Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:29:13.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transmission networks and ectoparasite mite burdens in Oecomys paricola (Rodentia: Cricetidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2020

Fernanda Rodrigues Fernandes Open the ORCID record for Fernanda Rodrigues Fernandes [Opens in a new window] ,
Somayra da Silva Abreu  and
Leonardo Dominici Cruz Open the ORCID record for Leonardo Dominici Cruz [Opens in a new window]
Fernanda Rodrigues Fernandes*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Avenida dos Portugueses, 1966, Bacanga, 65080805, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil
Somayra da Silva Abreu
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Avenida dos Portugueses, 1966, Bacanga, 65080805, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil
Leonardo Dominici Cruz
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Avenida dos Portugueses, 1966, Bacanga, 65080805, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Fernanda Rodrigues Fernandes, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The host contact network structure results from the movement and behaviour of hosts (e.g. degree of sociability; vagility and greater or lesser fidelity of shelters), which can generate heterogeneity in the transmission of parasites and influence the parasitic burden of individual hosts. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that the burdens of Gigantolaelaps oudemansi mites are related to the characteristics of the transmission networks of individuals of Oecomys paricola, a solitary rodent. The study was carried out in a savannah habitat in north-eastern Brazil. In the dry season, the rodent network presented sub-groups of rodent individuals interacting with each other, whereas in the wet season, no modules were formed in the network. Mite burden was positively related to the number of connections that an individual host had with other host individuals in the dry season. The pairwise absolute difference between the mean mite burdens among individual rodents was negatively correlated with the similarities of node interactions. No relationships were observed during the wet season. There was a higher heterogeneity of mite burden among hosts in the dry season compare to that in the wet season. In solitary species, spatial organization may show seasonal variation, causing a change in the opportunities of host contacts, thereby influencing the transmission and dispersion of their ectoparasite burdens.

Keywords

Contact networkecological conditionsrodent hostseasonality
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 148 , Issue 4 , April 2021 , pp. 443 - 450
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Madi, MA, Abu-Madi, MA, Behnke, JM, Mikhail, M, Lewis, JW and Al-Kaabi, ML (2005) Parasite populations in the brown rat Rattus norvegicus from Doha, Qatar between years: the effect of host age, sex and density. Journal of Helminthology 79, 105–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altizer, S, Nunn, CL, Thrall, PH, Gittleman, JL, Antonovics, J, Cunningham, AA, Dobson, AP, Ezenwa, V, Jones, KE, Pedersen, AB, Poss, M and Pulliam, JRC (2003) Social organization and parasite risk in mammals: integrating theory and empirical studies. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34, 517–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, EK, Bennett, NC, Faulkes, CG and Lutermann, H (2016) Digging for answers: contributions of density-and frequency-dependent factors on ectoparasite burden in a social mammal. Oecologia 180, 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneberg, P, Skorping, A, Grenfell, B and Read, AF (1998) Host densities as determinants of abundance in parasite communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265, 1283–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, AC (1987) Plots, Transformations and Regressions: An introduction to Graphical Methods of Diagnostic Regression Analysis. London, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, H, Zimmermann, N, McVicar, T, Vergopolan, N, Berg, A and Wood, EF (2018) Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific Data 5, 180214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellay, S, Oda, FH, Almeida-Neto, M, Oliveira, EF, Takemoto, RM and Balbuena, JA (2020) Host age predicts parasite occurrence, richness, and nested infracommunities in a pilot whale-helminth network. Parasitology Research 119, 2237–2244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borremans, B, Reijniers, J, Hughes, NK, Godfrey, SS, Gryseels, S, Makundi, RH and Leirs, H (2017) Nonlinear scaling of foraging contacts with rodent population density. Oikos 126, 792–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, JL and Ostfeld, RS (2008) Multiple causes of variable tick burdens on small-mammal hosts. Ecology 89, 2259–2272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchholz, MJ and Dick, CW (2017) Ecology of rodent-ectoparasite associations in South-Central Kentucky. Northeastern Naturalist 24, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cáceres, NC and Monteiro-Filho, ELA (2001) Food habits, home range and activity of Didelphis aurita (Mammalia, Marsupialia) in a forest fragment of Southern Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 36, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carleton, MD and Musser, GG (2015) Genus Oecomys Thomas, 1906. In Patton, JL, Pardiñas, UFJ and D'Elía, (eds), Mammals of South American, vol. 2. Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 393–417.Google Scholar
Christe, P, Glaizot, O, Evanno, G, Burndonckx, N, Devevey, G, Yannic, G, Patthey, P, Maeder, A, Vogel, P and Arlettaz, R (2007) Host sex and ectoparasites choice: preference for, and higher survival on female hosts. Journal of Animal Ecology 76, 703–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, F and Lu, L (2002) Connected components in random graphs with given expected degree sequences. Annals of Combinatorics 6, 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauset, A, Newman, MEJ and Moore, C (2004) Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E 70, 066111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colombo, VC, Nava, S, Antoniazzi, LR, Monje, LD, Racca, AL, Guglielmone, AA and Beldomenico, PM (2015) Factors affecting patterns of Amblyomma triste (Acari: Ixodidae) parasitism in a rodent host. Veterinary Parasitology 211, 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, LD, Fernandes, FR and Linhares, AX (2012) Similarities among ectoparasite fauna of sigmodontine rodents: phylogenetic and geographical influences. Parasitology 139, 1749–1756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csardi, G and Nepusz, T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal. Complex Systems 1695, 1–9.Google Scholar
Dowling, APG (2006) Mesostigmatid mites as parasites of small mammals: systematics, ecology, and the evolution of parasitic associations. In Morand, S, Krasnov, BR and Poulin, R (eds), Micromammals and Macroparasites: From Evolutionary Ecology to Management. Tokyo, JPN: Springer, pp. 104–117.Google Scholar
Duboscq, J, Romano, V, Sueur, C and MacIntosh, AJJ (2016) Network centrality and seasonality interact to predict lice load in a social primate. Scientific Reports 6, 22095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durden, LA (2006) Taxonomy, host associations, life cycles and vectorial importance of ticks parasitizing small mammals. In Morand, S, Krasnov, BR and Poulin, R (eds), Micromammals and Macroparasites: From Evolutionary Ecology to Management. Tokyo, JPN: Springer, pp. 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farine, DR (2017) A guide to null models for animal social network analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8, 1309–1320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandes, FR, Cruz, LD, Martins, EG and Reis, SF (2010) Growth and home range size of the gracile mouse opossum Gracilinanus microtarsus (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) in Brazilian cerrado. Journal of Tropical Ecology 26, 185–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, FR, Cruz, LD and Linhares, AX (2012) Effects of sex and locality on the abundance of lice on the wild rodent Oligoryzomys nigripes. Parasitology Research 111, 1701–1706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandes, FR, Cruz, LD, Linhares, AX and Von Zuben, CJ (2015) Effect of body size on the abundance of ectoparasitic mites on the wild rodent Oligoryzomys nigripes. Acta Parasitologica 60, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gettinger, D and Owen, RD (2016) Laelapine mite (Acari: Laelapidae) morphometric analysis reflects taxonomic and geographic clusters of South American oryzomyines (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae). MANTER: Journal of Parasite Biodiversity 2, 3–21.Google Scholar
Godfrey, SS (2013) Networks and the ecology of parasite transmission: a framework for wildlife parasitology. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 2, 235–245.Google ScholarPubMed
Godfrey, SS, Bull, CM, James, R and Murray, K (2009) Network structure and parasite transmission in a group living lizard, the gidgee skink Egernia stokesii. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63, 1045–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, SS, Moore, AJ, Nelson, NJ and Bull, CM (2010) Social network structure and parasite infection patterns in a territorial reptile, the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus). International Journal for Parasitology 40, 1575–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourbière, S, Morand, S and Waxman, D (2015) Fundamental factors determining the nature of parasite aggregation in hosts. PLoS One 10, e0116893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, RH and Nunn, CL (2012) Community structure and the spread of infectious disease in primate social networks. Evolutionary Ecology 26, 779–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, TT, Hendrickson, CI, Maxwell, TL, Petrosky, AL, Palme, R, Pigage, JC and Pigage, HK (2019) Host biology and environmental variables differentially predict flea abundances for two rodent hosts in a plague-relevant system. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 9, 174–183.Google Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE (2012) Manual Técnico da Vegetação Brasileira, 2nd Edn. Rio de Janeiro, BRA: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.Google Scholar
James, R, Croft, DP and Krause, J (2009) Potential banana skins in animal social network analysis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63, 989–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiene, F, Andriatsitohaina, B, Ramsay, MS, Rakotondramanana, H, Rakotondravony, R, Radespiel, U and Strube, C (2020) Forest edges affect ectoparasite infestation patterns of small mammalian hosts in fragmented forests in Madagascar. International Journal for Parasitology 50, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krasnov, B, Khokhlova, I and Shenbrot, G (2002) The effect of host density on ectoparasite distribution: an example of a rodent parasitized by fleas. Ecology 83, 164–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurvers, RHJM, Krause, J, Croft, DP, Wilson, ADM and Wolf, M (2014) The evolutionary and ecological consequences of animal social networks: emerging issues. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29, 326–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leu, ST, Kappeler, PM and Bull, CM (2010) Shelter sharing network predicts ectoparasite burden in a lizard. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64, 1495–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, WE, Francisco, AL and Sanaiotti, TM (1995) Home-range size and territoriality in Bolomys lasiurus (Rodentia: Muridae) in an Amazonian savanna. Journal of Tropical Ecology 11, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manly, BFJ (2006) Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 3rd Edn. New York, USA: Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Mantovani, W and Martins, FR (1988) Variações fenológicas das espécies do cerrado da Reserva Biológica de Moji Guaçu, Estado de São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 11, 101–112.Google Scholar
Mattie, H, Engø-Monsen, K, Ling, R and Onnela, JP (2018) Understanding tie strength in social networks using a local ‘bow tie’ framework. Scientific Reports 8, 9349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, CO (1947) Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. The American Midland Naturalist 37, 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monello, RJ and Gompper, ME (2010) Differential effects of experimental increases in sociality on ectoparasites of free-ranging raccoons. Journal of Animal Ecology 79, 602–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, MEJ (2003) Mixing patterns in networks. Physical Review E 67, 026126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, MEJ (2018) Networks, 2rd Edn. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, CL, Jordán, F, McCabe, CM, Verdolin, JL and Fewell, JH (2015) Infectious disease and group size: more than just a numbers game. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 370, 20140111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Connell, MA (1989) Population dynamics of Neotropical small mammals in seasonal habitats. Journal of Mammalogy 70, 532–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Orella, C and Schulte-Hostedde, AI (2005) Effects of sex and body size on ectoparasite burdens in the northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 83, 1381–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, SE, Ferrari, MF and Hudson, PJ (2008) The effects of social structure and sex-biased transmission on macroparasite infection. Parasitology 135, 1561–1569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, SE, Cagnacci, F, Stradiotto, A, Arnoldi, D and Hudson, PJ (2009) Comparison of social networks derived from ecological data: implications for inferring infectious disease dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 78, 1015–1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinheiro, F, Diniz, IR, Coelho, D and Bandeira, MPS (2002) Seasonal pattern of insect abundance in the Brazilian cerrado. Austral Ecology 27, 132–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R (2013) Explaining variability in parasite aggregation levels among host samples. Parasitology 140, 541–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Presley, SJ and Willig, MR (2008) Intraspecific patterns of ectoparasite abundances on Paraguayan bats: effects of host sex and body size. Journal of Tropical Ecology 24, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radovsky, F (1994) The evolution of parasitism and the distribution of some Dermanyssoid mites (Mesostigmata) on vertebrate host. In Houck, MA (ed.), Mites: Ecological and Evolutionary Analyses of Life-History Patterns. New York: Chapman & Hall, Inc, pp. 186–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2019) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Rimbach, R, Bisanzio, D, Galvis, N, Link, A, Di Fiore, A and Gillespie, TR (2015) Brown spider monkeys (Ateles hybridus): a model for differentiating the role of social networks and physical contact on parasite transmission dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 370, 20140110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, CR, Ribeiro, R and Marinho-Filho, J (2017) Influence of temporal variation and seasonality on population dynamics of three sympatric rodents. Mammalian Biology 84, 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sah, P, Mann, J and Bansal, S (2018) Disease implications of animal social network structure: a synthesis across social systems. Journal of Animal Ecology 87, 546–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samsing, F, Oppeda, F, Johansson, D, Bui, S and Dempster, T (2014) High host densities dilute sea lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis loads on individual Atlantic salmon, but do not reduce lice infection success. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 6, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltmann, A, Webster, F, Ferreira, SCM, Czirják, GA and Wachter, B (2019) Age-specific gastrointestinal parasite shedding in free-ranging cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) on Namibian farmland. Parasitology Research 118, 851–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sih, A, Spiegel, O, Godfrey, S, Leu, S and Bull, M (2017) Integrating social networks, animal personalities, movement ecology and parasites: a framework with examples from a lizard. Animal Behaviour 136, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Várfalvyová, D, Stanko, M and Miklisová, D (2011) Composition and seasonal changes of mesostigmatic mites (Acari) and flea fauna (Siphonaptera) in the nests of Mus spicilegus (Mammalia: Rodentia). Biologia 66, 528–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieira, EM, Iob, G, Briani, DC and Palma, ART (2005) Microhabitat selection and daily movements of two rodents (Necromys lasiurus and Oryzomys scotti) in Brazilian Cerrado, as revealed by a spool-and-line device. Mammalian Biology 70, 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljoen, H, Bennett, NC, Ueckermann, EA and Lutermann, H (2011) The role of host traits, season and group size on parasite burdens in a cooperative mammal. PLoS One 6, e27003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, QMR and Vander Wal, E (2020) Heterogeneity in social network connections is density-dependent: implications for disease dynamics in a gregarious ungulate. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 74, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohdy, S, Kemp, AD, Durden, LA, Wright, PC and Jernvall, J (2012) Mapping the social network: tracking lice in a wild primate (Microcebus rufus) population to infer social contacts and vector potential. BMC Ecology 12, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Fernandes et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Fernandes et al. supplementary material(File)
File 117.5 KB