Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:58:15.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coccidia of the Genus Isospora in Cats, Dogs and Man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

C. M. Wenyon
C. M. Wenyon
Affiliation:
Wellcome Bureau of Scientific Research.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent number of Parasitology Dobell (1926) has expressed disagreement with certain views put forward by me (1923) in a paper dealing with the coccidia of cats, dogs and man. His criticisms deal particularly with the name Isospora belli1 given by me to the coccidium discovered in man during the war, but my observations on the coccidia of cats and dogs also come under review. As regards the coccidia of these animals Dobell's criticisms would undoubtedly have been considerably modified if he had referred to a note written by myself and Sheather (1925). He has apparently overlooked this note entirely, an omission which is all the more unfortunate in that it has a very direct bearing on many of the statements made in his article.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 1926 , pp. 253 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dobell, C. (1919). A revision of the coccidia parasitic in man. Parasitology, XI. 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, C. (1926). On the species of Isospora parasitic in man. Parasitology XVIII. 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eimer, T. (1870). Ueber die ei- und kugelförmigen sogenannten Psorospermien der Wirbelthiere. Würzburg.Google Scholar
Pospiech, W. (1919). Untersuchungen über den mikroskopischen Nachweis von Darmparasiten im Kot von Fleischfressern. (Veterinärmed. Inaug. Diss.) Munich.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. and Lucet, A. (1891). Notes sur quelques espèces de coccidies encore peu étudiées. Bull. Soc. Zool. France, XVI. 246.Google Scholar
Reichenow, E. (1925). Über das Vorkommen von zwei Coccidienarten der Gattung Isospora beim Menschen. Arch. f. Schiffs- und Trop.-Hyg. XXIX. 172.Google Scholar
Rivolta, S. (1878). Della gregarinosi dei polli e dell' ordinamento delle gregarine e dei psorospermi degli animali domestici. Lombard. Giorn. d. Anat. Fisiol. e Patol. d. Anim. Pisa, Anni 1877–78, X. 220. Reprinted in Studi fatti nel Gab. di Anat. Patol. della R. Scuola Superiore Veterinaria di Pisa, 1879, 57.Google Scholar
Virchow, R. (1860). Helminthologische Notizen. 4. Zur Kenntnis der Wurmknoten. Arch. f. Path. Anat. XVIII. 523.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. (1923). Coccidiosis of cats and dogs and the status of the Isospora of man. Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit. XVII. 231.Google Scholar
Wenyon, C. M. and Sheather, L. (1925). [Exhibition of specimens illustrating Isospora infections of dogs.] Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. and Hyg. XIX. 10.Google Scholar
Zapfe, H. (1923). Zur Kenntnis der Kokzidiose des Hundes. (Veterinärmed. Inaug. Diss.) Hamburg.Google Scholar