Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:59:28.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood of dogs with demodicosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2010

S. K. SINGH*
Affiliation:
Division of Medicine, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122, Bareilly, U.P., India
U. DIMRI
Affiliation:
Division of Medicine, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122, Bareilly, U.P., India
M. C. SHARMA
Affiliation:
Division of Medicine, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122, Bareilly, U.P., India
B. SHARMA
Affiliation:
Division of Biochemistry, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122, Bareilly, U.P., India
M. SAXENA
Affiliation:
Division of Biochemistry, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122, Bareilly, U.P., India
*
*Corresponding author: Division of Medicine, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122, Bareilly, U.P., India. Tel: +91 581 2300587. Fax: +91 581 2303284. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate the CD4+/CD8+ ratio in peripheral blood of dogs with localized and generalized demodicosis. Sixteen dogs were examined, 8 with localized and 8 with generalized demodicosis, while 8 healthy dogs were used as controls. Peripheral blood was obtained and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were determined by flow cytometry. Significantly higher numbers of CD8+ T cells and lower numbers of CD4+ T cells were found in dogs with generalized demodicosis compared to dogs with localized demodicosis and healthy controls. Significantly higher numbers of CD8+ T cells and lower numbers of CD4+ T cells were also found in dogs with localized demodicosis compared to healthy controls. The CD4+/CD8+ ratio was also found to be significantly lower in dogs with generalized demodicosis in comparison with dogs with localized demodicosis and healthy controls. It is concluded that significant alteration in the CD4+/CD8+ ratio may be implicated in the pathogenesis of generalized canine demodicosis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akilov, O. E., Butov, Y. S. and Mumcuoglu, K. Y. (2005). A clinicopathological approach to the classification of human demodicosis. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft 8, 607614.Google Scholar
Akilov, O. E. and Mumcuoglu, K. Y. (2004). Immune response in demodicosis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 18, 440444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caswell, J. L., Yager, J. A., Parker, W. M. and Moore, P. F. (1997). A prospective study of the immunophenotype and temporal changes in the histologic lesions of canine demodecosis. Veterinary Pathology 34, 279287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bosschere, H., Casaer, J., Neukermans, A., Baert, K., Ceulemans, T., Tavernier, P. and Roels, S. (2007). Severe alopecia due to demodicosis in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Belgium. The Veterinary Journal 174, 665668.Google Scholar
Dimri, U., Ranjan, R., Kumar, N., Sharma, M. C., Swarup, D., Sharma, B. and Kataria, M. (2008). Changes in oxidative stress indices, zinc and copper concentration in blood in canine demodicosis. Veterinary Parasitology 154, 98102.Google Scholar
Fourie, L. J., Kok, D. J., Du Plessis, A. and Rugg, D. (2007). Efficacy of a novel formulation of metaflumizone plus amitraz for the treatment of demodectic mange in dogs. Veterinary Parasitology 150, 268274.Google Scholar
Frost, D. L. T. C. (1999). Results AFIP Wednesday Slide Conference – No. 14, December 15, 1999, Case II – 99RA415 (AFIP 2681364) reference to disease in a deer species. http://www.afip.org/vetpath/WSC/wsc99/99wsc14.htmGoogle Scholar
Fukata, T., Fuoki, S., Yoshikawa, H., Kambayashi, Y., Kito, K. and Kitagawa, H. (2005). Significance of the CD4/CD8 lymphocytes ratio in dogs suffering from demodicosis. Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association 58, 113–116.Google Scholar
Ghubash, R. (2006). Parasitic miticidal therapy. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 21, 135144.Google Scholar
Gortel, K. (2006). Update on canine demodicosis. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Small Animal Practice 36, 229241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, T. C., Hunt, R. D. and King, N. W. (1997). The skin and its appendages. In Veterinary Pathology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Mosmann, T. R. and Sad, S. (1996). The expanding universe of T-cell subsets: Th1, Th2 and more. Immunology Today 17, 138146.Google Scholar
Mumcuoglu, Y. K. and Akilov, O. E. (2005). The role of HLA A2 and Cw2 in the pathogenesis of human demodicosis. Dermatology 210, 109114.Google Scholar
Papadogiannakis, E., Andritsos, G., Kontos, V., Spanakos, G., Koutis, C. and Velonakis, E. (2009). Determination of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood of dogs with leismaniosis before and after prolonged allopurinol monotherapy. The Veterinary Journal (in the Press). doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.08.001.Google Scholar
Scott, D. W., Schultz, R. D. and Baker, E. (1976). Further studies on the therapeutic and immunologic aspects of generalized demodectic mange in the dog. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 12, 203213.Google Scholar
Shipstone, M. (2000). Generalised demodecosis in dogs, clinical perspective. Australian Veterinary Journal 78, 240242.Google Scholar
Tarallo, V. D., Lia, R. P., Sasanelli, M., Cafarchia, C. and Otranto, D. (2009). Efficacy of Amitraz plus Metaflumizone for the treatment of canine demodicosis associated with Malassezia pachydermatis. Parasites & Vectors 2 (in the Press). doi:10.1186/1756-3305-2-13.Google Scholar
Wong, P. and Am, E. G. P. (2003). CD8 T cell responses to infectious pathogens. Annual Review of Immunology 21, 2970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed