Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:58:59.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A survey of the endoparasites of the Red Kangaroo Megaleia rufa (Desmarest)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. Mykytowycz
R. Mykytowycz
Affiliation:
Division of Wildlife Research, C.S.I.R.O., Canberra, A.C.T., Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A survey of endoparasites of the Red Kangaroo (Megaleia rufa (Desmarest)) has been carried out in three geographically distinct areas of south-eastern Australia.

During a period covering 22 months, 464 kangaroos of different sexes and ages were collected. Alimentary canals and tracheae of all of them and blood and organ smears from 333 were examined for parasites.

A list of endoparasites of the Red Kangaroo encountered during the study and of others reported earlier is given. This includes three species of blood protozoa, two species of coccidia (Eimeria spp.), two species of cestode and twenty-one species of nematodes.

The numbers of some nematode species are analysed in relation to season, sex of host and age of host as expressed by length of tibia.

Two different patterns of age susceptibility of the Red Kangaroo to nematodes are recorded and it is suggested that these may be dependent upon the presence or absence of direct contact of the parasite with host tissue.

Distribution of nematodes in the stomach of the Red Kangaroo has been studied. Different species were found to occupy separate niches within the stomach.

A statistical test aimed at showing the correlation between severity of infection with some nematodes and condition of host expressed by the ratio: body weight — stomach content/tibia length showed only a very weak negative correlation.

Alimentary canals of 100 sheep and thirty-five wild rabbits sampled simultaneously in the same area were found to be infected with only small numbers of worms.

No parasites injurious to domestic stock were found in the kangaroos examined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , November 1964 , pp. 677 - 693
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Haley, A. J. (1962). Role of host relationships in the systematics of helminth parasites. J. Parasit. 48, 671–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. H & Mawson, P. M. (1940). A key to the nematode parasites of Australian marsupials and monotremes. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aust. 64, 363–70.Google Scholar
Mackerras, M. J. (1958). Catalogue of Australian Mammals and their recorded internal parasites. Part I. Monotremes and Marsupials. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 83, 101–25.Google Scholar
Mawson, P. M. (1964). Some Nematoda (Strongylina and Oxyurina) from kangaroos (Macropus spp.) from eastern Australia. Parasitology, 54, 237–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mykytowycz, R. (1956). A survey of endoparasites of the wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.) in Australia. C.S.I.R.O. Wildl. Res. 1, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mykytowycz, R. (1964 a). Coccidia in wild populations of the Red Kangaroo Megaleia rufa (Desmarest) and the Grey Kangaroo Macropus canguru (Müller). Parasitology, 54, 105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mykytowycz, R. (1964 b). Occurrence of bot-fly larvae Tracheomyia macropi Froggatt (Diptera: Oestridae) in wild Red Kangaroos, Megaleia rufa (Desmarest). Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 87, 307–12.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. P. (1962). The Nature of Parasitism. The Relationship of some Metazoan Parasites to their Hosts. New York and London: Academic press.Google Scholar