Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-tgq86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-28T02:28:48.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Blastocystis and Cryptosporidium in association with biofilms in a contaminated watercourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2025

Virginia Estrada
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional de Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Melisa Leone
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional de Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Alicia Saura
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inmunología y Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIDIE-CONICET), Córdoba, Argentina
Marisa Farber
Affiliation:
Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular (IABIMO), INTA-CONICET, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Ludmila López-Arias*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional de Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina
*
Corresponding author: Ludmila López-Arias; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the potential role of aquatic biofilms as natural reservoirs for Blastocystis. For this purpose, surface water (n = 4) and biofilm samples (n = 8) were collected from a stream nearby an urban area characterized by limited sanitation infrastructure and a high prevalence of Blastocystis in humans. Blastocystis cysts were detected in three of the four water samples and seven of the eight biofilm samples using fluorescence microscopy. Furthermore, viable cysts were identified exclusively in biofilm samples (five of the eight), while no live cysts were detected in water samples. These findings indicate that aquatic biofilms provide a habitat where Blastocystis cysts can adhere and remain viable, potentially contributing to their environmental accumulation. In addition, molecular characterization of the five isolates identified subtypes ST8 (allele 21) and ST3 (allele 36). This study is the first to report the detection and identification of viable Blastocystis subtypes in aquatic biofilms. The analysis of biofilms by fluorescence microscopy, as demonstrated here, offers a promising approach for monitoring Blastocystis and could serve as an alternative to traditional water sampling methods.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Introduction

Water contamination by pathogens is a significant global concern, thus emphasizing the need to enhance our understanding of the primary sources of pathogens and their impacts on water resources (Pandey et al., Reference Pandey, Kass, Soupir, Biswas and Singh2014). A key gap in our knowledge of pathogenic microorganisms is understanding their survival and persistence under varying conditions and habitats (Xie et al., Reference Xie, Liu, Wei, Chen, Gong, Ahmad, Lee, Ismail and Ni2022). In aqueous environments, some microorganisms can remain suspended or adhere to organic biological particles, eventually settling to the bottom as sediment (Medema et al., Reference Medema, Schets, Teunis and Havelaar1998). Others can adhere to pre-existing biofilms – a community of microorganisms that provides protection and prevents or delays their degradation (Wingender and Flemming, Reference Wingender and Flemming2011; Lefebvre et al., Reference Lefebvre, Razakandrainibe, Villena, Favennec and Costa2021).

Blastocystis is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal parasites in humans (Popruk et al., Reference Popruk, Adao and Rivera2021). Transmitted through the faecal-oral route, its cyst is considered its infective form, although its life cycle remains to be fully elucidated. The World Health Organization (WHO) has included Blastocystis in the ‘Water Sanitation and Health Program’ list of potential waterborne pathogens (World Health Organization, 2022). Evidence suggests that both its pathogenicity and host specificity may be linked to specific subtypes (Stensvold and Clark, Reference Stensvold and Clark2016). To date, at least 42 subtypes (STs) have been identified from various hosts (Aykur et al., Reference Aykur, Malatyalı, Demirel, Cömert-Koçak, Gentekaki, Tsaousis and Dogruman-Al2024). A literature review of research from 2005 to 2022 has revealed Blastocystis presence in water sources of 15 countries, predominantly in rivers. Eleven Blastocystis subtypes (ST1-ST8, ST10, ST23 and ST26) have been identified, with ST1 and ST3 being the most prevalent (Attah et al., Reference Attah, Sanggari, Li, Naiin, Ismail and Termizi2023). The parasite has demonstrated the ability to survive in water for up to 1 month at 25 °C or 2 months at 4 °C (Yoshikawa et al., Reference Yoshikawa, Yoshida, Nakajima, Yamanari, Iwatani and Kimata2004).

The present study aimed to test the hypothesis that aquatic biofilms act as natural reservoirs for Blastocystis. To test this, we collected samples from upstream and downstream sections of a stream located nearby an urban area with limited sanitation infrastructure and a high prevalence of Blastocystis in humans (López-Arias et al., Reference López-Arias, de la, Helman, Consiglio, Etchemendy and Farber2022).

Materials and methods

Study area and sample collection

In 2022 and 2023, environmental samples were collected from a stream in the Hurlingham district, located in the north-western region of Buenos Aires province (central-eastern Argentina). This watercourse is part of the Reconquista River Basin and flows from south to north through areas with varying degrees of urbanization and pollution from domestic and industrial wastewater. The water samples (superficial water) were collected in 5 L volumes collected from no more than 30 cm below the surface of the riverbed surface at four sites along the stream, designated A (34°34ʹ47.4″S 58°39ʹ45.4″W), B (34°35ʹ08.3″S 58°39ʹ44.1″W), C (34°36ʹ09.2″S 58°39ʹ35.6″W) and D (34°36ʹ49.5″S 58°39ʹ51.6″W) (Figure 1). Additionally, submerged plant leaves exhibiting visible biofilm formation, but no sign of decomposition, were collected in plastic tubes near the shore of the A–D sites.

Figure 1. Map showing the sampling sites and watercourses in the study area.

Water and biofilm processing

The surface water was decanted for 48 h, after which the sediment was concentrated by centrifugation (1500 rpm, 15 min). The supernatant was filtered through a 3 μm pore size nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore Corporation, USA) using a vacuum pump. The material retained on the filter was then combined with the sedimented material. In parallel, the biofilm was scraped from the leaves, which had been previously washed with distilled water to remove non-adherent particles. The resulting suspension was concentrated by centrifugation (1500 rpm, 15 min).

Microscopy examination and sample culture

The concentrated water and biofilm samples were examined by optical microscope at 400× magnification for the detection of Blastocystis. The parasite cysts were confirmed by exposing the samples to blue light (470 nm) under a fluorescence microscope (Axio Vert A1 FL-LED Zeiss, Germany). Confirmatory studies were conducted, as other protozoan enteroparasites have been identified under the microscope. Modified Ziehl–Neelsen staining was performed on samples where oocysts compatible with Apicomplexans were detected. In cases where Cryptosporidium were detected, their presence was further confirmed by immunolabeling of the oocyst wall using a mouse monoclonal anti-Cryptosporidium oocyst antibody (dilution 1:1000; developed by Dr Saura) and a FITC-labelled polyvalent anti-mouse immunoglobulin (SIGMA, USA) was used as a secondary (dilution 1:1000).

The viability of Blastocystis cysts found in the samples was assessed by inoculating 200 µL of concentrated material (either water or biofilm) into tubes containing 5 mL of Jones’ medium supplemented with 5% bovine serum. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions and examined microscopically daily. Subcultures were performed every 48–72 h.

DNA isolation and PCR analysis

Blastocystis cells were harvested from cultures where growth was confirmed to extract DNA. Briefly, 250 µL of cell suspension was concentrated, resuspended in 100 µL of DNAzol (Molecular Research Center Inc., USA) and incubated for 2 h at 56 °C with 10 µL of proteinase K (TransGen Biotech Co., China). One millilitre of DNAzol was added to the sample, mixed by inversion and centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was carefully transferred to another tube, and 0.75 mL of isopropanol was added. After mixing by inversion, the sample was incubated at −20 °C for 30 min and centrifuged at 12 000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was carefully removed, and the pellet was washed twice by adding 1 mL of 75% ethanol and mixing by inversion. The DNA pellet was dried at room temperature and resuspended in 30 µL of ultrapure water.

A PCR assay was performed in a 50 μL reaction mixture containing 0.4 μM of a primer set (Genbiotech SRL, Argentina), 0.2 mM dNTPs (TransGen Biotech Co., China), 0.5 U GoTaq DNA polymerase and 1× PCR buffer (Promega, USA) and 2 μL of DNA. The primers used were RD5_ATCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAGT and BhRDr_GAGCTTTTAACTGCAACAACG, which amplify the 600 bp barcoding region of SSU rRNA gene (Scicluna et al., Reference Scicluna, Tawari and Clark2006). The cycling conditions were 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles at 98 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s and a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplicons were submitted to a commercial company (Macrogen, South Korea) for sequencing. Both strands were sequenced with the same primers used in the PCR.

Phylogenetic analyses

The nucleotide sequences obtained were assembled using BioEdit software. Sequence identities were confirmed by performing alignments against the core nucleotide database from GenBank using a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTn) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). A phylogenetic analysis was conducted comparing the most frequently reported Blastocystis subtypes (ST1–ST10) with those isolated in this study (Jiménez et al., Reference Jiménez, Muñoz and Ramírez2022). The analysis was performed using the maximum likelihood method and Tamura-Nei model, with bootstrap values calculated with 1000 replicates. Proteromonas lacertae was included as an outgroup to root the final tree. The evolutionary analysis was conducted using MEGA X (Kumar et al., Reference Kumar, Stecher, Li, Knyaz and Tamura2018). Additionally, the sequences were analysed to discriminate Blastocystis alleles using the Blastocystis sp. PubMLST website: http://pubmlst.org/blastocystis/ (Jolley et al., Reference Jolley, Bray and Maiden2018).

Results

Microscopic analysis of the samples revealed the presence of (oo)cysts of Blastocystis, Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora and Giardia in the evaluated watercourse. Blastocystis was further confirmed by the detection of fluorescence emitted from its cysts, which measured between 5 and 10 µm (Figure 2 and Figure S1).

Figure 2. Blastocystis cysts detected in environmental samples under light microscopy (A) and fluorescence microscopy without exposure (B) and with blue light exposure (C). Scale bar: 10 µm.

The most frequently identified parasites in both in water and biofilm samples were Blastocystis and Cryptosporidium. These protists were identified in 91% and 81.8% of the samples, respectively. Both parasites were simultaneously detected in 87.5% (7/8) of the biofilm samples collected from the four sampling sites, except for site C in 2022. Conversely, Cyclospora and Giardia were present in only 18.2% and 9.1% of the samples, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1. Detection of enteric parasite (oo)cysts in environmental samples through microscopic examination. Presence (+); absence (−); superficial water (SW); biofilm (BF); no data (ND)

Cultures confirmed the presence of viable Blastocystis. Specifically, no parasite growth was detected in the superficial water (SW) samples, whereas growth occurred in five out of the seven positive biofilm (BF) samples. Live cysts were present in sample BFA (2022) and all BF samples collected in 2023 (A, B, C and D). Various parasite morphologies were present, including vacuolar, granular and amoeboid forms (Figure 3A).

Figure 3. Forms of Blastocystis spp. observed in vitro xenic culture, showing aggregates of vacuolar, granular and amoeboid forms (A). Molecular phylogenetic analysis based on the maximum likelihood method. The analysis used a fragment of barcoding region of the 18S rRNA gene from different Blastocystis subtypes was used for the analysis. OG: Proteromonas lacertae (B). Note: branch values less than 50 are not shown.

PCRs performed using DNA from Blastocystis cultures were all positives. The identification of double peaks at various sites within the chromatogram of the SSU rRNA gene from BFA (2023) indicated the potential presence of more than one subtypes. Consequently, the PCR assay and sequencing were repeated after several months of maintaining the BFA (2023) culture. The results revealed a chromatogram with unique peaks.

Phylogenetic analysis using the maximum likelihood method indicated that the isolate from sample BF D2023 exhibited the highest degree of similarity to Blastocystis sp. ST3, while isolates from samples BF A (2022), BF A, BF B and BF C (2023) were mostly closely related to subtype 8 (Figure 3B). Furthermore, allele 21 was identified in the isolates identified as Blastocystis sp. ST8, while allele 36 was found in the ST3 isolate. The nucleotide sequences of Blastocystis sp. obtained in this study have been submitted to GenBank (accession number PQ497564, PQ497565, PQ497566, PQ497567, PQ497568).

Discussion

This study analysed environmental samples from an urban stream in an area with limited access to water and sewage infrastructure, alongside poor environmental sanitation. In 2019, we conducted a study on enteric parasitosis in children under 12 years old in the same area. Our findings revealed that around half of the children (57.7%) were parasitized, with protists being the most prevalent group. The seven taxa identified included Blastocystis spp. (26.1%), Giardia lamblia (13.8%), Cryptosporidium spp. (7.7%) and Cyclospora cayetanensis (1.5%), among others (López-Arias et al., Reference López-Arias, de la, Helman, Consiglio, Etchemendy and Farber2022). In the present study, the analysed watercourse showed contamination with various parasitic protists, including Blastocystis, Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora and Giardia. Persistent sources of contamination from human activities and inadequate local sanitation conditions likely explain the presence of the same parasitic genera in both the child population and the watercourse on two separate occasions (2022 and 2023).

Blastocystis stood out because it was detectable in most biofilm samples collected in different sites, unlike the other parasites identified, except for Cryptosporidium (Table 1). This finding confirms the presence of Blastocystis along the watercourse. The limited literature on Blastocystis in sediments, particularly concerning aquatic biofilms, underscores a knowledge gap that may stem from difficulties in accurately identifying its stages in complex environmental samples. However, our fluorescence microscopy approach effectively addresses this challenge. The findings also indicated that some cysts remained viable at the time of detection. Although water samples contained cysts, cultures did not exhibit parasite growth. Conversely, most of the biofilm samples showed evidence of growth. The possibility that biofilms provide protection to Blastocystis, thereby prolonging its viability in the environment compared to cysts in suspension, remains unanswered and therefore requires further investigation.

Biofilms may act as environmental reservoirs, with certain pathogens attaching and therefore contributing to water pollution (Wingender and Flemming, Reference Wingender and Flemming2011). Our results suggest that Blastocystis cysts adhere to aquatic biofilms and remain viable, which could lead to their accumulation in the environment. A similar phenomenon occurs with Cryptosporidium, whose oocysts attach to organic particles, thereby promoting sedimentation in water and adhesion to biofilms (Lefebvre et al., Reference Lefebvre, Razakandrainibe, Villena, Favennec and Costa2021).

In this context, our findings highlight the value of studying biofilms with fluorescence microscopy as a promising approach for epidemiological or environmental monitoring of Blastocystis. This method could potentially replace conventional water sampling techniques. Jellison et al. (Reference Jellison, Cannistraci, Fortunato and McLeod2020) have proposed that incorporating aquatic biofilms in sampling strategies of Cryptosporidium could help identify high-risk regions within large, complex watersheds.

Molecular analysis of the isolates revealed that Blastocystis ST8 (allele 21) as the predominant subtype, detected at various sites along the stream except for site D. This subtype, uncommon in humans, has been associated with infections in animals such as rodents and pigs (Tito et al., Reference Tito, Chaffron, Caenepeel, Lima-Mendez, Wang, Vieira-Silva, Falony, Hildebrand, Darzi, Rymenans, Verspecht, Bork, Vermeire, Joossens and Raes2019; Hublin et al., Reference Hublin, Maloney and Santin2021). It has also been identified in both treated and untreated wastewater from treatment plants at low frequency; which suggests a degree of resistance to water treatment processes and an ability to survive in aquatic environments (Javanmard et al., Reference Javanmard, Rahimi, Niyyati, Aghdaei, Sharifdini, Mirjalali, Zali and Karanis2019; Stensvold et al., Reference Stensvold, Lebbad, Hansen, Beser, Belkessa, O’Brien Andersen and Clark2019). In contrast, Blastocystis ST3 (allele 36) was present exclusively at site D. This subtype is one of the most frequent in humans (Jiménez et al., Reference Jiménez, Muñoz and Ramírez2022), while allele 36 has been described in Spain and America in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms (Matovelle et al., Reference Matovelle, Quílez, Tejedor, Beltrán, Chueca and Monteagudo2024). In Argentina, reports of Blastocystis ST3 have so far included only alleles 134 and 34 (Casero et al., Reference Casero, Mongi, Sánchez and Ramírez2015). The double peaks observed in the chromatogram of one of the biofilm samples suggest the potential coexistence of subtypes (Guillemi et al., Reference Guillemi, Ruybal, Lia, Gonzalez, Lew, Zimmer, Lopez-Arias, Rodriguez, Rodriguez, Frutos, Wilkowsky and Farber2015). However, confirming this hypothesis requires further studies.

In conclusion, this study provides the first report of infectious cysts of Blastocystis sp. ST3 (allele 36) and ST8 (allele 21) in aquatic environmental samples from Argentina. The findings demonstrate that Blastocystis can adhere to aquatic biofilms and remain viable. Further research should investigate the factors influencing the sedimentation dynamics and integration of cysts into biofilms, and whether these factors enhance their survival in the environment.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182025000253.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Juan Herrera for his help with fieldwork and we also thank the personnel of Universidad Nacional de Hurlingham for providing the vehicle for transport to the sampling sites.

Author contributions

LLA conceived and designed the study. VE, ML and LLA were involved in all stages of the fieldwork. VE and LLA carried out the laboratory analysis. AS contributed to the technical assistance for immunolabeling Cryptosporidium oocysts and parasites culture. VE and LLA conducted data gatherings. LLA and MF wrote the article. ML and AS contributed to drafting and revising the manuscript.

Financial support

This work was supported by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT-O2019-00020) and funded by Universidad Nacional de Hurlingham (PIUNAHUR 2021).

Competing interests

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

References

Attah, AO, Sanggari, A, Li, LI, Naiin, H, Ismail, AH and Termizi, FHM (2023) Blastocystis occurrence in water sources worldwide from 2005 to 2022: A review. Parasitology Research 122, 110. doi:10.1007/s00436-022-07731-0.Google Scholar
Aykur, M, Malatyalı, E, Demirel, F, Cömert-Koçak, B, Gentekaki, E, Tsaousis, AD and Dogruman-Al, F (2024) Blastocystis: A mysterious member of the gut microbiome. Microorganisms 12(3), 461. doi:10.3390/microorganisms12030461.Google Scholar
Casero, RD, Mongi, F, Sánchez, A and Ramírez, JD (2015) Blastocystis and urticaria: Examination of subtypes and morphotypes in an unusual clinical manifestation. Acta Tropica 148, 156161. doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.05.004.Google Scholar
Guillemi, EC, Ruybal, P, Lia, V, Gonzalez, S, Lew, S, Zimmer, P, Lopez-Arias, L, Rodriguez, JL, Rodriguez, SY, Frutos, R, Wilkowsky, SE and Farber, MD (2015) Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for the study of Anaplasma marginale population structure over space and time. Infection Genetics & Evolution 30, 186194. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2014.12.027.Google Scholar
Hublin, JSY, Maloney, JG and Santin, M (2021) Blastocystis in domesticated and wild mammals and birds. Research in Veterinary Science 135, 260282. doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.09.031.Google Scholar
Javanmard, E, Rahimi, HM, Niyyati, M, Aghdaei, HA, Sharifdini, M, Mirjalali, H, Zali, MR and Karanis, P (2019) Molecular analysis of Blastocystis sp. and its subtypes from treated wastewater routinely used for irrigation of vegetable farmlands in Iran. Journal of Water and Health (5):837844. doi:10.2166/wh.2019.045.Google Scholar
Jellison, K, Cannistraci, D, Fortunato, J and McLeod, C (2020) Biofilm sampling for detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in a southeastern Pennsylvania watershed. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 10 86(23), e0139920. doi:10.1128/AEM.01399-20.Google Scholar
Jiménez, P, Muñoz, M and Ramírez, JD (2022) An update on the distribution of Blastocystis subtypes in the Americas. Heliyon 8(12), e12592. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12592.Google Scholar
Jolley, KA, Bray, JE and Maiden, MCJ (2018) Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Research 3, 124. doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Stecher, G, Li, M, Knyaz, C and Tamura, K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(6), 15471549. doi:10.1093/molbev/msy096.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, M, Razakandrainibe, R, Villena, I, Favennec, L and Costa, D (2021) Cryptosporidium-biofilm interactions: A review. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 87(3), e0248320. doi:10.1128/AEM.02483-20.Google Scholar
López-Arias, L, de la, FS, Helman, E, Consiglio, E, Etchemendy, S and Farber, M (2022) Enteroparasitosis en una población infantil del Municipio de Hurlingham, Buenos Aires. Medicina (Buenos Aires) 82(6), 891897.Google Scholar
Matovelle, C, Quílez, J, Tejedor, MT, Beltrán, A, Chueca, P and Monteagudo, LV (2024) Subtype distribution of Blastocystis spp. in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms in northern Spain. Microorganisms 27 12(6), 1084. doi:10.3390/microorganisms12061084.Google Scholar
Medema, GJ, Schets, FM, Teunis, PF and Havelaar, AH (1998) Sedimentation of free and attached Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in water. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64(11), 44604466. doi:10.1128/AEM.64.11.4460-4466.1998.Google Scholar
Pandey, PK, Kass, PH, Soupir, ML, Biswas, S and Singh, VP (2014) Contamination of water resources by pathogenic bacteria. AMB Express 4, 51. doi:10.1186/s13568-014-0051-x.Google Scholar
Popruk, S, Adao, DEV and Rivera, WL (2021) Epidemiology and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in humans: A review. Infection Genetics & Evolution 95, 105085. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105085.Google Scholar
Scicluna, SM, Tawari, B and Clark, CG (2006) DNA barcoding of Blastocystis. Protist 157(1), 7785. doi:10.1016/j.protis.2005.12.001.Google Scholar
Stensvold, CR and Clark, CG (2016) Current status of Blastocystis: A personal view. Parasitology International 65(6), 763771. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2016.05.015.Google Scholar
Stensvold, CR, Lebbad, M, Hansen, A, Beser, J, Belkessa, S, O’Brien Andersen, L and Clark, CG (2019) Differentiation of Blastocystis and parasitic archamoebids encountered in untreated wastewater samples by amplicon-based next-generation sequencing. Parasite Epidemiology and Control 21(9), e00131. doi:10.1016/j.parepi.2019.e00131.Google Scholar
Tito, RY, Chaffron, S, Caenepeel, C, Lima-Mendez, G, Wang, J, Vieira-Silva, S, Falony, G, Hildebrand, F, Darzi, Y, Rymenans, L, Verspecht, C, Bork, P, Vermeire, S, Joossens, M and Raes, J (2019) Population-level analysis of Blastocystis subtype prevalence and variation in the human gut microbiota. Gut 68(7), 11801189. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316106.Google Scholar
Wingender, J and Flemming, HC (2011) Biofilms in drinking water and their role as reservoir for pathogens. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 214(6), 417423. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.05.009.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2022) Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality: Fourth Edition Incorporating the First and Second Addenda. Geneva, World Health Organization. 2022.Google Scholar
Xie, Y, Liu, X, Wei, H, Chen, X, Gong, N, Ahmad, S, Lee, T, Ismail, S and Ni, SQ (2022) Insight into impact of sewage discharge on microbial dynamics and pathogenicity in river ecosystems. Scientific Report 12(1), 6894. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09579-x.Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, H, Yoshida, K, Nakajima, A, Yamanari, K, Iwatani, S and Kimata, I (2004) Fecal-oral transmission of the cyst form of Blastocystis hominis in rats. Parasitology Research 94(6), 391396. doi:10.1007/s00436-004-1230-5.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map showing the sampling sites and watercourses in the study area.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Blastocystis cysts detected in environmental samples under light microscopy (A) and fluorescence microscopy without exposure (B) and with blue light exposure (C). Scale bar: 10 µm.

Figure 2

Table 1. Detection of enteric parasite (oo)cysts in environmental samples through microscopic examination. Presence (+); absence (−); superficial water (SW); biofilm (BF); no data (ND)

Figure 3

Figure 3. Forms of Blastocystis spp. observed in vitro xenic culture, showing aggregates of vacuolar, granular and amoeboid forms (A). Molecular phylogenetic analysis based on the maximum likelihood method. The analysis used a fragment of barcoding region of the 18S rRNA gene from different Blastocystis subtypes was used for the analysis. OG: Proteromonas lacertae (B). Note: branch values less than 50 are not shown.

Supplementary material: File

Estrada et al. supplementary material

Estrada et al. supplementary material
Download Estrada et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.2 MB