Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:28:20.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Host-specific components of the reproductive success of Transversotrema patialense (Digenea: Transversotrematidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. J. Whitfield
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, King's College, London WC2R 2LS
R. M. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College, London SW7
D. A. P. Bundy
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College, London SW7

Summary

Using a range of infection techniques, the ability of cercariae of the ectoparasitic digenean Transversotrema patialense to infect 24 species of tropical freshwater fish is examined. Of the 24 species (from 11 families) it is possible to infect 21 (from 8 families) under laboratory conditions. Reproductive success (R) for T. patialense from the cercarial infection process to the production of viable eggs by adult flukes is estimated for infections on two fish hosts, the cyprinid Brwhydanio rerio and the characinid Cheirodon sp. in controlled laboratory conditions. To calculate R, separate estimations of parasite infectivity, survival, fecundity and egg viability were made on populations of both host species. The enhanced reproductive success (R) of T. patialense on Cheirodon sp. is the composite resultant of higher infectivity, lower mean expected adult fluke life-span and higher mean fecundity/surviving worm when compared with infections on B. rerio under identical experimental conditions. Different patterns of egg viability of the two hosts do not materially influence differential reproductive success. A variety of formal techniques for handling the interacting components of reproductive success are described. The relationship between these techniques and the concept of basic reproductive rate, R0 (Macdonald, 1957; Anderson, 1982) is assessed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. (1970). Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. M. (1982). Epidemiology. In Modern Parasitology (ed. Cox, F. E. G.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. M. & Whitfield, P. J. (1975). Survival characteristics of the free-living cercarial population of the ectoparasitic digenean Transversotrema patialense (Soparkar, 1924). Parasitology 70, 295310.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. M., Whitfield, P. J. & Mills, C. A. (1977). An experimental study of the population dynamics of an ectoparasitic digenean, Transversotrema patialense: the cercarial and adult stages. Journal of Animal Ecology 46, 555–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, D. A. P. (1979). Studies on the biology of an ectoparasitic digenean, Transversotrema patialense (Soparkar), with special reference to the developmental stages. Ph.D. dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
Dogiel, V. A., Polyanski, Y. I. & Kneisin, E. M. (1964). General Parasitology. (English Translation: Kabata, Z.). Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hairston, N. G. (1962). Population ecology and epidemiological problems. In Bilharziasis, Ciba Foundation Symposium, (ed. Wolstenholme, G. E. W. and O'Connor, M.) London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Hine, P. M. & Kennedy, C. R. (1974 a). Observations on the distribution, specificity and pathogenicity of the acanthocephalan Pomphorhynchus laevis (Muller). Journal of Fish Biology 6, 521–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, P. M. & Kennedy, C. R. (1974b). The population biology of the acanthocephalan Pomphorhynchus laevis (Muller) in the River Avon. Journal of Fish Biology 6, 665–79.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. C. (1976). Host selection and its consequences. In Ecological Aspects of Parasitology, (ed. Kennedy, C. R.). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. C., Hobbs, R. P. & Leong, T. S. (1977). Populations in perspective: community organisation and regulation of parasite populations. In Regulation of Parasite Populations, (ed. Esch, G. W.) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Horak, I. G. (1971). Paramphistomiasis of domestic ruminants. Advances in Parasitology 9, 3372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, C. R. (1975). Ecological Animal Parasitology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Leong, T. S. (1975). Metazoan parasites of fishes of Cold Lake, Alberta: a community analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
Macdonald, G. (1957). The Epidemiology and Control of Malaria. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. A., Anderson, R. M. & Whitfield, P. J. (1979). Density-dependent survival and reproduction within populations of the ectoparasitic digenean Transversotrema patialense on the fish host. Journal of Animal Ecology 48, 383–99.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. G. (1969). An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Whitfield, P. J. (1979). The Biology of Parasitism. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Whitfield, P. J. & Wells, J. (1973). Observations on the ectoparasitic digenean Transversotrema patialense. Parasitology 67, 27–8.Google Scholar