Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:36:04.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food intake and body weight changes in mice infected with metacestodes of Taenia crassiceps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

D. W. T. Crompton ,
S. E. Arnold ,
D. E. Walters  and
P. J. Whitfield
D. W. T. Crompton
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Molteno Institute, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EE
S. E. Arnold
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Molteno Institute, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EE
D. E. Walters
Affiliation:
AFRC Statistics Group, Department of Applied Biology, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3DX
P. J. Whitfield
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, King's College, The Strand, London WC2R 2LS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

General nutritional effects on female CFLP mice harbouring larval Taenia crassiceps were investigated using groups of mice fed ad libitum on purified diets containing 2%, 4%, 8% and 16% (w/w) protein respectively. When uninfected and infected mice were compared over an experimental period of 20 weeks, it was established that a significantly higher proportion of uninfected mice survived the course of the experiment than infected mice. There was no evidence of the presence of the parasites having any effect on the overall food intake of the mice. Infected mice, however, were found to be significantly heavier, on a fresh weight basis, than their uninfected partners, but the pattern was reversed when the dry weights of mouse carcasses were compared following the removal of parasites. In general, more parasite tissue was recovered from mice feeding on the higher protein diets (8% and 16%).

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , June 1985 , pp. 449 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ash, C., Crompton, D. W. T. & Lunn, P. G. (1985). Impact of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nematoda) on the serum albumin and amino acid concentrations of rats fed adequate or protein-deficient diets. Parasitology 90, 157–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernin, J. (1975). The growth of the metacestodes of Taenia crassiceps in white mice. Journal of Helminthology 49, 297–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crompton, D. W. T. (1984). Influence of parasitic infection on food intake. Federation Proceedings 43, 239–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Crompton, D. W. T., Walters, D. E. & Arnold, S. (1981). Changes in the food intake and body weight of protein-malnourished rats infected by Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nematoda). Parasitology 82, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsum, E., Nesheim, M. C. & Crompton, D. W. T. (1981). Nutritional aspects of Ascaris infection in young protein-deficient pigs. Parasitology 83, 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. S. (1964). Studies on responses of intermediate hosts to infection with Taenia crassiceps (Zeder, 1800) (Cestoda). Canadian Journal of Zoology 42, 367–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keymer, A., Crompton, D. W. T. & Walters, D. E. (1983). Nippostrongylus (Nematoda) in protein-malnourished rats: host mortality, morbidity and rehabilitation. Parasitology 86, 464–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroeze, W. K. & Freeman, R. S. (1982). Taenia crassiceps: fate of cysticerci following ingestion by the mouse. Experimental Parasitology 54, 425–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgensen, G. J. & Calaresu, R. R. (1978). Food intake considered from the view point of systems analysis. In Hunger Models (ed. Booth, D. A.), pp. 1–24. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nesheim, M. C., Crompton, D. W. T., Arnold, S. E. & Barnard, D. (1977). Dietary relations between Moniliformis (Acanthocephala) and laboratory rats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 197, 363–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, G. P. & Gibbs, J. (1976). What the gut tells the brain about feeding behaviour. In Appetite and Food Intake (ed. Silverstone, T.), pp. 129–39. Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin: Abakon Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. S., Crompton, D. W. T., Latham, M. C., Schulpen, T. W. J., Nesheim, M. C. & Jansen, A. J. J. (1980). Relationships between Ascaris infection and growth of malnourished pre-school children in Kenya. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 33, 1165–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sykes, A. R. & Coop, R. L. (1977). Chronic parasitism and animal efficiency. Agricultural Research Council Research Report 3, 41–6.Google Scholar
Vengesa, P. B. & Leese, H. J. (1979). Sugar absorption by the mouse small intestine following infection with Schistosoma mansoni. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 73, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willett, W. C., Kilama, W. L. & Kihamia, C. M. (1979). Ascaris and growth rates: a randomized trial of treatment. American Journal of Public Health 69, 987–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar