Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:37:24.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anthelmintic studies: III. A taeniacidal testing technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. S. Steward
J. S. Steward
Affiliation:
Nottingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A controlled taeniacidal technique is described using mice artifically infected with Hymenolepis nana var. fraterna.

2. The method of interpretation is based upon a form of computation relating to the number and sizes of worms left in the treated animals as well as the proportion of mice rendered negative by the treatment as compared with untreated controls.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 45 , Issue 3-4 , November 1955 , pp. 255 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berberian, D. A. (1946). Amer. J. Trop. Med. 26, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A. C. (1939). Amer. J. Hyg. 29, 105.Google Scholar
JrCraige, A. H. & Kleckner, A. L. (1946). N. Amer. Vet. 27, 26.Google Scholar
Culbertson, J. T. (1940). J. Pharmocol. 70, 309.Google Scholar
da Costa, S. F. Gomes (1930). C.R. Soc. Biol, Paris, 103, 342.Google Scholar
da Costa, S. F. Gomes (1932). C.R. Soc. Biol, Paris, 110, 1054.Google Scholar
Duguid, A. M. E. & Heathcote, R. St A. (1950). Arch. int. Pharmacodyn. 82, 309.Google Scholar
Enzie, F. D. (1944). Proc. Helm. Soc. Wash. 11, 18.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. E. & Harwood, P. D. (1941). Amer. J. Vet. Res. 2, 108.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. E. & Harwood, P. D. (1944). Proc. Helm. Soc. Wash. 11, 45.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. E., Powick, W. C. & Baudel, D. (1941). N. Amer. Vet. 22, 22.Google Scholar
Halawani, A. (1948). Personal communication, Cairo.Google Scholar
Harwood, P. D. & Guthrie, J. E. (1940). J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass. 97, 248.Google Scholar
Harwood, P. D. & Jerstad, A. G. (1938). Poult. Sci. 17, 295.Google Scholar
Hearin, J. T. (1941). Amer. J. Hyg. 33, (D), 71.Google Scholar
Holton, P. (1947). Brit. J. Pharmacol. 2, 100.Google Scholar
Hunninen, A. V. (1935). Amer. J. Hyg. 22, 414.Google Scholar
Hunninen, A. V. (1936). J. Parasit. 22, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyeux, Ch. (1925). Ann. Parasit. hum. comp. 3, 270.Google Scholar
Mazzotti, L., Rodriguez, L. & Tbeviño, A. (1947). Rev. Inst. Salubr. Enferm. Trop., Méx. [Abstracted in Trop. Dis. Bull. (1948), 45, 261.]Google Scholar
Pipkin, A. C. & Risk, E. (1948). J. Parasit. 34, Suppl. section 2, p. 28.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. A. (1937–1938). Cornell Vet. 27–28; 338.Google Scholar