Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:52:18.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host specificity is linked to intraspecific variability in the genus Lamellodiscus (Monogenea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2008

T. KACI-CHAOUCH ,
O. VERNEAU  and
Y. DESDEVISES
T. KACI-CHAOUCH
Affiliation:
UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7628, Modèles en biologie cellulaire et évolutive, Laboratoire Arago, Avenue Fontaulé, BP44, F-66651 Banyuls-sur-Mer, France CNRS, UMR 7628, Modèles en biologie cellulaire et évolutive, Laboratoire Arago, Avenue Fontaulé, BP44, F-66651 Banyuls-sur-Mer, France
O. VERNEAU
Affiliation:
UMR 5244 CNRS-EPHE-UPVD, Biologie et Ecologie Tropicale et Méditerranéenne, Parasitologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Université Via Domitia, 52 Avenue Paul Alduy, F-66860 Perpignan Cedex, France
Y. DESDEVISES*
Affiliation:
UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7628, Modèles en biologie cellulaire et évolutive, Laboratoire Arago, Avenue Fontaulé, BP44, F-66651 Banyuls-sur-Mer, France CNRS, UMR 7628, Modèles en biologie cellulaire et évolutive, Laboratoire Arago, Avenue Fontaulé, BP44, F-66651 Banyuls-sur-Mer, France
*
*Corresponding author: UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7628, Modèles en biologie cellulaire et évolutive, Laboratoire Arago, Avenue Fontaulé, BP44, F-66651 Banyuls-sur-Mer, France. Tel: +33 4 68 88 73 13. Fax: +33 4 68 88 16 99. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We investigated whether host specificity is linked to variability within species of Lamellodiscus monogeneans, which are gill ectoparasites of the Sparidae. We sampled fish parasites in the northeastern part of the Mediterranean Sea: 4 specialist species, using 1 single host species, and 3 generalist species, using 2 distinct host species. Intraspecific variability was assessed from 2 different datasets. Morphometric variability of the attachment organ, called the haptor, was estimated first from measurements of several sclerified haptoral parts on 102 individuals. Genetic variability was calculated based on comparisons of sequences derived from the first internal transcribed spacer (ITS-1) of nuclear ribosomal DNA of 62 individuals. Morphometric variances in the specialist versus generalist species were compared via principal component analysis and F-tests, and uncorrected genetic distances (p-distances) were estimated within each species. We showed that the inter-individual variance of morphometric characters, as well as p-distances, are clearly greater within generalist species than specialist ones. These findings suggest that a relative increase in morphological and molecular variability enhances the possibility to colonize new host species in monogeneans, and supports the hypothesis that intraspecific variability could be a potential determinant of host specificity.

Keywords

MonogeneaLamellodiscusSparidaehost specificitymorphometryfirst internal transcribed spacer (ITS-1) of nuclear ribosomal DNA
Type
Original Articles
Information
Parasitology , Volume 135 , Issue 5 , May 2008 , pp. 607 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adamson, M. L. and Caira, J. N. (1994). Evolutionary factors influencing the nature of parasite specificity. Parasitology 109, S85–S95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almeida, F. B., Rodrigues-Silva, R., Neves, R. H., Romani, E. L. and Machado-Silva, J. R. (2007). Intraspecific variation of Echinococcus granulosus in livestock from Peru. Veterinary Parasitology 143, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amine, F. and Euzet, L. (2005). Deux espèces nouvelles du genre Lamellodiscus Johnston & Tiegs, 1922. (Monogenea: Diplectanidae) parasites de Sparidae (Teleostei) des côtes de l'Algérie. Systematic Parasitology 60, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentz, S., Sinnappah-Kang, N. D., Lim, L. H. S., Lebedev, B., Combes, C. and Verneau, O. (2006). Historical biogeography of amphibian parasites, genus Polystoma (Monogenea: Polystomatidae). Journal of Biogeography 33, 742–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, D. R. and McLennan, D. A. (1991). Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior. A Research Program in Comparative Biology. The University of Chicago Press, London.Google Scholar
Bush, A. O., Fernandez, J. C., Esch, G. W. and Seed, J. R. (2001). Parasitism: the Diversity and Ecology of Animal Parasites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Buchmann, K. (1999). Immune mechanisms in fish against monogeneans – a model. Folia Parasitologica 46, 1–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Buchmann, K. and Lindenstrøm, T. (2002). Interactions between monogenean parasites and their fish hosts. International Journal for Parasitology 32, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cable, J., Harris, P. D., Tinsley, R. C. and Lazarus, C. M. (1999). Phylogenetic analysis of Gyrodactylus spp. (Platyhelminthes: Monogenea) using ribosomal DNA sequences. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, 1439–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, A., Combes, C. and Euzet, L. (1997). What makes a fish a suitable host for Monogenea in the Mediterranean? Journal of Helminthology 71, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casgrain, P. and Legendre, P. (2000). The R Package for Multivariate and Spatial Analysis, Version 4.0 d3 – User's Manual. Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal. Freeware available at URL http://www.fas.umontreal.ca/BIOL/legendre/.Google Scholar
Dávidová, M., Jarkovskỳ, J., Matejusová, I. and Gelnar, M. (2005). Seasonal occurrence and metrical variability of Gyrodactylus rhodei Zitnan 1964 (Monogenea, Gyrodactylidae). Parasitology Research 95, 398–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De MeeÛs, T., Michalakis, Y. and Renaud, F. (1998). Santa Rosalia revisited: or why are there so many kinds of parasites in “The Garden of Earthly Delights”? Parasitology Today 14, 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desdevises, Y., Jovelin, R., Jousson, O. and Morand, S. (2000). Comparison of ribosomal DNA sequences of Lamellodiscus spp. (Monogenea, Diplectanidae) parasitising Pagellus (Sparidae, Teleostei) in the north Mediterranean sea: species divergence and coevolutionary interactions. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 741–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desdevises, Y., Morand, S. and Oliver, G. (2001). Linking specialization to diversification in the Diplectanidae Bychowsky 1957 (Monogenea, Platyhelminthes). Parasitology Research 87, 223–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desdevises, Y., Morand, S., Jousson, O. and Legendre, P. (2002 a). Coevolution between Lamellodiscus (Monogenea; Diplectanidae) and Sparidae (Teleostei): The study of a complex host-parasite system. Evolution 56, 2459–2471.Google Scholar
Desdevises, Y., Morand, S. and Legendre, P. (2002 b). Evolution and determinants of specificity in the genus Lamellodiscus (Monogenea). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 77, 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euzet, L. (1984). Diplectanidae (Monogenea) parasites de poissons des Iles Kerkennah (Tunisie). Archives de L'Instititut Pasteur de Tunis 61, 463–474.Google ScholarPubMed
Euzet, L. and Oliver, G. (1966). Diplectanidae (Monogenea) des Téléostéens de la Méditerranée occidentale. III. Quelques Lamellodiscus Jonhston et Tiegs, 1922, parasites de poissons du genre Diplodus (Sparidae). Annales de Parasitologie Comparée (Paris) 41, 573–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euzet, L. and Oliver, G. (1967). Diplectanidae (Monogenea) de Téléostéens de la Méditerranée occidentale. IV. Quelques Lamellodiscus Jonhston et Tiegs, 1922, parasites de poissons du genre Pagellus Cuvier, 1829 (Sparidae). Annales de Parasitologie Comparée (Paris) 42, 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geets, A., Appleby, C. and Ollevier, F. (1999). Host-dependent and seasonal variation in opisthaptoral hard parts of Gyrodactylus cf. arcuatus from three Pomatoschistus spp. and G. arcuatus from Gasterosteus aculeatus: a multivariate approach. Parasitology 119, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemmill, A. W., Vinet, M. E. and Read, A. F. (2000). The evolutionary ecology of host-specificity: experimental studies with Strongyloides ratti. Parasitology 120, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, D. M., Moritz, C. and Mable, B. K. (Ed.) (1996). Molecular Systematics, 2nd Edn.Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, USA.Google Scholar
Huyse, T. and Volckaert, F. A. M. (2002). Identification of a host-associated species complex using molecular and morphometric analyses, with the description of Gyrodactylus rugiensoides n. sp. (Gyrodactylidae, Monogenea). International Journal for Parasitology 32, 907–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyse, T. and Volckaert, F. A. M. (2005). Comparing host and parasite phylogenies: Gyrodactylus flatworms jumping from goby to goby. Systematic Biology 54, 710–718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarkovsky, J., Morand, S., Simková, A. and Gelnar, M. (2004). Reproductive barriers between congeneric monogenean parasites. (Dactylogyrus: Monogenea): attachment apparatus morphology or copulatory organ incompatibility? Parasitology Research 92, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. and Miyata, T. (2002). MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research 30, 3059–3066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katoh, K., Kuma, K., Toh, H. and Miyata, T. (2005). MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Research 33, 511–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearn, G. C. (1971). The physiology and behaviour of the monogene skin parasite Entobdella soleae in relation to its host (Solea solea). In Ecology and Physiology of Parasites (ed. Fallis, A. M.), pp. 161–187. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klassen, G. J. and Beverley-Burton, M. (1987). Phylogenetic relationships of Ligictaluridus spp. (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) and their ictalurid (Siluriformes) hosts: an hypothesis. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 54, 84–90.Google Scholar
Klassen, G. J. and Beverley-Burton, M. (1988). North American fresh water Ancyrocephalids (Monogenea) with articulating haptoral bars: host-parasite coevolution. Systematic Zoology 37, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuchta, R., Vlcková, R., Poddubnaya, L. G., Gustinelli, A., Dzika, E. and Scholz, T. (2007). Invalidity of three Palaearctic species of Triaenophorus tapeworms (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea): evidence from morphometric analysis of scolex hooks. Folia Parasitologica (Praha) 54, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lymbery, A. J. (1989). Host specificity, host range and host preference. Parasitology Today 5, 298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mariniello, L., Ortis, M., D'Amelio, S. and Petrarca, V. (2004). Morphometric variability between and within species of Ligophorus Euzet & Suriano, 1977 (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalidae) in the Mediterranean Sea. Systematic Parasitology 57, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mladineo, I. and Maršić-Lučić, J. (2007). Host switch of Lamellodiscus elegans (Monogenea: Monopisthocotylea) and Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Monogenea: Polyopisthocotylea) between cage-reared sparids. Veterinary Communications Research 31, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mo, T. A. (1991 a). Variations of opisthohaptoral hard parts of Gyrodactylus salaris Malmberg, 1957 (Monogenea: Gyrodactylidae) on rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792) in a fish farm, with comments on the spreading of the parasite in South-eastern Norway. Systematic Parasitology 20, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mo, T. A. (1991 b). Variations of opisthohaptoral hard parts of Gyrodactylus salaris Malmberg, 1957 (Monogenea: Gyrodactylidae) on parr of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. in laboratory experiments. Systematic Parasitology 20, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morand, S., Page, R. D. M., Hafner, M. S. and Reed, D. L. (2000). Comparative evidence of host-parasite coadaptation: body-size relationships in Pocket Gophers and their Chewing Lice. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 70, 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morand, S., Simková, A., Matejusova, I., Plaisance, L., Verneau, O. and Desdevises, Y. (2002). Investigating patterns may reveal processes: evolutionary ecology of ectoparasitic monogeneans. International Journal for Parasitology 32, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neifar, L., Euzet, L. and Oliver, G. (2004). Lamellodiscus (Monogenea, Diplectanidae) nouveaux parasites branchiaux des poissons marins du genre Pagrus (Teleostei, Sparidae). Zoosystema 26, 365–376.Google Scholar
Oliver, G. (1968). Recherches sur les Diplectanidae (Monogenea) parasites de Téléostéens du Golfe du Lion. II. Lamellodiscinae nov. sub. fam. Vie Milieu 19, 95–138.Google Scholar
Oliver, G. (1973). Lamellodiscus obeliae n. sp. une nouvelle espèce de Diplectanidae (Monogenea, Monopisthocotylea) parasite de Pagellus centrodontus (Delaroche, 1809) (Pisces, Sparidae). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 41, 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, G. (1974). Nouveaux aspects du parasitisme des Diplectanidae Bychowsky, 1957 (Monogenea, Monopisthocotylea) chez les Téléostéens Perciformes des côtes de France. Compte-Rendus Académie des Sciences de Paris 279, 803–805.Google Scholar
Oliver, G. (1987). Les Diplectanidae Bychowsky, 1957 (Monogenea, Monopisthocotylea, Dactylogyridea). Systématique. Biologie. Ontogénie. Écologie. Essai de phylogénèse. Thèse d'état. Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc.Google Scholar
Poulin, R. (2007). Evolutionary Ecology of Parasites, 2nd Edn.Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. (1979). A critical evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic factors responsible for niche restriction in parasites. The American Naturalist 114, 648–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. (1989). Simple ecological systems, simple solutions to complex problems? Evolutionary Theory 8, 305–350.Google Scholar
Rohde, K. (1994). Niche restriction in parasites: proximate and ultimate causes. Parasitology 109, S69–S84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohde, K. and Hobbs, R. P. (1986). Species segregation: competition or reinforcement of reproductive barriers? In Parasite's Lives: Papers on Parasites, their Hosts and their Associations to in Honour of J.F.A. Sprent (ed. Cremin, M., Dobson, C. and Noorhouse, E.), pp. 189–199. University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, Australia.Google Scholar
Rubtsova, N. Y., Balbuena, J. A., Sarabeev, V. L., Blasco-Costa, I. and Euzet, L. (2006). Description and morphometrical variability of a new species of Ligophorus and of Ligophorus chabaudi (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) on Mugil cephalus (Teleostei) from the Mediterranean basin. Journal of Parasitology 92, 486–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sasal, P., Desdevises, Y. and Morand, S. (1998). Host-specialization and species diversity in fish parasites: phylogenetic conservatism? Ecography 21, 639–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasal, P., Trouvé, S., Müller-Graf, C. and Morand, S. (1999). Specificity and host predictability: a comparative analysis among monogenean parasites of fish. Journal of Animal Ecology 68, 437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinn, A. P., Gibson, D. I. and Sommerville, C. (2001). Morphometric discrimination of Gyrodactylus salaris Malmberg (Monogenea) from species of Gyrodactylus parasitising British salmonids using novel parameters Journal of Fish Diseases 24, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simková, A., Desdevises, Y., Gelnar, M. and Morand, S. (2001 a). Morphometric correlates of host specificity in Dactylogyrus species (Monogenea) parasites of European Cyprinid fish. Parasitology 123, 169–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simková, A., Gelnar, M. and Sasal, P. (2001 b). Aggregation of congeneric parasites (Monogenea: Dactylogyrus) among gill microhabitats within one host species (Rutilus rutilus L.). Parasitology 123, 599–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simková, A., Morand, S., Jobet, E., Gelnar, M. and Verneau, O. (2004). Molecular phylogeny of congeneric monogenean parasites (Dactylogyrus): a case of intrahost speciation. Evolution 58, 1001–1018.Google ScholarPubMed
Simková, A., Verneau, O., Gelnar, M. and Morand, S. (2006). Specificity and specialization of congeneric monogeneans parasitizing cyprinid fish. Evolution 60, 1023–1037.Google ScholarPubMed
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry – The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd Edn.W. H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. (2003). PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4d10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Timms, R. and Read, A. F. (1999). What makes a specialist special? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14, 333–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verneau, O., Renaud, F. and Catzeflis, F. (1997). Evolutionary relationships of sibling tapeworm species (Cestoda) parasitizing teleost fishes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14, 630–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilas, R., Criscione, C. D. and Blouin, M. S. (2005). A comparison between mitochondrial DNA and the ribosomal internal transcribed regions in prospecting for cryptic species of platyhelminth parasites. Parasitology 131, 839–846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zietara, M. S. and Lumme, J. (2002). Speciation by host switch and adaptive radiation in a fish parasite genus Gyrodactylus (Monogenea, Gyrodactylidae). Evolution 56, 2445–2458.Google Scholar