Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T06:03:28.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The consequences of self-fertilization and outcrossing of the cestode Schistocephalus solidus in its second intermediate host

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2003

M. CHRISTEN
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute of Limnology, Department of Evolutionary Ecology, August-Thienemann-Strasse 2, 24306 Plön, Germany
M. MILINSKI
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute of Limnology, Department of Evolutionary Ecology, August-Thienemann-Strasse 2, 24306 Plön, Germany

Abstract

Many hermaphroditic parasites reproduce by both cross-fertilization and self-fertilization. To understand the maintenance of such mixed mating systems it is necessary to compare the fitness consequences of the two reproductive modes. This has, however, almost never been done in the context of host–parasite coevolution. Here we show the consequences of outcrossing and selfing in an advanced life-stage of the cestode Schistocephalus solidus, i.e. in its second intermediate host, the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Each juvenile stickleback was simultaneously exposed to 2 experimentally infected copepods, one harbouring outcrossed the other selfed parasites. At 60 days p.i. parasites were removed from the fish's body cavity and, with microsatellite markers, assigned to either outcrossed or selfed origin. Prevalence was not significantly higher in outcrossed parasites. However, those fish that were infected contained significantly more outcrossed than selfed parasites. Thus the probability of a selfed parasite to progress in the life-cycle is reduced in the second intermediate host. Furthermore, we found that even the multiply infected fish increased in weight during the experiment. Nevertheless, total worm weight in multiply infected fish was significantly lower than in singly infected ones, which thus might be a parasite life-history strategy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)