Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:33:42.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Susceptibility of Autogenous and Anautogenous Races of Culex pipiens to Infection with Avian Malaria (Plasmodium relictum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

P. Tate
Affiliation:
From the Molteno Institute for Research in Parasitology, University of Cambridge
M. Vincent
Affiliation:
From the Molteno Institute for Research in Parasitology, University of Cambridge

Extract

1. Anautogenous English and autogenous Greek, Hungarian, Maltese and cross-bred strains of C. pipiens were infected with an Algerian and a German strain of P. relictum.

2. The different strains of C. pipiens behaved similarly as regards susceptibility and transmission towards the same strain of P. relictum.

3. The two strains of malaria differ in the infection rate produced in mosquitoes. The Algerian strain produces an infection rate of about 89 per cent., while that of the German strain is only about 43 per cent.

4. The difference in the infection rates of the two strains is not due merely to differences in the number of gametocytes formed.

5. In general C. pipiens fed on birds infected with the Algerian strain of malaria became more heavily infected than those fed on birds infected with the German strain.

6. C. pipiens were infected in some cases by feeding on birds with chronic infections of the Algerian strain of P. relictum, but not when fed on birds with chronic infections of the German strain.

7. No seasonal influence was found as regards the infection of C. pipiens by P. relictum.

8. The Algerian strain of malaria was successfully transmitted by English, Greek, Hungarian, Maltese and Greek-Hungarian strains of C. pipiens, and the German strain of malaria by English, Greek, Maltese and Greek-English strains of C. pipiens.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fourneau, E., Tréfouel, M. et Mme, Stefanopoulo, G., Benoit, G., De Lestrange, Y. and Melville, , Kenneth, I. (1930). Contribution à la chimiothérapie du paludisme. Essais sur la malaria des canaris. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 44, 503–33.Google Scholar
Huff, C. G. (1927). Studies on the infectivity of Plasmodia of birds for mosquitoes, with special reference to the problem of immunity in the mosquito. Amer. J. Hyg. 7, 706–34.Google Scholar
Huff, C. G. (1929). The effects of selection upon susceptibility to bird malaria in Culex pipiens Linn. Ann. Trop. Med. and Parasit. 23, 427–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, C. G. (1930). Individual immunity and susceptibility of Culex pipiens to various species of bird malaria as studied by means of double infectious feedings. Amer. J. Hyg. 12, 424–41.Google Scholar
Huff, C. G. (1931). The inheritance of natural immunity to Plasmodium cathemerium in two species of Culex. J. Preventive Med. 5, 249–59.Google Scholar
Huff, C. G. (1932). Further infectivity experiments with mosquitoes and bird malaria. Amer. J. Hyg. 15, 751–4.Google Scholar
Huff, C. G. (1934). Comparative studies on susceptible and insusceptible Culex pipiens in relation to infections with Plasmodium cathemerium and P. relictum. Amer. J. Hyg. 19, 123–47.Google Scholar
Huff, C. G. and Gambrell, Elizabeth (1934). Strains of Plasmodium cathemerium with and without gametocytes. Amer. J. Hyg. 19, 404–15.Google Scholar
James, S. P. (1931). Some general results of a study of induced malaria in England. Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. and Hyg. 24, 477538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikuth, W. and Giovannola, A. (1933). Zur Frage der medikamentösen Malariaprophylaxe auf Grund von experimentellen Untersuchungen an der Vogelmalaria. Riv. di Malariologia, 12, 657–74.Google Scholar
Reichenow, E. (1932). Die Entwicklung von Proteosoma circumflexum in Theobaldia annulata nebst Beobachtungen über das Verhalten anderer Vogelplasmodien in Mücken. Jenaische Zeits. f. Naturwissenschaft, 67, 434–51.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. (1933). Essai synthétique sur la vie du moustique commun (Culex pipiens). L'évolution humaine et les adaptations biologiques du moustique. Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool. 10e série, 16, 5168.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. and Toumanoff, C. (1930). Sur une race physiologique suractive du moustique commun Culex pipiens L. Bull. Soc. Path. Exot. 23, 196201.Google Scholar
Sergent, Et. and Sergent, Ed. (1921). Etude expérimentale du Paludisme (Paludisme des oiseaux à Plasmodium relictum, transmis par Culex pipiens). Arch. Inst. Pasteur de l'Afrique du Nord, 1, 132.Google Scholar
Tate, P. and Vincent, M. (1932 a). Influence of light on the gorging of Culex pipiens L. Nature, 130, 366–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, P. and Vincent, M. (1932 b). Susceptibility of English Culex pipiens L. to infection with bird malaria. Nature, 130, 630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, P. and Vincent, M. (1933). The action of synthetic quinoline compounds on avian malaria. Parasitology, 25, 411–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Mary (1933). Some observations on the biology of a Hungarian strain of Culex pipiens L. Arbeiten des I. Abteilung des Ungarischen Biologischen Forschungsinstitutes, 6, 119–22.Google Scholar