Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:48:41.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Caryophyllidea (Cestoidea): perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. S. Mackiewicz
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York 12222

Extract

Caryophyllids are widely distributed cestodes of the fresh water siluriform and cypriniform fishes of the world. There are about 126 species and 45 genera and they constitute approximately 25% of the cestode fauna of fresh water fish (Mackiewicz, 1972). Benthic-feeding fish become infected by eating tubificid worms (Annelida; Oligochaeta) that harbour the cercomer-beariug, infective stage; the tubificids, in turn, are infected by eating the operculated eggs in mud. Such a brief synopsis belies the fact that these well-known tapeworms are at the very heart of important questions concerning the evolution of Cestoidea. One has but to read Bazitov (1976), Freeman (1973), Kulakovskaya & Demshin (1978), Mameav (1975), Malmberg (1974) and Mackiewicz (1981) to appreciate that great differences still exist as to how caryophyllids evolved and what role they may have played in the evolution of the more numerous strobilate tapeworms.

Type
Trends and Perspectives
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, I. G. & Haslewood, G. A. D. (1962). Comparative studies of ‘Bile Salts’ 15. The natural occurrence and preparation of allocholic acid. Biochemistry Journal 85, 236–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, I. G. & Haslewood, G. A. D. (1970). Comparative studies of bile salts 5-chimaerol, a new bile alcohol from the white sucker. Catostomus commersoni Lacëpède. Biochemistry Journal 116, 581–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bazitov, A. A. (1976). The status of Caryophyllidea in the system of platyhelminthes. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 55, 1779–87. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Briggs, T. & Bussjaeger, C. (1972). Allocholic acid, the major component in bile from the river carpsucker, Carpiodes carpio (Rafinesque) (Catostomidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 42B, 493–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Brinkhurst, R. O. & Jamieson, B. G. M. (1971). Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Darlington, P. J. Jr. (1957). Zoogeography: The Geographic Distribution of Animals. New York and London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Demshin, N. I. (1975). Oligochaeta and Hirudinea as Intermediate Hosts of Helminths. Novosibirsk: Publishing House, ‘Nauka’. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Dubinina, M. N. (1966). The Tapeworms (Cestoda, Ligulidae) of the Fauna of the USSR. Moscow and Leningrad: Nauka Publishers. (Translation: New Delhi: Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, 1980).Google Scholar
Freeman, R. S. (1973). Ontogeny of cestodes and its bearing on their phylogeny and systematics. In Advances in Parsitology, vol. 11 (ed. Dawes, B.), pp. 481587. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grabda-Kazubska, B. (1976). Abbreviation of the life cycles in plagiorchid trematodes, general remarks. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 24, 125–41.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P. H., Rosen, D. E., Weitzman, S. H. & Meyers, G. S. (1966). Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes, with a provisional classification of living forms. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 131, 341456.Google Scholar
Grey, A. J. (1979). A comparative study of the chromosomes of twenty species of caryophyllidean tapeworms. Dissertation Abstracts International (B) 40, 590–1.Google Scholar
Grey, A. J. & Mackiewicz, J. S. (1980). Chromosomes of caryophyllidean cestodes: diploidy, triploidy and parthenogenesis in Glaridacris catostomi. International Journal for Parasitology 10, 397407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. W. (1930). Studies on the Caryophyllaeidae of North America. Illinois Biological Monographs 11 (1927), no. 4.Google Scholar
Kulakovskaya, O. P. & Demshin, N. I. (1978). Origin and phylogenetic relationships of caryophyllideans. In Problemy Gidro-Parazitologii (ed. Markevic, A.), pp. 95104. Kiev: ‘Naukova Dumka’. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Mackiewicz, J. S. (1972). Caryophyllidea (Cestoidea): a review. Experimental Parasitology 31, 417512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackiewicz, J. S. (1981). Caryophyllidea (Cestoidea): evolution and classification. In Advances in Parasitology, vol. 19 (ed. Lumdsen, W. H. R., Baker, J. R. and Muller, R.), pp. 139206, New York and London: Academic Press (in the Press).Google Scholar
Malmberg, G. (1974). On the larval protonephridial system of Gyrocotyle and the evolution of cercomeromorphae (Platyhelminthes). Zoologica Scripta 3, 6581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamaev, Yu. L. (1975). Hypotheses on the origin of cestodes from ‘Archigetes-like ancestors’, parasites of oligochaetes. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 54, 1277–83. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Price, P. W. (1980). Evolutionary Biology of Parasites. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Read, C. P. (1967). Longevity of the tapeworm, Hymenolepis diminuta. Journal of Parasitology 55, 1055–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stunkard, H. W. (1959). The morphology and life history of the digenetic trematode, Asymphylodora amnicola n.sp.; the possible significance of progenesis for the phylogeny of the Digenea. Biological Bulletin 117, 562–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szidat, L. (1959). Hormonale Beeinflussung von Parasiten durch ihren Wirt. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 19, 503–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, R. A. & McLeod, J. A. (1952). The Zoology of Tapeworms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wardle, R. A., McLeod, J. A. & Radinovsky, S. (1974). Advances in the Zoology of Tapeworms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar