Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:14:51.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on Trypanosoma (nannomonas) congolense: IV. Experimental immunization of mice against tsetse fly Challenge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

V. M. Nantulya
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases (ILRAD), P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
J. J. Doyle
Affiliation:
International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases (ILRAD), P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya
L. Jenni
Affiliation:
Swiss Tropical Institute, Basle, Switzerland

Summary

Groups of mice were exposed to multiple bites by tsetse flies (Glossina morsitans morsitans) infected with a clone of Trypanosoma congolense spread over a period of 8 days. The mice were subsequently treated with Berenil 10 days after the first fly bite as were uninfected control mice. The group of mice which received 12–15 infectious fly bites on two occasions, 21 days apart, were subsequently resistant to infection when re-challenged by flies infected with the same clone of T. congolense. These mice were also immune to challenge by flies infected with a different bloodstream variable antigen type derived from this same stock. The immunity was stock-specific and directed against the metacyclic forms of the parasite, but was short-lived.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allt, G., Evans, E. M. E., Evans, D. H. L. & Targett, G. A. T. (1971). Effect of infection with trypanosomes on the development of experimental allergic neuritis in rabbits. Nature, London 233, 197–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, J. J. (1977). Antigenic variation in salivarian trypanosomes. In Immunity to Blood Parasites of Animals and Man (ed. Miller, L. H., Pino, J. A. and McKelvey, J. L. Jr.), pp. 3163. New York and London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geigy, R. & Kauffmann, M. (1973). Sleeping sickness survey in the Serengeti Area (Tanzania) 1971. I. Examination of large mammals for trypanosomes. Acta Tropica 30, 1223.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, L. G., Green, D. G., Guy, M. W. & Voller, A. (1972). Immunosuppression during trypanosomiasis. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 53, 40–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Greenwood, B. M., Whittle, H. C. & Molyneux, D. H. (1973). Immunosuppression in Gambian trypanosomiasis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 67, 846–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jayawardena, A. N. & Waksman, B. H. (1977). Suppressor cells in experimental trypanosomiasis. Nature, London 265, 539–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levaditi, C. & McIntosh, J. (1909). Le mécanisme de la création des varietés de trypanosomes resistants aux anticorps. Comptes Rendues de la Sociéte de Biologie 66, 4951.Google Scholar
Longstafee, A. J., Freeman, J. & Hudson, K. M. (1973). Immunosuppression in trypanosomiasis: some thymus dependent and thymus independent responses. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 67, 264–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luckins, A. G. & Gray, A. R. (1978). An extravascular site of development of Trypanosoma congolense. Nature, London 272, 613–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumsden, W. H. R., Herbert, W. J. & Hardy, G. J. C. (1965). In vivo prophylactic activity of Berenil against trypanosomes in mice. Veterinary Record 77, 147–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Murray, P. K., Jennings, F. W., Murray, M. & Urquhart, G. M. (1974 a). The nature of immunosuppression in Trypanosoma brucei infections in mice. I. The role of the macrophage. Immunology 27, 815–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Murray, P. K., Jennings, F. W., Murray, M. & Urquhart, G. M. (1974 b). The nature of immunosuppression in Trypanosoma brucei infections in mice. II. The role of the T and B lymphocytes. Immunology 27, 825–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Murray, M. & Urquhart, G. M. (1977). Immunoprophylaxis against African trypanosomias. In Immunity to Blood Parasites of Animals and Man (ed. Miller, L. H., Pino, J. A. and McKelvey, J. L. Jr.,), pp. 209241. New York and London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, P. K., Urquhart, G. M., Murray, M. & Jennings, F. W. (1973). The response of mice infected with T. brucei to the administration of sheep erythrocytes. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygeine 67, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nantulya, V. M., Doyle, J. J. & Jenni, L. (1978). Studies on Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense. II. Observations on the cyclical transmission of three field isolates. Acta Tropica 35, 339–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Nantulya, V. M., Doyle, J. J. & Jenni, L. (1980). Studies on Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense. III. Antigenic variation in cyclically transmitted stocks. Parasitology 80, 123–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urquhart, G. M., Murray, M. & Jennings, F. W. (1972). The immune response to helminth infection in trypanosome-infected animals. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 66, 342–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, A. J. (1971). Immunological aspects of bovine trypanosomiasis. III. Patterns in the development of immunity. Tropical Animal Health and Production 3, 1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. J. & Cunningham, M. P. (1971). Immunological aspects of bovine trypanosomiasis. IV. Patterns in the production of common antibodies. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 3 133–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, A. J. & Cunningham, M. P. (1972). Immunological aspects of bovine trypanosomiasis. I. The immune response of cattle to infection with Trypanosoma congolense and antigenic variation of the infecting organisms. Experimental Parasitology 32, 165–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woo, P. K. T. (1971). Evaluation of the haematocrit centrifuge and other techniques for the field diagnosis of human trypanosomiasis and filariasis. Acta Tropica 28, 298303.Google ScholarPubMed