Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:14:15.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of the protein content of CBA/Ca mouse diet on the population dynamics of Trichuris muris (Nematoda) in primary infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

E. Michael
Affiliation:
Parasite Epidemiology Research Group, Department of Biology, Imperial College, University of London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BB
D. A. P. Bundy
Affiliation:
Parasite Epidemiology Research Group, Department of Biology, Imperial College, University of London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BB

Extract

The relationship between host dietary protein and intestinal helminth population biology during primary infection was studied using a mouse–T. muris experimental model. Uninfected CBA/Ca mice fed either a 4% (by mass) or 16% protein diet grew at a similar rate, but both suffered significant growth retardation when infected with T. muris. T. muris initial establishment and fecundity were unaffected by dietary protein content, but were significantly influenced by infection dose, declining at the higher level of infection. Dietary protein deficiency increased parasite survival at high infection levels. Heavily infected hosts fed the 16% protein diet were found to expel almost the whole of their infections around day 21 p.i. By contrast, this response appeared defective in hosts fed the lower 4% protein diet, resulting in the establishment and survival of large, chronic and patent infections. Mean faecal egg output per mouse increased with infection dose in animals fed a low protein diet, but was low and unrelated to infection exposure in hosts fed the 16% protein diet. It is concluded that low protein levels in diet, via alterations in host resistance, may have an important influence on the transmission of T. muris.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, E. M., Parkins, J. J. & Holmes, P. H. (1985). Influence of dietary protein on parasite establishment and pathogenesis in Finn Dorset and Scottish Blackface lambs given a single moderate infection of Haemonchus contortus. Research in Veterinary Science 38, 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alleyne, G. A. O., Hay, R. W., Picou, D. I., Stanfield, J. P. & Whitehead, R. G. (1977). Protein-Energy Malnutrition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. M. & Michel, J. F. (1977). Density-dependent survival in populations of Ostertagia ostertagi. International Journal for Parasitology 7, 321–9.Google Scholar
Behnke, J. M. (1987). Evasion of immunity by nematode parasites causing chronic infections. Advances in Parasitology 26, 171.Google Scholar
Bolin, T. D., Davis, A. E., Cummins, A. G., Duncombe, V. M. & Kelly, J. D. (1977). Effect of iron and protein deficiency on the expulsion of Nippostronglylus brasiliensis from the small intestine of the rat. Gut 18, 182–6.Google Scholar
Brailsford, T. J. & Mapes, C. J. (1987). Comparisons of Heligmosomoides polygyrus primary infection in protein-deficient and well-nourished mice. Parasitology 95, 311–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bundy, D. A. P. & Golden, M. H. N. (1987). The impact of host nutrition on gastrointestinal helminth populations. Parasitology 95, 623–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandra, R. K. (1984). Parasitic infection, nutrition, and immune response. Federation Proceedings 43, 251–5.Google Scholar
Crompton, D. W. T. (1987). Host diet as a determinant of parasite growth, reproduction and survival. Mammal Review 17, 117–26.Google Scholar
Crompton, D. W. T., Walters, D. E. & Arnold, S. (1981). Changes in the food intake and body weight of protein-malnourished rats infected with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (Nematoda). Parasitology 82, 23–8.Google Scholar
Donaldson, A. W. & Otto, G. F. (1946). Effects of protein-deficient diets on immunity to a nematode (Nippostrongylus muris) infection. American Journal of Hygiene 44, 384–99.Google Scholar
Foster, A. O. & Cort, W. W. (1932). The relation of diet to the susceptibility of dogs to Ancylostoma caninum. American Journal of Hygiene 16, 214–65.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S. N. & Behnke, J. M. (1977). Impairment of primary expulsion of Trichuris muris in mice concurrently infected with Nematospiroides dubius. Parasitology 75, 71–8.Google Scholar
Keymer, A. E. & Read, A. F. (1989). Behavioural ecology: the impact of parasitism. In Parasitism: Coexistence or Conflict? (ed. Toft, C. A. & Aeschlimann, A.), pp. 3761. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, T. D. G. & Wakelin, D. (1982). The use of host strain variation to assess the significance of mucosal mast cells in the spontaneous cure responses of mice to the nematode Trichuris muris. International Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology 67, 302–5.Google Scholar
Macdonald, G. (1965). The dynamics of helminth infections, with special reference to schistosomes. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 59, 489506.Google Scholar
May, R. M. (1977). Togetherness among schistosomes: its effects on the dynamics of the infection. Mathematical Biosciences 35, 301–43.Google Scholar
Michael, E. (1990). The effect of protein malnutrition on the population dynamics of Trichuris muris (Nematoda) in CBA/Ca mice. Ph.D. thesis, London University.Google Scholar
Michael, E. & Bundy, D.A.P. (1988). Density dependence in establishment, growth and worm fecundity in intestinal helminthiasis: the population biology of Trichuris muris (Nematoda) infection in CBA/Ca mice. Parasitology 98, 451–8.Google Scholar
Panesar, T. S. (1981). The early phase of tissue invasion by Trichuris muris (Nematoda: Trichuroidea). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 66, 163–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panesar, T. S. & Croll, C. A. (1980). The location of parasites within their hosts: site selection by Trichuris muris in the laboratory mouse. International Journal for Parasitology 10, 261–73.Google Scholar
Pike, E. H. (1972). Effects of solid and soluble diets upon Trichuris muris (Shrank, 1788) and DBA/2J mice. Journal of Parasitology 58, 257–64.Google Scholar
Selby, G. R. & Wakelin, D. (1975). Suppression of the immune response to Trichuris muris in lactating mice. Parasitology 71, 7785.Google Scholar
Slater, A. F. G. (1987). The influence of dietary protein on the epidemiology of Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nemaoda) in the laboratory mouse. Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Slater, A. F. G. & Keymer, A. E. (1986). Heligmosomoides polygyrus (Nematoda): the influence of dietary protein on the dynamics of repeated infection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 229, 6983.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L. S. (1987). The Impact of Helminth Infections on Human Nutrition. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. (1967). Acquired immunity to Trichuris muris in the albino laboratory mouse. Parasitology 57, 515–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. (1973). The stimulation of immunity to Trichuris muris in mice exposed to low-level infections. Parasitology 66, 181–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakelin, D. (1975). Genetic control of immune responses to parasites: immunity to Trichuris muris in inbred and random-bred strains of mice. Parasitology 71, 5160.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. & Lee, T. D. G. (1987). Immunobiology of Trichuris and Capillaria infections. In Immune Responses in Parasitic Infections: Immunology, Immunopathology and Immunoprophylaxis, Vol. 1 (ed. Soulsby, E. J. L.), pp. 6188. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar