Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:53:59.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution of Ascaris suum in experimentally and naturally infected pigs and comparison with Ascaris lumbricoides infections in humans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1998

J. BOES
Affiliation:
Danish Centre for Experimental Parasitology, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Ridebanevej 3, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
G. F. MEDLEY
Affiliation:
Danish Centre for Experimental Parasitology, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Ridebanevej 3, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark Ecosystems Analysis and Management Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
L. ERIKSEN
Affiliation:
Danish Centre for Experimental Parasitology, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Ridebanevej 3, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark Department of Clinical Studies, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Dyrlægevej 88, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
A. ROEPSTORFF
Affiliation:
Danish Centre for Experimental Parasitology, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Ridebanevej 3, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
P. NANSEN
Affiliation:
Danish Centre for Experimental Parasitology, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Ridebanevej 3, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark

Abstract

This paper describes the distribution of Ascaris suum in experimentally and naturally infected pigs, and offers a comparison with A. lumbricoides infections in humans. In the first study, worms were recovered post-mortem from a group of 38 pigs that had been trickle inoculated with 10000 infective A. suum eggs twice weekly for 12 weeks. In the second study, worms were collected from a group of 49 pigs that had been kept on a pasture contaminated with infective A. suum eggs for 10 weeks, after which they received treatment with an anthelmintic; they then were turned out on the same pasture for a second 10-week period before slaughter. The worm burdens of the naturally infected pigs were recorded both at treatment and post-mortem. Mean worm counts were similar at all occasions but the prevalence of infection was higher in the trickle infected and naturally reinfected pigs. Furthermore, the prevalence in naturally infected pigs increased significantly over the study period. Worm burden distributions in all groups were heavily overdispersed, but the distribution patterns differed significantly between groups: lower exposure (initial natural infection) gave a low prevalence and an almost uniform distribution of worm burdens among infected hosts. Continued or higher exposure (trickle and natural reinfection) resulted in increased prevalence and a reduction in the proportion of hosts with increasing worm load. A positive correlation was found between initial and reinfection worm burdens in the naturally infected pig population, suggesting that individual pigs are predisposed to a high or low intensity of infection. The prevalence and intensity as well as the distribution observed for A. suum infection in pigs were comparable to those reported for A. lumbricoides in endemic areas, and there is evidence for predisposition to A. suum in pigs, with an estimated correlation coefficient similar to that found in humans. It is concluded that A. suum infections in pigs are a suitable model to study the population dynamics of A. lumbricoides in human populations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)