Introduction
The genus Ctenocephalides comprises several species, which include the cat flea, C. felis. This well-known species is a haematophagous parasite of domestic cats and dogs and is of medical importance due to its close association with humans. With a nearly world-wide distribution, it is a known vector for various pathogenic microbes such as Rickettsia, and Bartonella (Bitam et al., Reference Bitam, Dittmar, Parola, Whiting and Raoult2010; Vasconcelos et al., Reference Vasconcelos, Billeter, Jett, Meinersmann, Barr, Diniz and Oakley2018; Douglas et al., Reference Douglas, Hug and Katzenback2021; Manvell et al., Reference Manvell, Berman, Callahan, Breitschwerdt, Swain, Ferris, Maggi and Lashnits2022). Apart from zoonotic pathogens, ectoparasites also host a large diversity of non-pathogenic microbes (Vasconcelos et al., Reference Vasconcelos, Billeter, Jett, Meinersmann, Barr, Diniz and Oakley2018). These non-pathogenic microbes can play an essential role in human and animal health as it has been reported that the overall microbial diversity can influence the acquisition, transmission and virulence of pathogens (Lawrence et al., Reference Lawrence, Hii, Chong, Webb, Traub, Brown and Šlapeta2015; Bonnet et al., Reference Bonnet, Binetruy, Hernández-Jarguín and Duron2017; Manvell et al., Reference Manvell, Berman, Callahan, Breitschwerdt, Swain, Ferris, Maggi and Lashnits2022). Despite the medical importance of the bacteria associated with C. felis (Manvell et al., Reference Manvell, Berman, Callahan, Breitschwerdt, Swain, Ferris, Maggi and Lashnits2022), contemporary insights into the microbiome of this taxon are limited to a few studies documenting pathogenic and non-pathogenic microbes (Lawrence et al., Reference Lawrence, Hii, Chong, Webb, Traub, Brown and Šlapeta2015; Vasconcelos et al., Reference Vasconcelos, Billeter, Jett, Meinersmann, Barr, Diniz and Oakley2018; Douglas et al., Reference Douglas, Hug and Katzenback2021; Manvell et al., Reference Manvell, Berman, Callahan, Breitschwerdt, Swain, Ferris, Maggi and Lashnits2022). It is important to realize that the accurate detection of microbiota is based on many assumptions and pitfalls (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Hofstaedter, Zhao, Mattei, Tanes, Clarke, Lauder, Sherrill-Mix, Chehoud, Kelsen and Conrad2017) and more accurate data can be generated when results are compared between studies done on similar host species, and from different geographic regions.
A study by Lawrence et al. (Reference Lawrence, Hii, Chong, Webb, Traub, Brown and Šlapeta2015), documented the microbiome diversity of C. felis in Australia for the first time and showed species specific differences between the microbiomes of C. f. felis, and that of the closely related stickfast flea, Echidnophaga a. ambulans. Vasconcelos et al. (Reference Vasconcelos, Billeter, Jett, Meinersmann, Barr, Diniz and Oakley2018), studied C. felis from the United States of America (USA; northern and southern California) and confirmed that Rickettsia, Bartonella and the symbiotic Wolbachia were the most common bacteria in the cat flea. The same study showed that there was no overall difference in microbiome diversity between geographic regions but when the prominent Rickettsia reads were excluded, some geographic differentiation was detected with Wolbachia and Bartonella, being more abundant in fleas from southern California when compared to northern California. Most recently, Manvell et al. (Reference Manvell, Berman, Callahan, Breitschwerdt, Swain, Ferris, Maggi and Lashnits2022) confirmed that the microbiome composition of C. felis differ among geographic sampling sites and concluded that widespread co-infection exist for strains of Rickettsia, Bartonella and Wolbachia across several states in the USA and the United Kingdom (UK). Although these studies provide some insights into the microbiome of the cat flea, the factors that drive the patterns in diversity and distribution are still to a large extent unknown.
At the broader scale, haematophagous obligate ectoparasites represent an interesting system to investigate the potential drivers of the variation in microbiome composition. The external factors that influence the microbiome of these parasite are likely more limited than, for example, free-living animals because of their specialized diets and their limited movement in the environment due to their host dependence. The microbial composition of these taxa is however part of the holobiont (characterized by a multidimensional interaction between the bacteria and the host, and also the many other species living in or around it; see also Ben-Yosef et al., Reference Ben-Yosef, Zaada, Dudaniec, Pasternak, Jurkevitch, Smith, Causton, Lincango, Tobe, Mitchell and Kleindorfer2017; McCabe et al., Reference McCabe, Receveur, Houtz, Thomas, Benbow, Pechal and Wallace2020; Doña et al., Reference Doña, Virrueta Herrera, Nyman, Kunnasranta and Johnson2021) and as such several factors (e.g. parasite genetics, host ecology and evolution, abiotic environment, bacterial interactions and/or stochastic events) may act as potential drivers of a parasite's microbial community. Indeed, parasite identity was the strongest predictor of microbiome composition in bat flies while the environment also had an effect, albeit to a lesser degree (Speer et al., Reference Speer, Teixeira, Brown, Perkins, Dittmar, Ingala, Wultsch, Krampis, Dick, Galen and Simmons2022). Similarly, Hawlena et al. (Reference Hawlena, Rynkiewicz, Toh, Alfred, Durden, Hastriter, Nelson, Rong, Munro, Dong and Fuqua2013) found that the microbiomes of ectoparasites on a wild rodent were largely influenced by parasite identity (tick vs flea) but not by the host or environmental conditions across a small geographic scale. The authors attributed the unexplained variance in bacterial composition to interspecific bacterial interactions or stochastic events (Hawlena et al., Reference Hawlena, Rynkiewicz, Toh, Alfred, Durden, Hastriter, Nelson, Rong, Munro, Dong and Fuqua2013). Further, the study found no differences in the microbiome of 2 flea species (Orchopeas leucopus and Ctenophthalmus pseudagyrtes) when considering all bacterial phylotypes whereas differences were observed when considering only the commonest arthropod-specific genera (i.e. Rickettsia, Franscisella and Bartonella). The nature of variation in microbiomes and the relative importance of factors shaping this variation in ectoparasites remain understudied.
This study aims to provide data on the microbiome of Ctenocephalides fleas in South Africa and to document the role of host species, species identity (parasite genetics), and the external environment on the bacterial diversity of cat fleas (C. felis). We used a selection of flea samples obtained from 3352 flea individuals occurring on 576 domestic cats and dogs and 10 wildlife species across South Africa (van der Mescht et al., Reference van der Mescht, Matthee and Matthee2021). The latter study confirmed the existence of 3 monophyletic flea species (C. felis, C. canis and C. connatus) and suggested that of the 3 currently recognized cat flea subspecies (C. f. damarensis, C. f. strongylus and C. f. felis) only C. f. damarensis morphotypes collected from wildlife (ground squirrels) may be regarded as a distinct taxonomic entity (i.e. C. f. damarensis and C. f. strongylus obtained from cats and dogs should be synonymized with C. f. felis) (van der Mescht et al., Reference van der Mescht, Matthee and Matthee2021). Within C. f. felis, however, 2 genetically distinct lineages were detected, 1 confined to the western xeric and warmer region, whereas the other lineage was found in the xeric warmer and more mesic cooler regions in South Africa. It was suggested that the off-host environment, particularly temperature and humidity, are important factors to consider in the evolution of C. felis (van der Mescht et al., Reference van der Mescht, Matthee and Matthee2021; also see Crkvencic and Šlapeta, Reference Crkvencic and Šlapeta2019).
Using the flea samples obtained from the above study, we superficially investigated whether the 3 Ctenocephalides species (C. felis, C. canis and C. connatus) and the 2 cat flea subspecies, C. f. damarensis (occurring on wildlife), and C. f. felis (occurring on cats and dogs) differ in their microbiome composition. Given the medical importance of the bacteria associated with C. f. felis, we more thoroughly investigated whether different vertebrate hosts (cats or dogs) have different microbial compositions and we also investigated whether the 2 genetic lineages of C. f. felis show different microbial species compositions. Since the environment was also shown to influence the microbiome of C. f. felis we explored which of selected environmental conditions will most likely affect the intraspecific microbial composition of C. f. felis geographically.
Materials and methods
Sampling
A total of 107 female fleas were selected from 8 distinct sampling sites in South Africa and included 3 Ctenocephalides species (C. felis, C. canis and C. connatus), 2 genetically and morphologically distinct C. felis subspecies (C. f. damarensis and C. f. felis), and the 2 genetic clades (C1 & C2) of C. f. felis (van der Mescht et al., Reference van der Mescht, Matthee and Matthee2021; Figure 1, Table 1). Flea collection and animal handling were performed after obtaining the necessary permits from the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development of the Republic of South Africa [12/11/1/7/5 (960)] and permission from Stellenbosch University Animal Ethics Committee (|ACU-2018–8860 and ACU- 2019–9089).
Figure 1. Sampling locations of Ctenocephalides felis used in the present study. Haplogroups as delineated by COII sequencing of flea samples (van der Mescht et al., Reference van der Mescht, Matthee and Matthee2021) and represented by haplogroups C1 = red, C2 = yellow and C3 = blue.
Table 1. Flea samples used in the current study, selected from 8 distinct South African sampling sites (locality and pool number) and including 3 different Ctenocephalides species (C. felis, C. canis and C. connatus), 2 genetically and morphologically distinct C. felis subspecies (C. f. damarensis and C. f. felis), and the 2 genetic clades of C. f. felis originating from cats and from dogs respectively (Genetic clade) (van der Mescht et al., Reference van der Mescht, Matthee and Matthee2021)
Fleas were collected using forceps and each individual was placed in a separate plastic tube filled with 96% ethanol and stored at ~ 5◦ C until further processing. Before DNA extraction, fleas were identified to species level using a Leica stereoscopic microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and the taxonomic key of Segerman (Reference Segerman1995), followed by identification to subspecies and clades using morphological and genetic barcoding analyses (van der Mescht et al., Reference van der Mescht, Matthee and Matthee2021). The latter was done by amplification of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit II (COII) as described in van der Mescht et al. (Reference van der Mescht, Matthee and Matthee2021).
DNA extraction and sequencing
To eliminate surface contamination, each individual flea was washed in 3 solutions consecutively (1% sodium hypochlorite – NaClO; Phosphate-buffered saline – PBS, pH = 7.4; Absolute ethanol – 100% EtOH) followed by 3 sequential rinses in PBS. Each wash/rinse was done using 400 μl of solution in a 1.5 mL tube for 1 min with gentle agitation. Genomic DNA isolation was performed in a DNA free environment and proceeded by crushing individual air-dried flea individuals in a 1.5 mL tube with 80 μl of the NucleoSpin® Tissue lysis buffer (Macherey-Nagel) for 3 min. The latter procedure was conducted using a bleached sterilized autoclaved plastic pestle (Eppendorf from Sigma Aldrich). After this homogenization step, 100 μl lysis buffer and 25 μl Proteinase K (Qiagen) was added to the solution. Complete genomic DNA isolation was then conducted using NucleoSpin® Tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel) following the instructions from the manufacturer. DNA was eluted in 50 μl Tris buffer (pH = 8.5) and stored at −20°C until further processing.
Prior to sequencing, extracted DNA was quantified using Qubit (Life Technologies) assessment. DNA extracted from 2 to 3 fleas obtained from the same host sampled at the same site, and representing the same genetic cluster (Table 1) were pooled together and concentrations of DNA adjusted so that each individual's DNA was equally represented in the pooled sample. These samples were then amplified using standard procedures outlined in the Ion 16S™ Metagenomics Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) that contains 2 16S rRNA gene primer sets (Primer set V2-4-8 and Primer set V3-6, 7-9) that selectively amplify the corresponding hypervariable gene regions of the 16S rRNA of bacteria. A non-template DNA extraction blank was incorporated as a negative control (all chemicals and procedures used for the DNA extraction were utilized except no extracted flea DNA was added as part of the extraction step). A total of 39 pooled DNA samples (Table 1) and the 1 negative control were subsequently sequenced at the Central Analytical Facility of Stellenbosch University using the Ion PGM™ Hi-Q™ Sequencing Kit and the Ion 316™ Chip v2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). The data were generated on an GeneStudio S5 Prime System (Ion Torrent PGM sequencer; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) and the 530 Chip was set to 850 flows that was sufficient to generate 400 bp fragments.
Data analyses
The Torrent Suite v4.4.2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) was used for base calling and demultiplexing of sequencing reads using default parameters. Sequences were processed for quality and initial analyses performed using Ion Reporter software v5.10 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) with cloud-based software and default settings (Malczynski et al., Reference Malczynski, Zhu, Zembower and Qi2021). The Ion Reporter Software uses a curated 16S rRNA gene reference database (MicroSEQ ID) as well as the curated Greengenes database (McDonald et al., Reference McDonald, Price, Goodrich, Nawrocki, DeSantis, Probst, Andersen, Knight and Hugenholtz2012) for annotation of microbial sequences. Reads filtered for quality (>Q20) were used to pick operational taxonomic units (OTUs) utilizing an open-reference OTU picking method based on 97% identity to sequences in the Greengenes database (v13.5) as per the manufacturer's instructions. This Ion Reporter Metagenomic Workflow (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) generates read counts, percentage mapped reads (including percentage mapped reads per primer), percentage sequence match and information on mapping. The criteria for taxonomic calls by the Ion Reporter metagenomic workflow are as follows: family, genus or species level identification are accepted when the read count is greater or equal to 1000; the percentage of mapped reads per primer is equal to or greater than 25% and the percentage of sequence match is equal to or greater than 97%.
Prior to statistical analysis, all OTUs with counts lower than 10 were removed from the dataset. In addition, OTUs identified in the negative control were also removed from the dataset entirely as well as OTUs not present in 10% of C. f. felis or C. canis samples or 100% of C. damarensis or C. connatus samples. All statistical analyses of the dataset were conducted using R (R version 4.1.3 (2022-03-10)) and total OTU counts. Firstly, community (alpha) diversity assessment consisting of observed richness, Shannon and Simpson diversity indexes and relative abundance, was conducted through processing of OTU counts using the R package phyloseq (McMurdie and Holmes, Reference McMurdie and Holmes2013). The phyloseq function, phyloseq::rerfy_even_depth was used to sub-sample the data without replacement in order to normalize OTU counts resulting from different sample sizes. Statistical significance of differences in relative abundance between flea species and between host species was calculated as per La Rosa et al. (Reference La Rosa, Brooks, Deych, Boone, Edwards, Wang, Sodergren, Weinstock and Shannon2012). The latter assumes a Dirichlet-Multinomial distribution and testing for a difference in mean distribution of each taxon across groups is conducted, accounting for the overdispersion in count data. Rare taxa (with counts under 100) are pooled into 1 group. Statistical significance of differences in observed richness and Shannon and Simpson diversity indexes between flea species and between host species was calculated using a Wilcoxon rank-sum exact test. Next, OTU counts at the genus level were displayed graphically. All graphics were generated using R package ggplot2 (Wickham Reference Wickham2016) unless stated otherwise. The genus level taxonomic rank was selected to highlight the counts for Ricketssia, Wolbachia and Bartonella which form the focus of this study. Bacterial community differences for C. felis samples from felines and canines were visualized using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity and a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot, drawn using the R package vegan (Oksanen et al., Reference Oksanen, Blanchet, Kindt, Legendre, Minchin, O'hara, Simpson, Solymos, Stevens, Wagner and Oksanen2012) and based on sequence counts of OTUs. To investigate possible geographic structure among the most common pathogenic bacteria found, phylogenetic analyses of Rickettsia and Bartonella found in C. f. felis sampled from cats only were performed. Ten random taxon input sequences were used for parsimony and maximum likelihood searches in PAUP* 4.0a169 (Swofford, Reference Swofford2021). Midpoint rooting was used and nodal support was estimated using 1000 bootstrap replicates. The optimal model for sequence evolution was determined using the Automated model selection function in PAUP* 4.0a169 (Swofford, Reference Swofford2021).
Generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM; Ferrier et al., Reference Ferrier, Drielsma, Manion and Watson2002, Reference Ferrier, Manion, Elith and Richardson2007) was used to record the environmental factors that potentially drives species turnover in the C. felis microbiome [i.e. change of pairwise dissimilarity (i.e. beta-diversity) along environmental gradients]. The GDM is a non-linear extension of the matrix regression technique. Its main advantage for studying the spatial patterns of species turnover is that it takes into account 2 types of non-linearity inherent to ecological data (Ferrier et al., Reference Ferrier, Manion, Elith and Richardson2007), namely (a) variable rate of compositional turnover along environmental gradient(s) and (b) the fact that the relationship between pairwise between-site compositional dissimilarity and environmental/spatial gradient(s) is curvilinear rather than linear (Ferrier et al., Reference Ferrier, Manion, Elith and Richardson2007). Consequently, the GDM deals with the variation of the turnover rate along each gradient by transformation of each of the predictor variables using an iterative maximum-likelihood estimation and I-splines (Ferrier et al., Reference Ferrier, Manion, Elith and Richardson2007; Fitzpatrick et al., Reference Fitzpatrick, Sanders, Normand, Svenning, Ferrier, Gove and Dunn2013). The maximum height of each plotted I-spline indicates the total amount of turnover associated with a given gradient, while all other predictors are held constant, so that the I-splines represent partial regression fits, demonstrating the importance of the effect of each predictor on compositional turnover. The slope of the I-spline demonstrated the turnover rate and its variation along a given gradient. To account for the curvilinear relationship between dissimilarity and environmental/spatial gradient(s), the linear predictor variable is transformed via a link function that defines the relationship between pairwise between-site dissimilarities (constrained to the range from zero to unity) and a scaled combination of between-site distances based on any number of environmental or geographical variables (see details in Ferrier et al., Reference Ferrier, Manion, Elith and Richardson2007). To run the GDMs, we used the package ‘gdm’ (Fitzpatrick et al., Reference Fitzpatrick, Mokany, Manion, Nieto-Lugilde and Ferrier2022) implemented in R. Data were transformed to presence/absence of species present at each geographic sampling locality. Data on environmental variables that presumably affect physiological processes in fleas (see Krasnov, Reference Krasnov2008) were extracted from CHELSA database for January 2019 (Karger et al., Reference Karger, Conrad, Böhner, Kawohl, Kreft, Soria-Auza, Zimmermann, Linder and Kessler2017; Brun et al., Reference Brun, Zimmermann, Hari, Pellissier and Karger2022). These variables were climate moisture index (kg/m2 per month), near surface relative humidity (%), potential evapotranspiration (kg/m2 per month), precipitation amount (kg/m2 per month/100), mean daily air temperature (̊) and vapour pressure deficit (Pa) as outlined to be important in Krasnov (Reference Krasnov2008).
Results
Microbiome diversity among and within flea species
The 107 Ctenocephalides samples sequenced in 39 pools yielded 453 168 to 893 406 reads per sample which passed quality filtering, and a total 387 OTUs belonging to 91 families, 116 genera and 180 putative species were identified. All data are available under Bioproject accession number PRJNA1007429. After comparison to the negative control, 20 families, 23 genera and 19 species were omitted. Furthermore, all OTUs not present in at least 10% of C. f. felis or C. canis or 100% of C. connatus or C. damarensis samples, were removed from the dataset. The remaining OTUs consisted of 25 families, 30 genera and 37 species. The most abundant bacterial genera (as per OTU counts summed across samples) found in the 3 Ctenocephalides species studied herein were Spiroplasma, Rickettsia, Wolbachia and Bartonella (Fig. 2). Variable levels of relative abundance was detected for Spiroplasma, Rickettsia, Wolbachia and Bartonella among the flea species and OTU counts were generally greatest in C. felis followed by C. canis and C. damarensis (the latter for Rickettsia and Wolbachia only) (Fig. 3A). These differences in abundance may however be strongly influenced by the large differences in sample numbers between C. felis and the other flea species. The differences in abundance of all bacterial genera between C. felis and C. canis are not significant (P = 1, 12 df) (Fig. 3A) and neither is the difference in abundance between C. felis and C. damarensis (P = 0.19, 12 df) (Fig. 3A). Relative abundance of the same common bacteria was highest in feline hosts for Bartonella and Spiroplasma, canine hosts for Rickettsia and Gennets for Wolbachia (Fig. 3B). The difference in abundance of all bacterial genera found in C. f. felis between canine and feline hosts is significant (P = 0.03, 12 df) with a total of 16 genera unique to C. f. felis samples from cats, 1 genus unique to C. f. felis sampled from dogs, and 6 genera shared among the fleas sampled from these 2 hosts (Supplementary Table 1), but the difference between C. f. felis on feline hosts and Gennets is not significant (P = 0.07, 12 df) and neither is the difference in relative abundance between C. felis and canine hosts and Gennets (P = 0.8, 12 df) (Fig. 3B). Relative abundance across sampling locations (Fig. 3C) was highest for Bartonella in Port Elizabeth, Rickettsia in Paarl, Spiroplasma in Somerset West and Wolbachia in Somerset West (Fig. 3C). In flea taxa where sampling was limited, Rickettsia species were not identified in any C. connatus, with only Ricketsiaceae identified and the Rickettsia genus at very low counts. This was also the case in C. canis. Host differences were also detected in that Bartonella were absent in C. f. felis samples obtained from dogs, but at the family level, Bartonellaceae was found at low frequency in 1 pooled sample (Supplementary Table 1).
Figure 2. Read counts for the 10 most common genera found across the 39 pooled Ctenocephalides samples sequenced in the present study. Ctenocephalides species and subspecies, together with the common name of the hosts from where they were sampled are indicated. Locality names correspond to those in Table 1.
Figure 3. Relative abundance for the OTU counts greater than 100 000 found across the 39 pooled Ctenocephalides samples sequenced in the present study depicting the most common genera found in the dataset. (A) Relative abundance across flea species, (B) Relative abundance across host species, (C) Relative abundance per sampled locality. Locality abbreviations and host abbreviations correspond to those in Table 1.
The different flea species sampled in the present study also showed variable bacterial profiles (Supplementary Table 1). Ctenocephalides canis, C. f. damarensis and C. f. felis from canine hosts had no unique bacterial taxa while C. connatus had 7 unique bacteria taxa which included, among others, Staphylococcus succinus, Streptomyces and an unclassified Rhizobiales (Supplementary Table 1). Ctenocephalides f. felis from feline hosts had the greatest number of unique bacterial taxa which based on sequence similarity and BLASTn searches (>97% sequence identity) included OTU's closely related to Bartonella grahamii and B. henselae as well as Rickettsia sibrica (Supplementary Table 1).
The NMDS plot of differences in bacterial communities between C. f. felis samples from canines and felines measured using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity show the rank-order distances between points. The greater the distance between points on the plot, the greater the difference in bacterial community makeup. There is overall greater difference between bacterial communities from feline hosts as they show a greater spread on the plot (Supplementary Fig. 1). Bacterial communities from canine hosts show fewer or smaller differences between samples as they are clustered more closely together on the plot. In addition, bacterial communities from canine hosts also cluster more closely with some samples from feline hosts, indicating smaller differences between those specific bacterial communities. These differences in bacterial community composition is reflective of the differences in bacterial abundance observed between canine and feline hosts and that samples from felines are more different from one another than samples from canines (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Alpha-diversity metrics including observed richness, Shannon diversity index and Simpson diversity index was highest in C. felis in all cases except for observed richness which was higher in C. conatus (Fig. 4A). However, this may again be influenced by the smaller sample sizes for some species. Nonetheless, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test comparing canine to feline hosts showed significant differences in observed richness (P = 0.03), and Shannon and Simpson diversity indexes (P = 0.015 and 0.017 respectively). There is no significant difference in the observed richness estimates across C. felis and C. canis (P = 0.1) but there is significant differences in Shannon and Simpson diversity estimates between C. felis and C. canis (P = 0.001 and P = 0.0003, respectively). A similar trend was, however, seen in that all indices were highest for feline hosts except for observed richness which was higher in Ground Squirrels (albeit based on small sample size) (Fig. 4B). This trend is followed in the observed richness being highest in the Bloemhof location, from which only 2 pooled samples were obtained. The Stellenbosch location had the highest diversity indexes (Fig. 4C). Comparing observed richness and Shannon and Simpson diversity estimates across C. felis and C. damarensis flea species showed significant difference for observed richness (P = 0.02) but there is no significant differences in Shannon and Simpson diversity estimates (P = 0.3 in both instances).
Figure 4. Observed richness, Shannon and Simpson diversity indexes across (A) flea species, (B) host species where GS = Ground Squirrel; G = Gennet and (C) locations as listed in Table 1.
Geographic structure in the OTU diversity of the cat flea microbiome
The common bacteria present in C. felis revealed no clear geographic differences in alpha-diversity metrics (Fig. 4C) and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests confirmed no statistical significant differences (0.2 < P < 0.9). Phylogenetic analyses of the Rickettsia and Bartonella OTU's detected in C. f. felis in this study only revealed the presence of several distinct 16S rRNA lineages for South African cat fleas but there were no clear geographic patterns among the sampling sites nor any genetic association specific to vertebrate host taxa (data not shown). Concerning Bartonella, 1 taxon did not cluster with any of the known species on Genbank and 6 different OTU clusters were detected in C. f. felis on cats in South Africa. Based on the total number of sequences obtained across all samples, the most common OTU's detected in this study were mostly similar to B. clarridgeiae and B. henselae on Genbank followed by sequences similar to B. grahamii. The remaining 3 OTU clusters share >97% sequence similarity with B. quintana, B. rattaustraliani, and B. rochalimae but these were detected in very low frequencies. Fifteen Rickettsia OTU's were observed. Of these, the most common OTU clusters found in this study most closely represent R. australis, R. rickettsia, and R. hoogstraalii in Genbank (Supplementary Table 1).
Environmental factors that may affect the microbiome composition of C. f. felis
Beta diversity of the microbiome composition at each site revealed that the percentage of explained deviance in the GDM was relatively low (19.24%). Nevertheless, the GDM revealed the main drivers of microbiome species turnover across sites being daily mean temperature, near-surface humidity and, to a lesser extent, precipitation (Table 2, Fig. 5). Pairwise dissimilarity in microbiome species composition steadily increased along the gradient of near surface relative humidity (Fig. 5). Along most of the precipitation gradient, this dissimilarity was extremely low and then sharply increased at the mesic sites. In contrast, the rate of species turnover was the highest at the colder sites and then slowed down (Fig. 5).
Table 2. Coefficients of the I-splines produced by the GDM of relationships between species turnover in the microbiome of C. f. felis sampled from cats only and across localities and geographic distance and climatic variables
Figure 5. Generalized dissimilarity model-fitted I-splines (partial regression fits) of (A) amount of precipitation in mm, (B) near surface relative humidity in percentage, and (C) mean daily air temperature in degrees centigrade as predictors of C. f. felis microbiome species turnover. The steeper slope of the transformed relationship on a given section of the gradient indicates greater rate of a turnover.
Discussion
The present study, mainly documenting bacterial diversity in C. felis fleas confined to South African host taxa, confirm the notion that host identity, parasite identity (flea species), and climatic conditions influence the microbiome compositions (Lawrence et al., Reference Lawrence, Hii, Chong, Webb, Traub, Brown and Šlapeta2015; Vecchi et al., Reference Vecchi, Newton, Cesari, Rebecchi and Guidetti2018; Storo et al., Reference Storo, Easson, Shivji and Lopez2021). Our study confirm that Bartonella, Rickettsia and Wolbachia are the most prevalent bacteria present in C. f. felis from cats but Bartonella was absent in C. f. felis sampled from dogs. Further, closely related subspecies of the cat flea, C. f. felis (on cats and dogs) and C. f. damarensis (from wildlife), showed significant differences in species richness (based on small sample sizes). Although these differences may be attributed to the relevant vertebrate host species, the influence of the environment off the host was not thoroughly investigated and thus cannot be excluded as a contributing factor explaining the pattern obtained (Griffiths et al., Reference Griffiths, Antwis, Lenzi, Lucaci, Behringer, Butler and Preziosi2019; Cahana and Iraqi, Reference Cahana and Iraqi2020). The genetically distinct C. f. felis clades, however, sampled from the same host species (van der Mescht et al., Reference van der Mescht, Matthee and Matthee2021) show broadly similar microbiome compositions (but differ in rare OTU's; also see Supplementary Fig. 1), and some differences are detected in beta-diversity among sampling sites.
When host species differences are eliminated as a contributing factor to microbiome diversity, interesting large-scale geographic differences were detected between the pathogenic microbiomes of C. f. felis from South African cats when compared to a similar study in California, USA (Vasconcelos et al., Reference Vasconcelos, Billeter, Jett, Meinersmann, Barr, Diniz and Oakley2018). In the case of Rickettsia, a bacterium genus that is responsible for febrile illness globally, R. felis was the most abundant in the USA study followed by R. senegalensis (Vasconcelos et al., Reference Vasconcelos, Billeter, Jett, Meinersmann, Barr, Diniz and Oakley2018). In South African samples, sequences obtained were most similar to R. australis which represent the most prominent lineage, followed by 2 OTU groups representing sequences most similar to R. felis and R. hoogstraalii (found in a lower number of amplicons). Despite detecting 15 different Rickettsia OTU lineages in the present study, the most common R. senegalensis detected in the USA, did not cluster close to any of the OTU lineages in the present study. In the case of Bartonella, that is associated with cat scratch disease, the presence of both B. henselae and B. clarridgeiae like sequences in the present study support the observations in California, USA. However, B. koehlerae, mostly confined to the northern sites in California, was absent from the South African fleas. The fourth most abundant bacterial species in the Californian study, Snodgrassella alvi, is a bacterium that is commonly associated with the gut microbiome of honey bees (Apis spp.) and bumble bees (Bombus spp.) (Kwong et al., Reference Kwong, Engel, Koch and Moran2014), and it was also found in the gut microbiome of Australian cat fleas (Lawrence et al., Reference Lawrence, Hii, Chong, Webb, Traub, Brown and Šlapeta2015). Interestingly, none of the sequences obtained in the present study cluster closely with S. alvi and this suggest that the latter taxon is most likely absent in South African cat fleas. Spiroplasma, a bacteria that is associated with intraocular infections in humans (Matet et al., Reference Matet, Le Flèche-Matéos, Doz, Dureau and Cassoux2020) was the fourth most prominent taxon detected in South Africa followed by Elizabethkingia which is documented as a multi-drug-resistant bacteria that can be associated with urinary tract infection (Gupta et al., Reference Gupta, Zaman, Mohan and Taneja2017). These findings confirm the notion that the external environment (e.g. habitat, geography) can influence the microbiome composition (Ahn and Hayes, Reference Ahn and Hayes2021; Kapheim, Johnson and Jolley, Reference Kapheim, Johnson and Jolley2021).
It has also been postulated that host ecology can influence the microbiome diversity (Lawrence et al., Reference Lawrence, Hii, Chong, Webb, Traub, Brown and Šlapeta2015). In the present study we compared the microbiome on congeneric flea species (C. connatus, C. canis and C. felis), that vary in host preference. The bacterial OTU richness was markedly higher and more unique in C. connatus that is associated with natural occurring burrowing rodents (ground squirrels) when compared to C. canis and C. felis that occur on domestic cats and dogs. In fact at least 2 of the unique bacteria in C. nonnatus are associated with soil (Ralstonia spp.; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Hu, Zhou and Li2020) and plant roots (Methylobacterium spp.; Palberg et al., Reference Palberg, Kisiała, Jorge and Emery2022). This pattern is supported by Lawrence et al. (Reference Lawrence, Hii, Chong, Webb, Traub, Brown and Šlapeta2015) that recorded a higher bacterial richness in the stickfast flea, E. a. ambulans, that occur on echidnas (another burrowing host species; Morrow and Nicol Reference Morrow and Nicol2009) compared to the gut microbiome of cat fleas, C. f. felis. It is probable that adult fleas (on the host body) and the free-living pre-imago life stages (in the nest) of burrowing host species will be more exposed to soil and its diverse bacterial composition (Torsvik et al., Reference Torsvik, Goksøyr and Daae1990) and this will facilitate a higher bacterial richness in these species when compared to cat fleas, whose domestic hosts generally live either indoors or in a relatively constant and confined outdoor environment (Lawrence et al., Reference Lawrence, Hii, Chong, Webb, Traub, Brown and Šlapeta2015).
Environmental conditions, and specifically macroclimatic conditions can play a major role in the microbiome diversity of parasites (Wielinga et al., Reference Wielinga, Gaasenbeek, Fonville, de Boer, de Vries, Dimmers, Gerard Akkerhuis Op, Schouls, Borgsteede and van der Giessen2006; Clay et al., Reference Clay, Klyachko, Grindle, Civitello, Oleske and Fuqua2008). The present study supports this through the GDM results. Dissimilarity in microbiome species composition was mainly driven by among-site variation in daily mean temperature, near-surface humidity and precipitation, although the relationship with the latter factor was weak. Since mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation has also been implicated as the main driver for bacterial community dissimilarities in forests (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Wang, Ku, Zhang, Zhu and Zhao2022), the environment off the host is clearly an important factor to consider. It is, however, interesting to note that temperature and humidity has also been proposed to affect flea distribution and abundance since the immature stages of fleas are sensitive to desiccation when they develop in the nest of the host (Kreppel et al., Reference Kreppel, Telfer, Rajerison, Morse and Baylis2016; van der Mescht et al., Reference van der Mescht, Matthee and Matthee2021). Based on the data at hand, it may be a mere co-incidence that flea and microbiome diversity are influenced by the same climatic factors (temperature and humidity), but on the other hand it may also reflect the close relationship between the evolution of the host (flea in this instance) and the bacteria associated with it.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182023000835.
Data availability
All data are available under Bioproject accession number PRJNA1007429.
Acknowledgements
Colleagues, friends, members of the public, private veterinary hospitals and animal welfare organizations (SPCA and AWS) are thanked for allowing collection of flea samples or in some instances collecting themselves for this study (these individuals are thanked by name in van der Mescht et al., Reference van der Mescht, Matthee and Matthee2021). Sequencing was performed at the Central Analytical Facility, Stellenbosch University. LVDM received financial support through a postdoctoral fellowship from the Claude Leon Foundation and research funding was provided to SM and CAM through Stellenbosch University Grants.
Authors’ contributions
CAM conceptualize the research, wrote the first draft, analysed some of the data and act as main supervisor for postdoctoral fellows, AB analysed the data and provided editorial comment, BRK analysed the data and provided editorial comment, SM conceptualize the research, participated in sampling and permit approvals, provided editorial comment and co-supervise a postdoctoral fellow, LVM conceptualize the research, conducted all the laboratory work, analysed some of the data and provided editorial comment.
Financial support
LVDM received financial support through a postdoctoral fellowship from the Claude Leon Foundation and research funding was provided to SM and CAM through Stellenbosch University Grants.
Competing interest
None
Ethical standards
Flea collection from cats and dogs and wild animal handling were performed after obtaining the necessary permits from the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development of the Republic of South Africa [12/11/1/7/5 (960)]. The project was also approved by Stellenbosch University Animal Ethics Committee (|ACU-2018–8860 and ACU- 2019–9089).
Open access
