Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:14:26.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An in vitro method for the chemotherapeutic investigation of anthelminthic potency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Ernest Baldwin
Ernest Baldwin
Affiliation:
From the Biochemical Laboratory, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A method is described for the detection of anthelminthic potency. The procedure does not call for exceptional technical skill, is relatively economical of drugs and living material alike, and is rapid and convenient in application. It has certain limitations such as are inherent in any in vitro method, and a special limitation in that it is not applicable to the study of drugs which act otherwise than on the neuro-muscular mechanisms of nematodes. Within these limitations it responds to compounds of known anthelminthjc efficiency and shows little or no response to compounds known to be devoid of anthelminthie value. Approximate quantitative data can be obtained with its aid, the reactions provoked by a given drug are substantially the same in different individuals, and each test provides a visible record of the influence of the drug under examination.

We do not claim that this procedure can in any sense replace experiments upon infested hosts, but must rather be followed up by such experiments when a promising degree of anthelminthie potency has been detected with its aid. We do, however, believe that it has a very real usefulness within the field to which its application is limited. As a preliminary device which allows the selection of promising compounds from large groups of new synthetic products it has already demonstrated its value in tests carried out in this laboratory on a series of about fifty new compounds prepared by Prof. Friedmann.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , July 1943 , pp. 89 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Clark, A. J. (1940). Applied Pharmacology, 7th ed.London.Google Scholar
da Costa, G. F. G. (1931). Arch. int. Pharmacodyn. 41, 443.Google Scholar
Davey, D. G. (1942). Cited in Davey, D. G. & Innes, J. R. M. (1942). Vet. Bull. 12, No. 8.Google Scholar
Findlay, G. M. (1939). Recent Advances in Chemotherapy, 2nd ed.London.Google Scholar
Gluschke, A. (1932). Arch. wiss. prakt. Tierheilk. 65, 201.Google Scholar
Hall, M. C. & Wigdor, M. (1926). J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass. 69, 1.Google Scholar
Harwood, P. D. (1934). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 32, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamson, P. D. & Brown, H. W. (1935). J. Pharmcol. 53, 227.Google Scholar
Lamson, P. D. & Brown, H. W. (1936). Amer. J. Hyg. 23, 85.Google Scholar
Lamson, P. D. & Ward, C. B. (1932). J. Parasit. 18, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamson, P. D. & Ward, C. B. (1936). Science N.Y., 84, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamson, P. D., Brown, H. W. & Ward, C. B. (1935). J. Pharmacol. 53, 198.Google Scholar
Lamson, P. D., Stoughton, R. W. & Bass, A. D. (1936). J. Pharmacol. 56, 50, 60, 63.Google Scholar
Lamson, P. D., Brown, H. W., Stoughton, R. W., Harwood, P. D., Baltzly, R. & Bass, A. (1935). J. Pharmacol. 53, 218, 234, 239.Google Scholar
Lapage, G. (1937). Nematodes Parasitic in Animals. London.Google Scholar
Oelkers, H. A. (1940). Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 195, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oelkers, H. A. & Rathje, W. (1941). Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 198, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oettingen, W. F. von (1929). J. Pharmacol. 36, 335.Google Scholar
Oettingen, W. F. von & Garcia, F. (1929). J. Pharmacol. 36, 355.Google Scholar
Rauther, W. (1925). In Kukenthal's Handbuch der Zoologie, 2, 249. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rebello, S. & Rico, J. T. (1926). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 94, 915.Google Scholar
Rico, J. T. (1926). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 94, 918, 921.Google Scholar
Rico, J. T. (1927). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 97, 718.Google Scholar
Rosenmund, K. W. & Schapiro, D. (1934). Arch. Pharm, Berl. 272, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, W. von (1885). Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 19, 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobotka, H. (1937). Physiological Chemistry of the Bile. London.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. L. & Sanderson, K. M. (1940). Vet. Rec. 52, 635.Google Scholar
Trendelenberg, P. (1916). Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 79, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, W. H. & Brady, F. J. (1940). J. Amer. Med. Ass. 114, 861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar