Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:32:09.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A histological description of the uterine bell of Polymorphus minutus (Acanthocephala)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. J. Whitfield
P. J. Whitfield
Affiliation:
The Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The cellular and syncytial components of the mature uterine bell of the palaeacanthocephalan, Polymorphus minutus are described, and compared with previous accounts of the histology of uterine bells. Each uterine bell always contains 17 separately distinguishable nuclei. This situation provides a good illustration of the phenomenon of organ eutely, common in Acanthocephala. The luminal spaces of the bell are described and their relevance to the translocation of eggs discussed.

I should like to thank Dr D. W. T. Crompton for his help and encouragement during the course of this work and Dr P. Tate for the provision of facilities. The work was carried out during the tenure of an S.R.C. Research Studentship.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , August 1968 , pp. 671 - 682
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cason, J. E. (1950). A rapid one-step Mallory-Heidenhain stain for connective tissue. Stain Technol. 25, 225–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crompton, D. W. T. & Whitfield, P. J. (1968). The course of infection and egg production of Polymorphus minutus in domestic ducks. Parasitology 58, 231–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodey, J. B. (1957). Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. Tech. Bull. Min. Agric., Fish. Fd, no. 2. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1951). The Invertebrates, vol. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. & Deland, E. W. (1929). Australian Acanthocephala, no. 2. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 53, 146–66.Google Scholar
Kaiser, J. E. (1893). Die Acanthocephalen und ihre Entwicklung. Biblthca zool. II. Heft 7.Google Scholar
Kaiser, J. E. (1913). Die Acanthocephalen und ihre Entwicklung. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Histologie, Ontogenie und Biologie einiger einheimischen Echinorhynchen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Knüpffer, P. (1888). Beitrag zur Anatomie des Ausführungsganges der weiblichen Geschlechtsprodukte einiger Acanthocephalen. Zap. imp. Akad. Nauk (7), 36, no. 12.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. (1931). Das urogenitale Organ von Oligacanthorhynchus taenoides (Diesing), einneuer Nephridialtypus bei den Acanthocephalen. Z. wiss. Zool. 138, 87–98.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. (1933). Acanthocephalen. Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, Bd. 4, Abt. 2, Buch 2.Google Scholar
Mullinger, A. M. (1964). The fine structure of ampullary electric receptors in Amiurus. Proc. R. Soc. B 160, 345–59.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Cleave, H. J. (1914). Studies in cell constancy in the genus Eorhynchus. J. Morph. 25, 253–98.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1939). Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Pt. 29. Acanthocephala, II. Jap. J. Zool. 13, 317–51.Google Scholar