Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T20:51:31.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The early development of immunity to Eimeria maxima in comparison with that to Eimeria tenella

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

M. Elaine Rose
Affiliation:
Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon

Extract

Immunity to Eimeria maxima, judged by oocyst production resulting from a low challenge inoculum, was evident when the challenge was given as early as 3 days after the immunizing dose of 250 or 500 oocysts. Immunity was complete, i.e. no oocysts were produced, to challenge at 7 days after an initial inoculum of 500 oocysts, or at 14 days after 250 oocysts. Judged by the above criteria 250 oocysts of E. tenella did not induce immunity to challenge given at 3, 5, 7 or 14 days. The findings are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beyer, T. V. (1963). Immunity in experimental coccidiosis of rabbit caused by heavy infective doses of Eimeria intestinalis. In Progress in Protozoology (eds. J., Ludvík, Lom, J. and J., Vávra), p. 448. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Capron, A. R. (1970). L'antigène parasitaire, structure et fonction. Journal of Parasitology 56, Section II, 515–21.Google Scholar
Doran, D. J. & Farr, M. M. (1965). Susceptibility of 1- and 3-day-old chicks to infection with the coccidium Eimeria acervulina. Journal of Protozoology 12, 160–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, D. M., Andersen, F. L. & Miner, M. L. (1963). The site of the immune reaction against Eimeria bovis in calves. Journal of Parasitology 49, 415–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton-Smith, C. (1949). Some factors influencing the origin and course of epidemics of coccidiosis in poultry. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 52, 449–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton-Smith, C., Beattie, J. & Long, P. L. (1961). Resistance to Eimeria tenella and its transference from one caecum to the other in individual fowls. Immunology 4, 111–21.Google Scholar
Horton-Smith, C. & Long, P. L. (1959). The effects of different anti-coccidial agents on the intestinal coccidioses of the fowl. Journal of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics 69, 192207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyner, L. P. & Norton, C. C. (1973). The immunity arising from continuous low-level infection with Eimeria tenella. Parasitology 67, 333–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, S. B. & McCullough, F. S. (1952). Relationships between sulphamethazine therapy and the acquisition of immunity to Eimeria tenella. Journal of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics 62, 116–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. (1962). Observations on the duration of the acquired immunity of chickens to Eimeria maxima, Tyzzer, 1929. Parasitology 52, 8993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, P. L. & Rowell, J. G. (1958). Counting oocysts of chicken coccidia. Laboratory Practice 7, 515–18, 534.Google Scholar
Lotze, J. C. & Leek, R. G. (1970). Failure of development of the sexual phase of Eimeria intricata in heavily inoculated sheep. Journal of Protozoology 17, 414–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukkur, T. K. S. & Bradley, R. E. (1969). Eimeria tenella: packed blood cell volume, hemoglobin and serum proteins of chickens correlated with the immune state. Experimental Parasitology 26, 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, M. E. (1967). The influence of age of host on infection with Eimeria tenella. Journal of Parasitology 53, 924–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, M. E. & Long, P. L. (1962). Immunity to four species of Eimeria in fowls. Immunology 5, 7992.Google ScholarPubMed
Schrecke, W. & Dürr, U. (1970). Excystations- und Infectionsversuche mit Kokzidien Oocysten bei neugeborenen Tieren. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene. Abteilung I Originale 215, 252–8.Google Scholar