Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:38:14.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential cellular responses at Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum feeding sites on susceptible and tick–resistant rabbits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. S. Gill  and
A. R. Walker
H. S. Gill
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, Scotland.
A. R. Walker
Affiliation:
Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, Scotland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The sequential, quantitative histological analysis of adult Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum feeding sites on rabbits showed that the cellular reactions at tick feeding sites change in character and magnitude with time after attachment, and differ considerably from primary infestation to tertiary infestation. Neutrophils (62–68%) followed by mononuclear cells (22–24%) were the major component of the cellular infiltrate throughout primary infestation. Eosinophils accounted for 10% of the cellular infiltrate at 24 h after attachment. Their proportions declined thereafter, forming 9% of the infiltrate at 72 h and 5% at 144 h. Basophil infiltration in most of the feeding lesions was noticed by 24 h, but always in low numbers. Despite a slight increase in absolute numbers the proportion of basophils fell from 3% at 24 h to 2– at 144 h. In contrast to primary infestation the cellular reactions on tertiary infestations were characterized by a significant increase in the numbers of basophils and eosinophils and marked degranulation of mast cells and basophils as early as 24 h after attachment. As the feeding advanced there was an increase in the mean proportions of basophils from 4% to 9% and mononuclear cells from 22% to 38%, and a decrease in the proportion of eosinophils from 21% to 9%. However, neutrophils (42–53%) remained the major component of the cellular infiltrate. There was no significant difference in the nature and sequence of cellular events in the feeding sites of male and female ticks, although the lesions produced by feeding males were 5–10 fold smaller than those of females. Mast cells, basophils and eosinophils appeared to be the major host cells involved in the resistance response, manifested by protracted feeding, reduced engorgement weight and poor egg laying. The mechanisms by which these cells might interact to mediate resistance are suggested and discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 91 , Issue 3 , December 1985 , pp. 591 - 607
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, J. R. (1973). Tick resistance: basophils in skin reactions of resistant guinea–pigs. International Journal for Parasitology 3, 195–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, J. R., Doube, B. M. & Kemp, D. H. (1977). Histology of bovine skin reactions to Ixodes holocyclus Neuman. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 41, 26–35.Google Scholar
Askenase, P. W. (1977). Role of basophils, mast–cells and vasoamines in hypersensitivity reactions with a delayed time course. Progress in Allergy 23, 199–320.Google ScholarPubMed
Bagnall, B. G. (1978). Cutaneous immunity to the tick Ixodes holocyclus. In Tick–borne Diseases and their Vectors (ed. Wilde, J. K. H.), pp. 77–81. Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University Of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bennet, H. S., Wyhick, A. D., Lees, S. W. & McNeil, J. H. (1976). Science and art in preparing tissues embedded in plastic for light microscopy with special reference to glycol methacrylate, glass knives and sample stain. Stain Technology 51, 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenberg, J. L., Ward, P. A. & Sonenshine, D. E. (1972). Tick–bite injury: mediation by a complement–derived chemotactic factor. Journal of Immunology 109, 451–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowessidjaou, J., Brossard, M. & Aeschlimann, A. (1977). Effects and duration of resistance acquired by rabbits on feeding and egg laying in Ixodes ricinus L. Experientia 33, 528–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branagan, D. (1974). The feeding performance of the Ixodid Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neum. on rabbits, cattle and other hosts. Bulletin of Entomological Research 64, 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brossard, M. & Fivaz, V. (1982). Ixodes ricinus L.: mast–cells, basophils and eosinophils in the Sequence of cellular events in the skin of infested or re–infested rabbits. Parasitology 85, 583–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brossard, M., Monneron, J. P. & Papatheodorou, V. (1982). Progressive sensitization of circulating basophils against Ixodes ricinus L. antigens during repeated infestations of rabbits. Parasite Immunology 4, 355–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S. J. & Askenase, P. W. (1983). Immune rejection of ectoparasites (ticks) by T cell and IgG1 antibody recruitment of basophils and eosinophils. Federation Proceedings 42, 126–30.Google Scholar
Brown, S. J., Bagnall, B. G. & Askenase, P. W. (1984 a). Ixodes holocydus: kinetics of cutaneous basophil responses in naive and actively and passively sensitized guinea pigs. Experimental Parasitology 57, 40–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S. J., Barker, R. W. & Askenase, P. W. (1984 b). Bovine resistance to Amblyomma americanum ticks: an acquired immune response characterized by cutaneous basophil infiltrates. Veterinary Parasitology 16, 147–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S. J., Galli, S. J., Gleich, G. J. & Askenase, P. W. (1982). Ablation of immunity to Amblyomma americanum by anti–basophil serum: co–operation between basophils and eosinophils in expression of immunity to ectoparasite (ticks) in guinea pigs. Journal of Immunology 129, 790–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J. & Knapp, F. W. (1980). Amblyomma americanum: Sequential histological analysis of adult feeding sites on guinea pigs. Experimental Parasitology 49, 303–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S. J. & Knapp, F. W. (1981). Response of hypersensitized guinea pigs to the feeding of Amblyomma americanum ticks. Parasitology 83, 213–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J., Worms, M. J. & Askenase, P. W. (1983). Rhipicephalus appendiculatus: Larval feeding sites in guinea pigs actively sensitized and receiving immune serum. Experimental Parasitology 54, 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, A. E., Wassom, D. L., Gleich, G. J., Loegering, D. A. & David, J. R. (1979). Damage to schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni induced by eosinophil major basic protein. Journal Of Immunology 122, 221–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Discombe, G. (1946). Criteria for eosinophilia Lancet 1, 195–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dvorak, H. F., Simpson, B. A., Bast, R. C jr & Leskowitz, S. (1971). Cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity. III. Participation of the basophil in hypersensitivity to antigen–antibody complexes, delayed hypersensitivity and contact allergy. Passive transfer. Journal of Immunology 107, 138–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, H. S. (1984). Tick feeding and the development of immunity to Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Gill, H. S., Boid, R. & Ross, C. A. (1985). Isolation and characterization of salivary antigens from Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum. Parasite Immunology (in the Press).Google Scholar
House, C. R. & Ginsborg, B. L. (1979). Pharmacology of cockroach salivary secretion. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 63C, 1–6.Google Scholar
Kemp, D. H. & Bourne, A. (1980). Boophilus microplus: the effect of histamine on the attachment of cattle–tick larvae – studies in vivo and in vitro. Parasitology 80, 487–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kierszenbaum, F., Ackerman, S. J. & Gleich, G. J. (1981). Destruction of bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma cruzi by eosinophil granule major basic protein. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 30, 775–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krinsky, W. L., Brown, S. J. & Askenase, P. W. (1982). Ixodes dammini: induced skin lesions in guinea pigs and rabbits and a comparison with Erythema Chronicum Migrans in patients with Lyme arthritis. Experimental Parasitology 53, 381–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, D. J., Worms, M. J. & Askenase, P. W. (1983). Cutaneous basophil associated resistance to ectoparasites (ticks). III. Electron microscopy of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus larval feeding sites in actively sensitized guinea pigs and recipients of immune serum. Journal of Pathology 139, 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. E. & James, J. W. (1953). A simple direct method for absolute basophil leucocyte count. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine. 82, 601–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paine, S. H., Kemp, D. H. & Allen, J. R. (1983). In vitro feeding of Dermacentor andersoni (Stiles): effects of histamine and other mediators. Parasitology 86, 419–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schleger, A. V., Lincoln, D. T., Mckenna, R. V., Kemp, D. H. & Roberts, J. A. (1976). Boophilus microplus: cellular responses to larval attachment and their relationship to host resistance. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 29, 499–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, J. & Torisu, M. (1978). Anisakis and eosinophil. I. Detection of a soluble factor selectively chemotactic for eosinophils in the extract from Anisakis larvae. Journal of Immunology 120, 745–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatchell, R. J. & Moorhouse, D. E. (1968). The feeding processes of the cattle tick Boophilus Microplus (Canestrini). II. The sequence of host–tissue changes. Parasitology 58, 441–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatchell, R. J. & Moorhouse, D. E. (1970). Neutrophils: their role in the formation of a tick feeding lesion. Science 167, 1002–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theis, J. H. & Budwiser, P. D. (1974). Rhipicephalus sanguineus: sequential histopathology at the host–arthropod interface. Experimental Parasitology 36, 77–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, A. R., Fletcher, J. D., McKellar, S. B., Bell, L. J. & Brown, C. G. D. (1985). The maintenance and survival of Theileria annulata in colonies of Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 79, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weller, P. F. & Goetzl, E. J. (1979). The regulatory and effector role of eosinophils. Advances in Immunology 27, 339–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikel, S. K. (1982). Histamine content of tick attachment sites and the effects of H1 and H2 histamine antagonists on the expression of resistance. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 76, 179–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wikel, S. K. & Allen, J. R. (1977). Acquired resistance to ticks. III. Cobra venom factor and the resistance response. Immunology 32, 457–65.Google ScholarPubMed