Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:01:47.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Workshop no. 3. Serodiagnosis of parasitic infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2018

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although methods for quantitative immunoassay have been available for a long time and have been used as a diagnostic tool for viral and bacterial diseases, as well as for immunological disorders, it is only recently that such methods have found wider application in parasitology. There are probably several reasons for this. One is that in developed countries parasitic diseases and in particular tropical infections were for a long time not recognized as severe health problems which deserved serious attention. Many technical problems have also been associated with parasite serology. Earlier serological methods were, for various reasons, unsuitable for use in the diagnosis of parasitic infections. For instance, the complement fixation test is, in many instances, not sensitive enough to detect active infection and the later introduced passive haemagglutination test, which has a considerably higher level of sensitivity, has the disadvantage of not detecting antibodies to carbohydrate antigens, such as some of the diagnostic antigens of adult schistosomes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 82 , Issue 4 , July 1981 , pp. 49 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cambiaso, C. L., Leek, A. E., De Steenwinkel, F., Billen, J. & Masson, T. L. (1965). Partiole counting immunoossay (Pacia). 1. A general method for the determination of antibodies, antigens °nd haptens. Journal of Immunolog ical Methods 18, 33–44.Google Scholar
Enovall, E. & Perlmann, P. (1971). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Elisa) quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunoehemistry 8, 871–874.Google Scholar
Gray, M. A., Luckins, A. G., Rae, P. & Brown, C. G. D. (1980). Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for serodiagnosis of infeotion withTheiltria parva and T. annulata. Research in Veterinary Science (in the press).Google Scholar
Luckins, A. G. (1977). Detcotion of antibodies in trypanosomo infected cattle by means of a microplate enzymo-linked immunosorbent assay. Tropical Animal Health and Production 9, 53–62.Google Scholar
Luckins, A. G. & Mehlitz, D. (1978). Evaluation of an inclirect fluorescent antibody test, enzymelinked immunosorbent assay and quantifieation of immunoglobulins in the diagnosis of bovine trypanosomiasis. Tropical Animal Health and Production 10, 149–159.Google Scholar
Luckins, A. G., Boid, R., Rae, P., Mahmoud, M. M., El Malik, K. H. & Gray, A. R. (1979). Serodiagnosis of infection with Trypanosoma evansi in cameis in the Sudan. Tropical Animal Health and Production 11, 1–12.Google Scholar
Toussaint, A. J. & Anderson, R. I. (1965). Soluble antigen fluorescent-antibody technique. Applied Microbiology 13, 4, 552–557.Google Scholar