Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:52:10.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acanthocephala from China. I. New Species and New Genera from Chinese Fishes1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

H. J. Van Cleave
H. J. Van Cleave
Affiliation:
(University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1916, the writer (Van Cleave, 1916) called attention to the fact that lack of published records should not be taken as an indication of scarcity of Acanthocephalans in the Chinese fauna. A single species of Centrorhynchus has been described from a magpie, and Faust (1921 a) has recorded the species common in the hog. As yet, apart from these two specific identifications, the acanthocephalan fauna of China has remained unknown.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , April 1928 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Faust, E. C. (1921). Preliminary survey of the parasites of vertebrates of North China. China Med. J. 35, repr. 15 pp.Google Scholar
Faust, E. C. (1921 a). Preliminary survey of the intestinal parasites of man in the central Yangtze Valley. China Med. J. 35, repr. 30 pp.Google Scholar
MacCallum, G. A. (1918). Notes on the genus Camallanus and other Nematodes from various hosts. Zoopathologica, 1, 123–134.Google Scholar
Ortlepp, R. J. (1924). On a collection of helminths from Dutch Guiana. J. Helminthol. 2, 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cleave, H. J. (1916). Centrorhynchus pinguis n.sp. from China. J. Parasitol. 4, 164–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cleave, H. J. (1920). Two new genera and species of acanthocephalous worms from Venezuelan fishes. Proc. U.S. National Mus. 58, 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar