Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:25:28.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Delayed rejection of single Hymenolepis diminuta in primary infections of young mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. D. Befus  and
D. W. Featherston
A. D. Befus
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH, Scotland
D. W. Featherston
Affiliation:
Wellcome Laboratories for Experimental Parasitology, University of Glasgow, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1QH, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In CFLP male tapeworm-free mice, from 2 to 7 weeks old at infection, at least 80% of single Hymenolepis diminuta establish and grow but then are rejected; day of rejection defined as the first day when ≦ 50% of the worms were recovered. Young mice, 2 to 4 weeks old, usually reject their worms during days 16–20 while older mice, 5 to 7 weeks old, reject them during days 12–14. Biomass (total dry weight of all worms recovered on a given day from a group of mice) varied markedly with host age and was consistently greatest in 4-week-old mice. The position of the worm in the intestine did not vary with host age. The quality of mice (categorized by the Medical Research Council Laboratory Animals Centre) did not appear to affect the course of a primary, single H. diminuta infection although, undoubtedly, the mice had varied immunological histories. Variations in time of rejection and biomass of worms recovered are accounted for by both immunological and physiological mechanisms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , August 1974 , pp. 77 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auerbach, R. (1972). Studies on the development of immunity: the response to sheep red blood cells. In Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 7 (ed. Moscona, A. A. and Monroy, A.), pp. 257–80. New York, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brambell, F. W. R. (1970). The transmission of passive immunity from mother to young. In Frontiers of Biology, vol. 18 (ed. Neuberger, A. and Tatum, E. L.). Amsterdam, London: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Chanana, A. D., Schaedeli, J., Hess, M. W. & Cottier, H. (1973). Predominance of theta-positive lymphocytes in gut-associated and peripheral lymphoid tissues of newborn mice. The Journal of Immunology 110, 283–5.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. C. (1939). The effects of number and age of worms on development of primary and secondary infection with Hymenolepis diminuta in rats, and an investigation into the true nature of ‘premunition’ in tapeworm infections. American Journal of Hygiene 29, 105–14.Google Scholar
Crabbé, P. A., Nash, D. R., Bazin, H., Eyssen, H. & Heremans, J. F. (1970). Immunohistochemical observations on lymphoid tissues from conventional and germ-free mice. Laboratory Investigation 22, 448–57.Google Scholar
Dineen, J. K. & Kelly, J. D. (1973). Immunological unresponsiveness of neonatal rats to infection with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. The competence of neonatal lymphoid cells in worm expulsion. Immunology 25, 141–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, A. & Parrott, D. M. V. (1972). The effect of antigen deprivation on thymusdependent and thymus-independent lymphocytes in the small intestine of the mouse. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 12, 477–88.Google Scholar
Gazdar, A. F., Beitzel, W. & Talal, N. (1971). The age related responses of New Zealand mice to murine sarcoma virus. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 8, 501–9.Google Scholar
Hopkins, C. A., Subramanian, G. & Stallard, H. (1972 a). The development of Hymenolepis diminuta in primary and secondary infections in mice. Parasitology 64, 401–12.Google Scholar
Hopkins, C. A., Subramanian, G. & Stallard, H. (1972 b). The effect of immunosuppressants on the development of Hymenolepis diminuta in mice. Parasitology 65, 111–20.Google Scholar
Jarrett, E. E. E. & Urquhart, G. M. (1971). The immune response to nematode infections. In International Review of Tropical Medicine, vol. 4 (ed. Woodruff, A. W. and Lincicome, D. R.), pp. 53–96. New York, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jarrett, E. E. E., Jarrett, W. F. H. & Urquhart, G. M. (1968). Immunological unresponsiveness to helminth parasites: 1. The pattern of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis infection in young rats. Experimental Parasitology 23, 151–60.Google Scholar
Murray, M. (1972). Immediate hypersensitivity effector mechanisms. II. In vivoreactions. In Immunity to Animal Parasites (ed. Soulsby, E. J. L.), pp. 155–90. New York, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, B. M. & Jones, V. E. (1971). Nippostrongylus brasiliensis: A review of immunity and the host/parasite relationship in the rat. Experimental Parasitology 29, 138–77.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. K. & MacInnis, A. J. (1968). A fast, simple method for obtaining viable hymenolepidid cysticercoids from Tribolium confusum. The Journal of Parasitology 54, 662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage, D. C. (1970). Associations of indigenous microorganisms with gastrointestinalmucosal epithelia. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 23, 1495–501.Google Scholar