Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:11:29.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of multiple stressors in fish: how parasites and contaminants interact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2022

Bernd Sures Open the ORCID record for Bernd Sures [Opens in a new window]  and
Milen Nachev Open the ORCID record for Milen Nachev [Opens in a new window]
Bernd Sures*
Affiliation:
Department of Aquatic Ecology and Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
Milen Nachev
Affiliation:
Department of Aquatic Ecology and Centre for Water and Environmental Research (ZWU), University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: Bernd Sures, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interest in local environmental conditions and the occurrence and behaviour of parasites has increased over the last 3 decades, leading to the discipline of Environmental Parasitology. The aim of this discipline is to investigate how anthropogenically altered environmental factors influence the occurrence of parasites and how the combined effects of pollutants and parasites affect the health of their hosts. Accordingly, in this paper, we provide an overview of the direct and indirect effects of pollutants on the occurrence and distribution of fish parasites. However, based on current knowledge, it is difficult to draw general conclusions about these interdependencies, as the effects of pollutants on free-living (larval) parasite stages, as well as their effects on ectoparasites, depend on the pollutant–host–parasite combination as well as on other environmental factors that can modulate the harmful effects of pollutants. Furthermore, the question of the combined effects of the simultaneous occurrence of parasites and pollutants on the physiology and health of the fish hosts is of interest. For this purpose, we differentiate between the dominance effects of individual stressors over other, additive or synergistically reinforcing effects as well as combined antagonistic effects. For the latter, there are only very few studies, most of which were also carried out on invertebrates, so that this field of research presents itself as very promising for future investigations.

Keywords

Aquatic parasitesEnvironmental Parasitologypollution
Type
Review Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 149 , Special Issue 14: Fish Parasitology , December 2022 , pp. 1822 - 1828
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Aquatic organisms, and fish in particular, are affected by a variety of stressors caused by anthropogenic influences that lead to changes in environmental parameters. These in turn elicit stress responses of the organism in the sense that the affected organisms show reactions outside their normal range. Stressors include chemical pollutants (i.e. contaminants), nutrients, flow velocity, pH, dissolved oxygen, disturbance in light and temperature regimes and many other physico-chemical variables that can be significantly altered by anthropogenic activities (e.g. Birk et al., Reference Birk, Chapman, Carvalho, Spears, Andersen, Argillier, Auer, Baattrup-Pedersen, Banin, Beklioğlu, Bondar-Kunze, Borja, Branco, Bucak, Buijse, Cardoso, Raoul-Marie Couture, Cremona, de Zwart, Feld, Ferreira, Feuchtmayr, Gessner, Gieswein, Globevnik, Graeber, Graf, Gutiérrez-Cánovas, Hanganu, Işkın, Järvinen, Jeppesen, Kotamäki, Kuijper, Lemm, Lu, Solheim, Mischke, Moe, Nõges, Nõges, Ormerod, Panagopoulos, Phillips, Posthuma, Pouso, Prudhomme, Rankinen, Rasmussen, Richardson, Sagouis, Santos, Schäfer, Schinegger, Schmutz, Schneider, Schülting, Segurado, Stefanidis, Sures, Thackeray, Turunen, Uyarra, Venohr, von der Ohe, Willby and Hering2020). In this paper, the focus is mainly on the chemical pollutants that can cause acute and/or chronic effects in biota when exceeding aqueous concentrations above their natural range of occurrence. However, other factors such as the temperature regime, pH and dissolved oxygen are also considered, as they may influence the solubility and bioavailability of pollutants or, conversely, the pollutants may influence the natural ranges of some of these factors (e.g. oxygen content, pH) and thus contribute significantly to the effects of the pollutants.

Chemical contaminants include various micropollutants of inorganic and organic nature, organometallic compounds, but also dissolved salts (NaCl, CO32−) and nutrients (e.g. NO3−, NO2−, NH4+, PO43−). The inorganic pollutants comprise various trace elements (metals and metalloids such as Cd, Pb, As), which may be of geogenic origin (Erasmus et al., Reference Erasmus, Zimmermann, Smit, Malherbe, Nachev, Sures and Wepener2022). In most cases, however, the elevated concentrations are related to anthropogenic activities such as mining, industrial and domestic wastewater, agriculture, erosion of landfills, waste dump and many others (e.g. Schertzinger et al., Reference Schertzinger, Ruchter and Sures2018, Reference Schertzinger, Itzel, Kerstein, Tuerk, Schmidt and Sures2019; Kontchou et al., Reference Kontchou, Nachev and Sures2021; Rothe et al., Reference Rothe, Botha, Feld, Weyand, Zimmermann, Smit, Wepener and Sures2021; Erasmus et al., Reference Erasmus, Zimmermann, Smit, Malherbe, Nachev, Sures and Wepener2022; Link et al., Reference Link, Schreiner, Graf, Szöcs, Bundschuh, Battes, Cîmpean, Sures, Grabner, Buse, Buse and Schäfer2022). Metals can affect for example the embryonic and larval development of fish, its growth and fitness as well as reproduction (e.g. summarized in Taslima et al., Reference Taslima, Al-Emran, Rahman, Hasan, Ferdous, Rohani and Shahjahan2022). The modes of action comprise effects on molecular and cellular levels as well as on the immune system, on the physiology, and the metabolism of fish (see Taslima et al. (Reference Taslima, Al-Emran, Rahman, Hasan, Ferdous, Rohani and Shahjahan2022) and references therein). Some metals such as Cd, Cr, Hg and Pb may also act as endocrine disruptors (reviewed in Chakraborty, Reference Chakraborty2021).

Elevated levels of dissolved salts (e.g. salinization) and nutrients are also related to anthropogenic activities and can directly affect fish or indirectly affect environmental conditions (e.g. in the case of eutrophication) and the species composition of the biota (Schröder et al., Reference Schröder, Sondermann, Sures and Hering2015) as well as food availability for fish in general. Organic pollutants include a large group of compounds used in industry (e.g. PCBs, PAHs, plasticizers, flame retardants) and agriculture (e.g. pesticides), but also some that are used as pharmaceuticals or personal care products or enter domestic wastewater as metabolic end products. Similar to inorganic pollutants, they can have effects on different levels of organization in fish and might additionally act as endocrine disruptors (Tierney et al., Reference Tierney, Farrell and Brauner2013).

In addition to the pollutants mentioned, parasites might represent an additional stressor for fish at the individual, population or community level. Parasite infections can reduce host fitness by inducing different pathological, immunological and physiological responses (e.g. Sures et al., Reference Sures, Knopf and Kloas2001; Münderle et al., Reference Münderle, Sures and Taraschewski2004; Buchmann and Bresciani, Reference Buchmann, Bresciani and Woo2006; Gérard et al., Reference Gérard, Hervé, Réveillac and Acou2016). Nutrition and energy drain as well as host manipulation can reduce the performance and fitness of infected individuals. Parasite infection can also negatively affect the dynamics and density of fish populations and thus the entire fish community. Population effects are particularly significant for infections with parasites that cause severe pathological damage (e.g. Sokolowski and Dove, Reference Sokolowski and Dove2006; Shafaquat et al., Reference Shafaquat, Syed, Showket, Shazia, Uzma and Iram2016; Barišić et al., Reference Barišić, Filipović Marijić, Mijošek, Čož-Rakovac, Dragun, Krasnići, Ivanković, Kružlicová and Erk2018; Dezfuli et al., Reference Dezfuli, Maestri, Lorenzoni, Carosi, Maynard and Bosi2021) or with parasites that act as endocrine disruptors and parasitic castrators (e.g. Trubiroha et al., Reference Trubiroha, Kroupova, Wuertz, Frank, Sures and Kloas2010, Reference Trubiroha, Kroupova, Frank, Sures and Kloas2011) and/or manipulate their host to make it more vulnerable to predation (e.g. Giles, Reference Giles1983; Museth, Reference Museth2001; Gabagambi et al., Reference Gabagambi, Salvanes, Midtøy and Skorping2019; Svensson et al., Reference Svensson, Eghbal, Eriksson and Nilsson2022).

In general, parasite infections increase the susceptibility of their hosts to various stressors (Combes, Reference Combes1995), so that infected fish exposed to multiple stressors may react differently than uninfected conspecifics. The aim of this paper is therefore to summarize and discuss what is known about the complex interactions between parasites and various contaminants from the perspective of the fish host (see Fig. 1). In terms of Environmental Parasitology, this overview sheds light on the role of parasites in ecosystems where multiple stressors interact. First, we provide an overview of (i) the direct interaction between parasite stages which are in close contact to environmental contaminants (i.e. ectoparasites and free-living stages of endoparasites), before (ii) summarizing indirect effects of pollutants on fish parasite occurrence and distribution. Additionally, we give examples of (iii) the complex fish–parasite–pollution interaction and finally, provide some (iv) concluding remarks and an outlook for future research.

Fig. 1. Changes in pollution levels of aquatic habitats can directly or indirectly affect the structure and composition of fish parasite communities. The direct mode of action includes mainly effects on adult ectoparasites or larval stages that are in immediate contact with the environment. Adverse effects of pollutants lead to lower transmission efficiency of parasites, which in turn affects the structure and dynamics of parasite populations.

Direct interaction between parasites and contaminants in the aquatic environment

Parasites constitute a significant part of natural ecosystems and produce a considerable amount of their biomass (Kuris et al., Reference Kuris, Hechinger, Shaw, Whitney, Aguirre-Macedo, Boch, Dobson, Dunham, Fredensborg, Huspeni, Torchin and Lafferty2008; Soldánová et al., Reference Soldánová, Selbach and Sures2016). Similar to free-living organisms, parasites are affected by and respond to environmental conditions. Fluctuations in the population dynamics of parasites are still not very well understood, but in several cases, the reasons lie in changes in environmental conditions (pollution, anthropogenic impact, etc.; see Thieltges et al., Reference Thieltges, Jensen and Poulin2008) as well as in invasive species encountering susceptible hosts after their arrival and then succeeding accordingly (Goedknegt et al., Reference Goedknegt, Feis, Wegner, Luttikhuizen, Buschbaum, Camphuysen, van der Meer and Thieltges2016). Over the last 2 decades, research has shown that environmental factors have a significant impact on parasites and can directly influence the composition and diversity of parasite communities. The direct mode of action includes effects on adult ectoparasites or larval stages that are in immediate contact with the environment (Gheorgiu et al., Reference Gheorgiu, Marcogliese and Scott2006; Gheorghiu et al., Reference Gheorghiu, Cable, Marcogliese and Scott2007; Thieltges et al., Reference Thieltges, Jensen and Poulin2008; Sures et al., Reference Sures, Nachev, Selbach and Marcogliese2017). Pollution-induced lethal responses lead to lower transmission efficiency of parasites, which in turn affects the structure and dynamics of parasite populations. Moreover, ectoparasites have been found to respond very sensitive to pollution (e.g. eutrophication or chemical pollution) (Gilbert and Avenant-Oldewage, Reference Gilbert and Avenant-Oldewage2021) similar to endoparasites with free-living larval stages (e.g. cercariae, miracidia), which may also be directly affected by environmental conditions (summarized by Thieltges et al., Reference Thieltges, Jensen and Poulin2008). A meta-analysis of published data (Gilbert and Avenant-Oldewage, Reference Gilbert and Avenant-Oldewage2021) has shown that pollution can have both positive and negative effects on monogenean communities, while some pollutants show no clear effects. It can be seen that metals tend to have a negative effect on monogenean communities (lower abundance of some species and lower diversity), while eutrophication has a positive effect (see Gilbert and Avenant-Oldewage, Reference Gilbert and Avenant-Oldewage2021 and references therein). Direct effects of pollutants on endoparasites are due to exposure of free-living larval stages to pollutants. Metals have been reported to affect trematode transmission by reducing the longevity, viability and infectivity of cercariae (Pietrock and Marcogliese, Reference Pietrock and Marcogliese2003; Morley et al., Reference Morley, Lewis and Hoole2006). Similar effects were reported for organic pollutants such as various pesticides (e.g. Koprivnikar et al., Reference Koprivnikar, Baker and Forbes2006, Reference Koprivnikar, Forbes and Baker2007; Rohr et al., Reference Rohr, Raffel, Sessions and Hudson2008; Raffel et al., Reference Raffel, Sheingold and Rohr2009; Hua et al., Reference Hua, Buss, Kim, Orlofske and Hoverman2016).

Free-living stages of endoparasites and ectoparasites can not only be affected by pollutants, but also should in turn be able to influence the level of pollutants in the environment. For example, cercariae, which are excreted in large numbers and biomass by the molluscan intermediate host (Soldánová et al., Reference Soldánová, Selbach and Sures2016; Díaz-Morales et al., Reference Díaz-Morales, Bommarito, Vajedsamiei, Grabner, Rilov, Wahl and Sures2022), could act as a pollutant sink at low spatial scales, influencing the distribution and further bioavailability of chemicals when accumulated by them. During their short lifespan, cercariae provide a food source for various aquatic organisms (Johnson et al., Reference Johnson, Dobson, Lafferty, Marcogliese, Memmott, Orlofske, Poulin and Thieltges2010), including fish, and thus may additionally contribute to the distribution and translocation of chemicals within the various components of food webs. It can be assumed that a significant proportion of pollutants could be stored in free-living stages of parasites in ecosystems, as various parasitic taxa have an excellent accumulation capacity (see e.g. Sures et al., Reference Sures, Nachev, Selbach and Marcogliese2017). Interestingly, to the best of our knowledge, no study is available addressing a possible pollutant uptake by cercariae although studies by Morley and colleagues (Morley et al., Reference Morley, Irwin and Lewis2003, Reference Morley, Lewis and Hoole2006) suggest the availability of metals for cercariae with subsequent fatal effects. Regardless of a possible pollutant load, the majority of the cercariae die, sediment together with the suspended matter and become demineralized. Ectoparasites such as crustaceans and monogeneans, which can accumulate metals (Pérez-del-Olmo et al., Reference Pérez-del-Olmo, Nachev, Zimmermann, Fernández and Sures2019; Nachev et al., Reference Nachev, Rozdina, Michler-Kozma, Raikova and Sures2022), can also presumably take up pollutants from the environment. It has already been shown that, for example, metals may become incorporated into the sclerotized structures of the haptor in monogeneans (Gilbert and Avenant-Oldewage, Reference Gilbert and Avenant-Oldewage2017). Often, such a contaminant exposure lead to malformation of the haptor in several families of monogeneans (see e.g. Šebelová et al., Reference Šebelová, Kuperman and Gelnar2002; Pečínková et al., Reference Pečínková, Matějusová, Koubková and Gelnar2005; Dzika et al., Reference Dzika, Kuształa and Kuształa2007; Rodríguez-González et al., Reference Rodríguez-González, May-Tec, Herrera-Silveira, Puch-Hau, Quintanilla-Mena, Villafuerte, Velázquez-Abunader, Aguirre-Macedo and Vidal-Martínez2020) and could therefore even be used to indicate metal pollution in aquatic ecosystems (Gilbert and Avenant-Oldewage, Reference Gilbert and Avenant-Oldewage2021).

Indirect effects of contaminants on parasite occurrence and distribution in the aquatic environment

Indirect effects of contaminants on individual parasites and their communities refer to the presence and abundance of free-living intermediate or definitive hosts involved in the life cycle of multi-host parasites. Host organisms require an optimal range of environmental conditions and respond to deviations from these or to the presence of stressors with reduced abundance, while in the extreme range of conditions they may even be absent. As a result, parasites show lower species richness and diversity, and changes in species composition. Nachev and Sures (Reference Nachev and Sures2009) reported lower parasite diversity in fish from polluted sites (higher metal concentrations and eutrophication) in comparison to less polluted localities. Similar patterns were reported by Krause et al. (Reference Krause, McLaughlin and Marcogliese2010) in relation to general water quality in combination with adverse environmental conditions as well as by Barišić et al. (Reference Barišić, Filipović Marijić, Mijošek, Čož-Rakovac, Dragun, Krasnići, Ivanković, Kružlicová and Erk2018) and Braicovich et al. (Reference Braicovich, McMaster, Glozier and Marcogliese2020) as a consequence of industrial and agricultural activities and effluent of a wastewater treatment plant. The richness and structure of parasite communities were found to follow gradients of salinity and eutrophication, with fecal coliform counts and temperature serving as proxies for the pulp mill and municipal effluents (Blanar et al., Reference Blanar, Marcogliese and Couillard2011), land use and the concentration of hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediments (Blanar et al., Reference Blanar, Hewitt, McMaster, Kirk, Wang, Norwood and Marcogliese2016), pharmaceuticals (Pravdová et al., Reference Pravdová, Kolářová, Grabicová, Randák, Janáč, Kvach, Jurajda and Ondračková2022) or levels in PCBs in sediments (Carreras-Aubets et al., Reference Carreras-Aubets, Montero, Kostadinova and Carrassón2012) as well as the level of urbanization (Taglioretti et al., Reference Taglioretti, Rossin and Timi2018). Also anthropogenic activities such as clearcutting (Marcogliese et al., Reference Marcogliese, Ball and Lankester2001) and precipitation (Marcogliese et al., Reference Marcogliese, Locke, Gélinas and Gendron2016), which alter the temperature, chemistry and hydrology of aquatic systems and the composition of free-living communities, were found to impact the communities of fish parasites.

But also the opposite scenario has been described in the literature. The host's physiology and immune system may undergo a number of stressor-induced changes when exposed to environmental contaminants that are beneficial to the parasites' infection success, for example, if the host's immune system is weakened. In this case, levels of pollutants positively correlate with the abundance of some parasite taxa (Marcogliese, Reference Marcogliese2004, Reference Marcogliese2005). Positive effects are described for ectoparasites such as monogeneans, which often occur in higher abundance and diversity as a result of the host's immune system being compromised by pollution (Pérez-del Olmo et al., Reference Pérez-del Olmo, Raga, Kostadinova and Fernández2007; Sanchez-Ramirez et al., Reference Sanchez-Ramirez, Vidal-Martínez, Aguirre-Macedo, Rodriguez-Canul, Gold-Bouchot and Sures2007; Pravdová et al., Reference Pravdová, Kolářová, Grabicová, Mikl, Bláha, Randák, Kvach, Jurajda and Ondračková2021). Although comparatively, much information is available on the effects of contaminants on the immune system of fish, most of these studies are correlative in nature. Mechanistic studies, on the other hand, dealing with the immunotoxicity of xenobiotics are mainly based on challenges by viral and bacterial pathogens or synthetic antigens (Regala et al., Reference Regala, Rice, Schwedler and Dorociak2001; Sures, Reference Sures2008a). Comparable studies investigating the immunosuppressive effects of environmental pollutants on metazoan parasites are relatively rare, as they are quite complicated to conduct (Hoole, Reference Hoole1997). Laboratory infection experiments of European eels (Anguilla anguilla) with the swim bladder nematode Anguillicola crassus revealed that exposure of eels to PCB 126 resulted in a complete suppression of the eels' antibody response although no higher infection intensities were found in PCB 126-exposed eels when compared to unexposed conspecifics (Sures and Knopf, Reference Sures and Knopf2004). Moreover, a combined Cd- and PCB 126-exposure together with experimental infection with A. crassus induced significantly increased cortisol levels in eel blood, which themselves are assumed to be immunosuppressive (Sures et al., Reference Sures, Lutz and Kloas2006).

Interactive effects of simultaneously occurring pollution and parasitism on fish

Following the ecological concept of stressor interaction (Birk et al., Reference Birk, Chapman, Carvalho, Spears, Andersen, Argillier, Auer, Baattrup-Pedersen, Banin, Beklioğlu, Bondar-Kunze, Borja, Branco, Bucak, Buijse, Cardoso, Raoul-Marie Couture, Cremona, de Zwart, Feld, Ferreira, Feuchtmayr, Gessner, Gieswein, Globevnik, Graeber, Graf, Gutiérrez-Cánovas, Hanganu, Işkın, Järvinen, Jeppesen, Kotamäki, Kuijper, Lemm, Lu, Solheim, Mischke, Moe, Nõges, Nõges, Ormerod, Panagopoulos, Phillips, Posthuma, Pouso, Prudhomme, Rankinen, Rasmussen, Richardson, Sagouis, Santos, Schäfer, Schinegger, Schmutz, Schneider, Schülting, Segurado, Stefanidis, Sures, Thackeray, Turunen, Uyarra, Venohr, von der Ohe, Willby and Hering2020) pollutants and parasites can interact in many ways (Fig. 2) and 3 main types of impact on their hosts can be distinguished: (1) only 1 of the 2 stressors has relevant effects on the host, i.e. the effects of 1 stressor outweigh those of the other stressor (stressor dominance); (2) parasites and pollutants act independently in a way that their joint effect is the sum of the individual effects (additive effects); and (3) 1 stressor either strengthens (synergistic) or weakens (antagonistic) the effects of the other. As previously mentioned various organic and inorganic contaminants can act as toxic substances with adverse effects on the physiology of the host that can be modulated by simultaneously occurring parasites.

Fig. 2. Interactive effects of pollutants and parasites on different organization levels of fish. Parasites are an additional stressor for fish that might superimpose the effects of environmental factors, which can lead to various forms of stressor interaction. In addition to frequently observed additive and synergistic negative effects on fish, there are also examples of antagonistic effects where parasite infections appear to be beneficial to infected individuals. Also, dominance effects might occur where 1 stressor outweigh effects of the other stressor. Effects of these stressors often manifest on molecular and subcellular levels but their effects might be seen on the population or even community level.

In the case of a dominant stressor, there are examples of both parasites as well as pollutants. Especially monoxenous parasites with short life cycles and high infectivity can quickly threaten fish to such an extent that they die, so that further stressors such as pollutants hardly play a role in these scenarios. For example, the monogenean Gyrodactylus salaris has shown high virulence towards East Atlantic salmon in rivers in Norway, leading to high mortality of fry and parr (Heinecke et al., Reference Heinecke, Martinussen and Buchmann2007 and references therein). On the other hand, pollutants can also show stressor dominance, especially if they are really highly toxic substances that are present in correspondingly high concentrations. There are a number of environmental disasters that show how dominant and fatal pollution as a stressor can be. One of the most prominent ones in freshwater ecosystems is probably the Sandoz accident that occurred in 1986 in Switzerland (Van Urk et al., Reference Van Urk, Kerkum and Van Leeuwen1993). A fire in a chemical production plant led to the release of toxic agrochemicals into the River Rhine, killing a large part of the eel population and severely damaging other fish species and macroinvertebrates as far downstream as the Netherlands (Güttinger and Stumm, Reference Güttinger and Stumm1992).

Probably, the most common scenario is where the negative effects of pollutants and parasites are more pronounced when they occur together, in the sense of an additive or synergistic interaction, than if only a single stressor were present (Fig. 2). Accordingly, in these cases, the damage to the fish is also significantly greater as if only a single stressor occurs (Sures, Reference Sures2008b). Many studies have shown that acute and chronic effects of chemicals can be exacerbated by parasitism, through lower fish survival (e.g. Boyce and Yamada, Reference Boyce and Yamada1977; Pascoe and Cram, Reference Pascoe and Cram1977; Gheorgiu et al., Reference Gheorgiu, Marcogliese and Scott2006), poorer body condition (e.g. Thilakaratne et al., Reference Thilakaratne, McLaughlin and Marcogliese2007) and various physiological markers (e.g. Marcogliese and Pietrock, Reference Marcogliese and Pietrock2011 and references therein; Sures et al., Reference Sures, Nachev, Selbach and Marcogliese2017 and references therein). In particular, interest in the interaction between parasites and environmental pollution has increased in recent years in terms of biomarker responses. Currently, it appears that mostly the pathogenicity of parasites can be enhanced when they coexist with pollutants, such that the negative effects induced by pollution are exacerbated by the parasites (Marcogliese et al., Reference Marcogliese, Dautremepuits, Gendron and Fournier2010; Frank et al., Reference Frank, Godehardt, Nachev, Trubiroha, Kloas and Sures2013). However, the modulation of pollutant–biomarker responses in organisms by parasites is a phenomenon that is currently not well understood and therefore deserves further investigation (Sures et al., Reference Sures, Nachev, Selbach and Marcogliese2017).

The most interesting interactions are antagonistic effects, where the presence of 1 stressor mitigates the negative effects of the other. The ability of some helminth species such as cestodes, acanthocephalans and nematodes to accumulate pollutants in high concentrations is the best-known example in this context. Due to their enormous pollutant (mainly metals) accumulation capacity, these parasites can significantly reduce the levels of accumulated pollutants within the fish body (summarized in Sures et al., Reference Sures, Nachev, Selbach and Marcogliese2017). This has been demonstrated in laboratory and field studies for concentrations of various trace elements whose concentrations were reduced in fish infected by acanthocephalans (Sures et al., Reference Sures, Siddall and Taraschewski1999, Reference Sures, Dezfuli and Krug2003; Filipović Marijić et al., Reference Filipović Marijić, Vardić Smrzlić and Raspor2013, Reference Filipović Marijić, Vardić Smrzlić and Raspor2014; Brázová et al., Reference Brázová, Hanzelová, Miklisová, Šalamún and Vidal-Martínez2015; Paller et al., Reference Paller, Resurreccion, de la Cruz and Bandal2016), cestodes (Gabrashanska and Nedeva, Reference Gabrashanska and Nedeva1996; Turcekova and Hanzelova, Reference Turcekova and Hanzelova1999; Eira et al., Reference Eira, Torres, Miquel, Vaqueiro, Soares and Vingada2009; Oyoo-Okoth et al., Reference Oyoo-Okoth, Wim, Osano, Kraak, Ngure, Makwali and Orina2010; Baruš et al., Reference Baruš, Šimková, Prokeš, Peňáz and Vetešník2012; Brázová et al., Reference Brázová, Hanzelová, Miklisová, Šalamún and Vidal-Martínez2015; Torres et al., Reference Torres, Eira, Miquel, Ferrer-Maza, Delgado and Casadevall2015; Leite et al., Reference Leite, dos Reis Pedreira Filho, de Azevedo and Abdallah2021) and nematodes (Bergey et al., Reference Bergey, Weis and Weis2002; Hursky and Pietrock, Reference Hursky and Pietrock2015). Similar patterns were reported also for organic pollutants, with acanthocephalan infected fish (Brázová et al., Reference Brázová, Hanzelová and Miklisová2012) having significant lower concentrations of PCBs. From a theoretical point of view, one would expect less severe effects if the pollutant concentration in infected hosts is lower than in non-infected hosts. Lower pollutant-related toxicity could also result if alternative physiological pathways are activated by parasites, leading to changes in the host's pollutant metabolism. However, these reduced pollutant effects must of course be weighed against the pathological effects of parasites. And this assessment must be carried out individually for each host–parasite–pollutant combination, so that we are currently still a long way from understanding antagonistic effects of parasites and pollutants. Beneficial effects of infection with acanthocephalans on the physiology of fish (reduced oxidative damage) were recorded in natural habitats with higher levels of organic micropollutants (Molbert et al., Reference Molbert, Alliot, Leroux-Coyau, Médoc, Biard, Meylan, Jacquin, Santos and Goutte2020) and in laboratory exposure studies with PAH (Molbert et al., Reference Molbert, Agostini, Alliot, Angelier, Biard, Decencière, Leroux-Coyau, Millot, Ribout and Goutte2021). Also from non-vertebrate hosts antagonistic interactions between pollutants and parasites are known. Freshwater mussels, Pisidium amnicum, partially infected with larvae of digenean trematodes, were exposed to pentachlorophenol (PCP), resulting in a significantly shorter survival time of the uninfected mussels compared to infected conspecifics, which survived up to twice as long (Heinonen et al., Reference Heinonen, Kukkonen and Holapainen2001). For Artemia parthenogenetica Sánchez et al. (Reference Sánchez, Pons, Martínez-Haro, Taggart, Lenormand and Green2016) demonstrated a higher host resistance to increasing arsenic concentrations for intermediate hosts infected with different parasite species.

Compared to additive or synergistic interactions of parasites and pollutants, there have been few studies on antagonistic effects where parasites can reduce pollutant effects. Parasite-reduced pollutant concentrations in infected hosts certainly appear beneficial if hosts face increasing levels of pollution, as lower pollutant concentrations are usually associated with less toxic effects. This relationship should be explored in more detail in future studies, with a clear focus on whether the negative effects of a parasitosis can be outweighed by the potentially positive effects of lower pollutant concentrations. In addressing these aspects, studies should be conducted not only at the individual level but also, if possible, at the population and ecosystem levels.

Conclusions

The interactions between pollutants and parasites presented here show that parasites must be regarded as organisms that are in close mutual exchange with pollutants. This interaction of parasites and pollutants is significant for both – the occurrence of parasites in ecosystems and for the health of their hosts. In environmental studies, parasites need to be taken into account because they can influence the interaction between fish and pollutants and thus the results of the studies in general. Lower accumulation of contaminants in organism infected with parasites, for example, could make free-living established indicator organisms less reliable for environmental monitoring. On the other hand, contaminants are capable of significantly affecting fish–parasite interactions and parasite transmission, which may lead to an increase or decrease in parasite infestation in fish populations. Systematic studies on the mechanisms of action and the complexity of the interaction between fish and parasites in a polluted environment are largely lacking, so that the basic relationships are often poorly understood. It is known that parasites are also successfully transferred to the next host in polluted environments through host manipulation (e.g. Fanton et al., Reference Fanton, Franquet, Logez and Kaldonski2020). However, there is not much research studies on changes in host behaviour under pollution conditions and how this affects the transmission efficiency of parasites. Acute or chronic toxic effects on e.g. intermediate hosts may weaken them and make them more susceptible to predation by fish, which could be beneficial for trophically transmitted parasites (e.g. Acanthocephala, Cestoda).

Acknowledgements

We thank the editors and 2 unknown reviewers of this special issue for their support.

Author's contributions

BS and MN conceived the structure of this paper. BS led the writing of the paper, MN oversaw the writing and prepared the figures. All authors contributed critically to the draft and approved the final paper.

Financial support

This study was performed within the Collaborative Research Center (CRC) RESIST (A09) funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – CRC 1439/1 – project number: 426547801.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

Not applicable here.

References

Barišić, J, Filipović Marijić, V, Mijošek, T, Čož-Rakovac, R, Dragun, Z, Krasnići, N, Ivanković, D, Kružlicová, D and Erk, M (2018) Evaluation of architectural and histopathological biomarkers in the intestine of brown trout (Salmo trutta Linnaeus, 1758) challenged with environmental pollution. Science of the Total Environment 642, 656–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baruš, V, Šimková, A, Prokeš, M, Peňáz, M and Vetešník, L (2012) Heavy metals in two host-parasite systems: tapeworm vs fish. Acta Veterinaria Brno 81, 313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergey, L, Weis, JS and Weis, P (2002) Mercury uptake by the estuarine species Palaemonetes pugio and Fundulus heteroclitus compared with their parasites, Probopyrus pandalicola and Eustrongylides sp. Marine Pollution Bulletin 44, 1046–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birk, S, Chapman, D, Carvalho, L, Spears, BM, Andersen, HE, Argillier, C, Auer, S, Baattrup-Pedersen, A, Banin, L, Beklioğlu, M, Bondar-Kunze, E, Borja, A, Branco, P, Bucak, T, Buijse, AD, Cardoso, AC, Raoul-Marie Couture, RM, Cremona, F, de Zwart, D, Feld, CK, Ferreira, MT, Feuchtmayr, H, Gessner, MO, Gieswein, A, Globevnik, L, Graeber, D, Graf, W, Gutiérrez-Cánovas, C, Hanganu, J, Işkın, U, Järvinen, M, Jeppesen, E, Kotamäki, N, Kuijper, M, Lemm, JU, Lu, S, Solheim, AL, Mischke, U, Moe, SJ, Nõges, P, Nõges, T, Ormerod, SJ, Panagopoulos, Y, Phillips, G, Posthuma, L, Pouso, S, Prudhomme, C, Rankinen, K, Rasmussen, JJ, Richardson, J, Sagouis, A, Santos, JM, Schäfer, RB, Schinegger, R, Schmutz, S, Schneider, SC, Schülting, L, Segurado, P, Stefanidis, K, Sures, B, Thackeray, SJ, Turunen, J, Uyarra, MC, Venohr, M, von der Ohe, PC, Willby, N and Hering, D (2020) Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems. Nature Ecology and Evolution 4, 1060–1068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanar, CA, Marcogliese, DJ and Couillard, CM (2011) Natural and anthropogenic factors shape metazoan parasite community structure in mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) from two estuaries in New Brunswick, Canada. Folia Parasitologica 58, 240–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanar, CA, Hewitt, M, McMaster, M, Kirk, J, Wang, Z, Norwood, W and Marcogliese, DJ (2016) Parasite community similarity in Athabasca river trout-perch (Percopsis omiscomaycus) varies with local-scale land use and sediment hydrocarbons, but not distance or linear gradients. Parasitology Research 115, 3853–3866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, NP and Yamada, SB (1977) Effects of a parasite, Eubothrium salvelini (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea), on the resistance of juvenile sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka to zinc. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34, 706–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braicovich, PE, McMaster, M, Glozier, NE and Marcogliese, DJ (2020) Distribution of parasites of slimy sculpin Cottus cognatus Richardson, 1836 (Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae) in the Athabasca drainage, Alberta, Canada, and their relation to water quality. Parasitology Research 119, 3243–3254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brázová, T, Hanzelová, V and Miklisová, D (2012) Bioaccumulation of six PCB indicator congeners in a heavily polluted water reservoir in Eastern Slovakia: tissue-specific distribution in fish and their parasites. Parasitology Research 111, 779–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brázová, T, Hanzelová, V, Miklisová, D, Šalamún, P and Vidal-Martínez, VM (2015) Host-parasite relationships as determinants of heavy metal concentrations in perch (Perca fluviatilis) and its intestinal parasite infection. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 122, 551–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchmann, K and Bresciani, J (2006) Monogenea (Phylum Platyhelminthes). In Woo, PTK (ed.), Fish Diseases and Disorders: Protozoan and Metazoan Infections, vol. 1. Wallingford: CABI Publishing, pp. 297–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras-Aubets, M, Montero, FE, Kostadinova, A and Carrassón, M (2012) Parasite communities in the red mullet, Mullus barbatus L., respond to small-scale variation in the levels of polychlorinated biphenyls in the Western Mediterranean. Marine Pollution Bulletin 64, 1853–1860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakraborty, SB (2021) Non-essential heavy metals as endocrine disruptors: evaluating impact on reproduction in teleosts. Proceedings of the Zoological Society 74, 417–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combes, C (1995) Interactions Durables. Ecologie et Évolution du Parasitisme. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Dezfuli, BS, Maestri, C, Lorenzoni, M, Carosi, A, Maynard, BJ and Bosi, G (2021) The impact of Anguillicoloides crassus (Nematoda) on European eel swimbladder: histopathology and relationship between neuroendocrine and immune cells. Parasitology 148, 612–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz-Morales, DM, Bommarito, C, Vajedsamiei, J, Grabner, DS, Rilov, G, Wahl, M and Sures, B (2022) Heat sensitivity of first host and cercariae may restrict parasite transmission in a warming sea. Scientific Reports 12, 1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzika, E, Kuształa, A and Kuształa, M (2007) Parasites of carp bream, Abramis brama, from lake Jamno, Poland. Helminthologia 44, 222–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eira, C, Torres, J, Miquel, J, Vaqueiro, J, Soares, AMVM and Vingada, J (2009) Trace element concentrations in Proteocephalus macrocephalus (Cestoda) and Anguillicola crassus (Nematoda) in comparison to their fish host, Anguilla anguilla in Ria de Aveiro, Portugal. Science of the Total Environment 407, 991–998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erasmus, JH, Zimmermann, S, Smit, NJ, Malherbe, W, Nachev, M, Sures, B and Wepener, V (2022) Human health risks associated with consumption of fish contaminated with trace elements from intensive mining activities in a peri-urban region. Science of the Total Environment 825, 154011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanton, H, Franquet, E, Logez, M and Kaldonski, N (2020) Pomphorhynchus laevis manipulates Gammarus pulex behaviour despite salt pollution. Freshwater Biology 65, 1718–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filipović Marijić, V, Vardić Smrzlić, I and Raspor, B (2013) Effect of acanthocephalan infection on metal, total protein and metallothionein concentrations in European chub from a Sava river section with low metal contamination. Science of the Total Environment 463–464, 772–780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filipović Marijić, V, Vardić Smrzlić, I and Raspor, B (2014) Does fish reproduction and metabolic activity influence metal levels in fish intestinal parasites, acanthocephalans, during fish spawning and post-spawning period? Chemosphere 112, 449–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, SN, Godehardt, S, Nachev, M, Trubiroha, A, Kloas, W and Sures, B (2013) Influence of the cestode Ligula intestinalis and the acanthocephalan Polymorphus minutus on levels of heat shock proteins (HSP70) and metallothioneins in their fish and crustacean intermediate hosts. Environmental Pollution 180, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabagambi, NP, Salvanes, A-GV, Midtøy, F and Skorping, A (2019) The tapeworm Ligula intestinalis alters the behavior of the fish intermediate host Engraulicypris sardella, but only after it has become infective to the final host. Behavioural Processes 158, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrashanska, M and Nedeva, I (1996) Content of heavy metals in the system fish-cestodes. Parassitologia 38, 58.Google Scholar
Gérard, C, Hervé, M, Réveillac, E and Acou, A (2016) Spatial distribution and impact of the gill-parasitic Mazocraes alosae (Monogenea Polyopisthocotylea) on Alosa alosa and A. fallax (Actinopterygii, Clupeidae). Hydrobiologia 763, 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheorghiu, C, Cable, J, Marcogliese, DJ and Scott, ME (2007) Effects of waterborne zinc on reproduction, survival and morphometrics of Gyrodactylus turnbulli (Monogenea) on guppies (Poecilia reticulata). International Journal for Parasitology 37, 375–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gheorgiu, C, Marcogliese, DJ and Scott, M (2006) Concentration-dependent effects of waterborne zinc on population dynamics of Gyrodactylus turnbulli (Monogenea) on isolated guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Parasitology 132, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, BM and Avenant-Oldewage, A (2017) Trace element and metal sequestration in vitellaria and sclerites, and reactive oxygen intermediates in a freshwater monogenean, Paradiplozoon ichthyoxanthon. PLoS ONE 12, e0177558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, BM and Avenant-Oldewage, A (2021) Monogeneans as bioindicators: a meta-analysis of effect size of contaminant exposure toward Monogenea (Platyhelminthes). Ecological Indicators 130, 108062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, N (1983) Behavioural effects of the parasite Schistocephalus solidus (Cestoda) on an intermediate host, the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Animal Behaviour 31, 1192–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedknegt, MA, Feis, ME, Wegner, KM, Luttikhuizen, PC, Buschbaum, C, Camphuysen, KCJ, van der Meer, J and Thieltges, DW (2016) Parasites and marine invasions: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Journal of Sea Research 113, 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güttinger, H and Stumm, W (1992) Ecotoxicology: an analysis of the Rhine pollution caused by the Sandoz chemical accident, 1986. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 17, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinecke, RD, Martinussen, T and Buchmann, K (2007) Microhabitat selection of Gyrodactylus salaris Malmberg on different salmonids. Journal of Fish Diseases 30, 733–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinonen, J, Kukkonen, JVK and Holapainen, JI (2001) Temperature- and parasite-induced changes in toxicity and lethal body burdens of pentachlorophenol in the freshwater clam Pisidium amnicum. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 20, 2778–2784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoole, D (1997) The effects of pollutants on the immune response of fish: implications for helminth parasites. Parassitologia 39, 219–225.Google ScholarPubMed
Hua, J, Buss, N, Kim, J, Orlofske, SA and Hoverman, JT (2016) Population-specific toxicity of six insecticides to the trematode Echinoparyphium sp. Parasitology 143, 542–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hursky, O and Pietrock, M (2015) Intestinal nematodes affect selenium bioaccumulation, oxidative stress biomarkers, and health parameters in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Environmental Science and Technology 49, 2469–2476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, PTJ, Dobson, A, Lafferty, KD, Marcogliese, DJ, Memmott, J, Orlofske, SA, Poulin, R and Thieltges, DW (2010) When parasites become prey: ecological and epidemiological significance of eating parasites. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25, 362–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kontchou, JA, Nachev, M and Sures, B (2021) Ecotoxicological effects of traffic-related metal sediment pollution in Lumbriculus variegatus and Gammarus sp. Environmental Pollution 268, 115884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koprivnikar, J, Baker, RL and Forbes, MR (2006) Environmental factors influencing trematode prevalence in grey tree frog (Hyla versicolor) tadpoles in southern Ontario. Journal of Parasitology 92, 997–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koprivnikar, J, Forbes, MR and Baker, RL (2007) Contaminant effects on host-parasite interactions: atrazine, frogs, and trematodes. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 26, 2166–2170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krause, RJ, McLaughlin, JD and Marcogliese, DJ (2010) Parasite fauna of Etheostoma nigrum (Percidae: Etheostomatinae) in localities of varying pollution stress in the St. Lawrence River, Quebec, Canada. Parasitology Research 107, 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuris, AM, Hechinger, RF, Shaw, JC, Whitney, KL, Aguirre-Macedo, L, Boch, CA, Dobson, AP, Dunham, EJ, Fredensborg, BL, Huspeni, TC, Torchin, ME and Lafferty, KD (2008) Ecosystem energetic implications of parasite and free-living biomass in three estuaries. Nature 454, 515–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leite, LAR, dos Reis Pedreira Filho, W, de Azevedo, RK and Abdallah, VD (2021) Proteocephalus macrophallus (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) infecting Cichla kelberi (Cichliformes: Cichlidae) as a bioindicator for trace metal accumulation in a neotropical river from Southeastern Brazil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 232, 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, M, Schreiner, VC, Graf, N, Szöcs, E, Bundschuh, M, Battes, KP, Cîmpean, M, Sures, B, Grabner, D, Buse, J, Buse, J and Schäfer, RB (2022) Pesticide effects on macroinvertebrates and leaf litter decomposition in areas with traditional agriculture. Science of the Total Environment 828, 154549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcogliese, DJ (2004) Parasites: small players with crucial roles in the ecological theater. EcoHealth 1, 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcogliese, DJ (2005) Parasites of the superorganism: are they indicators of ecosystem health? International Journal for Parasitology 35, 705–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcogliese, DJ and Pietrock, M (2011) Combined effects of parasites and contaminants on animal health: parasites do matter. Trends in Parasitology 27, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcogliese, DJ, Ball, M and Lankester, MW (2001) Potential impacts of clearcutting on parasites of minnows in small boreal lakes. Folia Parasitologica 48, 269–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcogliese, DJ, Dautremepuits, C, Gendron, AD and Fournier, M (2010) Interactions between parasites and pollutants in yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in the St. Lawrence River, Canada: implications for resistance and tolerance to parasites. Canadian Journal of Zoology 88, 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcogliese, DJ, Locke, SA, Gélinas, M and Gendron, AD (2016) Variation in parasite communities in Spottail shiners (Notropis hudsonius) linked with precipitation. Journal of Parasitology 102, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molbert, N, Alliot, F, Leroux-Coyau, M, Médoc, V, Biard, C, Meylan, S, Jacquin, L, Santos, R and Goutte, A (2020) Potential benefits of acanthocephalan parasites for chub hosts in polluted environments. Environmental Science and Technology 54, 5540–5549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molbert, N, Agostini, S, Alliot, F, Angelier, F, Biard, C, Decencière, B, Leroux-Coyau, M, Millot, A, Ribout, C and Goutte, A (2021) Parasitism reduces oxidative stress of fish host experimentally exposed to PAHs. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 219, 112322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morley, NJ, Irwin, SWB and Lewis, JW (2003) Pollution toxicity to the transmission of larval digeneans through their molluscan hosts. Parasitology 126, S5–S26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, NJ, Lewis, JW and Hoole, D (2006) Pollutant-induced effects on immunological and physiological interactions in aquatic host-trematode systems: implications for parasite transmission. Journal of Helminthology 80, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Münderle, M, Sures, B and Taraschewski, H (2004) Influence of Anguillicola crassus (Nematoda) and Ichthyophthirius multifiliis (Ciliophora) on swimming activity of European eel Anguilla anguilla. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 60, 133–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Museth, J (2001) Effects of Ligula intestinalis on habitat use, predation risk and catchability in European minnows. Journal of Fish Biology 59, 1070–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nachev, M and Sures, B (2009) The endohelminth fauna of barbel (Barbus barbus) correlates with water quality of the Danube River in Bulgaria. Parasitology 136, 545–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nachev, M, Rozdina, D, Michler-Kozma, DN, Raikova, G and Sures, B (2022) Metal accumulation in ecto- and endoparasites from the anadromous fish, the Pontic shad (Alosa immaculata). Parasitology 149, 496–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyoo-Okoth, E, Wim, A, Osano, O, Kraak, MH, Ngure, V, Makwali, J and Orina, PS (2010) Use of the fish endoparasite Ligula intestinalis (L., 1758) in an intermediate cyprinid host (Rastreneobola argentea) for biomonitoring heavy metal contamination in Lake Victoria, Kenya. Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management 15, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paller, VGV, Resurreccion, DJB, de la Cruz, CPP and Bandal, MZ (2016) Acanthocephalan parasites (Acanthogyrus sp.) of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) as Biosink of lead (Pb) contamination in a Philippine freshwater lake. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 96, 810–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascoe, D and Cram, P (1977) The effect of parasitism on the toxicity of cadmium to the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Journal of Fish Biology 10, 467–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pečínková, M, Matějusová, I, Koubková, B and Gelnar, M (2005) Classification and occurrence of abnormally developed Paradiplozoon homoion (Monogenea, Diplozoinae) parasitizing gudgeon Gobio gobio. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 64, 63–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez-del-Olmo, A, Nachev, M, Zimmermann, S, Fernández, M and Sures, B (2019) Medium-term dynamics of element concentrations in a sparid fish and its isopod parasite after the Prestige oil-spill: shifting baselines? Science of the Total Environment 686, 648–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-del Olmo, A, Raga, JA, Kostadinova, A and Fernández, M (2007) Parasite communities in Boops boops (L.) (Sparidae) after the prestige oil-spill: detectable alterations. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54, 266–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pietrock, M and Marcogliese, DJ (2003) Free-living endohelminth stages: at the mercy of environmental conditions. Trends in Parasitology 19, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pravdová, M, Kolářová, J, Grabicová, K, Mikl, L, Bláha, M, Randák, T, Kvach, Y, Jurajda, P and Ondračková, M (2021) Associations between pharmaceutical contaminants, parasite load and health status in brown trout exposed to sewage effluent in a small stream. Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 21, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pravdová, M, Kolářová, J, Grabicová, K, Randák, T, Janáč, M, Kvach, Y, Jurajda, P and Ondračková, M (2022) Pharmaceutical contamination and biotic factors affecting parasitism in common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquaculture Research 53, 4116–4127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffel, TR, Sheingold, JL and Rohr, JR (2009) Lack of pesticide toxicity to Echinostoma trivolvis eggs and miracidia. Journal of Parasitology 95, 1548–1551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regala, RP, Rice, CD, Schwedler, TE and Dorociak, IR (2001) The effects of tributyltin (TBT) and 3,3′,4,4′,5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB-126) mixtures on antibody responses and phagocyte oxidative burst activity in channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 40, 386–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodríguez-González, A, May-Tec, AL, Herrera-Silveira, J, Puch-Hau, C, Quintanilla-Mena, M, Villafuerte, J, Velázquez-Abunader, I, Aguirre-Macedo, ML and Vidal-Martínez, VM (2020) Fluctuating asymmetry of sclerotized structures of Haliotrematoides spp. (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae) as bioindicators of aquatic contamination. Ecological Indicators 117, 106548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohr, JR, Raffel, TR, Sessions, SK and Hudson, PJ (2008) Understanding the net effects of pesticides on amphibian trematode infections. Ecological Applications 18, 1743–1753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothe, LE, Botha, TL, Feld, CK, Weyand, M, Zimmermann, S, Smit, NJ, Wepener, V and Sures, B (2021) Effects of conventionally-treated and ozonated wastewater on mortality, physiology, body length, and behavior of embryonic and larval zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environmental Pollution 286, 117241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez-Ramirez, C, Vidal-Martínez, VM, Aguirre-Macedo, ML, Rodriguez-Canul, RP, Gold-Bouchot, G and Sures, B (2007) Cichlidogyrus sclerosus (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalinae) and its host, the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), as bioindicators of chemical pollution. The Journal of Parasitology 93, 1097–1106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sánchez, MI, Pons, I, Martínez-Haro, M, Taggart, MA, Lenormand, T and Green, AJ (2016) When parasites are good for health: cestode parasitism increases resistance to arsenic in brine shrimps. PLoS Pathogens 12, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schertzinger, G, Ruchter, N and Sures, B (2018) Metal accumulation in sediments and amphipods downstream of combined sewer overflows. Science of the Total Environment 616–617, 1199–1207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schertzinger, G, Itzel, F, Kerstein, J, Tuerk, J, Schmidt, TC and Sures, B (2019) Accumulation pattern and possible adverse effects of organic pollutants in sediments downstream of combined sewer overflows. Science of the Total Environment 675, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schröder, M, Sondermann, M, Sures, B and Hering, D (2015) Effects of salinity gradients on benthic invertebrate and diatom communities in a German lowland river. Ecological Indicators 57, 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šebelová, Š, Kuperman, B and Gelnar, M (2002) Abnormalities of the attachment clamps of representatives of the family Diplozoidae. Journal of Helminthology 76, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafaquat, AS, Syed, T, Showket, AG, Shazia, A, Uzma, N and Iram, A (2015) Acanthocephalan infestation in fishes – a review. Journal of Zoology Studies 2, 33–38.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, MS and Dove, ADM (2006) Histopathological examination of wild American eels infected with Anguillicola crassus. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 18, 257–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soldánová, M, Selbach, C and Sures, B (2016) The early worm catches the bird? Productivity and patterns of Trichobilharzia szidati cercarial emission from Lymnaea stagnalis. PLoS ONE 11, e0149678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sures, B (2008 a) Environmental parasitology. Interaqions between parasites and pollutants in the aquatic environment. Parasite 15, 434–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sures, B (2008 b) Host-parasite interactions in polluted environments. Journal of Fish Biology 73, 2133–2142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sures, B and Knopf, K (2004) Individual and combined effects of cadmium and 3,3′,4,4′,5- pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) on the humoral immune response in European eel (Anguilla anguilla) experimentally infected with larvae of Anguillicola crassus (Nematoda). Parasitology 128, 445–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sures, B, Siddall, R and Taraschewski, H (1999) Parasites as accumulation indicators of heavy metal pollution. Parasitology Today 15, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sures, B, Knopf, K and Kloas, W (2001) Induction of stress by the swimbladder nematode Anguillicola crassus in European eels, Anguilla anguilla, after repeated experimental infection. Parasitology 123, 179–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sures, B, Dezfuli, BS and Krug, HF (2003) The intestinal parasite Pomphorhynchus laevis (Acanthocephala) interferes with the uptake and accumulation of lead (210Pb) in its fish host chub (Leuciscus cephalus). International Journal for Parasitology 33, 1617–1622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sures, B, Lutz, I and Kloas, W (2006) Effects of infection with Anguillicola crassus and simultaneous exposure with Cd and 3,3′,4,4′,5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) on the levels of cortisol and glucose in European eel (Anguilla anguilla). Parasitology 132, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sures, B, Nachev, M, Selbach, C and Marcogliese, DJ (2017) Parasite responses to pollution: what we know and where we go in ‘Environmental parasitology’. Parasites and Vectors 10, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svensson, PA, Eghbal, R, Eriksson, R and Nilsson, E (2022) How cunning is the puppet-master? Cestode-infected fish appear generally fearless. Parasitology Research 121, 1305–1315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taglioretti, V, Rossin, MA and Timi, JT (2018) Fish-trematode systems as indicators of anthropogenic disturbance: effects of urbanization on a small stream. Ecological Indicators 93, 759–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taslima, K, Al-Emran, M, Rahman, MS, Hasan, J, Ferdous, Z, Rohani, MF and Shahjahan, M (2022) Impacts of heavy metals on early development, growth and reproduction of fish: a review. Toxicology Reports 9, 858–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieltges, DW, Jensen, KT and Poulin, R (2008) The role of biotic factors in the transmission of free-living endohelminth stages. Parasitology 135, 407–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thilakaratne, IDSIP, McLaughlin, JD and Marcogliese, DJ (2007) Effects of pollution and parasites on biomarkers of fish health in spottail shiners Notropis hudsonius (Clinton). Journal of Fish Biology 71, 519–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, KB, Farrell, AP and Brauner, CJ (eds) (2013) Fish Physiology: Organic Chemical Toxicology of Fishes. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Torres, J, Eira, C, Miquel, J, Ferrer-Maza, D, Delgado, E and Casadevall, M (2015) Effect of intestinal tapeworm Clestobothrium crassiceps on concentrations of toxic elements and selenium in European Hake Merluccius merluccius from the Gulf of Lion (Northwestern Mediterranean Sea). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 63, 9349–9356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trubiroha, A, Kroupova, H, Wuertz, S, Frank, SN, Sures, B and Kloas, W (2010) Naturally-induced endocrine disruption by the parasite Ligula intestinalis (Cestoda) in roach (Rutilus rutilus). General and Comparative Endocrinology 166, 234–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trubiroha, A, Kroupova, H, Frank, SN, Sures, B and Kloas, W (2011) Inhibition of gametogenesis by the cestode Ligula intestinalis in roach (Rutilus rutilus) is attenuated under laboratory conditions. Parasitology 138, 648–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turcekova, L and Hanzelova, V (1999) Concentrations of Cd, As and Pb in non-infected and infected Perca fluviatilis with Proteocephalus percae. Helmintologia 36, 31.Google Scholar
Van Urk, G, Kerkum, F and Van Leeuwen, CJ (1993) Insects and insecticides in the lower Rhine. Water Research 27, 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Changes in pollution levels of aquatic habitats can directly or indirectly affect the structure and composition of fish parasite communities. The direct mode of action includes mainly effects on adult ectoparasites or larval stages that are in immediate contact with the environment. Adverse effects of pollutants lead to lower transmission efficiency of parasites, which in turn affects the structure and dynamics of parasite populations.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Interactive effects of pollutants and parasites on different organization levels of fish. Parasites are an additional stressor for fish that might superimpose the effects of environmental factors, which can lead to various forms of stressor interaction. In addition to frequently observed additive and synergistic negative effects on fish, there are also examples of antagonistic effects where parasite infections appear to be beneficial to infected individuals. Also, dominance effects might occur where 1 stressor outweigh effects of the other stressor. Effects of these stressors often manifest on molecular and subcellular levels but their effects might be seen on the population or even community level.