Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:40:01.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Echinococcus granulosus infection in mice: host responses during primary and secondary infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

E. M. Riley ,
J. B. Dixon ,
P. Jenkins  and
O. Ross
E. M. Riley
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX
J. B. Dixon
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX
P. Jenkins
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX
O. Ross
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The reaction of Balb/c mice to primary and secondary subcutaneous infection with chinoeoccu.s granulosus protoscoleces (PSC) is described. From 3 to 14 days following primary exposure to PSC, draining lymph nodes increase in weight and there is expansion of T and B lymphocyte populations, enhancement of in vitro lymphocyte transformational responses and production of PSC-specific 1gM and IgE antibodies. Despite the persistence of viable PSC in host tissues, lymphocyte responses decline to pre-infection values over the period 3–8 weeks post-infection. Secondary exposure to PSC immediately induces lympho proliferation, enhancement of transformational responses, production of IgE antibody and encapsulation of PSC by inflammatory cells. Although specific antibody levels remain high until at least 8 weeks after challenge infection, lymphocyte activity begins to decline after 4 days and is profoundly suppressed by 10 days. Parasite viability appears to be significantly reduced in secondary, as opposed to primary, infection and is associated with the accumulation of large numbers of eosinophils, mast cells and macrophages in infected tissues.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 391 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allan, D., Jenkins, P., Connor, R. J. & Dixon, J. B. (1981). A study of immunoregulation of Balb/c mice by Echinococcus granulosus equinus during prolonged infection. Parasite Immunology 3, 137–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, A. E., Vadas, M. A. & David, J. R. (1980). Mechanisms of eosinophil-mediated helminthotoxicity. In The Eosinophil in Health and Disease (ed. Mahmoud, A. A. F. and Austen, K. F.), pp. 253–73. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. & Sadun, E. H. (1976). Immunology of Parasitic Infections. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Connor, R. J. (1980). Experimental infection of mice with Echinococcus granulosus equinus of British origin. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 74, 97–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, R. W., Trapp, A. & Williams, J. F. (1981). Pathology of Taenia taeniaeformis infection in the rat: hepatic, lymph node and thymic changes. Journal of Comparative Pathology 91, 219–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, D. A., Dixon, J. B., Jenkins, P., Judson, D. G., Riley, E. M. & Ross, G. (1984). Lymphocyte transformation as an aspect of immune recognition in echinococcosis. A review of some current experiments. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 78, 206–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, J. B., Jenkins, P. & Allan, D. (1982). Immune recognition of Echinococcus granulosus. 1. Parasite-activated, primary transformation by normal murine lymph node cells. Parasite Immunology 4, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fusser, A., Perez-Montfort, R. & Larralde, C. (1979). The immunology of human and animal cysticercosis: a review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 57, 839–56.Google Scholar
Ford, W. L. (1978). Measurement of graft-versus-host activity. In Handbook of Experimental Immunology, 3rd edn (ed. Weir, D. M.) pp. 30.1–30.12. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. & Johnstone, P. (1977). Experimental epidemiology of hydatidosis and cysticercosis. Advances in Parasitology 15, 311–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, P., Dixon, J. B., Ross, G. & Cox, D. A. (1985). Echinococcus granulosus Changes in the transformational behaviour of murine lymph node cells during infection. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology (in the Press).Google Scholar
Jenkins, P., Ross, G., Cox, D. A. & Dixon, J. B. (1982). Lymphoid changes in early murine echinococcosis. Parasitalogy 85, lxvii–lxviii.Google Scholar
McLaren, D. J. & Boros, D. L. (1983). Shistosoma mansoni: Schistosomulicidal activity of macro phages isolated from liver granulomas of infected mice. Experimental Parasitology 56, 346–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G. F. (1979 a). Responses to infection with metazoan and protozoan parasites. Advances in Immunology 28, 451–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, G. F. (1979 b). Effector cells, molecules and mechanisms in host-protective immunity to parasites. Immunology 38, 209–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Molinari, J. A., Hess, J. A. & Wesley, R. K. (1982). Sequential mesenteric lymph node histological response following Trichinella spiralis infection. Internal Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology 69, 81–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, W. I., Murray, M. & Hinson, C. A. (1982). The response of the murine lymphoid system to a chronic infection with Trypanosoma congolense. II. The lymph nodes, thymus and liver. Journal of Pathology 138, 273–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rickard, M. D. & Williams, J. F. (1982). Hydatidosis/cysticercosis: Immune mechanisms and immunization against infection. Advances in Parasitology 21, 229–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RILEY, E. M., DIxoN, J. B., KELLy, D. F. & Cox, D. A. (1985). The immune response to Echinococcus granulosus: sequential histological observations of lymphoreticular and connective tissues during early murine infection. Journal of Comparative Pathology 95, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smithers, S. R., Terry, R. J. & Hockley, D. J. (1969). Host antigens in schistosomiasis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 171, 483–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, J. F. (1979). Recent advances in the immunology of cestode infections. Journal of Parasitology 65, 337–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed