Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:02:26.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative studies on holotrichous ciliates in the Colpidium-Glaucoma-Leucophrys-Tetrahymena group

II. Morphology, life cycles and systematic status of strains in pure culture*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

John O. Corliss
John O. Corliss
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University College, New York University, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the last 30 years, at various laboratories in the United States, France and England, many strains of small holotrichous ciliates have been established in axenic culture for use in a widening variety of investigations of a physiological or biochemical nature. Since few of these organisms have been adequately described or properly identified by the workers employing them, thus making difficult meaningful comparison of the various experimental results reported, the need for morphological and taxonomical study has become increasingly apparent. At least twenty-nine such axenic strains of ciliates, considered members of a ‘Colpidium-Glaucoma-Leucophrys-Tetrahymena group’ because it has been principally to these four genera that the protozoa have been assigned in the past, are still in existence and twenty-six of them were collected for use in the present investigation. For accurate identification of such relatively undifferentiated ciliates the use of silver nitrate impregnation techniques, the value of which was recognized some years ago by Klein (1926) and stressed by Furgason (1940), is re-emphasized as being nearly indispensable. Details of buccal organelles and differentiated pellicular structures in other parts of the body are revealed precisely and with constancy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 43 , Issue 1-2 , May 1953 , pp. 49 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balamuth, W. (1940). Regeneration in protozoa: a problem of morphogenesis. Quart. Rev. Biol. 15, 290–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, M. A. (1944). The rearing of sterile adult Anopheles. Pub. Hlth Reps, 59, 1384–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beers, C. D. (1946). Tillina magna: micronuclear number, encystment and vitality in diverse clones; capabilities of amicronucleate races. Biol. Bull. 91, 256–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browning, I. (1951). Cytoplasmic inclusions of the protozoan, Tetrahymena geleii. Texas Reps. Biol. Med. 9, 3–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Browning, I., Swinford, L. R. & Varnedoe, N. B. (1950). Environmentally induced long-term modification of generation time in the protozoan Tetrahymena geleii (T-P). (Abstr.) Recs. Genet. Soc. Amer. 19, 91.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. & Brachon, S. (1935). Discrimination, chez deux infusoires du genre Glaucoma, entre système argentophile et infraciliature. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 118, 399–403.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. & Chatton, M. (1927). Sur les conditions nécessaires pour déterminer expérimentalement la conjugaison de l'infusoire Glaucoma scintillans. C.R. Acad. Sci. 185, 400–2.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. & Lwoff, A. (1936). Techniques pour l'étude des protozoaires, spécialement de leurs structures superficielles (cinétome et argyrome). Bull. Soc. fr. Micr. 5, 25–39.Google Scholar
Chatton, E., Lwoff, A., Lwoff, M. & Monod, J. L. (1931). La formation l'ébauche buccale posterieure chez les ciliés en division et ses relations de continuité topographique et génétique avec la bouche anterieure. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 107, 540–4.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. & Tellier, L. (1934). Sur les lésions de la chromatins produites par l'arsenic chez l'iofusoire Glaucoma piriformis. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 116, 950–3.Google Scholar
Claff, C. L. (1947). Induced morphological changes in Tetrahymena vorax. (Abstr.) Biol. Bull. 93, 216–17.Google Scholar
Claparéde, E. & Lachmann, J. (1858). Études sur les infusoires et les rhizopodes. Mem. Inst. nat. Génèvois, 5, 1–142.Google Scholar
Corliss, J. O. (1949). Comparative morphology of certain ciliates in the Colpidium-Glaucoma-Tetrahymena group. (Abstr.) Anat. Rec. 105, 548.Google Scholar
Corliss, J. O. (1950). History of bacteria-free ciliates in the Colpidium-Glaucoma-Leucophrys-Tetrahymena group. (Abstr.) Proc. Amer. Soc. Protozool. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Corliss, J. O. (1951 a). On nomenclature for congeneric ciliates in the Colpidium-Glaucoma-Leucophrys-Tetrahymena group. (Abstr.) Soc. Syst. Zool., News Ltr, no. 5, 9–10.Google Scholar
Corliss, J. O. (1951 b). Morphology and systematic status of pure culture strains in the Colpidium-Glaucoma-Leucophrys-Tetrahymena group. (Abstr.) Proc. Amer. Soc. Protozool. 2, 11.Google Scholar
Corliss, J. O. (1952 a). Comparative studies on holotrichous ciliates in the Colpidium-Glaucoma-Leucophrys-Tetrahymena group. I. General considerations and history of strains in pure culture. Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 71, 159–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corliss, J. O. (1952 b). Review of the genus Tetrahymena. (Abstr.) Proc. Amer. Soc. Protozool. 3, 3.Google Scholar
Corliss, J. O. (1952 c). Characterization of the family Tetrahymenidae nov. fam. (Abstr.) Proc. Amer. Soc. Protozool. 3, 4.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1841). Histoire naturelle des zoophytes infusoires. (Paris.)Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G. (1830). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Organization der Infusorien und ihrer geographischen Verbreitung, besonders in Siberien. Abhandl. Akad. Wise, zu Berlin. Aus dem Jahre 1830. (Gedruckt 1832). 1–88.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G. (1831). Über die Entwickelung und Lebensdauer der Infusionsthiere; nebst ferneren Beitragen zu einer Vergleichung ihrer organischen Systeme. Abhandl. Akad. Wiss. zu Berlin. Aus dem Jahre 1831. (Gedruckt 1832). 1–154.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G. (1838). Die Infusionsthierchen als vollkommene Organismen. (Leipzig.)Google Scholar
Elliott, A. M. (1933). Isolation of Colpidium striatum Stokes in bacteria-free cultures and the relation of growth to the pH of the medium. Biol. Bull. 65, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, A. M. (1935). Characterization of species of Colpidium, with special reference to C. campylum and C. striatum. (Abstr.) Anat. Rec. (Suppl.) 64, 108.Google Scholar
Epstein, H. (1926). Infektion des Nervensystems von Fischen durch Infusorien. Arch. Buss. Protist. 5, 169–80.Google Scholar
Fauré-Fremiet, E. (1906). Le Glaucoma pyriformis et l'organisation de la substance vivante. C.R. Assoc. Anat. Session de Bordeaux, 120–7.Google Scholar
Fauré-Fremiet, E. (1910). Étude sur les mitochondries des protozoaires et des cellules sexuelles. Arch. Anat. Micr. 2, 457–648.Google Scholar
Fauré-Fremiet, E. (1912). Études cytologiques sur quelques infusoires des marais salants du Croisic. Arch. Anat. Micr. 13, 401–79.Google Scholar
Fauré-Fremiet, E. (1944). Polymorphisme de l'Enchelys mutans (Mermod). Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 69, 212–19.Google Scholar
Fauré-Fremiet, E. (1945). Polymorphisme du Monodiniumvorax, nov. sp. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 70, 69–79.Google Scholar
Fauré-Fremiet, E. (1948). Doublets homopolaires et régulation morphogénétique chez le cilié Leucophrys patula. Arch. Anat. Micr. 37, 183–203.Google Scholar
Fauré-Fremiet, E. (1949). Action du lithium sur la stomatogenèse chez les ciliés. Belg.-Nederl. Cytoembryol. Dagen., Gent, 100–2.Google Scholar
Fauré-Fremiet, E. (1950). Morphologie comparée et systématique des ciliés. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 75, 109–22.Google Scholar
Fauré-Fremiet, E. & Mugard, H. (1949). Le dimorphisme de Espejoia mucicola. Hydrobiol. 1, 379–89.Google Scholar
Furgason, W. H. (1940). The significant cytostomal pattern of the ‘Glaucoma-Colpidium group’, and a proposed new genus and species, Tetrahymena geleii. Arch. Protistenk. 94, 224–66.Google Scholar
Gelei, J. V. (1935). Colpidium glaucomaeforme n.sp. (Hymenostomata) und sein Neuronemensystem. Arch. Protistenk. 85, 289–302.Google Scholar
Glaser, R. W. & Coria, N. A. (1930). Methods for the pure culture of certain protozoa. J. Exp. Med. 51, 787–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grassé, P. P. & De Boissezon, P. (1929). Turchiniella culicis n.g., n.sp. infusoire parasite de l'hemocoele d'un Culex adulte. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 54, 187–91.Google Scholar
Grell, K. G. (1950). Der Kerndualismus der Ciliaten und Suktorien. Naturwiss. 15, 347–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, A. (1932). The constant culture of Stentor coeruleus. Arch Protistenk. 76, 118–29.Google Scholar
Hetherington, A. (1934). The sterilization of protozoa. Biol. Bull. 67, 315–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, J. (1947). The question of the equality of somatic and germ nuclei in respect to heredity and survival, on the basis of studies in a soil protozoön. Arch. Biol. Hungar. 17, 193–202.Google Scholar
Janda, V. & Jírovec, O. (1937). Ueber künstlich hervorgerufenen Parasitismus eines freilebenden Ciliaten Glaucoma piriformis und Infektionsversuche mit Euglena gracilis und Spirochaeta biflexa. Mém. Soc. Zool. Tchée, de Prag. 5, 34–58.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. F. (1935). Isolation of Glaucoma ficaria Kahl in bacteria-free culture, and growth in relation to pH of the medium. Arch. Protistenk. 86, 263–77.Google Scholar
Kahl, A. (1926). Neue und wenig bekannte Formen der holotrichen und heterotrichen Ciliaten. Arch. Protistenk. 55, 197–438.Google Scholar
Kahl, A. (1930–1935). Wimpertiere oder Ciliata. Parts of Dahl's Die Tierwelt Deutschlands. (Jena.)Google Scholar
Kellin, D. (1921). On a new ciliate, Lambomella stegomyiae, n.g., n.sp., parasitic in the body cavity of the larvae of Stegomyia scutellaris Walker. Parasitology, 13, 216–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidder, G. W. (1939). The influence of food on the structure of a new species of Glaucoma. (Abstr.) Anat. Rec. (Suppl.) 75, 87.Google Scholar
Kidder, G. W. (1941). Growth studies on ciliates. VII. Comparative growth characteristics of four species of sterile ciliates. Biol. Bull. 80, 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidder, G. W. & Dewey, V. C. (1945). Studies on the biochemistry of Tetrahymena. III. Strain differences. Physiol. Zool. 18, 136–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidder, G. W., Lilly, D. M. & Claff, C. L. (1940). Growth studies on ciliates. IV. The influence of food on the structure and growth of Glaucoma vorax sp.nov. Biol. Bull. 78, 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidder, G. W., Stuart, C. A., McGann, V. G. & Dewey, V. C. (1945). Antigenic relationships in the genus Tetrahymena. Physiol. Zool. 18, 415–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, H. (1941). Relationships between certain protozoa and other animals. Chapt. 19 in Calkins, G. N. & Summers, F. M. (eds.), Protozoa in biological research. Columbia Univ. Press. (New York.)Google Scholar
Klein, B. M. (1926). Ergebnisse mit einer Silbermethode bei Ciliaten. Arch. Protistenk. 56, 243–79.Google Scholar
Klein, B. M. (1943). Das Silberlinien- oder neuroformative System der Ciliaten. Ann. Nat.-hist. Mus. Wien. 53, 156–336.Google Scholar
Knight, D. R. & McDougle, H. C. (1944). A protozoon of the genus Tetrahymena found in domestic fowl. Amer. J. Vet. Res. 5, 113–16.Google Scholar
Kozloff, E. N. (1946). The morphology and systematic position of a holotrichous ciliate parasitizing Deroceras agreste (L.). J. Morph. 79, 445–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamborn, W. A. (1921). A protozoon pathogenic to mosquito larvae. Parasitology, 13, 213–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrie, N. R. (1935). Studies in the metabolism of protozoa. II. Some biochemical reactions occurring in the presence of the washed cells of Glaucoma pyriformis. Biochem. J. 29, 2297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepsi, J. (1926). Die Infusorien des Süsswassers und Meeres. (Berlin.)Google Scholar
Loefer, J. B. (1952). Some observations on the size of Tetrahymena. J. Morph. 90, 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lwoff, A. (1923). Sur la nutrition des infusoires. C.R. Acad. Sci. 176, 928–30.Google Scholar
Lwoff, A. (1924). Infection expérimentale à Glaucoma piriformis chez Galleria mellonella (Lepidoptère). C.R. Acad. Sci. 178, 1106–8.Google Scholar
Lwoff, A. (1932). Recherches biochimiques sur la nutrition des protozoaires. Le pouvoir de synthèse. Monogr. Inst. Pasteur. (Paris.)Google Scholar
Lwoff, A. (1947). Some aspects of the problem of growth factors for protozoa. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 1, 101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lwoff, A. (1950). Problems of morphogenesis in ciliates. Wiley and Sons. (New York.)Google Scholar
Lwoff, A. (1951). Editor, Biochemistry and physiology of protozoa. Academic Press. (New York.)Google Scholar
Maupas, E. (1883). Contribution à l'étude morphologique et anatomique des infusoires ciliés. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. (sér. 2), 1, 427–664.Google Scholar
Maupas, E. (1888). Recherches expérimental sur la multiplication des infusoires ciliés. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. (sér. 2), 6, 165–277.Google Scholar
Maupas, E. (1889). La rajeunissement karyogamique chez les ciliés. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. (sér. 2), 7, 149–517.Google Scholar
Mugard, H. (1948). Contribution à l'étude des infusoires hymenostomes histiophages. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. (sér. 11), 10, 171–268.Google Scholar
Müller, O. F. (1773). Vermium terrestrium et fluviatilium, seu animalium infusorium, helminthicorum et testaceorum, non marinorum, succincta historia. (Havniae et Lipsiae).Google Scholar
Müller, O. F. (1780). Zoologia Danica seu animalium Daniae et Norvegiae rariorum ac minus notorum. Descriptionfies et historia. (Havniae.)Google Scholar
Müller, O. F. (1786). Animalcula infusoria fluviatilia et marina. (Havniae et Lipsiae.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muspratt, J. (1945). Observations on the larvae of tree-hole breeding Culicini (Diptera: Culicidae) and two of their parasites. J. Ent. Soc. S. Afr. 8, 13–20.Google Scholar
Muspratt, J. (1947). Notes on a ciliate protozoan, probably Glaucoma pyriformis, parasitic in culicine mosquito larvae. Parasitology, 38, 107–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter, T. S. (1945). Chromatin diminution. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 36, 443–8.Google Scholar
Park, O. (1929). The osmiophilic bodies of the protozoans, Stentor and Leucophrys. Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 48, 20–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penard, E. (1922). Études sur les infusoires d'eau douce. (Geneve.)Google Scholar
Phelps, A. (1935). Growth of protozoa in pure culture. I. Effect upon the growth curve of the age of the inoculum and of the amount of the inoculum. J. Exp. Zool. 70, 109–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prowazek, S. V. (1909). Duplicidade morfolojica nos infuzorios ciliados (Formdimorphismus bei ciliaten Infusorien). Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, 1, 105–8.Google Scholar
Reynolds, B. D. (1936). Colpoda steini, a facultative parasite of the land slug, Agriolimax agrestis. J.Parasit. 22, 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, M. (1939 a). A study of the reactions in vitro of certain ciliates belonging to the Glaucoma-Colpidium group to antibodies in the sera of rabbits immunised therewith. J, Path. Bact. 48, 305–22.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. (1939 b). An analysis of some of the antigenic properties of certain ciliates belonging to the Glaucoma-Colpidium group as shown in their response to immune serum. J. Path. Bact. 48, 323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roux, J. (1899). Observations sur quelques infusoires ciliés des environs de Génève avec la description de nouvelles espèces. Rev. Suisse de Zool. 6, 557–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandon, H. (1927). The composition and distribution of the protozoan fauna of the soil. Oliver & Boyd. (Edinburgh.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenk, E. T. & McMasters, J. H. (1948). Procedure in taxonomy. Stanford Univ. Press. (California.)Google Scholar
Schewiakoff, W. (1889). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der holotrichen Ciliaten. Biblioth. Zool. 5, 1–77.Google Scholar
Schewiakoff, W. (1896). The organization and systematics of the Infusoria Aspirotricha (Holotricha auctorum). Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St Petersbourg (ser. 8), 4. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Shumway, W. (1940). A ciliate protozoon parasitic in the central nervous system of larval Ambystoma. Biol. Bull. 78, 283–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, F. (1860). Ueber die Eintheilung der holotrichen Infusionsthiere und einige neuere Gattungen und Arten dieser Ordnung. Sitz-ber. K. Böhm. Ges. Wiss. Prag.Google Scholar
Stein, F. (1867). Der Organismus der Infusionsthiere nach eigenen Forschungen in systematischer Reihenfolge bearbeitet. II. (Leipzig.)Google Scholar
Stokes, A. C. (1885). Some new infusoria from American fresh-waters. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), 15, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, A. C. (1886). Some new infusoria from American fresh-waters. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), 17, 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, A. C. (1887). Notices of new fresh-water infusoria. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 24, 244–55.Google Scholar
Stokes, A. C. (1888). A preliminary contribution toward a history of the fresh-water infusoria of the United States. J. Trenton Nat. Hist. Soc. 1, 71–344.Google Scholar
Tanzer, C. (1941). Serological studies with free-living protista. J. Immunol. 42, 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. V., Thomas, J. O. & Brown, M. G. (1933). Studies on the protozoa. IV. Lethal effects of the X-radiation of a sterile culture medium for Colpidium campylum. Physiol. Zool. 6, 467–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treillard, M. & Lwoff, A. (1924). Sur un infusoire parasite de la cavité générate des larves de Chironomes. Sa sexualité. C.R. Acad. Sci. 178, 1761–64.Google Scholar
Villekeuve-Brachon, S. (1940). Recherehes sur les ciliés hétérotriches. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gen. 82, 1–180.Google Scholar
Warren, E. (1932). On a ciliate protozoon inhabiting the liver of a slug. Ann. Natal Mus. 7, 1–53.Google Scholar
Watson, J. M. (1944). Studies on the morphology and bionomics of a little known holotrichous ciliate—Balantiophorus minutus Schew. Part II.—The effect of environmental factors. J. R. Micr. Soc. 64, 31–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. M. (1946). On the coprophilic habits of a ciliate—Glaucoma piriformis. J.Trop. Med. (Hyg.) 49, 44–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilber, C. G. & Seaman, G. R. (1947). Synthesis of lipids from proteins in Colpidium campylum. (Abstr.) Biol. Bull. 93, 214–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Woodruff, L. L. (1921). Micronucleate and amicronucleate races of infusoria. J. Exp. Zool. 34, 329–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar