Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:57:19.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development of Leucocytozoon canis in the Tick with a Reference to the Development of Piroplasma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

S. R. Christophers
S. R. Christophers
Affiliation:
Central Research Institute, Kasauli, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the last issue of Parasitology a description is given by Wenyon (5) of the developmental cycle of Leucocytozoon canis in the tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Wenyon refers to the description of the development given by me (2), but rightly points out that one stage, that of the large compound cysts, was overlooked. The surmise, however, that these large and easily ruptured cysts were overlooked owing to their having been broken up in the preparation of films is only part of the truth. A full explanation involves facts in regard to the development of this parasite which have not been touched upon by Wenyon; it is possible, as will be seen shortly, that Wenyon's description of the cycle, like mine, involved a considerable error. In this respect, as a result of work not yet published, I am able to supplement what has been written on the subject.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1912 , pp. 37 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1)Christophers, S. R.Haemogregarina gerbilli. Sci. Mem. Officers Med. and San. Depart. Govert. India. New series No. 18.Google Scholar
(2)Christophers, S. R.The sexual Cycle of Leucocytozoon canis in the tick. Sci. Mem. Officers Med. and San. Depart. Govert. India. No. 28, 1907.Google Scholar
(3)Balfour, A.Second Report of the Wellcome Research laboratories. Depart. of Education, Sudan Govt. 1906.Google Scholar
(4)Miller, W. W.Hepatozoon perniciosum. Treasury Depart. Public Health and Marine Hospital Service of the United States Hygiene Laboratory Bulletin, No. 46.Google Scholar
(5)Wenyon, C. M.Oriental Sore in Bagdad, together with observations on a Gregarine in Stegomyia fasciata, the Haemogregarine of dogs and the Flagellates of House Flies. Parasitology, Vol. IV, No. 3. 10. 1911.Google Scholar
(6)Koch, R.Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Piroplasmen. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene u. Infektionskr. Vol. LIV. 1906.Google Scholar
(7)Christophers, S. R.Piroplasma canis and its life cycle in the tick. Sci. Mem. by Off. of the Med. and San. Depart, of the Government of India. No. 29.Google Scholar
(8)Marzinowski, and Bielitzer, . Piroplasmose des Pferdes in Russland und die Rolle der Zecke Dermacentor reticulatus bei ihrer Verbreitung. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene u. Infektionskr. Vol. LXIII. 1909.Google Scholar
(9)Dschunkowski, u. Luhs.Entwicklungsformen von Piroplasmen in Zecken. 9. Internat. Vet. Kongr. Haag. 1909. Ref. Bull. Inst. Past. Vol. VIII, p. 452. 1910.Google Scholar
(10)Nuttall, and Graham-Smith, . The Development of Piroplasma canis in culture. Parasitology, Vol. I, No. 3. 10. 1908.Google Scholar