Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:17:42.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dactylogyrus species parasitizing European Barbus species: morphometric and molecular variability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2007

A. ŠIMKOVÁ ,
M. PEČÍNKOVÁ ,
E. ŘEHULKOVÁ ,
M. VYSKOČILOVÁ  and
M. ONDRAČKOVÁ
A. ŠIMKOVÁ*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic
M. PEČÍNKOVÁ
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic
E. ŘEHULKOVÁ
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic
M. VYSKOČILOVÁ
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Květná 8, 60365 Brno, Czech Republic
M. ONDRAČKOVÁ
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Květná 8, 60365 Brno, Czech Republic
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic. Tel: +420 549497363. Fax: +420 541211214. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The aims of the study were (1) to describe the Dactylogyrus communities living on selected South European Barbus species, (2) to analyse morphometric variability of their attachment and reproductive organs, and (3) to perform molecular phylogenetic analyses, in order to investigate the mode of speciation in Dactylogyrus species parasitizing congeneric hosts. In Bulgaria, Dactylogyrus crivellius, D. dyki and D. petenyi were found on B. balcanicus, and D. dyki on B. cyclolepis. In Spain, Dactylogyrus carpathicus and D. dyki were detected on B. meridionalis. Morphometric analyses of D. dyki revealed significant differences in the attachment and reproductive organs when individuals from different Barbus species were compared. Two monophyletic groups were recognized from the molecular phylogenetic analyses: the first included D. carpathicus and D. crivellius which have large body size and anchors, with a weakly supported basal position of D. malleus from B. barbus; the second included D. dyki and D. petenyi which have small body and anchor sizes. The comparison of host and parasite phylogenies did not indicate the intrahost speciation. Intraspecific molecular variability was found between individuals of D. dyki and D. carpathicus from different Barbus species, suggesting the need for a taxonomic revision for these species.

Keywords

DactylogyrusBarbus spp.morphometryattachment organsreproductive organsmolecular phylogenyspeciation
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 134 , Issue 12 , November 2007 , pp. 1751 - 1765
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almaça, C. (1988). Remarks on the biogeography of Euro-Mediterranean Barbus (Cyprinidae, Pisces). Bulletin d'Ecologie 19, 159–162.Google Scholar
Aydogdu, A., Altunel, F. N. and Yildirimhan, H. S. (2002). The occurrence of helminth parasites in barbel (Barbus plebejus escherichi, Steindachner, 1897) of the Doganci (Bursa) Dam Lake, Turkey. Acta Veterinaria – Beograd 52, 369–380.Google Scholar
Booton, G. C., Kaufman, L., Chandler, M., Oguto-Ohwayo, R., Duand, W. and Fuerst, P. A. (1999). Evolution of the ribosomal RNA Internal transcribed spacer one (ITS-1) in cichlid fishes of the Lake Victoria region. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11, 273–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bush, A. O., Lafferty, K. D., Lotz, J. M. and Shostack, A. W. (1997). Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575–583.Google Scholar
Crivelli, A. J., Malakou, M., Catsadorakis, G. and Rosecchi, E. (1996). The prespa barbel, Barbus prespensis, a fish species endemic to the prespa lakes (North-Western Greece). Folia Zoologica 45 (Suppl. 1), 21–32.Google Scholar
Doadrio, I. (1990). Phylogenetic relationships and classification of western Palearctic species of Barbus (Osteichthyes, Cyprinidae). Aquatic Living Resources 3, 265–282.Google Scholar
Doadrio, I., Carmona, J. A. and Machordom, A. (2002). Haplotype diversity and phylogenetic relationships among the Iberian barbels (Barbus, Cyprinidae) reveal two evolutionary lineages. Journal of Heridity 93, 140–147.Google ScholarPubMed
Dowling, T. E., Tibbets, C. A., Minckley, W. L. and Smith, G. R. (2002). Evolutionary relationships of the Plagopterins (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from cytochrome b sequences. Copeia 3, 665–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupont, F. and Lambert, A. (1986). Étude des communautés de Monogènes Dactylogyridae parasites des Cyprinidae du Lac Mikri Prespa (Nord de la Grèce). Description de trois nouvelles espèces chez un Barbus endémique: Barbus cyclolepis prespensis Karavan, 1924. Annales de Parasitologie humaine et comparée 61, 597–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Gharbi, S., Renaud, F. and Lambert, A. (1992). Dactylogyrids (Platyhelminthes: Monogenea) of Barbus spp. (Teleostei: Cyrpinidae) from the Iberian Peninsula. Research and Reviews in Parasitology 52, 103–116.Google Scholar
El Gharbi, S., Birgi, E. and Lambert, A. (1994). The Monogenea (Dactylogyridae), parasites of Cyprinidae of the genus Barbus in Northern Africa. Systematic Parasitology 27, 45–70.Google Scholar
Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (Eds) (2006). FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication www.fishbase.orgGoogle Scholar
Guégan, J.-F. and Lambert, A. (1990). Twelve new species of dactylogyrids (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea) from West African barbels (Teleostei, Cyprinidae), with some biogeographical implications. Systematic Parasitology 17, 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guégan, J.-F. and Agnèse, J.-F. (1991). Parasite evolutionary events inferred from host phylogeny: the case of Labeo species (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) and their dactylogyrid parasites (Monogenea, Dactylogyridae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 69, 595–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusev, A. V. (1985). Metazoan Parasites. Part I. Identification Key to Parasites of Freshwater Fish. Vol. 2, (ed. Bauer, O. N.). Nauka, Leningrad. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: a user – friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41, 95–98.Google Scholar
Hillis, D. M. and Dixon, M. T. (1991). Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. The Quarterly Review of Biology 66, 411–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivasik, V. M. (1963). K voprosu o parazitofauna kaprovij rib verjnego techniia reki Tissi (Zakarpate). Acta Veterinaria Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 13, 363–366.Google Scholar
Kakacheva-Avramova, D. (1968). Gelminti po ribi ot reki na zapadna Stara planina I. Monogeneoidea. Predstaviteli na sem. Dactylogyridae. Izvestiya na Tsentralnata Khelmintologichna Laboratoriya, Sofia 12, 97–107. (In Bulgarian.)Google Scholar
Kotlík, P. and Berrebi, P. (2001). Phylogeography of the barbel (Barbus barbus) assessed by mitochondrial DNA variation. Molecular Ecology 10, 2177–2185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotlík, P. and Berrebi, P. (2002). Genetic subdivision and biogeography of the Danubian rheophilic barb Barbus petenyi inferred from phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA variation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotlík, P., Tsigenopoulos, C. S., Rab, P. and Berrebi, P. (2002). Two new Barbus species from the Danube River basin, with redescription of B. petenyi (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Folia Zoologica 51, 227–240.Google Scholar
Lambert, A. (1977). Les Monogènes Monopisthocotylea parasites des poissons d'eau douce de la France méditerranéenne. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 3ème sér., 429, Zool. 299, 177–214.Google Scholar
Le Brun, N., Renaud, F., Berrebi, P. and Lambert, A. (1992). Hybrid zones and host-parasite relationships: effect on the evolution of parasitic specificity. Evolution 46, 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, D. T.  J. and Olson, P. D. (2001). Small subunit rDNA and the Platyhelminthes: Signal, noise, conflict and compromise. In Interrelationships of the Platyhelminthes (ed. Littlewood, D. T. J. and Bray, R. A.), pp. 262–278. Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
Machodrom, A. and Doadrio, I. (2001 a). Evidence of a cenozoic betic-kabilian connection based on freshwater fish phylogeography (Luciobarbus, Cyprinidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18, 252–263.Google Scholar
Machodrom, A. and Doadrio, I. (2001 b). Evolutionary history and speciation modes in the cyprinid genus Barbus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 268, 1297–1306.Google Scholar
Machodrom, A., Doadrio, I. and Berrebi, P. (1995). Phylogeny and evolution of the genus Barbus in the Iberian Peninsula as revealed by allozyme electrophoresis. Journal of Fish Biology 47, 211–236.Google Scholar
Markevitch, A. P. (1951). Parazitofauna presnovodnych ryb USSR. (Parasite fauna of freshwater fishes of USSR). Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk Ukrainskoj SSR, Kiev. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Malmberg, G. (1957). On the occurrence of Gyrodactylus on Swedish fishes. Skrifter utgivna av Sodra Sveriges Fiskeriforening, (1956), pp. 19–76. (In Swedish.)Google Scholar
Molnar, K. (1964). Über die Parasitenfauna der Fische in Ungarn. II. Bekannte und neue Dactylogyrus – Arten an einheimischen Fischen. Acta Veterinaria Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 14, 455–467.Google Scholar
Nolan, M. and Cribb, T. H. (2005). The use and implications of ribosomal DNA sequencing for the discrimination of digenean species. Advances in Parasitology 60, 101–163.Google ScholarPubMed
Olson, P. D. and Littlewood, D. T.  J. (2002). Phylogenetics of the Monogenea – evidence from a medley of molecules. International Journal for Parasitology 32, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, P. D. and Tkach, V. V. (2005). Advances and trends in the molecular systematics of the parasitic Platyhelminthes. Advances in Parasitology 60, 165–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, R. D.  M. (1994). Parallel phylogenies: reconstructing the history of host-parasite assemblages. Cladistics 10, 155–173.Google Scholar
Posada, D. and Crandall, K. A. (1998). Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prost, M. (1988). Fish Monogenea of Poland. VIII. Parasites of Barbus meridionalis petenyi (Heck.). Acta Parasitologica Polonica 33, 1–6.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F. and Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MRBAYES 3: Baysien phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, T. R. and Gold, J. R. (1993). Complete sequence of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene in the cherryfin shiner, Lytrurus roseipinnis (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Copeia 3, 880–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šimková, A., Plaisance, L., Matejusová, I., Morand, S. and Verneau, O. (2003). Phylogenetic relationships of the Dactylogyridae Bychowsky, 1933 (Monogenea: Dactylogyridea): the need for the systematic revision of the Ancyrocephalinae Bychowsky, 1937. Systematic Parasitology 54, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Šimková, A., Morand, S., Jobet, E., Gelnar, M. and Verneau, O. (2004). Molecular phylogeny of congeneric monogenean parasites (Dactylogyrus): a case of intrahost speciation. Evolution 58, 1001–1018.Google ScholarPubMed
Šimková, A., Verneau, O., Gelnar, M. and Morand, S. (2006). Specificity and specialisation of congeneric monogeneans parasitizing cyprinid fish. Evolution 60, 1023–1037.Google ScholarPubMed
Swofford, D. L. (2002). PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony and Other Methods. Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Vassilev, M. V. and Pehlivanov, L. Z. (2005). Checklist of Bulgarian Freshwater Fishes. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 57, 161–190.Google Scholar
Zardoya, R. and Doadrio, I. (1999). Molecular evidence on the evolutionary and biogeographical patterns of European cyprinids. Journal of Molecular Evolution 49, 227–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Žitňan, R. (1965). Monogenoidea der Fische des Flusses Hron. Helminthologia 6, 29–48.Google Scholar