Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T17:10:52.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative effects of mites and lice on the reproductive success of rock doves (Columba livia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

D. H. Clayton  and
D. M. Tompkins
D. H. Clayton
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
D. M. Tompkins
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We report experimental data comparing the effects of Mesostigmatid mites and Ischnoceran lice on the reproductive performance of a single group of captive rock doves (Columba livia). Several components of host reproductive success were compared for the two groups, including number of eggs laid, hatching success, nestling growth rates, fledging success, post-fledging body mass and survival. Adult body mass and survival were also compared. There was a dramatic difference in the effects of the mites and lice. The former drove host reproductive success to zero, mainly by agitating adults and causing them to incubate eggs less faithfully. Nestling growth rates and post-fledging survival were also significantly reduced by mites. Lice showed no effect on reproductive success whatsoever, even though the feather damage they cause is known to have energetic consequences (Booth, Clayton & Block, 1993). Neither parasite had a significant effect on adult birds. Although Ischnocera are found on most species of birds, our results for lice constitute the first experimental test of the impact of Ischnocera on avian reproductive success (preliminary report by Clayton & Tompkins, 1994). We discuss reasons for the different effects of mites and lice, including the relationship of horizontal (mites) and vertical (lice) transmission to the evolution of virulence.

Keywords

ectoparasitesreproductionrock dovesmiteslice
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , February 1995 , pp. 195 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. M. & Gordon, D. M. (1982). Processes influencing the distribution of parasite numbers within host populations with special emphasis on parasite-induced host mortalities. Parasitology 85, 373–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. (1982). Coevolution of hosts and parasites. Parasitology 85, 411–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ateyo, W. T. & Gaud, J. (1979). Feather mites and their hosts. In Recent Advances in Acarology (ed. Rodriquez, J. G.), pp. 355–361. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, C. M. (1993). Lice (Amblycera and Ischnocera) as vectors of Eulimdana spp. (Nematoda: Filarioidea) in Charadriiform birds and the necessity of short reproductive periods in adult worms. Journal of Parasitology 79, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benbrook, E. A. (1965). External parasites of poultry. In Diseases of Poultry (ed. Biester, H. E. & Schwarte, L. H.), pp. 925–964. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Bliss, C. I. (1953). Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data. Biometrics 9, 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, D. T., Clayton, D. H. & Block, B. A. (1993). Experimental demonstration of the energetic cost of parasitism in free-ranging hosts. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 253, 125–9.Google Scholar
Brown, C. R. & Brown, M. B. (1986). Ectoparasites as a cost of coloniality in cliff swallows (Hirundo pyrrhonota). Ecology 67, 1206–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, L. (1991). The nest protection hypothesis: the adaptive use of plant secondary compounds by European starlings. In Bird–Parasite Interactions: Ecology, Evolution, and Behaviour (ed. Loye, J. E. & Zuk, M.), pp. 205–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, D. H. (1989). Coevolutionary ecology of the rock dove, Columba livia, and its chewing lice (Mallophaga: Ischnocera). Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Clayton, D. H. (1990). Mate choice in experimentally parasitized rock doves: lousy males lose. American Zoologist 30, 251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, D. H. (1991). Coevolution of avian grooming and ectoparasite avoidance. In Bird–Parasite Interactions: Ecology, Evolution, and Behaviour (ed. Loye, J. E. & Zuk, M.), pp. 258–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, D. H., Gregory, R. D. & Price, R. D. (1992). Comparative ecology of Neotropical bird lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera). Journal of Animal Ecology 61, 781–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, D. H. & Tompkins, D. M. (1994). Ectoparasite virulence is linked to mode of transmission. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 256, 211–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Derylo, A. (1974 a). Studies on the economic harmfulness of Mallophaga. I. The influence of invasion of lice on the state of health in hens and turkeys (in Polish). Medycyna Weterynaryjna 30, 353–7.Google Scholar
Derylo, A. (1974 b). Studies on the economic harmfulness of Mallophaga. II. Influence of lice infestation on egg laying and hatching of hens (in Polish). Medycyna Weterynaryjna 30, 406–10.Google Scholar
Devaney, J. A. (1976). Effects of the chicken body louse, Menacanthus stramineus, on caged layers. Poultry Science 55, 430–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Droge, D. L. (1986). Parent–offspring conflict and the allocation of parental investment in the feral pigeon, Columba livia. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Duffy, D. C. (1983). The ecology of tick parasitism on densely nesting Peruvian seabirds. Ecology 64, 110–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichler, W., Zlotorczyka, J., Ludwig, H. W. & Stenram, H. I. (1972). The pigeon louse Columbicola columbae columbae (German translation). Angewandte Parasitologie 13, 1–18.Google Scholar
Emlen, J. T. (1986). Responses of breeding cliff swallows to nidicolous parasite infestations. The Condor 88 110–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewald, P. W. (1983). Host–parasite relations, vectors, and the evolution of disease severity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14, 465–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, J. H. (1981). Arthropods of Medical Importance. Chilbolton, Hampshire: Noble Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54, 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. A. (1985). On the control of parasites in nest boxes and the use of pesticides near birds. Sialia 7, 17–25.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. F. (1992). Rock dove. In The Birds of North America (ed. Poole, A., Stettenheim, P. & Gill, F.). Washington: The American Ornithologists' Union.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, A. C. (1967). Anaemia in poultry infested with the Red Mite Dermanyssus gallinae. Veterinary Record 80, 514–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehmann, T. (1991). Ectoparasitic impacts on Gerbillus andersoni allenbyi under natural conditions. Parasitology 104, 479–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, T. (1993). Ectoparasites: direct impact on host fitness. Parasitology Today 9, 8–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levi, W. M. (1957). The Pigeon. Columbia, S.C.: R. L. Bryan Co.Google Scholar
Margolis, L., Esch, G. W., Holmes, J. C., Kuris, K. M. & Schad, G. A. (1982). The use of ecological terms in parasitology. Journal of Parasitology 68, 131–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. G. (1981). The Ecology of Ectoparasitic Insects. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Matthysse, G., Jones, C. J. & Purnasiri, A. (1974). Development of northern fowl mite populations on chickens, effects on the host, and immunology. Search Agriculture 4.Google Scholar
Moss, W. W. (1978). The mite genus Dermanyssus: a survey, with description of Dermanyssus trochilinis, n.sp., and a revised key to the species (Acari: Mesostigmata: Dermanyssidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 14, 627–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, W. W. & Camin, J. H. (1970). Nest parasitism, productivity, and clutch size in Purple Martins. Science 168, 1000–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, B. C. & Murray, M. D. (1971). The distribution of Mallophaga on the domestic pigeon (Columba livia). International Journal for Parasitology 1, 21–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sikes, R. K. & Chamberlain, R. W. (1954). Laboratory observations on three species of bird mites. Journal of Parasitology 40, 691–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strandtmann, R. W. & Wharton, G. W. (1958). A Manual of Mesostigmatid Mites Parasitic on Vertebrates. Institute of Acarology, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Waage, J. K. (1979). The evolution of insect/vertebrate associations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 12, 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar