Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T12:07:55.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Establishment and maintenance of behavioural dominance in male mice infected withTrichinella spiralis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

M. E. Rau
M. E. Rau
Affiliation:
Institute of Parasitology, McGill University, Macdonald Campus, Ste. Anne de Bellevue, P.Q., CanadaH9X 1CO
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Trichinella spiralis infections influenced the establishment and maintenance of behavioural dominance among outbred male mice. Infected animals assumed a subordinate status when challenged by normal or more lightly infected conspecifics both in an unfamiliar test arena and in their established home cages. These effects were demonstrable during the acute and the chronic phases of infection. The significance of this phenomenon to the survival of the mouse host and the transmission of the parasite is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 86 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 319 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bonner, J. T. (1955). Cells and Societies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, R. G. (1980). Population size, social behaviour, and dispersal in house mice: a quantitative investigation. Animal Behaviour 28, 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fries, J. C. & Mcclearn, G. E. (1970). Social dominance and Darwinian fitness in the laboratory mouse. American Naturalist 104, 40811.Google Scholar
Freeland, W. J. (1981). Parasitism and behavioural dominance among male mice. Science 213, 4612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausfater, G. & Waston, D. F. (1976). Social and reproductive correlates of parasite ova emission by baboons. Nature, London 262, 6889.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D.Waston, A. & Miller, G. R. (1964). Predation and red grouse populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 1, 18395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, L., Diakow, C. A. & Barsel, G. E. (1965). Inter-strain fighting in male mice. Animal Behaviour 13, 528.Google Scholar
Lidicker, W. Z. (1975). The role of dispersal in the demography of small mammals. In Small Mammals: their Productivity and Population Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Metzgar, L. H. (1967). An experimental comparison of screech owl predation on resident and transient white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus). Journal of Mammalogy 48, 38791.Google Scholar
Noyes, R. F., Barrett, G. W. & Taylor, D. H. (1981). Social structure of feral house mouse (Mus musculus) populations: effects of resource partitioning. Behavioural Ecology and Socio-biology 10, 15763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rau, M. E. (1983). The open-field behaviour of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis. Parasitology 86, 31118.Google Scholar
Selander, R. K. & Yang, S. Y. (1970). Biochemical genetics and behaviour in wild house mouse populations. In Contributions to Behavior-Cenetic Analysis: the Mouse as a Prototype. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Non-parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, Toronto and London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1969). Biometry. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
Tanner, C. E. (1968). Relationship between infecting dose, muscle parasitism, and antibody response in experimental trichinosis in rabbits. Journal of Parasitology 54, 98–107.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar