Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:05:36.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary on ‘A Candide response to Panglossian accusations by Randolph and Dobson: biodiversity buffers disease’ by Dr R. Ostfeld (Parasitology 2013, in press) – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2013

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum
Information
Parasitology , Volume 141 , Issue 4 , April 2014 , pp. 579
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Andrew D. M. Dobson also contributed to the above article and was mistakenly excluded from the authorship list.

Andrew D. M. Dobson's affiliation at the time of writing the commentary was the British Trust for Ornithology, Stirling, Scotland.

The publisher would like to apologize for this error.

References

REFERENCE

Randolph, S. E. (2013). Commentary on ‘A Candide response to Panglossian accusations by Randolph and Dobson: biodiversity buffers disease’ by Dr R. Ostfeld (Parasitology 2013, in press). Parasitology 140, 1199–1200. doi:10.1017/S0031182013000620.Google Scholar