Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:13:59.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Penetrating Nematode Larvae assist Bacterial Invasion from the Bowel?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

E. Leonard Taylor  and
Harvey S. Purchase
E. Leonard Taylor
Affiliation:
The Veterinary Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.
Harvey S. Purchase
Affiliation:
The Veterinary Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

That parasitic worms may induce bacterial invasion from the intestine has frequently been asserted in explanation of the sporadic occurrence of some bacterial and virus diseases of animals. Weinberg, in 1907, gave an extensive review of the literature dealing with inflammatory conditions of the intestine, due to bacterial invasion associated with parasitic worms. He also gave an account of some original clinical observations. He concluded that, by biting and boring into the intestinal wall, or by wounding it with hooks and suckers, the majority of helminths favour the penetration of microbes, these being carried on the exterior and in the intestine of the worms. In one case, where a fatal septicaemia was associated with the presence of a single individual Trichocephalus, the author's conclusion, that even isolated worms are very dangerous, appears to be rather strained. Records of clinical observations of this kind frequently appear in the literature, but, as a general rule, the evidence showing the agency of the worm is very slender and amounts to little more than the observation of the presence of worms in animals suffering from some bacterial disease.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , July 1931 , pp. 301 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aynaud, M. (1926). Présence des larves de nématodes dans les tumeurs du charbon symptomatique et du bradsot. C. R. Soc. Biol. 95, 440.Google Scholar
Balteano, L. (1922). L'infection charbonneuse et l'immunité anti-charbonneuse chez les lapins et les cobayes. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 36, 805.Google Scholar
Basset, J. and Carré, H. (1907). A propos de l'absorption intestinale des particules solides. C. R. Soc. Biol. 62, 261.Google Scholar
Basset, J. and Carré, H. (1907). Conditions dans lesquelles la muqueuse digestive est perméable aux microbes de l'intestin. C. R. Soc. Biol. 62, 890.Google Scholar
Basset, J. and Denizot, M. (1929). Charbon bactéridien d'origine intestinale dans un troupean de brebis. Rev. Vét, et J. Méd. Vét. 81, 135.Google Scholar
Basset, J. and Moulin, A. (1930). Epizootie de colibacillose d'origine vermineuse et roˇle pathogène des Strongyles des équidés. C. R. Soc. Biol. 104, 996.Google Scholar
Bayon, H. P. (1929). The pathology of transmissible anaemia (erythromyelosis) in the fowl; its similarity to human haemopathies. Parasitology, 21, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besnoit, and Cuillé, (1898). Sur le rôle du parasitisme interne dans les infections générales. C. R. Soc. Biol. 5 (37), 1089.Google Scholar
Besredka, A. (1921). Vaccination par voie cutanée. Charbon: Cuti-infection, cuti-vaccination, cuti-immunité. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 35, 421.Google Scholar
Biester, H. E., Murray, C., McNutt, S. H., and Purwin, P. (1928). Studies on infectious enteritis in swine. II. J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. 72, 1003.Google Scholar
Boquet, A. (1924). Sur l'infection charbonneuse du cobaye par inoculation sous-muqueuse de bactéridies. C. R. Soc. Biol. 90, 72.Google Scholar
Carré, H. (1928). Le parasitisme, facteur d'affections microbiennes. Bull. Méd. Vét. 1, 147.Google Scholar
De Blieck, L. and Baudet, E. A. R. F. (1920). Bakterielle Infektion infolge des Eindringens von Strongyloideslarven durch die Kutis. Deutsche Tierärztl. Wocheschr. 28, 620.Google Scholar
Grierson, A. M. M. (1929). Experimental observations on anthrax infection and anti-anthrax immunisation. J. Compar. Path. and Therap. 42, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawanishi, K. (1929). Experimental studies on the entrance of pathogenic bacilli incidental to percutaneous infection with hookworm. Taiwan Igakkai Zasshi J. Med. Assoc Formosa, No. 294, September, p. 50.Google Scholar
Malvoz, E. and Lambient, J. (1918). Infections microbiennes consécutives à la pénétration cutanée des larves de l'Ankylostome. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 32, 243.Google Scholar
Tyzzer, E. E. (1926). Heterakis vesicularis Frölich 1791: a vector of an infectious disease. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. and Med. 23, 708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Bülow, T. (1929). Tuberculose latente réactivée par le passage des larves d'Ankylostomes à travers le parenchyme pulmonaire. Bull. Soc. Path. Exot. 22, 26.Google Scholar
Weinberg, M. (1907). Du rôle des helminthes, des larves d'helminthes et des larves d'insectes dans la transmission des microbes pathogènes. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 21, 417 and 533.Google Scholar