Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:46:32.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The cattle lice of Great Britain Part II. Lice populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. J. Craufurd-Benson
Affiliation:
The Cooper Technical Bureau, Berkhamsted

Extract

1. The seasonal variations and regional distribution of the cattle lice have been studied by monthly examinations of cattle at the Cooper Field Research Station.

2. Additional evidence has been obtained by the distribution of a questionnaire to farmers, the general results of which are included in this paper.

3. The seasonal variations of the populations of the four species of cattle lice in Great Britain are similar. The maximum population density is reached in February and March. In April and May there is a rapid decline until the populations reach their lowest level in June, July and August. In September, the lice start increasing in numbers till they reach their maximum density in February and March.

4. The regional distribution of the population varies in accordance with the seasonal variations of the whole population.

5. The various climatic factors that may affect the lice populations are discussed. It is considered that the light intensity is a factor of major importance in this country.

6. The various factors inherent in the host animal are discussed, and it is suggested that the seasonal fluctuations of the density of the animal's coat are important.

7. The finding of a previous paper (Craufurd-Benson, 1941) that the microclimatic temperature is important as affecting the hatching of eggs is discussed in relation to the variations of lice populations as a whole.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akinschin, Th. (1914). Parasites. Lice on animals and their destruction. The Agriculturist, St Petersburg, 7, 287. Rev. App. Ent. Ser. B, 2, 118.Google Scholar
Bedford, G. A. H. (1932). Rep. Dir. Vet. Ser. Anim. Industr. S. Afr. p. 18.Google Scholar
Bishopp, F. C. (1921). Solenopotes capillatus, a sucking louse of cattle not heretofore known in the United States. J. agric. Res. 21, 797801.Google Scholar
Cooley, R. A. & Parker, R. R. (1916). Cattle lice in Montana. Rep. Montana Live Stock Sanitary Board and State Vet. Surgeons, Helena, 19151916, pp. 1921.Google Scholar
Craufurd-Benson, H. J. (1941). The cattle lice of Great Britain. Pt. I. Biology, with special reference to Haematopinus eurysternus. Parasitology, 33, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imes, M. (1925). Cattle lice and how to eradicate them. Farmers Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 909.Google Scholar
Lamson, , Jun, G. H. (1918). Cattle lice and their control. Bull. Storrs Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 97.Google Scholar
McDougall, R. S. (1923). Insect and other pests of 1922. Separate from Trans. Highland and Agric. Soc. Scotland. 43 pp.Google Scholar
O'Connor, B. A. (1932). Solenopotes capillatus Enderlein, a sucking louse of cattle hitherto unrecorded from Australia. J. Dep. Agric. W. Aust. (2) 9, 300–2.Google Scholar
Roberts, F. H. S. (1938). Cattle lice; their economic importance in Queensland. Aust. Vet. J. 14, 55–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shull, W. E. (1932). Control of the cattle louse, Bovicola bovis Linn. (Mallophaga, Tricho-dectidae). J. econn. Ent. 25, 1208–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. W. (1933). Sodium fluoride as a control fqr cattle lice. Rep. ent. Soc. Ontario. 1932, 63, 54–6.Google Scholar
Underbill, B. M. (1923). Some parasites of hogs, sheep, cattle and poultry. Gen. Bull. Pennsylvania Dep. Agric. no. 354, p. 40.Google Scholar
Walton, C. L. (1924). Preliminary Report on the agricultural zoology of North Wales. Univ. Coll. N. Wales Dep. Agric. no. 28, Bangor.Google Scholar