Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:22:36.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attempts to protect goats against challenge with Trypanosoma vivax by initiation of primary infections with large numbers of metacyclic trypanosomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

G. J. Vos ,
S. K. Moloo ,
R. T. Nelson  and
P. R. Gardiner
G. J. Vos
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, KE
S. K. Moloo
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, KE
R. T. Nelson
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, KE
P. R. Gardiner
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, KE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Attempts were made to immunize goats by infection with large numbers of metacyclic trypanosomes of a clone of Trypanosoma vivax, followed by chemotherapy. Five groups of 6 goats each were infected intradermally with 5 different doses of cultured metacyclics of T. vivax, ranging from 102 to 106 trypanosomes/goat. Four weeks after infection, the goats were treated with 10 mg/kg diminazene aceturate (Berenil, Hoechst A.G.). Three weeks after treatment, 3 goats in each group were challenged intradermally with 104 homologous metacyclics derived from culture. The remaining 3 goats in each group were challenged by 20 tsetse infected with the homologous clone. Five out of 30 goats were resistant to homologous challenge; 4 of the goats that had been challenged with cultured parasites, and 1 that had been challenged by tsetse. In each group 1 goat was protected. Protection was therefore not apparently influenced by the number of trypanosomes used to establish the primary infection. In another experiment, 6 goats were each infected by feeding 100 tsetse on the goats for 15 consecutive days. Three weeks after infection the goats were treated with Berenil and 3 weeks later challenged by 20 tsetse infected with the homologous clone. Three out of the 6 goats resisted challenge. The susceptible goats in both experiments, however, showed a reduction in the peak of parasitaemia following challenge compared with both challenge controls and the initial infections. Lytic antibodies to cultured metacyclics of T. vivax were detected in goats that resisted challenge after a primary infection with cultured metacyclics, and in resistant and susceptible goats after a primary infection by tsetse. All infected goats produced lytic antibodies to live bloodstream forms, as well as antibodies to bloodstream form lysates (demonstrated by ELISA). It is suggested that the immunity that had been induced in some of the experimental animals is due to antibody responses to both metacyclic and bloodstream variable antigen types (VATs) expressed during infection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 97 , Issue 3 , December 1988 , pp. 383 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akol, G. W. O. & Murray, M. (1983). Trypanosoma congolense: susceptibility of cattle to cyclical challenge. Experimental Parasitology 55, 386–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akol, G. W. O. & Murray, M. (1985). Induction of protective immunity in cattle by tsetse-transmitted cloned isolates of Trypanosoma congolense. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 79, 617–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akol, G. W. O., Murray, M., Hirumi, H., Hirumi, K. & Moloo, S. K. (1985). Infectivity to cattle of metacyclic forms of Trypanosoma congolense grown in vitro. II. Immunogenicity of the parasites. In Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense in cattle: the role of the early events, following cyclically-transmitted infection, in induction of immunity and in host susceptibility. Ph.D. thesis, pp. 147–165. University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Barry, J. D. (1986). Antigenic variation during Trypanosoma vivax infections of different host species. Parasitology 92, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, J. D. & Gathuo, H. (1984). Antigenic variation in Trypanosoma vivax: isolation of a serodeme. Parasitology 89, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowe, J. S., Barry, J. D., Luckins, A. G., Ross, C. A. & Vickerman, K. (1983). All metacyclic variable antigen types of Trypanosoma congolense identified using monoclonal antibodies. Nature, London 306, 389–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Gee, A. L. W. (1980). An attempt to immunise against Trypanosoma vivax by cyclical infection followed by treatment. In Host-Parasite Relationships in Trypanosoma (Duttonella) vivax with Special Reference to the Influence of Antigenic Variation. Ph.D. thesis, pp. 113–136. University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. J. (1977). Antigenic variation in the haemoprotozoa-with special reference to salivarian trypanosomes. In Immunity to Blood Parasites of Animals and Man, (eds. Miller, L. H., Pino, J. A. and McKelvey, J. J. Jr), pp. 31–63. London and New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, D. L., Akol, G. W. O., Murray, M., Morrison, W. I. & Moloo, S. K. (1980). The chancre: early events in the pathogenesis of African trypanosomiasis in domestic livestock. In The Host Invader Interplay (ed. H., van der Bossche), pp. 345–356. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland: Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Emery, D. L., Moloo, S. K. & Murray, M. (1987). Failure of Trypanosoma vivax to generate protective immunity in goats against transmission by Glossina morsitans morsitans. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 81, 611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardiner, P. R., Webster, P., Jenni, L. & Moloo, S. K. (1986 a). Metacyclic Trypanosoma vivax possess a surface coat. Parasitology 92, 5–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardiner, P. R., Thatthi, R., Gathuo, H., Nelson, R. & Moloo, S. K. (1986 b). Further studies of cyclical transmission and antigenic variation of the ILDar 1 serodeme of Trypanosoma vivax. Parasitology 92, 581–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, M. A., Hirumi, H. & Gardiner, P. R. (1987). The salivarian trypanosomes: insect forms. In In Vitro Methods of Parasite Cultivation, (ed. Taylor, A. E. R. and Baker, J.), pp. 118–152. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hajduk, S. L. (1984). Antigenic variation during the developmental cycle of Trypanosoma brucei. Journal of Protozoology 31, 41–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Hirumi, K., Nelson, R. T., Hirumi, H. & Moloo, S. K. (1985). Characterisation of Trypanosoma vivax metacyclic trypomastigotes propagated in vitro. Proceedings of the VIIth International Congress of Protozoology, 22–2906 1985, Abstract No. 46. p. 64. Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
McGuire, T. C., Musoke, A. J. & Kurtti, T. (1979). Functional properties of bovine IgG1 and IgG2: interaction with complement, macrophages and skin. Immunology 38, 249–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Morrison, W. I., Black, S. J., Paris, J., Hinson, C. A. & Wells, P. W. (1982). Protective immunity and specificity of antibody responses elicited in cattle by irradiated Trypanosoma brucei. Parasite Immunology 4, 395–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nantulya, V. M., Doyle, J. J. & Jenni, L. (1980). Studies on Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense. IV. Experimental immunisation of mice against tsetse fly challenge. Parasitology 80, 133–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nantulya, V. M., Musoke, A. J. & Moloo, S. K. (1986). Apparent exhaustion of the variable antigenic repertoire of Trypanosoma vivax in infected cattle. Infection and Immunity 54, 444–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otieno, L. H. & Darji, N. (1979). The abundance of pathogenic African trypanosomes in the salivary secretions of wild Glossina pallidipes. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 73, 583–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paris, J., Murray, M. & McOdimba, F. (1982). A comparative evaluation of the parasitological techniques currently available for the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis in cattle. Acta Tropica 37, 307–16.Google Scholar
Thrusfield, M. V. (1986). Veterinary Epidemiology. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Voller, A., Bidwell, D. E. & Bartlett, A. M. (1976). Enzyme immunoassays in diagnostic medicine. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 53, 55–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Vos, G. J., Moloo, S. K. & Gardiner, P. R. (1988). Susceptibility of goats to tsetse-transmitted challenge with Trypanosoma vivax from East and West Africa. Parasitology 96, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, M. B. & Nakane, P. K. (1978). Recent developments in the periodate method of conjugating horseradish peroxidase (HRPO) to antibodies. In Immunofluorescence and Related Staining Techniques, (ed. Knapp, W., Holubar, K. and Wick, G.), pp. 215–224. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland, Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Woo, P. T. K. (1970). The haematocrit centrifuge technique for the diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis. Acta Tropica 27, 384–6.Google ScholarPubMed