Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:36:51.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Nematodes assist Bacterial Invasion of the Host by wounding the Wall of the Intestinal Tract?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

E. L. Taylor
E. L. Taylor
Affiliation:
Veterinary Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Weybridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The experiments here described make provision for some of the eventualities not covered by the previous experiments of Taylor and Purchase, and appear to give a more definite answer to the question on the effect of the presence of parasitic worms in aiding the entry of bacteria into the body.

Although the conditions, in these experiments, appear to have been very favourable for the bacteria present in the lumen of the bowel to invade the host through abrasions of the wall caused by the parasitic worms, the evidence of assistance given by the worms to the entry of bacteria has not been obtained. In view of these findings, and taking into consideration other experimental results, it seems highly probable that the injuries caused to the bowel wall by parasitic worms in general do not play any important part in bringing about bacterial infection from the lumen of the intestine.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , May 1935 , pp. 145 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bassett, J. and Moulin, A. (1933). Septicémie à B. coli et B. viscosum d'origine vermineuse pour la plupart chez le jeune Mulet. Rev. vét., Toulouse, 85 305–20.Google Scholar
Carne, H. R. and Ross, J. C. (1932). The association of the bacillus of Priesz-Nocard with lesions caused by Oesophagostomum columbianum in sheep. J. camp. Path. 45 150–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyeux, Ch. and Baer, J. G. (1929). Études sur le réencapsulement de Sparganum ranarum(Gastaldi, 1854). C. R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 111 305–7.Google Scholar
Kinsley, A. T. (1931). Esophagostomiasis and hemorrhagic septicaemia in steers. Vet. Med. 26, 506.Google Scholar
Koidzumi, M. (1927). A résumé of works on Ascaris recently published from the Parasitology Laboratory, Keio University Medical College. Japan med. World, 7 12–16.Google Scholar
Le Roux, P. L. (1932). Notes of the more important worms of cattle, sheep and pigs in Northern Rhodesia. Ann. Bull. Dep. Anim. Hlth N. Rhod. 1931, pp. 9–24.Google Scholar
Shortt, H. E., Campbell, H. G. M. and Lal, C. (1932). Transmission experiments in Kala Azar with hookworms. Indian med. Res. Mem. No. 25, 73–9.Google Scholar
Skrjabine, K. I. (1932). La Prophylaxie par le traitement des Helminthoses du mouton, d'après la pratique de l'union Soviétique. Bull. Off. int. Epizoot. 6 153–72.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. L. and Purchase, S. H. (1931). Do penetrating nematode larvae assist bacterial invasion from the bowel? Parasitology, 23, 301–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar