Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:34:04.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Genera and Species of Mallophaga

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Launcelot Harrison
Affiliation:
(From the Quick Laboratory, University of Cambridge.)

Extract

Since Professor Kellogg has published a list of Mallophaga, in Wytsman's Genera Insectorum, so recently as 1908, my reasons for preparing the present publication require an explanation. This explanation involves some criticism of Kellogg's list, but my main reasons are concerned rather with the plan of this list than with the few errors and omissions that I indicate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagnall, and Hall, (1912). Records of some Bird-lice. Journ. Econ. Biol. vii. pp. 59.Google Scholar
Barthélemy, (1836). Description du Ricin de l'Houbara. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, Ser. i. Tom. v. pp. 689690, PL xx, f. B.Google Scholar
Berlese, (1896). Materiali per un catalogo dei Mallofagi e Pediculini Italiani. Soc. Ent. Ital. Bull. xxvi. pp. 5165 and pp. 232244.Google Scholar
Bezzi, (1890). Note sopra alcuni insetti epizoi. Soc. Ent. Ital. Bull. xxii. pp. 3037.Google Scholar
Bezzi, (1893). Rev. Ital. Sci. Nat. xiii. pp. 7377 etc.Google Scholar
Boisduval, and Lacordaire, (1835). Faune Entomohgique des Environs de Paris, Paris, pp. 117125.Google Scholar
Bullen, . See Le Souëf and Bullen.Google Scholar
Burmeister, (1838). Handbuch der Entomologie, Berlin, Bd ii. pp. 418433.Google Scholar
Carriker, (1902). Some new Mallophaga from Nebraska birds. Journ. N. Y. Ent. Soc. x. pp. 216229, PL. XX.–XXII.Google Scholar
Carriker, (1903). Mallophaga from birds of Costa Rica, Central America. Univ. Nebraska Stud. iii. pp. 123197.Google Scholar
Carriker, and Shull, (1910). Some new species of Mallophaga from Michigan. Ent. News, xxi. pp. 5157.Google Scholar
Carriker, . See also Shull and Carriker.Google Scholar
Chapman, (1897). Two new species of Trichodectes. Ent. News, viii. pp. 185187.Google Scholar
Chapman, See also Kellogg and Chapman.Google Scholar
Children, (1836). Appendix to Back's Arctic Land Expedition. Articulata, pp. 532–542.Google Scholar
Coinde, (1859). Notes pour servir à 1'histoire des Epizoiques. Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. de Moscou, xxxii. No. 3, pp. 418427.Google Scholar
Cummings, (1913). On some nondescript Anoplura and Mallophaga. Bull. Ent. Research, iv. pp. 3545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, (1914). Descriptions of five new species of Anoplura and Mallophaga. Bull. Ent. Research, v. pp. 155177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, (1916). New Species of Lice. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. xvii. pp. 90107.Google Scholar
Degeer, (1778). Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire des Insectes, Stockholm, vii. Des Ricins, pp. 6982.Google Scholar
De Haan, . See Lyonet.Google Scholar
Denny, (1841). In Jardine. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. vi. p. 327.Google Scholar
Denny, (1842). Monographia Anoplurorum Britanniae, London.Google Scholar
Denny, (1852). List of specimens of British animals in the collection of the British Museum, London, Pt xi. Anoplura, or Parasitic Insects. 51 pp.Google Scholar
Dufour, (1834). Description et iconographie de trois espéces du genre Philopterus. Ann. Soc. Ent. France, iv. pp. 669680, PI. XXI.Google Scholar
Dugés, (1902). Trichodectes geomydis Osborn, var. expansus. Mem. Soc. Ant. Alzate Mexico, xviii. pp. 185187.Google Scholar
Durrant, (1906). Descriptions of new Mallophaga. Ohio Nat. vi. pp. 528530.Google Scholar
Durrant, (1906). Descriptions of new Mallophaga, II. Ohio Nat. vii. pp. 3537.Google Scholar
Durrant, (1908). Descriptions of new Mallophaga, III. Ohio Nat. viii. pp. 355358.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, (1828). Symbolae Physicae, Berlin. Mammalia. Art. Hyrax. (Reprinted in Gistel'sFaunus, Vol. ii.)Google Scholar
Enderlein, (1903). Die Landarthropoden der von der Tiepel-Expedition besuchten antarktischen Inseln. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der deulschen Tiefsee-Expedition, “Valdivia,” Jena, Bd 3, pp. 236238.Google Scholar
Enderlein, (1909). Mallophaga in Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903, X. Band. Zoologie, ii. Band, pp. 442457.Google Scholar
Enderlein, (1909). Anopluren und Mallophagen; in Schultze, Forsckungsreise in Südafrika, II. Jenais. Denkschr. xiv. pp. 7982.Google Scholar
Evans, (1912). Note on Mallophaga from the little auk etc. Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin. xviii. pp. 265276.Google Scholar
Evans, (1912). Mallophaga from the ptarmigan. Scottish Nat. 1912, p. 280.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1775). Systema Entomologiae, Flensburg, pp. 804810.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1776). Genera Insectorum, Chilonii, pp. 309310.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1781). Species Insectorum, Hamburg, pp. 476484.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1787). Mantissa Insectorum, Hafniae, pp. 368–371.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (17921794). Entomologia systematica etc., Hafniae, iv. pp. 417425.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1798). Ditto. Supplementum, pp. 570–571.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1805). Systema Antliatorum, Brunsviga, pp. 340–350.Google Scholar
Fabricius, O. (1780). Fauna Groenlandica, Copenhagen and Leipzic, pp. 215220.Google Scholar
Ferris, . See Kellogg and Ferris.Google Scholar
Fourcroy, (1785). Entomologia Parisiensis, Paris, pp. 517522.Google Scholar
Fournel, (1840). Faune de la Moselle, Metz. Vol. ii. Anoploures, pp. 165176.Google Scholar
Frisch, (1720). Beschreibung von allerley Insecten in Teutsh-land, Berlin.Google Scholar
Gay, (1849). Historia fisica y politica de Chile, Paris, 18441854. Vol. iv. pp. 100104. Descriptions by Gervais, P..Google Scholar
Gay, (1878). Lettura d' introduzione al corso di Zoologia. Il Medico Veterinario, xxv. p. 494.Google Scholar
Geoffroy, (1762). Histoire abrégée des Insectes, Paris, Tome ii. 2nd part, pp. 595605.Google Scholar
Gervais, (1847). In Walckenaer's Histoire Naturelle des Insectes, Paris. Vol. iii. Aptères, par Gervais, P., Ricins, pp. 307361.Google Scholar
Gervais, See also under Gay.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1861). Die Federlingen der Raubvogeln. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xvii. pp. 515529.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1861). Die Haarlinge der Gattungen Trichodectes v. Gyropus. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xviii. pp. 8193, 2 Taf.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1861). Epizoen nach den Wohnthiere geordnet. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xviii. pp. 289319.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1867). Die im Zoologischen Museum der Universität Halle aufgestellten Epizoen, nebst Beobachtungen über dieselben. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xxviii. pp. 353397.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1867). Description of Lipeurus ferox. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xxix. p. 195.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1867). Die Federlinge des Auerhahnes. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xxix. pp. 426430.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1871). Analytische Uebersicht der Säugethierläuse Haematopinus v. Trichodectes. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat., xxxvii. pp. 173179.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1874). Insecta Epizoa, Leipsic.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1876). Neue Federlinge. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xlvii. pp. 247251.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1876). Descriptions of Nirmus sulphureus and Menopon caudatum. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xlvii. pp. 528529.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1876). Diagnoses of some species of Mallophaga collected by the Rev. A. E. Eaton etc. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. xvii. pp. 388389.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1877). Descriptions of Goniodes pallidas and Nirmus brunneipictus. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xlix. pp. 529530.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1878). Mallophaga. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 1878. Extra Vol. pp. 250257.Google Scholar
Giebel, (1879). Philopteren oder Federlinge. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. lii. pp. 474475.Google Scholar
Giglioli, (1864). On some parasitical insects from China. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci. iv. pp. 1826.Google Scholar
Gmelin, (1788). French edition of the Systema Naturae of Linnaeus, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Grosse, (1885). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Mallophagen. Zeit. f. wiss. Zool. xlii. p. 530.Google Scholar
Grube, (1851). Parasiten. Middendorff's Sibirische Reise, Bd ii. Th. I. pp. 467497, St Petersburg.Google Scholar
Guérin, (18181825). Planches. Bonaterre's Encyclopétlie Methodique, Paris, Pl. 254.Google Scholar
Guérin, See also Percheron.Google Scholar
Gurlt, (1842). Über die auf Haussäugethieren und auf Hausvögeln lebenden Schmarotzerinsekten. Mag. f. d. ges. Thierheilkunde, viii. pp. 409433Google Scholar
Gurlt, (1842). Über die auf Haussäugethieren und auf Hausvögeln lebenden Schmarotzerinsekten. Mag. f. d. ges. Thierheilkunde ix. pp. 110.Google Scholar
Gurlt, (1857). Verzeichniss der Thiere auf welchen Schmarotzerinsekten leben. Arch. f. Naturgesch. xxiii. pp. 276311.Google Scholar
Gurlt, (1878). Neues Verzeichniss der Thiere auf welchen Schmarotzerinsekten leben. Arch. f. Naturgesch. xliv. pp. 162210.Google Scholar
Harrison, (1911). Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. Wales, Notes and Exhibits, pp. 633634.Google Scholar
Harrison, (1915). On a new family and five new genera of Mallophaga. Parasitology, vii. pp. 383407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, (1915). Mallophaga from Apteryx etc. Parasitology, viii. pp. 88100.Google Scholar
Harrison, (1915). The respiratory system of Mallophaga. Parasitology, viii. pp. 101127.Google Scholar
Harrison, (1916). The genera and species of Mallophaga. Parasitology, ix. pp. 1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, See also Johnston and Harrison.Google Scholar
Harrison, and Johnston, (1915). Mallophaga from Marsupials, I. Parasitology, viii. pp. 338359.Google Scholar
Hentzsch, (1804). Epitome Entomologiae Systematicae, Leipzic, pp. 216217.Google Scholar
Hermann, (1804). Mémoire Aptérologique, Paris.Google Scholar
Jardine, . See Denny (1841).Google Scholar
Johnston, and Harrison, (1911). Notes on some Mallophagan generic names. Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. Wales, xxxvi. pp. 321328.Google Scholar
Johnston, and Harrison, (1912). A census of Australian Mallophaga. Proc. Roy. Soc. Queensland, xxiv. pp. 115.Google Scholar
Johnston, and Harrison, (1912). A list of Mallophaga found on introduced and domesticated animals in Australia. Proc. Boy. Soc. Queensland, xxiv. pp. 1722.Google Scholar
Johnston, and Harrison, (1912). A collection of Mallophaga from the Kermadees. Trans. N. Zeal. Inst. xliv. pp. 363373.Google Scholar
Johnston, . See also Harrison and Johnston.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1896). New Mallophaga, I. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. vi. pp. 31168.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1896). New Mallophaga, II. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. vi. pp. 431548.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1899). Mallophaga from birds of Panama, Baja California, and Alaska. (In New Mallophaga, III.) Occ. Papers Calif. Acad. Sci. vi. pp. 152.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1899). A list of the Biting-lice (Mallophaga) taken from birds and mammals of North America. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. xxii. pp. 39100.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1903). Two new genera of Mallophaga. Biol. Bull. v. pp. 8591.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1906). Mallophaga from Argentina. Journ. N. Y. Ent. Soc. xiv. pp. 4549, PI. II.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1906). A gigantic new biting bird-louse. Ent. News, pp. 6263.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1906). A second collection of Mallophaga from birds of Galapagos etc. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. xxxii. pp. 315324.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1907). The Mallophagan parasites of the Kea. Psyche, 1907, pp. 122123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, (1908). Mallophaga, in Wytsman's Genera Insectorum, Brussels.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1910). Mallophagan parasites from the California condor. Science, xxxi. pp. 3334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, (1910). Mallophaga from the hoatzin. Zoologica, i. pp. 117121.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1910). Mallophaga. Wiss. Ergebn. schwed. tool. Exp. Kilimandjaro, Bd iii. Abt. 15, pp. 4356.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1913). The Docophori of owls. Science, xxxvii. pp. 154155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, (1914). Mallophaga from birds of the South Atlantic. Mus. Brooklyn Inst. Arts and Sci. Science Bull. ii. No. 4, pp. 8089.Google Scholar
Kellogg, (1914). Ectoparasites of Mammals. American Nat. xlviii. 1914, pp. 257279.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Chapman, (1899). Mallophaga from birds of California. (In New-Mallophaga, III.) Occ. Papers Calif. Acad. Sci. vi. pp. 53142.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Chapman, (1902). Mallophaga from birds of the Pacific Coast of North America. Journ. N. Y. Ent. Soc, x. pp. 2028.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Chapman, (1902). Mallophaga from birds of the Hawaiian Islands. Journ. N. Y. Ent. Soc. x. pp. 155170. (Reprinted in the Fauna Hawaiiemis, III. pp. 305–321.)Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Ferris, (1915). Anoplura and Mallophaga from Zululand. Annals Durban Museum, i. pp. 147158.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Ferris, (1915). The Anoplura and Mallophaga of North American Mammals. Leland Stanford Junior University Publications. 74 pp.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Kuwana, (1900). Mallophaga from Alaskan birds. Proc. Acad., Nat. Sci. Phila. 1900, pp. 151159.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Kuwana, (1902). Mallophaga from birds. (Papers from the Hopkins Stanford Galapagos expedition, No. 10.) Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci. iv. pp. 457491.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Mann, (1912). A third collection of Mallophaga from Alaskan birds. Ent. News, xxiii. pp. 1217.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Mann, (1912). Mallophaga from islands off Lower California. Ent. News, xxiii. pp. 5565.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Nakayama, (1914). Mallophaga of the Vizcacha. Ent. News, xxv. pp. 193201.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Nakayama, (1914). A new Trichodectes from Baja California. Psyche, xxi. pp. 9092.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Nakayama, (1915). A new Trichodectes from the goat. Psyche, xxii. pp. 3335.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Paine, (1910). Mallophaga from the birds of Laysan Island. Ent. News, xxi. pp. 124125.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Paine, (1910). Mallophaga from birds and mammals. Ent. News, xxi. pp. 459463.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Paine, (1911). Anoplura and Mallophaga from African hosts. Bull. Ent. Res. ii. pp. 145152.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Paine, (1911). Mallophaga from Bolivian birds. Ent. News, xxii. pp. 1924.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Paine, (1911). Mallophaga from Californian birds. Ent. News, xxii. pp. 7579.Google Scholar
Kellogg, and Paine, (1914). Mallophaga of birds (mostly Corvidae and Phasianidae) of India. Rec. Indian Mus. x. pp. 217243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolenati, (1846). Meletemata entomologica. Fasc. v. Petropoli Anoplura, pp. 128140.Google Scholar
Kolenati, (1858). Zwei neue österreichische Philopteriden. Sitz. d. Math.-nat. Cl. Kaiserl. Acad. Wiss. Wiss, xxix. pp. 247249.Google Scholar
Kuwana, . See Kellogg and Kuwana.Google Scholar
Lacordaire, . See Boisduval and Lacordaire.Google Scholar
Latreille, (1803). Buffon's Histoire Naturelle, Tom. 86. Hist. Nat. des Crustacéset des Insectes, viii. pp. 100112.Google Scholar
Leidy, (1878). A louse of the pelican. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 1878, p. 100.Google Scholar
Le Souëf, (1902). Descriptions of some new Mallophaga from marsupials. Victorian-Naturalist, xix. pp. 5051.Google Scholar
Le Souëf, (1902). Descriptions of some new species of Mallophaga from Australian birds. Vict. Nat. xix. pp. 9091.Google Scholar
Le Souëf, and Bullen, (1902). Descriptions of some Mallophaga from Australian birds. Vict. Nat. xviii. pp. 155158.Google Scholar
Le Souëf, (1902). Description of a Mallophagous parasite from the Kangaroo. Vict. Nat. xviii. p. 159.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, (1746). Fauna Suecica.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, (1758). Systema Naturae, 10th Edition.Google Scholar
Lucas, (1849). Histoire Naturelle des Animaux Articulés d'Algérie.Google Scholar
Lyonet, (1829). Anatomie de différentes espèces d'insectes. Posthumous work edited by De Haan, . Mém. du Mus. xviii. pp. 262274.Google Scholar
Macalister, (1869). Note on Gyropus dicotylis, a new species of Parasite. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1869, pp. 420423.Google Scholar
McGregor, (1912). A new Mallophagan. Ent. News, xxiii. pp. 305306.Google Scholar
Macqueen, . See Neumann (1905).Google Scholar
Maitland, (1854). Parasitica in Bouwstoffen voor eene Fauna van Nederland, T. ii.Google Scholar
Mann, . See Kellogg and Mann; Paine and Mann.Google Scholar
Mégnin, (1884). Le Trichodectes lipeuroides n.sp. Le Naturaliste, No. 62, pp. 494495.Google Scholar
Meinert, (1880). Les Parasites et les Maladies Parasitaires, Paris. Famille des Ricinés, pp. 7996.Google Scholar
Mjöberg, (1910). Mallophagen von Vögeln aus Ägypten und dem Sudan. Results Swed. Zool. Exp. Egypt and White Nile, No. 12a, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Mjöberg, (1910). Studien über Mallophagen und Anopluren. Arkiv f. Zool. vi. pp. 1296.Google Scholar
Morse, (1903). Synopses of North American Invertebrates, XIX. The Trichodectidae. Amer. Nat. xxxvii. pp. 609624.Google Scholar
Müller, (1776). Zootogiae Danicae Prodromus, Havniae, pp. 184185.Google Scholar
Nakayama, See Kellogg and Nakayama.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1890). Contribution à 1'étude des Ricinidae parasites de la famille des Psittacidae. Bull. Soc. Toulouse, xxiv. p. 55.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1890). Sur un pseudo-parasite du cheval. Rev. Vétérinaire, 1890, pp. 7881.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1891). Notes sur quelques Ricinidae d'origine exotique. Bull. Soc. Toulouse, xxv. p. 83.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1902). Deux nouvelles Pédiculines. Arch. Parasit. v. pp. 600601.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1903). Deux nouvelles Pédiculines. (Note rectificative.) Arch. Parasit. vi. p. 144.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1905). Parasites and Parasitic Diseases of Domesticated Animals. 2nd English Edition, ed. Macqueen, London.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1906). Notes sur les Mallophages. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, xx. pp. 5460.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1907). Pédiculidés, Mallophages, Ixodidés, in Charcot's Expédition Antarctique Française, pp. 1317.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1909). Parasites et Maladies parasitaires des Oiseaux domestiques, Paris.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1911). Mallophages. British Antarctic Expedition, 1907–1909. Reports on Scientific Investigations, Vol. ii. pt 3, pp. 1922.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1912). Notes sur les Mallophages, II. Arch. d. Parasitologie, xv. pp. 363384.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1912). Sur le genre Laemobothrion Nitzsch. Bull. Mus. d'Hist. nat. No. 5.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1912). Sur le genre Gyropus Nitzsch. Bull. Soc. Zool. de France, xxxvii. pp. 212228.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1913). Mallophaga. Deuxième Expédition Antarctique Française, pp. 187196.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1913). Notes sur les Mallophages, III. Arch. d. Parasitologie, xv. pp. 608634.Google Scholar
Neumann, (1914). Sur trois espèces de Degeeriella. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, xxxix. pp. 144148.Google Scholar
Neveu-Lemaire, (1912). Parasitologic des Animaux Domestiques, Paris. Les Apt`res, pp. 10951120.Google Scholar
Nitzsch, (1806). Voigt's Magaz. f. d. Naturk. p. 420.Google Scholar
Nitzsch, (1818). Die Familien und Gattungen der Thierinsekten. Germar's Magaz. d. Ent. iii. pp. 261316.Google Scholar
Nitzsch, (1866). Die Federlinge der Sing-, Schrei-, Kletter-, und Taubenvogel. (Posthumously published by Giebel.) Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xxvii. pp. 115122.Google Scholar
Nitzsch, See also various papers listed under Giebel.Google Scholar
Olfers, (1816). De vegetativis et animatis corporibus in corporibus animatis referiundis commentarius, Berlin, pp. 8097.Google Scholar
Osborn, (1891). The Pediculi and Mallophaga. Bull. No. 7, Div. of Ent., U. S. Dept of Agriculture, Washington.Google Scholar
Osborn, (1896). Mallophaga. Bull. No. 5 (n. ser.), Div. of Ent., U. S. Dept of Agriculture, Washington, pp. 189249.Google Scholar
Osborn, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. xii. 1899, p. 189.Google Scholar
Osborn, (1902). Mallophagan records and descriptions. Ohio Naturalist, ii. pp. 175178.Google Scholar
Osborn, (1902). Mallophagan records and descriptions. Ohio Naturalist, ii. pp. 201204.Google Scholar
Packard, (1870). Certain parasitic insects. Amer. Naturalist, iv. pp. 8399.Google Scholar
Packard, (1872). Descriptions of new species of Mallophaga collected by C. H. Merriam, etc. (U. S. Geol. Survey of Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah.) Sixth Annual Report of U. S. Geol. Survey, pp. 731–734. (See also Amer. Naturalist, VIII. pp. 219–220.)Google Scholar
Paine, (1912). The Mallophagan genus Heterodoxus Le Souëf and Bullen. Ent. News, xxiii. pp. 359362.Google Scholar
Paine, (1912). Notes on a miscellaneous collection of Mallophaga from Mammals. Ent. News, xxiii. pp. 437–142.Google Scholar
Paine, (1913). A new genus of Mallophaga. Psyche, xx. pp. 158161.Google Scholar
Paine, (1914). A new genus of Mallophaga from African Guinea Fowl in the U. S. National Museum. Smithson. Misc. Coll. lxi. No. 23, 4 pp.Google Scholar
Paine, (1914). Nomenclature note on the Mallophagan genus Ancistrocephalus Paine. Psyche, xxi. p. 23.Google Scholar
Paine, (1914). Mallophaga from birds at Laguna Beach, California. First Ann. Rept Laguna Marine Lab.Google Scholar
Paine, and Mann, (1913). Mallophaga from Brazilian birds. Psyche, xx. pp. 1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panzer, (1793). Faunae Insectorum Germanicae, Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Percheron, (1835). In Guérin et Percheron, Genera des Insectes, Paris, 5e Livraison, No. 10. Q. Docophorus Nitzsch.Google Scholar
Perry, (1876). Proc. Lit. Phil. Soc. Liverpool, xxx. pp. lxxx and lxxxi.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1871). Description de quelques parasites du genre Docophorus. Tijd. v. Ent. vi. pp. 113137.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1878). Acidoproctus. Tijd. v. Ent. xxi. pp. 179183.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1880). Les Pédiculines, Essai Monographique, Leyden.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1881). Quatres nouvelles Pédiculines. Tijd. v. Ent. xxiv. pp. 16.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1883). O. Taschenberg, Die Mallophagen etc. Tijd. v. Ent. xxvi. pp. 145151.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1883). Quelques Pédiculines nouvelles ou peu connues. Tijd. v. Ent. xxvi. pp. 152158.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1884). Description d'une nouvelle Pédiculine. Notes from, the Leyden Museum, vi. pp. 111113.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1885). Les Pédiculines, Supplement, Leyden.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1888). Quelques nouvelles Pédiculines. Tijd. v. Ent. xxxi. pp. 147164.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1889). Description d'une nouvelle Pédiculine. Notes from the Leyden Museum, xi. pp. 3536.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1889). Quelques Pédiculines nouvelles. Tijd. v. Ent. xxxiii. pp. 223259.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1890). Nirmus assimilis. Trans. Ent. Soc. London, Proceedings, p. xxiii.Google Scholar
Piaget, (1895). Un nouveau parasite du Transvaal. Tijd. v. Ent. xxxviii. pp. 101102.Google Scholar
Picaglia, (1884). Intorno alla divisione del genere Menopon nei due sottogeneri Menopon e Piagetia. Atti d. Soc. Nat. Modena, Rendiconti delle Adunanze, Ser. III. Vol. ii. pp. 103108.Google Scholar
Picaglia, (1885). Pediculini nuovi del Museo di Zoologia ed Anatomia Comparata della R. Universitá di Modena. Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. xxviii. pp. 8291.Google Scholar
Picaglia, (1885). Pediculini dell' Instituto Anatomo-Zoologico della R. Univ. di Modena. Atti d. Soc. Nat. Modena, Memorie, Ser. III. Vol. iv. pp. 97162.Google Scholar
Ponton, (1870). On a new species of parasite from the tiger. Month. Micr. Journ. iv. p. 147.Google Scholar
Ponton, (1871). On some new parasites. Month. Micr. Journ. vi. p. 8.Google Scholar
Railliet, (1895). Traité de Zoologie Médicate et Agricole, Paris. Famille des Ricinidés, pp. 833848.Google Scholar
Redi, (1668). Esperienze intorno alla generazione degli insetti fatti, Firenze.Google Scholar
Rudow, (1866). Sechs neue Haarlinge. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xxvii. pp. 109115.Google Scholar
Rudow, (1866). Charakteristik neue Federlinge. Zeit.f. d. ges. Nat. xxvii. pp. 465477.Google Scholar
Rudow, (1869). Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Mallophagen oder Pelzfresser, Diss., Halle.Google Scholar
Rudow, (1869). Neue Mallophagen. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xxxiv. pp. 387407.Google Scholar
Rudow, (1870). Beobachtungen über die Lebensweise und den Bau der Mallophagen oder Pelzfresser etc. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xxxv. pp. 272302.Google Scholar
Rudow, (1870). Beobachtungen über die Lebensweise und den Bau der Mallophagen oder Pelzfresser etc., II. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xxxv. pp. 449487.Google Scholar
Rudow, (1870). Beobachtungen über die Lebensweise und den Bau der Mallo-phagen oder Pelzfresser etc., III. Zeit. f. d. ges. Nat. xxxvi. pp. 121143.Google Scholar
Samouelle, (1819). The Entomologist's Useful Companion, London.Google Scholar
Schömmer, (1913). Über die Mallophagen, insbesondere die unserer Haustiere, Dissert., Giessen.Google Scholar
Schrank, (1776). Beyträge zur Naturgeschiehte, Augsburg and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schrank, (1781). Enumeratio Insectorum Austriae Indigenorum, Augusta Vindelicorum, pp. 499507.Google Scholar
Schrank, (1803). Fauna Boica, Landshut, pp. 186194.Google Scholar
Scopoli, (1763). Entomologia Carniolica, Vindobonae, pp. 381385.Google Scholar
Scopoli, (1772). Annus V Historico-Naturalis. v. Observationes Zoologicae, Lipsiae, pp. 124125.Google Scholar
Shull, and Carriker, (1911). A biological survey of the sand dune region on the south shore of Saginaw Bay. Mallophaga, pp. 233242. Publ. Michigan geol. biol. Surv. No. 4 (Biol. Ser. No. 2).Google Scholar
Shull, . See also Carriker and Shull.Google Scholar
Simonetta, (1882). Elenco sistematico dei Pediculini appartenenti al Museo Zoologico dell' Univ. di Pavia. Soc. Ent. Ital. Bull. xiv. pp. 204220.Google Scholar
Stephens, (1829). A systematic catalogue of British insects. Vol. ii. Haustellata, pp. 330335.Google Scholar
Stobbe, (1913). Mallophagen. 1. Beitrag: Neue Formen von Säugetieren. Entom. Rundsch. Jahrg. xxx. pp. 105106 and 111112.Google Scholar
Stobbe, (1913). Mallophagen. 2. Beitrag: Die Gattung Eutrichophilus Mjöberg. Deutsch. entom. Zeitschr. 1913, pp. 562567.Google Scholar
Stobbe, (1913). Mallophagen. 3. Beitrag: Die Trichodectiden des Berliner Museums für Naturkunde. Sitz.-Ber. Ges. not. Freunde, 1913, pp. 365383.Google Scholar
Stobbe, (1914). Mallophagen. 4. Beitrag. Deutsch. ent. Zeitschr. 1914, pp. 176178.Google Scholar
Sulzer, (1776). Abgekürzte Geschichle der Insecten, Wintherthür.Google Scholar
Taschenberg, (1879). Ueber die Synonymie von Goniocotes hologaster. Zeit. f. ges. Nat. lii. pp. 104107.Google Scholar
Taschenberg (1882). Die Mallophagen etc. Nova Acta, Halle, xliv. pp. 1244.Google Scholar
Torreggiani, (1910). Reference by Neveu-Lemaire (q. v.), p. 1108, to description of Trichodecles aucheniae-lamae.Google Scholar
Uchida, (1915). Bird-infesting Mallophaga of Japan (I). (Genus Physostomum.) Annotat. Zool. Japon. ix. pp. 6772, figs. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Uchida, (1916). Bird-infesting Mallophaga of Japan (II). (Genera Goniodes and Goniocotes.) Annotat. Zool. Japon. ix. pp. 8188, figs. 1–4.Google Scholar
Vollenhoven, (1860). De Dieren van Nederland. Vol. 1. Luizen, pp. 127135. Haarlem.Google Scholar
Waterston, (1910). Notes on some ectoparasites in the Museum, Perth. Trans. Perth Soc. Nat. Sci. v. pp. 4850.Google Scholar
Waterston, (1912). On Docophorus bassanae Denny etc. Proc. Boy. Phys. Soc. Edin. xviii. pp. 248250.Google Scholar
Waterston, (1912). Two ectoparasites from the snipe. Ent. Month. Mag. xxiii. pp. 6163.Google Scholar
Waterston, (1912). Notes on some ectoparasites in the Museum, Perth, II. Trans. Perth Soc. Nat. Sci. v. pp. 123128.Google Scholar
Waterston, (1912). On Mackayia dimorpha, a new genus and species of Mallophaga from the Manx shearwater. Scott. Naturalist, 1912, pp. 251258.Google Scholar
Waterston, (1912). A new species of Mackayia. Scott. Naturalist, 1912, p. 258.Google Scholar
Waterston, (1914). An account of the Bird-lice of the genus Docophorus (Mallophaga) found on British Auks, Pt I. Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin. xix. pp. 149158.Google Scholar
Waterston, (1914). On some ectoparasites in the South African Museum, Cape Town. Ann. Sth Afric. Mus. x. pp. 271321.Google Scholar
Waterston, (1915). An account of the Bird-lice of the genus Docophorus (Mallophaga) found on British Auks, Pt II. Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin. xix. pp. 171176.Google Scholar
Waterston, (1915). On two new species of Mallophaga. Ent. Month. Mag., 3rd Ser., Vol. i. pp. 1216.Google Scholar
Westwood, (1874). Thesaurus entomologicus oxoniensis, London.Google Scholar