Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:10:49.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host-parasite interactions and the feeding of blood-sucking arthropods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. J. Tatchell
R. J. Tatchell
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Long Pocket Laboratories, Indooroopilly, 4068, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The range of interactions between blood-sucking arthropods and their hosts is enormous and their importance to man would be difficult to overestimate. From the tundra to the tropics man, and animals in which he has a vital nutritional or economic interest, represent to the blood-sucking arthropod a source of animal protein. By their activities in obtaining a blood meal the host may be subjected to minimal inconvenience, acute irritation, or suffer severely from blood loss or from the effects of toxins introduced during feeding. Superimposed upon these situations is an enormous variety of disease agents which may be transmitted to the host by the parasite during or after feeding.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , February 1969 , pp. 93 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Audy, J. R. (1951). Trombiculid mites and scrub itch. Aust. J. Sci. 14, 94–6.Google Scholar
Bell, J. F., Clifford, C. M., Moore, G. J. & Raymond, G. (1966). Effects of limb disability on lousiness in mice. III. Gross aspects of acquired resistance. Expl. Parasit. 18, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blacklock, D. B., Gordon, R. M. & Fine, J. (1930). Metazoan immunity: a report on recent investigations. With a bacteriological investigation. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 24, 5–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, A. N. (1963). The physiology of Mosquitoes, pp. 1–393. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Dineen, J. K. (1963). Immunological aspects of parasitism. Nature, Lond. 197, 268–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feingold, B. F., Benjiamini, E. & Michaeli, D. (1968). The allergic responses to insect bites. A. Rev. Ent. 13, 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillett, J. D. (1967). Natural selection and feeding speed in a blood-sucking insect. Proc. R. Soc. B, 167, 316–29.Google Scholar
Gillies, M. T. (1964). Selection for host preferences in Anopheles gambiae. Nature, Lond. 203, 852–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregson, J. D. (1960). Morphology and functioning of the mouthparts of Dermacentor andersoni Stiles. Acta trop. 17, 47–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Hirsch, J. G. (1965). Neutrophil and eosinophil leucocytes. In The inflammatory Process, 1st edn, pp. 245–80. Ed. Zweifach, B. W., Grant, L. and McClusky, R. T.. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoeppli, R. & Schumacher, H. H. (1962). Histological reactions to trombiculid mites, with special reference to ‘natural’ and ‘unnatural’ hosts. Z. Tropenmed. Parasit. 13, 419–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Howell, C. J. (1966). Collection of salivary gland secretion from the argasid Ornithodoros savignyi Audouin (1827) by the use of a pharmacological stimulant. J. S. Afr. Vet. Med. As. 37, 236–9.Google Scholar
Hudson, A., Bowman, L. & Orr, C. W. M. (1960). Effects of absence of saliva on blood-feeding by mosquitoes. Science, N.Y. 131, 1730–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kartmann, L. (1966). Insect allergy and arthropod-borne infection: a hypothesis. 1st Int. Congr. Parasit. 2, 1092–3.Google Scholar
Larrivee, D. H., Benjiamini, E., Feingold, B. F. & Shumizu, M. (1964). Histologic studies of guinea pig skin: different stages of allergic reactivity to flea bites. Expl Parasit. 15, 491–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavoipierre, M. M. J. & Beck, A. J. (1967). Feeding mechanism of Chiroptonyssus robustipes on the transilluminated bat wing. Expl Parasit. 20, 312–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavoipierre, M. M. J. & Riek, R. F. (1955). Observations on the feeding habits of argasidm ticks and on the effect of their bites on laboratory animals together with a note on the production of coxal fluid by several of the species studied. A. trop. Med. Parasit. 49, 96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, H. M. O. & Lloyd, L. (1928). Notes on the process of digestion in tsetse flies. Bull. ent. Res. 19, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, D. E. (1968). The attachment of some ixodid ticks to their natural hosts. 2nd Int. Congr. Acarology (in the Press).Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M., Kernaghan, R. J. & Wright, A. I. (1965). A method for the prevention of skin reactions in goats used for feeding tsetse flies, Glossina spp. A. trop. Med. Parasit. 59, 88–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, W. A. & Bainborough, A. R. (1963). Development in sheep of resistance of the ked Melophagus ovinus (L). III. Histopathology of sheep skin as a clue to the nature of resistance. Expl Parasit. 13, 118–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, E. R. & Noble, G. A. (1961). Parasitology: The Biology of Animal Parasites, pp. 1–767. London: Henry Limpton.Google Scholar
Nutting, W. B. (1968). Host specificity in parasitic acarines. Acarologia 10, 165–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Ogilvie, B. M. (1963). Nippostrongylus braziliensis (Travassos, 1914; Travassos & Darriba, 1929). A study of the life cycle and the immunological response of the host. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D. & Al-Hafidh, R. (1965). Ecological control of a parasite population by genetic evolution in the parasite-host system. A. ent. Soc. Am. 58, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, J. A. (1968 a). Acquisition by the host of resistance to the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). J. Parasit. 54, 657–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J. A. (1968 b). Resistance of cattle to the tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). II. Stages of the life-cycle of the parasite against which resistance is manifest. J. Parasit. 54, 667–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, M. & Ford, B. (1966). Hormones of the vertebrate host controlling ovarian regression and copulation of the rabbit flea. Nature, Lond. 211, 261–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, T. & Kilborne, F. L. (1893). Investigations into the nature, causation and prevention of Texas or Southern cattle fever. Bull. Bur. Anim. Ind. U.S. Dep. Agric. pp. 1–301.Google Scholar
Snowball, G. J. (1956). The effect of self-licking by cattle on infestations of cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). Aust. J. agric. Res. 7, 227–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprent, J. F. A. (1959). Parasitism, immunity and evolution. In The Evolution of Living Organisms, pp. 149–65. Ed. Leeper, G. W.. Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Tatchell, R. J. (1958). The physiology of digestion in the larvae of the horse bot-fly, Gasterophilus intestinalis (De Geer). Parasitology 48, 448–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatchell, R. J. (1967). A modified method for obtaining tick oral secretion. J. Parasit. 53, 1106–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatchell, R. J. & Moorhouse, D. E. (1968). The feeding processes of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) Part II. The sequence of host tissue changes. Parasitology, 58, 441–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trager, W. (1939). Acquired immunity to ticks. J. Parasit. 25, 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar