Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:58:42.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Influence of the Environment on the Sheep Blow-Fly Lucilia sericata Meig.

IV. The Indirect Effect of Temperature and Humidity acting through certain Competing Species of Blow-Flies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. C. Evans
A. C. Evans
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The comparative resistance to high temperature and various humidities of four species of blow-flies, Calliphora erythrocephala Meig., Lucilia sericata Meig., Sarcophaga falculata Pand. and Phormia groenlandica Zett. is studied. It is shown that Phormia groenlandica is the most resistant species and Calliphora erythrocephala the least resistant species, with Lucilia sericata and Sarcophaga falculata occypying an intermediate position.

This order of resistance is correlated negatively with the order of the seasonal succession of the species.

It is suggested that certain differences in the length of life of males and females subjected to various humidities is brought about by an “ageing” factor.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , July 1936 , pp. 431 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cousin, G. (1932). Bull. biol. Suppl. 15, 1–341.Google Scholar
Davies, W. Maldwyn (1930). Nature, Lond., 125, 779–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. C. (1934). Parasitology, 26, 366–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. C. (1935). Bull. ent. Res. 25, 171–5.Google Scholar
Evans, A. C. (1935 a). Parasitology, 27, 291–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. C. (1935 b). Parasitology 27, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. (1916). Parasitology 8, 440–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdaway, F. G. & Evans, A. C. (1930). Nature, Lond., 125, 598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdaway, F. G. (1930). Parasitology 126, 648–9.Google Scholar
Nicholson, (1934). Bull. ent. Res. 25, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peairs, C. M. (1927). Bull. W. Va agric. Exp. Sta. No. 208, 1–62.Google Scholar
Prochnow, O. (1908). Quoted from Uvarov, B. P., Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. (1931), pp. 1–247.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. (1927). Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. pp. 24–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, R. A. (1927). J. Hyg., Camb., 26, 441–64.Google Scholar