, L. (1974). Serodiagnosis of parasite diseases. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology (ed. Lennette, E. H., Spaulding, E. H. and Truant, J. P.) pp. 645–63. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology.Google Scholar
Nussenzweig, V. & Goble, F. C. (1966). Further studies on the antigenic constitution of strains of Trypanosoma (Schizotrypanum) cruzi. Experimental Parasitology 18, 224–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussenzweig, V., Kloetzel, J. & Deane, L. M. (1963). Acquired immunity in mice infected with strains of immunological types A and B of Trypanosoma cruzi. Experimental Parasitology 14, 233–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soria, G. H. & Dusanic, D. G. (1975). Comparative studies of Trypanosoma vespertilionis Battaglia and Trypanosoma dionisii Bettencourt and Franca. Journal of Protozoology 22, 509–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed