Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:32:28.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The feeding processes of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini)

Part II. The sequence of host-tissue changes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. J. Tatchell  and
D. E. Moorhouse
R. J. Tatchell
Affiliation:
*C.S.I.R.O., Division of Entomology, Veterinary Parasitology Laboratory, Fairfield Road, Yeerongpilly, Queensland, Australia
D. E. Moorhouse
Affiliation:
†Department of Parasitology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The development of the feeding lesions of the ixodid tick Boophilus microplus was followed throughout the parasitic life-cycle on cattle of both Zebu and European breeds, using histological techniques.

The feeding lesion of this tick must be the result of an interaction between the tick and its host as it is neither the result of simple mechanical trauma, nor of lysis of the host tissues by salivary secretions of the tick alone, nor is it solely a result of an inflammatory response.

The histological evidence suggests that the diet of the tick in each instar changes as the lesion develops; first, tissue fluids are available, then tissue fluids along with leucocytes which have infiltrated the lesion, and finally these two components along with whole blood.

An early intense infiltration of eosinophils into the area of the mouthparts, typical of an immediate hypersensitive or anaphylactic response, was noted with European cattle on secondary and subsequent exposures to larvae. Hypersensitivity to tick infestation, which has been equated with resistance to infestation, was seen as an extreme of a normal spectrum of sensitization which results in an abnormal susceptibility.

The definitive lesion was similar with all hosts studied. It consisted of a cavity containing leucocytes, predominantly neutrophils, some lymphocytes and erythrocytes in an area of heavily infiltrated collagen.

It is concluded that this host-parasite relationship illustrates the concept of adaptation tolerance as proposed by Sprent (1962).

It is with much pleasure that we acknowledge the continued generous financial support by the Australian Meat Research Committee (formerly the Australian Cattle and Beef Research Committee), which has made possible this project.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , May 1968 , pp. 441 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arthur, D. R. (1962). Ticks and Disease, pp. 1–445London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Balashov, Yu. S. (1965). Mechanism of salivation and the morphologic histochemical peculiarities of the salivary glands in ixodid ticks (Acarina, Ixodoidea). Ent. Obozr. 44, 785–802.Google Scholar
Berlin, L. B. (1957). Histological changes induced in the skin of rabbits and guinea pigs by Hyalomma asiaticum P. Schl. and E. Schl. (Ixodidae) parasitism. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 112, 340–3.Google Scholar
Cowdry, E. V. & Danks, W. B. C. (1933). Studies on East Coast Fever. II. Behaviour of the parasite and the development of distinctive lesions in susceptible animals. Parasitology 25, 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dineen, J. K. (1963). Immunological aspects of parasitism. Nature, Lond. 197, 268–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foggie, A. (1959). Studies on the relationship of tick bite to tick pyaemia of lambs. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 53, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, J. & Little, D. A. (1964). Resistance of Droughtmaster cattle to tick infestation and babesiosis. Aust. vet. J. 40, 247–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregson, J. D. (1962). Observations on the feeding of Dermacentor andersoni Stiles on perfused preparations. Proc. 11th Int. Congr. Ent. Vienna 2, 463–66.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, L. F. (1955). Studies on the parasitic stages of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Acarina: Ixodidae). Aust. J. Zool. 3, 145–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoeppli, R. & Schumacher, H. H. (1962). Histological reactions to Trombiculid mites, with special reference to ‘natural’ and ‘unnatural’ hosts. Z. Tropenmed. Parasit. 13, 419–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Kelley, R. B. (1943). Zebu cross cattle in northern Australia. Bull. Coun. scient. ind. Res., Melb. no. 172, pp. 1–96.Google Scholar
Kligman, A. M. (1964). The biology of the stratum corneum. In The Epidermis, 1st ed., pp. 387–433. Edited by Montagna, W. and Lobitz, W. C.. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrivee, D. H., Benjiamini, E., Feingold, B. F. & Shimizu, M. (1964). Histologic studies of guinea pig skin: different stages of allergic reactivity to flea bites. Expl Parasit. 15, 491–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lees, A. D. (1952). The role of cuticle growth in the feeding process of ticks. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 121, 759–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litt, M. (1964). Eosinophils and antigen–antibody reactions. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 116, 964–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moorhouse, D. E. & Tatchell, R. J. (1966). The feeding processes of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini): a study in host parasite relations. Part 1. Attachment to the host. Parasitology 56, 623–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, W. A. & Bainborough, A. R. (1963). Development in sheep of resistance to the ked Melophagus ovinus (L). III. Histopathology of sheep skin as a clue to the nature of resistance. Expl Parasit. 13, 118–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. & Strickland, C. (1908). On the presence of an anticoagulin in the salivary glands and intestines of Argas persicus. Parasitology 1, 302–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlowsky, E. N. & Alfeeva, S. P. (1941). Histopathological modifications in the skin of cattle from the bite of the tick Ixodes ricinus. Trudy voenno-med. Akad. R.K.K.A. 25, 153–60.Google Scholar
Pavlowsky, E. N. & Stein, A. K. (1927). Experimentelle Untersuchungen uber die Wirkung von Ixodes ricinus (Ixodidae) auf die Menschenhaut. Arch. Schiffs-u Tropen hyg. 31, 574–86.Google Scholar
Riek, R. F. (1962). Studies on the reactions of animals to infestations with ticks. VI. Resistance of cattle to infestation with the tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). Aust. J. agric. Res. 13, 532–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Y., Ohara, S. & Unagami, T. (1960). Studies on ixodid ticks. Part III. Comparative observations on the histological changes of host tissue caused by tick bite. Acta Medica biol. Niigata 7, 323–9.Google Scholar
Saito, Y. & Ohara, S. (1961). Studies of ixodid ticks. Part V. Further studies on the reactions of the skin of laboratory animals to the bites of immature ticks. Acta Medica. biol. Niigata 9, 1–32.Google Scholar
Sprent, J. F. A. (1962). Parasitism, immunity and evolution. In The Evolution of Living Organisms, pp. 149–65. Ed. Leeper, G. W.. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Tatchell, R. J. (1967). Salivary secretion in the cattle tick as a means of water elimination. Nature, Lond. 213, 940–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trager, W. (1939). Acquired immunity to ticks. J. Parasit. 25, 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, P. R. (1955). Observations on infestations of undipped cattle of British breeds with the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). Aust. J. agric. Res. 6, 655–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, P. R. (1962). Selection of cattle for tick resistance, and the effect of herds of different susceptibility on Boophilus populations. Aust. J. agric. Res. 13, 974–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar