Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:51:13.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental infections of the domestic fowl with a variant of Eimeria praecox from the Ceylon jungle fowl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. L. Long ,
M. A. Fernando  and
O. Remmler
P. L. Long
Affiliation:
Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon
M. A. Fernando
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
O. Remmler
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A species of Eimeria from the Ceylon jungle fowl (Gallus lafayetti), at first thought to be a new species of Eimeria, has been identified as a strain of E. praecox. Oocysts of this jungle fowl strain were slightly larger than those of E. praecox, being 23·2 × 19·9 μm, but the endogenous stages were similar. The strain reproduced poorly in the domestic fowl but oocyst production was improved by treating the chickens with beta-methasone. A single infection of chickens with the strain of jungle fowl origin protected against challenge with the original culture and E. praecox, but did not cross-protect against E. acervulina. The name E. praecox var. ceylonensis is proposed for this strain of Eimeria.

The criteria used to identify new species of Eimeria are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , August 1974 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fernando, M. A. & McCraw, B. M. (1973). Mucosal morphology and cellular renewal in the small intestine of chickens following a single infection of Eimeria acervulina. Journal of Parasitology 59, 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, M. A. & Remmler, O. (1973 a). Four new species of Eimeria and one of Tyzzeria from the Ceylon jungle fowl Gallus lafayettei. Journal of Protozoology 20, 43–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernando, M. A. & Remmler, O. (1973 b). Eimeria diminuta sp.n. from the Ceylon jungle fowl Gallus lafayettei. Journal of Protozoology 20, 357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyner, L. P. (1969). Immunological variation between two strains of Eimeria acervulina. Parasitology 59, 725–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. (1967 a). Studies on Eimeria praecox Johnson, 1930, in the chicken. Parasitology 57, 351–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, P. L. (1967 b). Studies on Eimeria mivati in chickens and a comparison with Eimeria acervulina. Journal of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics 77, 315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, P. L. (1970). Development (Schizogony) of Eimeria tenella in the liver of chickens treated with corticosteroid. Nature, London 225, 290–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. (1973). Studies on the relationship between Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria mivati. Parasitology 67, 143–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. & Rose, M. E. (1970). Extended schizogony of Eimeria mivati in betamethasonetreated chickens. Parasitology 60, 147–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. & Rowell, J. G. (1958). Counting oocysts of chicken coccidia. Laboratory Practice 7, 515–9.Google Scholar
Tyzzer, E. E., Theiler, H. & Jones, E. E. (1932). Coccidiosis in gallinaceous birds. IIa. A comparative study of Eimeria of the chicken. American Journal of Hygiene 15, 319–93.Google Scholar