Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:37:13.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic control of liability to infection with Nematospiroides dubius in mice: direct and correlated responses to selection of mice for faecal parasite egg count

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. J. Brindley  and
C. Dobson
P. J. Brindley
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Queensland, St Lucia 4067, Australia
C. Dobson
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Queensland, St Lucia 4067, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mice selected as liable (L) and refractory (R) over 10 generations voided significantly more and less Nematospiroides dubius eggs compared with randomly mated (Rd) mice after primary infection with 100 larvae. Strong positive correlation was found between the numbers of N. dubius eggs in mouse faeces and the numbers of adult N. dubius recovered from mice culled from the R, Rd and L colonies. Selection limit based on a faecal e.p.g. was reached in the L mice after 9 generations whereas the faecal N. dubius e.p.g. voided by the R mice continued to decline throughout selection. In contrast, no change in worm numbers was found in L or R mice after 6 generations. The refractory state of the trait, liability to infection with N. dubius, was inherited as a dominant character with a realized heritability value of ~ 0∣2. Differential correlated responses from N. dubius infectivity compared with N. dubius fecundity and growth indicated murine genetic control of this trait by 2 major genetic units. In general, there were negative phenotypic and genetic correlations between the faecal N. dubius e.p.g. of mice and murine morphological conformation, but positive correlations between the faecal N. dubius e.p.g. of selected mice and establishment, growth and fecundity of N. dubius populations in these mice. There was little correlation between the faecal N. dubius e.p.g. after primary infection and anti-N. dubius antibody titres and parasite female/male sex-ratio.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 87 , Issue 1 , August 1983 , pp. 113 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackert, J. E. (1942). Natural resistance to helmintic infections. Journal of Parasitology 28, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albers, G. A. A. (1981). Genetic resistance to experimental Cooperia oncophora infections in calves. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool 81–1, 1–118.Google Scholar
Becker, W. A. (1967). Manual of Procedures in Quantitative Genetics. Washington: Washington State University Press.Google Scholar
Biozzi, G., Mouton, D., Sant'Anna, O. A., Passos, H. C., Gennari, M., Reis, M. H., Ferreira, V. C. A., Heumann, A. M., Bouthillier, Y., Ibanez, O. M., Stiffel, C. & Siqueira, M. (1979). Genetics of immunoresponsiveness to natural antigens in the mouse. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 85, 33–98.Google ScholarPubMed
Brindley, P. J. & Dobson, C. (1981). Genetic control of liability to infection with Nemato-spiroides dubius in mice: selection of refractory and liable populations of mice. Parasitology 83, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brindley, P. J. & Dobson, C. (1982 a). Nematospiroides dubius in mice selected for liability to infection: modification of parasite biology through host selection. International Journal for Parasitology 12, 573–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, P. J. & Dobson, C. (1982 b). Multiple infections with Nematospiroides dubius in mice selected for liability to a single infection. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Research 60, 319–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cypess, R. H., Lucia, H. L., Zidian, J. L. & Rivera-Ortiz, C. I. (1977). Heligmosomoides polygyrus: temporal, spatial and morphological population characteristics in LAF1/J mice. Experimental Parasitology 42, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, P. R. (1974). Genetics of Host-Parasite Interaction. 1, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Dineen, J. K. & Windon, R. G. (1980). The effect of sire selection on the response of lambs with irradiated Trichostrongylus colubriformis larvae. International Journal for Parasitology 10, 189–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, C. (1982). Passive transfer of immunity with serum in mice infected with Nematospiroides dubius: Influence of quality and quantity of immune serum. International Journal for Parasitology 12, 207–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, C. & Owen, M. E. (1977). Influence of serial passage on the infectivity and immuno-genicity of Nematospiroides dubius in mice. International Journal for Parasitology 7, 463–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1955). Patterns of response in selection experiments with mice. Cold Spring Harbour Symposium of Quantitative Biology 10, 178–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, W. A. (1965). Selection for weaning weight in Merino sheep 2. Correlated responses in other production characters. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 5, 361–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riffkin, G. G. & Dobson, C. (1979). Predicting resistance of sheep to Haemortchus contortus infections. Veterinary Parasitology 5, 365–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robards, G. E. & Pattie, W. A. (1967). Selection for crimp frequency in the wool of Merino sheep 1. Direct response to selection. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 7, 552–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, T. W. W., Le Jambre, L. F., Adams, D. B. & Love, P. J. (1978). Trichostrongylus colubriformis infection in guinea-pigs: genetic basis for variation in susceptibility to infection among outbred animals. Parasitology 76, 201–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sitepu, P. & Dobson, C. (1982). Genetic control of resistance to infection with Nematospiroides dubius in mice: selection of high-and low-immune response populations of mice. Parasitology 85, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sucharit, S. & MacDonald, W. W. (1973). Brugia pahangi in small laboratory animals: attempts to increase susceptibility of white rats to Brugia pahangi by host selection. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 4, 71–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. (1975). Genetic control of immune responses to parasites: selection for responsiveness and non-responsiveness to Trichuris muris in random-bred mice. Parasitology 71, 377–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, B. L., Berry, R. O., Turk, R. D. & Morgan, C. O. (1949). Selection of sheep and goats for resistance to stomach worms, Haemonchus contortus. Journal of Animal Science 8, 609–10.Google Scholar