Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:35:18.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host specificity in Schistocephalus solidus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Trond Bråten
Trond Bråten*
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, Glasgow University, Scotland
*
*On leave from Zoological Laboratory, University of Oslo, Norway.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Investigations on the host specificity of plerocercoids of Schistocephalus solidus were carried out using the technique of surgically transferring plerocercoids from the body cavity of Gasterosteus aculeatus to various other fish. Plerocercoids survived in all cases when transferred from G. aculeatus to other G. aculeatus; when tranferred to Pungitius pungitius the worms survived for long periods but failed to grow. Plerocercoids transferred to Coitus gobio, Nemacheilus barbatula, Phoxinus phoxinus, Salmo trutta, Coregonus clupeoides, Perca fluviatilis, Rutilus rutilus and Esox lucius always died within 2–10 days after being transferred. Electron-microscopic examinations of the tegument of plerocercoids transferred to new hosts showed: in G. aculeatus normal appearance throughout the experiment; in P. pungitius degeneration of the microtrichs after 6 days; and in S. trutta complete destruction of the tegument in 7 days.

Plerocercoids of the genus Diphyllobothrium survived the transfer from Gasterosteus aculeatus to Salmo trutta and continued to grow in their new host.

Infection of fish with S. solidus by feeding infected copepods and by aspetic injection of procercoids into the body cavity of the fish were also tried. Gasterosteus aculeatus became infected using both these methods but it was not possible to infect Pungitius pungitius.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , November 1966 , pp. 657 - 664
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bisset, K. A. (1948). Natural antibodies in the blood serum of freshwater fish. J. Hyg, Camb. 46, 267–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, J. E. (1957). Principles of Immunology. London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Dubinina, M. N. (1957). [The question of specificity in the family Diphyllobothriidae Lühe, 1910] Trudy¯ leningr. Obshch. Estest. 73, 181–87. [In Russian: German summary.]Google Scholar
Dubinina, M. N. (1959). [On the natural system of classification of the genus Schistocephalus Creplin (Cestoda, Ligulidae).] Zool. Zh. 38, 1498–17. [In Russian: English summary.]Google Scholar
McCaig, M. L. O. & Hopkins, C. A. (1965). Studies on Schistocephalus solidus. 3. The in vitro cultivation of the plerocercoid. Parasitology 55, 257–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, J. F. (1959). The laboratory propagation of Spirometra mansonoides (Mueller, 1935) as an experimental tool. II. Culture and infection of the copepod host, and harvesting the procercoid. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 78, 245–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar