Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T17:14:44.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The course of infection and growth of Moniliformis dubius (Acanthocephala) in the intermediate host Periplaneta americana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. M. Lackie
J. M. Lackie
Affiliation:
The Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A quantitative study has been made of the relationship between Moniliformis dubius and Periplaneta americana.

1. Eggs removed from the body cavity of the worm hatch at a higher rate after dessication and after a short period of time following removal.

2. There is an exponential decline in the additional number of cystacanths recovered as the dose is increased linearly.

3. Female cockroaches are more susceptible to high levels of infection than males.

4. Direct injection into the haemocoele produces a similar recovery rate to that from oral infection.

5. Previous infection does not seem to affect the success of a superimposed infection.

6. Rates of development and growth are described.

7. The effect of the parasite on the concentration of free amino acids in the haemolymph was found to be negligible.

I would like to thank Miss S. Arnold and Mr D. Barnard for technical assistance, Mr E. Walters for help with statistical analysis, Dr D. W. T. Crompton for many helpful discussions and Dr P. J. Whitfield for reading this paper. This work has been carried out during the tenure of a Science Research Council Studentship.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , February 1972 , pp. 95 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crompton, D. W. T. (1970). An Ecological Approach to Acanthocephalan Physiology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edmonds, S. J. (1966). Hatching of the eggs of Moniliformis dubius. Experimental Parasitology 19, 216–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, S. J. & Ganesalingam, V. K. (1970). Changes in composition of host haemolymph after an attack by an insect parasitoid. Nature, London 227, 191–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gingrich, R. E. (1964). Acquired humoural immune response of Oncopeltus to injected materials. Journal of Insect Physiology 10, 179–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, D. & Robinson, E. S. (1967). Aspects of the development of Moniliformis dubius. Journal of Parasitology 53, 142–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, D. V. (1946). Studies on the life history and development of Moniliformis dubius Meyer, 1933. Journal of Parasitology 32, 257–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephens, J. M. (1963). Immunity in Insects in ‘Insect Pathology’ pp. 273–95 (ed. Steinhaus, E. A.). New York and London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, J. & Corrigan, J. (1959). Rapid collection of insect blood. Journal of Economic Entomology 52, 538–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umbreit, W. W., Burris, R. H. & Stauffer, J. F. (1949). Manometric Techniques and Tissue Metabolism, 2nd edition. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Van Asperen, K. & Van Esch, I. (1956). The chemical composition of haemolymph of Periplaneta americana. Archives néerlandaises de zoologie 11, 342–60.Google Scholar