Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:49:25.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fasciola tragelaphi sp.nov. from the sitatunga, Tragelaphus spekei Rothschild, with a note on the prepharyngeal pouch in the genus Fasciola L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. W. Pike  and
J. B. Condy
A. W. Pike
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Bureau of Helminthology, St Albans, England and Veterinary Research Laboratory, Salisbury, Rhodesia
J. B. Condy
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Bureau of Helminthology, St Albans, England and Veterinary Research Laboratory, Salisbury, Rhodesia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Fasciola tragelaphi sp.nov. from the bile ducts of a Tragelaphus spekei shot in the Chobe swamps of Rhodesia differs from other species of the genus in its very large size (10.2–12.0 cm long in fixed and mounted specimens), in the shape of its body and in the distribution and arrangement of the reproductive organs. The testes lie almost entirely in the posterior half of the body, well away from the female genitalia, which lie mostly in the anterior third of the worm. The ovary is always bilateral, and the coiled uterus runs in a straight line between the caeca to the genital atrium. A prepharyngeal pouch found in this species is compared with that found in other members of the genus Fasciola and in related genera.

We gratefully acknowledge the help given during the preparation of this paper by the staff of the Bureau, particularly Mr G. Dimmock for technical assistance. We would also like to thank Mr S. Prudhoe for reading the manuscript and offering useful advice, Mr B. Bracegirdle for producing the photograph of the whole worm reproduced in the Plate, fig. 1 and to Bechuanaland Hunters Ltd., particularly I. M. Henderson, for obtaining further specimens for examination.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , August 1966 , pp. 511 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dinnik, J. A. & Dinnik, N. N. (1961). On the morphology and life history of Fasciola nyanzae Leiper, 1910 from the hippopotamus. J. Helminth., R.T. Leiper Supplement, pp. 53–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engbert, H. R. (1962). Microscopical studies on the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica L. and Dicrocoelium dendriticum Rud. Microscope 13, 130–40.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T. (1910). The entozoa of the hippopotamus. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. pp. 233–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuckart, R. (1863). Die menschlichen Parasiten und die von ihnen herrührenden Krankheiten. Ein Hand- und Lehrbuch für Naturforscher und Aerzte, vol. 1, 766 pp. Leipzig und Heidelburg: C. F. Winter.Google Scholar
Mehlis, D. E. (1825). Observationes anatomicas de Distomate hepatico et lanceolato ad Entozoorum human corporis historian naturalem illustrandam. 42 pp. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Osaki, Y. (1935). Trematode parasites of Indian porpoise Neophocaena phocaenoides Gray. J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. (Ser. B, Div. 1) 3, 115–38.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. (1894). The anatomy of the large American fluke (Fasciola magna) and a comparison with other species of the genus Fasciola s.st. Containing also a list of the chief epizoötics of fascioliasis (distomiasis) and a bibliography of Fasciola hepatica by Albert Hassall. J. comp. Med. vet. Archs 15, 225–43.Google Scholar
Tandon, R. S. (1956). On Fasciola indica Verma [sic], 1953, the common liver fluke of India. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. India (Sect. B) 26, 373–95.Google Scholar
Varma, A. K. (1953). On Fasciola indica n.sp. with some observations on F. hepatica and F. gigantica. J. Helminth. 27, 185–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. B. (1961). The dimorphism of Polystoma integerrimum (Frölich) Rudolphi and its bearing on relationships within the Polystomatidae. Part III. J. Helminth. 35, 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar