Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:46:12.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Anatomy of Argas persicus (Oken 1818)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

L. E. Robinson  and
J. Davidson
L. E. Robinson
Affiliation:
(From the Cooper Laboratory for Economic Research, Watford.)
J. Davidson
Affiliation:
(From the Cooper Laboratory for Economic Research, Watford.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The muscular system is so highly developed in the Ixodoidea, that it is no matter of surprise that it has been the subject of more or less detailed treatment in most of the publications dealing with tick anatomy; but, with a single exception, the existing descriptions do not extend beyond a general classification of the various muscles, with the addition of brief remarks, in some instances, on the histological structure of the muscle fibres. In the majority of cases, also, the observations only apply to the Ixodid ticks, and although the general arrangement of the musculature in the two families of the Ixodoidea is not fundamentally different, the comparative anatomy of the muscles offers some difficulty, owing to the great morphological differences which the two families present.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , January 1914 , pp. 382 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bonnet, A. (1907). Reoberches sur l'anatomie comparée et le développement des Ixodidés. Ann. Univ. Lyon, N. Sér. I, Fasc. 20, 1–180, Pls. I–VI.Google Scholar
Dönitz, W. (1909). Ueber das Zeckengenus Amblyomma. Sitzungsber. der Gesellsch. naturforsch. Freunde, Berlin, Jahrg. 1909, No. 8, 440–482, Figs. 1–15.Google Scholar
Gené, G. (1844). Memoria per servire alla storia naturale degli issodi. Mem. d. R. Accad. Torino, 2nd ser. ix. (1848), 751–786.Google Scholar
Heller, C. (1858). Zur Anatomie von Argas persicus. Sitzungsber. d. Kaiserl. Akad. Wien, xxx, Math.-Naturwiss. Klasse, 297–326, Pls. I–IV.Google Scholar
Hindle, E. and Merriman, G. (1912). The Sensory Perceptions of Argas persicus Oken. Parasitology, v, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordenskiöld, E. (1908). Zur Anatomie und Histologie von Ixodes reduvius. Zool. Jahrb. xxv, 637–674, Pls. 26–28, 2 text-figs.Google Scholar
Nordenskiöld, E. (1909 c). Zur Anatomie und Histologie von Ixodes reduvius. II. Zool. Jahrb. xxvii, 449–464, Pl. 30.Google Scholar
Nuttall, G. H. F. (07 1908). The Ixodoidea or Ticks. Journ. Roy. Inst. Publ. Health, xvi, 385–403, 7 text-figs., 1 diagram. Harben Lecture, I.Google Scholar
Pagenstecher, H. A. (1861). Beiträge zur Anatomie der Milben, Heft 2, Ixodes ricinus. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, 45 pp., 2 Pls.Google Scholar
Pagenstecher, H. A. (1861 c). Zur Anatomie von Argas reflexus. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zoologie, xi, 142–155, Pl. XVI, Figs. 1–13.Google Scholar
Samson, K. (1909 b). Zur Spermohistiogenese der Zecken. Sitzungsber. d. Gesellsch. naturf. Freunde, No. 8, 486–499, Pl. IX, 7 text-figs.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. (1894). Die Embrionalentwicklung von Ixodes calcaratus Bir. Traduit St Pétersb. Obsch. xxiv, 214.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. (1894). Die Embrionalentwicklung von Ixodes calcaratus Bir. Travaux de la Soc. d. naturalistes de St Pétersb. xxiv, Livr. 2.Google Scholar