Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:14:13.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Association between large strongyle genera in larval cultures – using rare-event Poisson regression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2013

X. CAO ,
A. N. VIDYASHANKAR  and
M. K. NIELSEN
X. CAO
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
A. N. VIDYASHANKAR
Affiliation:
M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
M. K. NIELSEN*
Affiliation:
M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
*
*Corresponding author: M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Decades of intensive anthelmintic treatment has caused equine large strongyles to become quite rare, while the cyathostomins have developed resistance to several drug classes. The larval culture has been associated with low to moderate negative predictive values for detecting Strongylus vulgaris infection. It is unknown whether detection of other large strongyle species can be statistically associated with presence of S. vulgaris. This remains a statistical challenge because of the rare occurrence of large strongyle species. This study used a modified Poisson regression to analyse a dataset for associations between S. vulgaris infection and simultaneous occurrence of Strongylus edentatus and Triodontophorus spp. In 663 horses on 42 Danish farms, the individual prevalences of S. vulgaris, S. edentatus and Triodontophorus spp. were 12%, 3% and 12%, respectively. Both S. edentatus and Triodontophorus spp. were significantly associated with S. vulgaris infection with relative risks above 1. Further, S. edentatus was associated with use of selective therapy on the farms, as well as negatively associated with anthelmintic treatment carried out within 6 months prior to the study. The findings illustrate that occurrence of S. vulgaris in larval cultures can be interpreted as indicative of other large strongyles being likely to be present.

Keywords

Large strongylesStrongylusTriodontophoruslarval cultureassociationrare event
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 140 , Issue 10 , September 2013 , pp. 1246 - 1251
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coles, G. C., Brown, S. N. and Trembath, C. M. (1999). Pyrantel resistant large strongyles in racehorses. Veterinary Record 145, 408.Google ScholarPubMed
Drudge, J. H. (1972). Endoparasitisms. In Equine Medicine and Surgery, 2nd Edn, pp. 157–179. American Veterinary Publications, Evanston, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Duncan, J. L. and Pirie, H. M. (1972). The life cycle of Strongylus vulgaris in the horse. Research in Veterinary Science 13, 374–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enigk, K. (1951). Die Pathogenese der thrombotisch-embolische Kolik des Pferdes. Monatsheft fur Tierheilkunde 3, 65–74.Google Scholar
Henriksen, S. A. and Korsholm, H. (1983). A method for recovery of gastrointestinal strongyle larvae. Nordisk Veterinaer Medicin 35, 429–430.Google ScholarPubMed
Herd, R. P. (1990). The changing world of worms – the rise of the cyathostomes and the decline of Strongylus vulgaris. Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian 12, 732–736.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. M. (2004). Drug resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance: a status report. Trends in Parasitology 20, 477–481. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2004.08.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, R. M. and Nielsen, M. K. (2010). An evidence-based approach to equine parasite control: it ain't the 60s anymore. Equine Veterinary Education 22, 306–316. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2010.00084.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenfels, J. R., Kharchenko, V. A. and Dvojnos, G. M. (2008). Illustrated identification keys to strongylid parasites (Strongylidae: Nematoda) of horses, zebras and asses (Equidae). Veterinary Parasitology 156, 4–161. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, E. T., Drudge, J. H. and Tolliver, S. C. (1975). Field tests of three salts of pyrantel [hydrochloride, tartrate, pamoate] against internal parasites of the horse [Strongylus vulgaris, Parascaris equorum, Strongylus edentatus]. American Journal of Veterinary Research 36, 161–166.Google Scholar
Lyons, E. T., Swerczek, T. W., Tolliver, S. C., Bair, H. D., Drudge, J. H. and Ennis, L. E. (2000). Prevalence of selected species of internal parasites in equids at necropsy in central Kentucky (1995–1999). Veterinary Parasitology 92, 51–62. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00266-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, E. T., Tolliver, S. S. and Collins. S. S. (2006). Prevalence of large endoparasites at necropsy in horses infected with Population B small strongyles in a herd established in Kentucky in 1966. Parasitology Research 99, 114–118. doi: 10.1007/s00436-005-0116-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, S., Murphy, D. and Mellor, D. (1999). Pathogenicity of cyathostome infection. Veterinary Parasitology 85, 113–121. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00092-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCraw, B. M. and Slocombe, J. O. D. (1978). Strongylus edentatus: development and lesions from ten weeks postinfection to patency. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 42, 340–356.Google ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, M. K., Monrad, J. and Olsen, S. N. (2006). Prescription-only anthelmintics – a questionnaire survey on strategies for surveillance and control of equine strongyles in Denmark. Veterinary Parasitology 135, 47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.10.020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, M. K., Baptiste, K. E., Tolliver, S. C., Collins, S. S. and Lyons, E. T. (2010 a). Analysis of multiyear studies in horses in Kentucky to ascertain whether counts of eggs and larvae per gram of feces are reliable indicators of numbers of strongyles and ascarids present. Veterinary Parasitology 174, 77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.08.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, M. K., Vidyashankar, A. N., Andersen, U. V., DeLisi, K., Pilegaard, K. and Kaplan, R. M. (2010 b). Effects of fecal collection and storage factors on strongylid egg counts in horses. Veterinary Parasitology 167, 55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.09.043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, M. K., Vidyashankar, A. N., Olsen, S. N., Monrad, J. and Thamsborg, S. M. (2012). Strongylus vulgaris associated with usage of selective therapy on Danish horse farms – is it reemerging? Veterinary Parasitology 189, 260–266. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.04.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Round, M. C. (1969). The prepatent period of some horse nematodes determined by experimental infection. Journal of Helminthology 43, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, A. F. (1948). The development of helminthiasis in thoroughbred foals. Journal of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics 58, 107–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallenstein, S. and Bodian, C. (1987). Inferences on odds ratios, relative risks, and risk differences based on standard regression programs. American Journal of Epidemiology 126, 346–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wetzel, R. (1952). Die Entwicklungsdauer (Prepatent-periode) von Strongylus edentatus im Pferd. Deutsche Tierartzliche Wochenschrift 59, 129–130.Google Scholar
Zocchetti, C., Consonni, D. and Bertazzi, P. A. (1995). Estimation of prevalence rate ratios from cross-sectional data. International Journal of Epidemiology 24, 1064–1065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zou, G. (2004). A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. American Journal of Epidemiology 159, 702–706. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed