Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:12:17.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eimeria phasiani Tyzzer, 1929—a coccidium from the pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). II. Pathogenicity and drug action*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. I. Trigg
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Applied Entomology, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, S. W. 7†

Extract

Eimeria phasiani was shown to be pathogenic to young pheasant poults. Doses of 100000 or more oocysts proved fatal to birds up to 3 weeks old. Lesser doses produced losses in the live-weight gain of the host.

Two separate strains of E. phasiani were completely susceptible to 0·006% (w/w) Sulphaquinoxaline, but less so to 0·006% (w/w) Amprolium and 0·0125% (w/w) Zoalene.

I should like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr E. U. Canning for her supervision and helpful advice, and to Professor O. W. Richards, F.R.S., for permission to work at the Imperial College Field Station. I am also grateful to Mr T. H. Blank, of the Eley Game Advisory Service, Fordingbridge, Hants, who gave day-old pheasant chicks for this study.

The work was financed by a scholarship from the Agricultural Research Council.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, E. R. (1934). Coccidia and coccidiosis of domesticated, game and laboratory animals and of man, pp. 147. Ames, Iowa: Iowa St. Coll. Press.Google Scholar
Clarkson, M. J. (1958). Life history and pathogenicity of Eimeria adenoeides, Moore & Brown 1951, in the turkey poult. Parasitology 48, 7088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, S. F. N., Joyner, L. P. & Kendall, S. B. (1963). Coccidiosis, pp. 264. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Hammond, D. M. (1965). Cellular interactions between bovine coccidia and their hosts. In Progress in Protozoology, pp. 53–4. Abstracts of the Second Int. Conf. Protozool., London.Google Scholar
Horton-Smith, C. (1958). Resistance to anti-coccidial drugs experimentally induced in a laboratory strain Eimeria tenella. Rep. 11th World's Poult. Congr. Mexico City.Google Scholar
Joyner, L. P. (1957). Induced drug-fastness to nitrofurazone in a laboratory strain of Eimeria tenella. Vet. Rec. 69, 1415–18.Google Scholar
Natt, M. P. (1959). The effect of cecal coccidiosis on the blood cells of the domestic fowl. 3. Changes in the leukocyte picture during the course of the infection. Expl Parasit. 8, 182–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natt, M. P. & Herrick, C. A. (1955). The effect of cecal coccidiosis on the blood cells of the domestic fowl. 1. Comparison of changes in the erythrocyte count resulting from hemorrhage in infected and mechanically bled birds. The use of the hematocrit value as an index of the severity of the hemorrhage resulting from the infection. Poult. Sci. 34, 1100–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadek, S. E. (1955). A simple direct technique for counting avian blood cells. J. Am. vet. med. Ass. 127, 72–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Trigg, P. I. (1965). Studies on the coccidia of pheasants and on strain variation of coccidia in gallinaceous birds. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Trigg, P. I. (1967). Eimeria phasiani Tyzzer, 1929 a coccidium from the pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). I. The life cycle. Parasitology 57, 135–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyzzer, E. E. (1929). Coccidiosis in gallinaceous birds. Am. J. Hyg. 10, 269383.Google Scholar